UbiquitousOS
/
OpenCloudOS-Kernel
mirror of https://gitee.com/OpenCloudOS/OpenCloudOS-Kernel.git
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
OpenCloudOS-Kernel/include/trace/events/tlb.h

63 lines
1.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes are being attempted. Right now, we can try to use the vm counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually _requested_. This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones that we have very little control over (the ones at context switch). Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.com Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-07-31 23:40:59 +08:00
#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
#define TRACE_SYSTEM tlb
#if !defined(_TRACE_TLB_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
#define _TRACE_TLB_H
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
x86/tlb/trace: Export enums in used by tlb_flush tracepoint Have the enums used in __print_symbolic() by the trace_tlb_flush() tracepoint exported to userpace such that they can be parsed by userspace tools. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150403013802.220157513@goodmis.org Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2015-03-25 06:15:57 +08:00
#define TLB_FLUSH_REASON \
EM( TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, "flush on task switch" ) \
EM( TLB_REMOTE_SHOOTDOWN, "remote shootdown" ) \
EM( TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" ) \
EMe( TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" )
/*
* First define the enums in TLB_FLUSH_REASON to be exported to userspace
* via TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM().
*/
#undef EM
#undef EMe
#define EM(a,b) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(a);
#define EMe(a,b) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(a);
TLB_FLUSH_REASON
/*
* Now redefine the EM() and EMe() macros to map the enums to the strings
* that will be printed in the output.
*/
#undef EM
#undef EMe
#define EM(a,b) { a, b },
#define EMe(a,b) { a, b }
x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes are being attempted. Right now, we can try to use the vm counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually _requested_. This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones that we have very little control over (the ones at context switch). Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.com Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-07-31 23:40:59 +08:00
x86/tlb/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline. Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in this scenario as was noted by LOCKDEP: ... Disabling non-boