OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c

1127 lines
29 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* edac_mc kernel module
* (C) 2005, 2006 Linux Networx (http://lnxi.com)
* This file may be distributed under the terms of the
* GNU General Public License.
*
* Written by Thayne Harbaugh
* Based on work by Dan Hollis <goemon at anime dot net> and others.
* http://www.anime.net/~goemon/linux-ecc/
*
* Modified by Dave Peterson and Doug Thompson
*
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/edac.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/edac.h>
#include "edac_core.h"
#include "edac_module.h"
/* lock to memory controller's control array */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mem_ctls_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(mc_devices);
#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG
edac: rename channel_info to rank_info What it is pointed by a csrow/channel vector is a rank information, and not a channel information. On a traditional architecture, the memory controller directly access the memory ranks, via chip select rows. Different ranks at the same DIMM is selected via different chip select rows. So, typically, one csrow/channel pair means one different DIMM. On FB-DIMMs, there's a microcontroller chip at the DIMM, called Advanced Memory Buffer (AMB) that serves as the interface between the memory controller and the memory chips. The AMB selection is via the DIMM slot, and not via a csrow. It is up to the AMB to talk with the csrows of the DRAM chips. So, the FB-DIMM memory controllers see the DIMM slot, and not the DIMM rank. RAMBUS is similar. Newer memory controllers, like the ones found on Intel Sandy Bridge and Nehalem, even working with normal DDR3 DIMM's, don't use the usual channel A/channel B interleaving schema to provide 128 bits data access. Instead, they have more channels (3 or 4 channels), and they can use several interleaving schemas. Such memory controllers see the DIMMs directly on their registers, instead of the ranks, which is better for the driver, as its main usageis to point to a broken DIMM stick (the Field Repleceable Unit), and not to point to a broken DRAM chip. The drivers that support such such newer memory architecture models currently need to fake information and to abuse on EDAC structures, as the subsystem was conceived with the idea that the csrow would always be visible by the CPU. To make things a little worse, those drivers don't currently fake csrows/channels on a consistent way, as the concepts there don't apply to the memory controllers they're talking with. So, each driver author interpreted the concepts using a different logic. In order to fix it, let's rename the data structure that points into a DIMM rank to "rank_info", in order to be clearer about what's stored there. Latter patches will provide a better way to represent the memory hierarchy for the other types of memory controller. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 21:26:13 +08:00
static void edac_mc_dump_channel(struct rank_info *chan)
{
debugf4("\tchannel = %p\n", chan);
debugf4("\tchannel->chan_idx = %d\n", chan->chan_idx);
debugf4("\tchannel->csrow = %p\n\n", chan->csrow);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
debugf4("\tchannel->dimm = %p\n", chan->dimm);
}
static void edac_mc_dump_dimm(struct dimm_info *dimm)
{
int i;
debugf4("\tdimm = %p\n", dimm);
debugf4("\tdimm->label = '%s'\n", dimm->label);
debugf4("\tdimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", dimm->nr_pages);
debugf4("\tdimm location ");
for (i = 0; i < dimm->mci->n_layers; i++) {
printk(KERN_CONT "%d", dimm->location[i]);
if (i < dimm->mci->n_layers - 1)
printk(KERN_CONT ".");
}
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
debugf4("\tdimm->grain = %d\n", dimm->grain);
debugf4("\tdimm->nr_pages = 0x%x\n", dimm->nr_pages);
}
static void edac_mc_dump_csrow(struct csrow_info *csrow)
{
debugf4("\tcsrow = %p\n", csrow);
debugf4("\tcsrow->csrow_idx = %d\n", csrow->csrow_idx);
debugf4("\tcsrow->first_page = 0x%lx\n", csrow->first_page);
debugf4("\tcsrow->last_page = 0x%lx\n", csrow->last_page);
debugf4("\tcsrow->page_mask = 0x%lx\n", csrow->page_mask);
debugf4("\tcsrow->nr_channels = %d\n", csrow->nr_channels);
debugf4("\tcsrow->channels = %p\n", csrow->channels);
debugf4("\tcsrow->mci = %p\n\n", csrow->mci);
}
static void edac_mc_dump_mci(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
debugf3("\tmci = %p\n", mci);
debugf3("\tmci->mtype_cap = %lx\n", mci->mtype_cap);
debugf3("\tmci->edac_ctl_cap = %lx\n", mci->edac_ctl_cap);
debugf3("\tmci->edac_cap = %lx\n", mci->edac_cap);
debugf4("\tmci->edac_check = %p\n", mci->edac_check);
debugf3("\tmci->nr_csrows = %d, csrows = %p\n",
mci->nr_csrows, mci->csrows);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
debugf3("\tmci->nr_dimms = %d, dimms = %p\n",
mci->tot_dimms, mci->dimms);
debugf3("\tdev = %p\n", mci->dev);
debugf3("\tmod_name:ctl_name = %s:%s\n", mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name);
debugf3("\tpvt_info = %p\n\n", mci->pvt_info);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG */
/*
* keep those in sync with the enum mem_type
*/
const char *edac_mem_types[] = {
"Empty csrow",
"Reserved csrow type",
"Unknown csrow type",
"Fast page mode RAM",
"Extended data out RAM",
"Burst Extended data out RAM",
"Single data rate SDRAM",
"Registered single data rate SDRAM",
"Double data rate SDRAM",
"Registered Double data rate SDRAM",
"Rambus DRAM",
"Unbuffered DDR2 RAM",
"Fully buffered DDR2",
"Registered DDR2 RAM",
"Rambus XDR",
"Unbuffered DDR3 RAM",
"Registered DDR3 RAM",
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mem_types);
/**
* edac_align_ptr - Prepares the pointer offsets for a single-shot allocation
* @p: pointer to a pointer with the memory offset to be used. At
* return, this will be incremented to point to the next offset
* @size: Size of the data structure to be reserved
* @n_elems: Number of elements that should be reserved
*
* If 'size' is a constant, the compiler will optimize this whole function
* down to either a no-op or the addition of a constant to the value of '*p'.
*
* The 'p' pointer is absolutely needed to keep the proper advancing
* further in memory to the proper offsets when allocating the struct along
* with its embedded structs, as edac_device_alloc_ctl_info() does it
* above, for example.
*
* At return, the pointer 'p' will be incremented to be used on a next call
* to this function.
*/
void *edac_align_ptr(void **p, unsigned size, int n_elems)
{
unsigned align, r;
void *ptr = *p;
*p += size * n_elems;
/*
* 'p' can possibly be an unaligned item X such that sizeof(X) is
* 'size'. Adjust 'p' so that its alignment is at least as
* stringent as what the compiler would provide for X and return
* the aligned result.
* Here we assume that the alignment of a "long long" is the most
* stringent alignment that the compiler will ever provide by default.
* As far as I know, this is a reasonable assumption.
*/
if (size > sizeof(long))
align = sizeof(long long);
else if (size > sizeof(int))
align = sizeof(long);
else if (size > sizeof(short))
align = sizeof(int);
else if (size > sizeof(char))
align = sizeof(short);
else
return (char *)ptr;
r = size % align;
if (r == 0)
return (char *)ptr;
*p += align - r;
return (void *)(((unsigned long)ptr) + align - r);
}
/**
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
* edac_mc_alloc: Allocate and partially fill a struct mem_ctl_info structure
* @mc_num: Memory controller number
* @n_layers: Number of MC hierarchy layers
* layers: Describes each layer as seen by the Memory Controller
* @size_pvt: size of private storage needed
*
*
* Everything is kmalloc'ed as one big chunk - more efficient.
* Only can be used if all structures have the same lifetime - otherwise
* you have to allocate and initialize your own structures.
*
* Use edac_mc_free() to free mc structures allocated by this function.
*
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
* NOTE: drivers handle multi-rank memories in different ways: in some
* drivers, one multi-rank memory stick is mapped as one entry, while, in
* others, a single multi-rank memory stick would be mapped into several
* entries. Currently, this function will allocate multiple struct dimm_info
* on such scenarios, as grouping the multiple ranks require drivers change.
*
* Returns:
* On failure: NULL
* On success: struct mem_ctl_info pointer
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
unsigned n_layers,
struct edac_mc_layer *layers,
unsigned sz_pvt)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
struct edac_mc_layer *layer;
struct csrow_info *csi, *csr;
edac: rename channel_info to rank_info What it is pointed by a csrow/channel vector is a rank information, and not a channel information. On a traditional architecture, the memory controller directly access the memory ranks, via chip select rows. Different ranks at the same DIMM is selected via different chip select rows. So, typically, one csrow/channel pair means one different DIMM. On FB-DIMMs, there's a microcontroller chip at the DIMM, called Advanced Memory Buffer (AMB) that serves as the interface between the memory controller and the memory chips. The AMB selection is via the DIMM slot, and not via a csrow. It is up to the AMB to talk with the csrows of the DRAM chips. So, the FB-DIMM memory controllers see the DIMM slot, and not the DIMM rank. RAMBUS is similar. Newer memory controllers, like the ones found on Intel Sandy Bridge and Nehalem, even working with normal DDR3 DIMM's, don't use the usual channel A/channel B interleaving schema to provide 128 bits data access. Instead, they have more channels (3 or 4 channels), and they can use several interleaving schemas. Such memory controllers see the DIMMs directly on their registers, instead of the ranks, which is better for the driver, as its main usageis to point to a broken DIMM stick (the Field Repleceable Unit), and not to point to a broken DRAM chip. The drivers that support such such newer memory architecture models currently need to fake information and to abuse on EDAC structures, as the subsystem was conceived with the idea that the csrow would always be visible by the CPU. To make things a little worse, those drivers don't currently fake csrows/channels on a consistent way, as the concepts there don't apply to the memory controllers they're talking with. So, each driver author interpreted the concepts using a different logic. In order to fix it, let's rename the data structure that points into a DIMM rank to "rank_info", in order to be clearer about what's stored there. Latter patches will provide a better way to represent the memory hierarchy for the other types of memory controller. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 21:26:13 +08:00
struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
struct dimm_info *dimm;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
u32 *ce_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS], *ue_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
unsigned pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS];
void *pvt, *ptr = NULL;
unsigned size, tot_dimms = 1, count = 1;
unsigned tot_csrows = 1, tot_channels = 1, tot_errcount = 0;
int i, j, err, row, chn;
bool per_rank = false;
BUG_ON(n_layers > EDAC_MAX_LAYERS || n_layers == 0);
/*
* Calculate the total amount of dimms and csrows/cschannels while
* in the old API emulation mode
*/
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
tot_dimms *= layers[i].size;
if (layers[i].is_virt_csrow)
tot_csrows *= layers[i].size;
else
tot_channels *= layers[i].size;
if (layers[i].type == EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT)
per_rank = true;
}
/* Figure out the offsets of the various items from the start of an mc
* structure. We want the alignment of each item to be at least as
* stringent as what the compiler would provide if we could simply
* hardcode everything into a single struct.
*/
mci = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*mci), 1);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
layer = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*layer), n_layers);
csi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*csi), tot_csrows);
chi = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*chi), tot_csrows * tot_channels);
dimm = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(*dimm), tot_dimms);
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
count *= layers[i].size;
debugf4("%s: errcount layer %d size %d\n", __func__, i, count);
ce_per_layer[i] = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(u32), count);
ue_per_layer[i] = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sizeof(u32), count);
tot_errcount += 2 * count;
}
debugf4("%s: allocating %d error counters\n", __func__, tot_errcount);
pvt = edac_align_ptr(&ptr, sz_pvt, 1);
size = ((unsigned long)pvt) + sz_pvt;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
debugf1("%s(): allocating %u bytes for mci data (%d %s, %d csrows/channels)\n",
__func__, size,
tot_dimms,
per_rank ? "ranks" : "dimms",
tot_csrows * tot_channels);
mci = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (mci == NULL)
return NULL;
/* Adjust pointers so they point within the memory we just allocated
* rather than an imaginary chunk of memory located at address 0.
*/
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
layer = (struct edac_mc_layer *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)layer));
csi = (struct csrow_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)csi));
edac: rename channel_info to rank_info What it is pointed by a csrow/channel vector is a rank information, and not a channel information. On a traditional architecture, the memory controller directly access the memory ranks, via chip select rows. Different ranks at the same DIMM is selected via different chip select rows. So, typically, one csrow/channel pair means one different DIMM. On FB-DIMMs, there's a microcontroller chip at the DIMM, called Advanced Memory Buffer (AMB) that serves as the interface between the memory controller and the memory chips. The AMB selection is via the DIMM slot, and not via a csrow. It is up to the AMB to talk with the csrows of the DRAM chips. So, the FB-DIMM memory controllers see the DIMM slot, and not the DIMM rank. RAMBUS is similar. Newer memory controllers, like the ones found on Intel Sandy Bridge and Nehalem, even working with normal DDR3 DIMM's, don't use the usual channel A/channel B interleaving schema to provide 128 bits data access. Instead, they have more channels (3 or 4 channels), and they can use several interleaving schemas. Such memory controllers see the DIMMs directly on their registers, instead of the ranks, which is better for the driver, as its main usageis to point to a broken DIMM stick (the Field Repleceable Unit), and not to point to a broken DRAM chip. The drivers that support such such newer memory architecture models currently need to fake information and to abuse on EDAC structures, as the subsystem was conceived with the idea that the csrow would always be visible by the CPU. To make things a little worse, those drivers don't currently fake csrows/channels on a consistent way, as the concepts there don't apply to the memory controllers they're talking with. So, each driver author interpreted the concepts using a different logic. In order to fix it, let's rename the data structure that points into a DIMM rank to "rank_info", in order to be clearer about what's stored there. Latter patches will provide a better way to represent the memory hierarchy for the other types of memory controller. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-27 21:26:13 +08:00
chi = (struct rank_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)chi));
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
dimm = (struct dimm_info *)(((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)dimm));
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < n_layers; i++) {
mci->ce_per_layer[i] = (u32 *)((char *)mci + ((unsigned long)ce_per_layer[i]));
mci->ue_per_layer[i] = (u32 *)((char *)mci + ((unsigned long)ue_per_layer[i]));
}
pvt = sz_pvt ? (((char *)mci) + ((unsigned long)pvt)) : NULL;
/* setup index and various internal pointers */
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
mci->mc_idx = mc_num;
mci->csrows = csi;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
mci->dimms = dimm;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
mci->tot_dimms = tot_dimms;
mci->pvt_info = pvt;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
mci->n_layers = n_layers;
mci->layers = layer;
memcpy(mci->layers, layers, sizeof(*layer) * n_layers);
mci->nr_csrows = tot_csrows;
mci->num_cschannel = tot_channels;
mci->mem_is_per_rank = per_rank;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
/*
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
* Fill the csrow struct
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
*/
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
for (row = 0; row < tot_csrows; row++) {
csr = &csi[row];
csr->csrow_idx = row;
csr->mci = mci;
csr->nr_channels = tot_channels;
chp = &chi[row * tot_channels];
csr->channels = chp;
for (chn = 0; chn < tot_channels; chn++) {
chan = &chp[chn];
chan->chan_idx = chn;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
chan->csrow = csr;
}
}
/*
* Fill the dimm struct
*/
memset(&pos, 0, sizeof(pos));
row = 0;
chn = 0;
debugf4("%s: initializing %d %s\n", __func__, tot_dimms,
per_rank ? "ranks" : "dimms");
for (i = 0; i < tot_dimms; i++) {
chan = &csi[row].channels[chn];
dimm = EDAC_DIMM_PTR(layer, mci->dimms, n_layers,
pos[0], pos[1], pos[2]);
dimm->mci = mci;
debugf2("%s: %d: %s%zd (%d:%d:%d): row %d, chan %d\n", __func__,
i, per_rank ? "rank" : "dimm", (dimm - mci->dimms),
pos[0], pos[1], pos[2], row, chn);
/* Copy DIMM location */
for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++)
dimm->location[j] = pos[j];
/* Link it to the csrows old API data */
chan->dimm = dimm;
dimm->csrow = row;
dimm->cschannel = chn;
/* Increment csrow location */
row++;
if (row == tot_csrows) {
row = 0;
chn++;
}
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/* Increment dimm location */
for (j = n_layers - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
pos[j]++;
if (pos[j] < layers[j].size)
break;
pos[j] = 0;
}
}
mci->op_state = OP_ALLOC;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mci->grp_kobj_list);
/*
* Initialize the 'root' kobj for the edac_mc controller
*/
err = edac_mc_register_sysfs_main_kobj(mci);
if (err) {
kfree(mci);
return NULL;
}
/* at this point, the root kobj is valid, and in order to
* 'free' the object, then the function:
* edac_mc_unregister_sysfs_main_kobj() must be called
* which will perform kobj unregistration and the actual free
* will occur during the kobject callback operation
*/
return mci;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_alloc);
/**
* edac_mc_free
* 'Free' a previously allocated 'mci' structure
* @mci: pointer to a struct mem_ctl_info structure
*/
void edac_mc_free(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
debugf1("%s()\n", __func__);
edac_mc_unregister_sysfs_main_kobj(mci);
i7core_edac: don't use a freed mci struct This is a nasty bug. Since kobject count will be reduced by zero by edac_mc_del_mc(), and this triggers the kobj release method, the mci memory will be freed automatically. So, all we have left is ctl_name, as shown by enabling debug: [ 80.822186] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c, line at 1020: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() remove_link [ 80.832590] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c, line at 1024: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() remove_mci_instance [ 80.843776] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c, line at 640: edac_mci_control_release() mci instance idx=0 releasing [ 80.855163] EDAC MC: Removed device 0 for i7core_edac.c i7 core #0: DEV 0000:3f:03.0 [ 80.862936] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c, line at 2089: (null): free structs [ 80.871134] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/edac_mc.c, line at 238: edac_mc_free() [ 80.878379] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c, line at 726: edac_mc_unregister_sysfs_main_kobj() [ 80.888043] EDAC DEBUG: in drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c, line at 1232: drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c: i7core_put_devices() Also, kfree(mci) shouldn't happen at the kobj.release, as it happens when edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device() is called, but the logic is: edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device(mci); edac_printk(KERN_INFO, EDAC_MC, "Removed device %d for %s %s: DEV %s\n", mci->mc_idx, mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name, edac_dev_name(mci)); So, as the edac_printk() needs the mci struct, this generates an OOPS. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2010-08-17 05:34:37 +08:00
/* free the mci instance memory here */
kfree(mci);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_free);
/**
* find_mci_by_dev
*
* scan list of controllers looking for the one that manages
* the 'dev' device
* @dev: pointer to a struct device related with the MCI
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *find_mci_by_dev(struct device *dev)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
struct list_head *item;
debugf3("%s()\n", __func__);
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (mci->dev == dev)
return mci;
}
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_mci_by_dev);
/*
* handler for EDAC to check if NMI type handler has asserted interrupt
*/
static int edac_mc_assert_error_check_and_clear(void)
{
int old_state;
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL)
return 1;
old_state = edac_err_assert;
edac_err_assert = 0;
return old_state;
}
/*
* edac_mc_workq_function
* performs the operation scheduled by a workq request
*/
static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req)
{
struct delayed_work *d_work = to_delayed_work(work_req);
struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_edac_mem_ctl_work(d_work);
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* if this control struct has movd to offline state, we are done */
if (mci->op_state == OP_OFFLINE) {
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return;
}
/* Only poll controllers that are running polled and have a check */
if (edac_mc_assert_error_check_and_clear() && (mci->edac_check != NULL))
mci->edac_check(mci);
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* Reschedule */
queue_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work,
msecs_to_jiffies(edac_mc_get_poll_msec()));
}
/*
* edac_mc_workq_setup
* initialize a workq item for this mci
* passing in the new delay period in msec
*
* locking model:
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
*/
static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
{
debugf0("%s()\n", __func__);
/* if this instance is not in the POLL state, then simply return */
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
queue_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
}
/*
* edac_mc_workq_teardown
* stop the workq processing on this mci
*
* locking model:
*
* called WITHOUT lock held
*/
static void edac_mc_workq_teardown(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
int status;
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
status = cancel_delayed_work(&mci->work);
if (status == 0) {
debugf0("%s() not canceled, flush the queue\n",
__func__);
/* workq instance might be running, wait for it */
flush_workqueue(edac_workqueue);
}
}
/*
* edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value)
*
* user space has updated our poll period value, need to
* reset our workq delays
*/
void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int value)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
struct list_head *item;
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* scan the list and turn off all workq timers, doing so under lock
*/
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (mci->op_state == OP_RUNNING_POLL)
cancel_delayed_work(&mci->work);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* re-walk the list, and reset the poll delay */
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, (unsigned long) value);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
}
/* Return 0 on success, 1 on failure.
* Before calling this function, caller must
* assign a unique value to mci->mc_idx.
*
* locking model:
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex lock held
*/
static int add_mc_to_global_list(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
struct list_head *item, *insert_before;
struct mem_ctl_info *p;
insert_before = &mc_devices;
p = find_mci_by_dev(mci->dev);
if (unlikely(p != NULL))
goto fail0;
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
p = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (p->mc_idx >= mci->mc_idx) {
if (unlikely(p->mc_idx == mci->mc_idx))
goto fail1;
insert_before = item;
break;
}
}
list_add_tail_rcu(&mci->link, insert_before);
atomic_inc(&edac_handlers);
return 0;
fail0:
edac_printk(KERN_WARNING, EDAC_MC,
"%s (%s) %s %s already assigned %d\n", dev_name(p->dev),
edac_dev_name(mci), p->mod_name, p->ctl_name, p->mc_idx);
return 1;
fail1:
edac_printk(KERN_WARNING, EDAC_MC,
"bug in low-level driver: attempt to assign\n"
" duplicate mc_idx %d in %s()\n", p->mc_idx, __func__);
return 1;
}
static void del_mc_from_global_list(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
atomic_dec(&edac_handlers);
list_del_rcu(&mci->link);
/* these are for safe removal of devices from global list while
* NMI handlers may be traversing list
*/
synchronize_rcu();
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mci->link);
}
/**
* edac_mc_find: Search for a mem_ctl_info structure whose index is 'idx'.
*
* If found, return a pointer to the structure.
* Else return NULL.
*
* Caller must hold mem_ctls_mutex.
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_find(int idx)
{
struct list_head *item;
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
if (mci->mc_idx >= idx) {
if (mci->mc_idx == idx)
return mci;
break;
}
}
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(edac_mc_find);
/**
* edac_mc_add_mc: Insert the 'mci' structure into the mci global list and
* create sysfs entries associated with mci structure
* @mci: pointer to the mci structure to be added to the list
*
* Return:
* 0 Success
* !0 Failure
*/
/* FIXME - should a warning be printed if no error detection? correction? */
int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
{
debugf0("%s()\n", __func__);
#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG
if (edac_debug_level >= 3)
edac_mc_dump_mci(mci);
if (edac_debug_level >= 4) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mci->nr_csrows; i++) {
int j;
edac_mc_dump_csrow(&mci->csrows[i]);
for (j = 0; j < mci->csrows[i].nr_channels; j++)
edac_mc_dump_channel(&mci->csrows[i].
channels[j]);
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++)
edac_mc_dump_dimm(&mci->dimms[i]);
}
#endif
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
if (add_mc_to_global_list(mci))
goto fail0;
/* set load time so that error rate can be tracked */
mci->start_time = jiffies;
if (edac_create_sysfs_mci_device(mci)) {
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"failed to create sysfs device\n");
goto fail1;
}
/* If there IS a check routine, then we are running POLLED */
if (mci->edac_check != NULL) {
/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;
edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
} else {
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
}
/* Report action taken */
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_INFO, "Giving out device to '%s' '%s':"
" DEV %s\n", mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name, edac_dev_name(mci));
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return 0;
fail1:
del_mc_from_global_list(mci);
fail0:
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_add_mc);
/**
* edac_mc_del_mc: Remove sysfs entries for specified mci structure and
* remove mci structure from global list
* @pdev: Pointer to 'struct device' representing mci structure to remove.
*
* Return pointer to removed mci structure, or NULL if device not found.
*/
struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_del_mc(struct device *dev)
{
struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
debugf0("%s()\n", __func__);
mutex_lock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* find the requested mci struct in the global list */
mci = find_mci_by_dev(dev);
if (mci == NULL) {
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
return NULL;
}
del_mc_from_global_list(mci);
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
/* flush workq processes */
edac_mc_workq_teardown(mci);
/* marking MCI offline */
mci->op_state = OP_OFFLINE;
/* remove from sysfs */
edac_remove_sysfs_mci_device(mci);
edac_printk(KERN_INFO, EDAC_MC,
"Removed device %d for %s %s: DEV %s\n", mci->mc_idx,
mci->mod_name, mci->ctl_name, edac_dev_name(mci));
return mci;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_del_mc);
static void edac_mc_scrub_block(unsigned long page, unsigned long offset,
u32 size)
{
struct page *pg;
void *virt_addr;
unsigned long flags = 0;
debugf3("%s()\n", __func__);
/* ECC error page was not in our memory. Ignore it. */
if (!pfn_valid(page))
return;
/* Find the actual page structure then map it and fix */
pg = pfn_to_page(page);
if (PageHighMem(pg))
local_irq_save(flags);
virt_addr = kmap_atomic(pg);
/* Perform architecture specific atomic scrub operation */
atomic_scrub(virt_addr + offset, size);
/* Unmap and complete */
kunmap_atomic(virt_addr);
if (PageHighMem(pg))
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/* FIXME - should return -1 */
int edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned long page)
{
struct csrow_info *csrows = mci->csrows;
int row, i, j, n;
debugf1("MC%d: %s(): 0x%lx\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__, page);
row = -1;
for (i = 0; i < mci->nr_csrows; i++) {
struct csrow_info *csrow = &csrows[i];
n = 0;
for (j = 0; j < csrow->nr_channels; j++) {
struct dimm_info *dimm = csrow->channels[j].dimm;
n += dimm->nr_pages;
}
if (n == 0)
continue;
debugf3("MC%d: %s(): first(0x%lx) page(0x%lx) last(0x%lx) "
"mask(0x%lx)\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__,
csrow->first_page, page, csrow->last_page,
csrow->page_mask);
if ((page >= csrow->first_page) &&
(page <= csrow->last_page) &&
((page & csrow->page_mask) ==
(csrow->first_page & csrow->page_mask))) {
row = i;
break;
}
}
if (row == -1)
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
"could not look up page error address %lx\n",
(unsigned long)page);
return row;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
const char *edac_layer_name[] = {
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_BRANCH] = "branch",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL] = "channel",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_SLOT] = "slot",
[EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT] = "csrow",
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_layer_name);
static void edac_inc_ce_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
bool enable_per_layer_report,
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS])
{
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
int i, index = 0;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
mci->ce_count++;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
if (!enable_per_layer_report) {
mci->ce_noinfo_count++;
return;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] < 0)
break;
index += pos[i];
mci->ce_per_layer[i][index]++;
if (i < mci->n_layers - 1)
index *= mci->layers[i + 1].size;
}
}
static void edac_inc_ue_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
bool enable_per_layer_report,
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS])
{
int i, index = 0;
mci->ue_count++;
if (!enable_per_layer_report) {
mci->ce_noinfo_count++;
return;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] < 0)
break;
index += pos[i];
mci->ue_per_layer[i][index]++;
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
if (i < mci->n_layers - 1)
index *= mci->layers[i + 1].size;
}
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
static void edac_ce_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS],
const char *msg,
const char *location,
const char *label,
const char *detail,
const char *other_detail,
const bool enable_per_layer_report,
const unsigned long page_frame_number,
const unsigned long offset_in_page,
u32 grain)
{
unsigned long remapped_page;
if (edac_mc_get_log_ce()) {
if (other_detail && *other_detail)
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"CE %s on %s (%s%s - %s)\n",
msg, label, location,
detail, other_detail);
else
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"CE %s on %s (%s%s)\n",
msg, label, location,
detail);
}
edac_inc_ce_error(mci, enable_per_layer_report, pos);
if (mci->scrub_mode & SCRUB_SW_SRC) {
/*
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
* Some memory controllers (called MCs below) can remap
* memory so that it is still available at a different
* address when PCI devices map into memory.
* MC's that can't do this, lose the memory where PCI
* devices are mapped. This mapping is MC-dependent
* and so we call back into the MC driver for it to
* map the MC page to a physical (CPU) page which can
* then be mapped to a virtual page - which can then
* be scrubbed.
*/
remapped_page = mci->ctl_page_to_phys ?
mci->ctl_page_to_phys(mci, page_frame_number) :
page_frame_number;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
edac_mc_scrub_block(remapped_page,
offset_in_page, grain);
}
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
static void edac_ue_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
const int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS],
const char *msg,
const char *location,
const char *label,
const char *detail,
const char *other_detail,
const bool enable_per_layer_report)
{
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
if (edac_mc_get_log_ue()) {
if (other_detail && *other_detail)
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"UE %s on %s (%s%s - %s)\n",
msg, label, location, detail,
other_detail);
else
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_WARNING,
"UE %s on %s (%s%s)\n",
msg, label, location, detail);
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
if (edac_mc_get_panic_on_ue()) {
if (other_detail && *other_detail)
panic("UE %s on %s (%s%s - %s)\n",
msg, label, location, detail, other_detail);
else
panic("UE %s on %s (%s%s)\n",
msg, label, location, detail);
}
edac_inc_ue_error(mci, enable_per_layer_report, pos);
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
#define OTHER_LABEL " or "
void edac_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
const unsigned long page_frame_number,
const unsigned long offset_in_page,
const unsigned long syndrome,
const int layer0,
const int layer1,
const int layer2,
const char *msg,
const char *other_detail,
const void *mcelog)
{
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/* FIXME: too much for stack: move it to some pre-alocated area */
char detail[80], location[80];
char label[(EDAC_MC_LABEL_LEN + 1 + sizeof(OTHER_LABEL)) * mci->tot_dimms];
char *p;
int row = -1, chan = -1;
int pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS] = { layer0, layer1, layer2 };
int i;
edac: move dimm properties to struct dimm_info On systems based on chip select rows, all channels need to use memories with the same properties, otherwise the memories on channels A and B won't be recognized. However, such assumption is not true for all types of memory controllers. Controllers for FB-DIMM's don't have such requirements. Also, modern Intel controllers seem to be capable of handling such differences. So, we need to get rid of storing the DIMM information into a per-csrow data, storing it, instead at the right place. The first step is to move grain, mtype, dtype and edac_mode to the per-dimm struct. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@parallels.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Williams <mike@mikebwilliams.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 05:38:08 +08:00
u32 grain;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
bool enable_per_layer_report = false;
debugf3("MC%d: %s()\n", mci->mc_idx, __func__);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/*
* Check if the event report is consistent and if the memory
* location is known. If it is known, enable_per_layer_report will be
* true, the DIMM(s) label info will be filled and the per-layer
* error counters will be incremented.
*/
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] >= (int)mci->layers[i].size) {
if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED)
p = "CE";
else
p = "UE";
edac_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
"INTERNAL ERROR: %s value is out of range (%d >= %d)\n",
edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
pos[i], mci->layers[i].size);
/*
* Instead of just returning it, let's use what's
* known about the error. The increment routines and
* the DIMM filter logic will do the right thing by
* pointing the likely damaged DIMMs.
*/
pos[i] = -1;
}
if (pos[i] >= 0)
enable_per_layer_report = true;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/*
* Get the dimm label/grain that applies to the match criteria.
* As the error algorithm may not be able to point to just one memory
* stick, the logic here will get all possible labels that could
* pottentially be affected by the error.
* On FB-DIMM memory controllers, for uncorrected errors, it is common
* to have only the MC channel and the MC dimm (also called "branch")
* but the channel is not known, as the memory is arranged in pairs,
* where each memory belongs to a separate channel within the same
* branch.
*/
grain = 0;
p = label;
*p = '\0';
for (i = 0; i < mci->tot_dimms; i++) {
struct dimm_info *dimm = &mci->dimms[i];
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
if (layer0 >= 0 && layer0 != dimm->location[0])
continue;
if (layer1 >= 0 && layer1 != dimm->location[1])
continue;
if (layer2 >= 0 && layer2 != dimm->location[2])
continue;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/* get the max grain, over the error match range */
if (dimm->grain > grain)
grain = dimm->grain;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/*
* If the error is memory-controller wide, there's no need to
* seek for the affected DIMMs because the whole
* channel/memory controller/... may be affected.
* Also, don't show errors for empty DIMM slots.
*/
if (enable_per_layer_report && dimm->nr_pages) {
if (p != label) {
strcpy(p, OTHER_LABEL);
p += strlen(OTHER_LABEL);
}
strcpy(p, dimm->label);
p += strlen(p);
*p = '\0';
/*
* get csrow/channel of the DIMM, in order to allow
* incrementing the compat API counters
*/
debugf4("%s: %s csrows map: (%d,%d)\n",
__func__,
mci->mem_is_per_rank ? "rank" : "dimm",
dimm->csrow, dimm->cschannel);
if (row == -1)
row = dimm->csrow;
else if (row >= 0 && row != dimm->csrow)
row = -2;
if (chan == -1)
chan = dimm->cschannel;
else if (chan >= 0 && chan != dimm->cschannel)
chan = -2;
}
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
if (!enable_per_layer_report) {
strcpy(label, "any memory");
} else {
debugf4("%s: csrow/channel to increment: (%d,%d)\n",
__func__, row, chan);
if (p == label)
strcpy(label, "unknown memory");
if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
if (row >= 0) {
mci->csrows[row].ce_count++;
if (chan >= 0)
mci->csrows[row].channels[chan].ce_count++;
}
} else
if (row >= 0)
mci->csrows[row].ue_count++;
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/* Fill the RAM location data */
p = location;
for (i = 0; i < mci->n_layers; i++) {
if (pos[i] < 0)
continue;
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
p += sprintf(p, "%s:%d ",
edac_layer_name[mci->layers[i].type],
pos[i]);
}
edac: Create a dimm struct and move the labels into it The way a DIMM is currently represented implies that they're linked into a per-csrow struct. However, some drivers don't see csrows, as they're ridden behind some chip like the AMB's on FBDIMM's, for example. This forced drivers to fake^Wvirtualize a csrow struct, and to create a mess under csrow/channel original's concept. Move the DIMM labels into a per-DIMM struct, and add there the real location of the socket, in terms of csrow/channel. Latter patches will modify the location to properly represent the memory architecture. All other drivers will use a per-csrow type of location. Some of those drivers will require a latter conversion, as they also fake the csrows internally. TODO: While this patch doesn't change the existing behavior, on csrows-based memory controllers, a csrow/channel pair points to a memory rank. There's a known bug at the EDAC core that allows having different labels for the same DIMM, if it has more than one rank. A latter patch is need to merge the several ranks for a DIMM into the same dimm_info struct, in order to avoid having different labels for the same DIMM. The edac_mc_alloc() will now contain a per-dimm initialization loop that will be changed by latter patches in order to match other types of memory architectures. Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-01-28 01:12:32 +08:00
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
/* Memory type dependent details about the error */
if (type == HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED) {
snprintf(detail, sizeof(detail),
"page:0x%lx offset:0x%lx grain:%d syndrome:0x%lx",
page_frame_number, offset_in_page,
grain, syndrome);
edac_ce_error(mci, pos, msg, location, label, detail,
other_detail, enable_per_layer_report,
page_frame_number, offset_in_page, grain);
} else {
snprintf(detail, sizeof(detail),
"page:0x%lx offset:0x%lx grain:%d",
page_frame_number, offset_in_page, grain);
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
edac_ue_error(mci, pos, msg, location, label, detail,
other_detail, enable_per_layer_report);
}
}
edac: Change internal representation to work with layers Change the EDAC internal representation to work with non-csrow based memory controllers. There are lots of those memory controllers nowadays, and more are coming. So, the EDAC internal representation needs to be changed, in order to work with those memory controllers, while preserving backward compatibility with the old ones. The edac core was written with the idea that memory controllers are able to directly access csrows. This is not true for FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, some recent advanced memory controllers don't present a per-csrows view. Instead, they view memories as DIMMs, instead of ranks. So, change the allocation and error report routines to allow them to work with all types of architectures. This will allow the removal of several hacks with FB-DIMM and RAMBUS memory controllers. Also, several tests were done on different platforms using different x86 drivers. TODO: a multi-rank DIMMs are currently represented by multiple DIMM entries in struct dimm_info. That means that changing a label for one rank won't change the same label for the other ranks at the same DIMM. This bug is present since the beginning of the EDAC, so it is not a big deal. However, on several drivers, it is possible to fix this issue, but it should be a per-driver fix, as the csrow => DIMM arrangement may not be equal for all. So, don't try to fix it here yet. I tried to make this patch as short as possible, preceding it with several other patches that simplified the logic here. Yet, as the internal API changes, all drivers need changes. The changes are generally bigger in the drivers for FB-DIMMs. Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com> Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com> Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com> Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com> Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com> Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
2012-04-19 02:20:50 +08:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(edac_mc_handle_error);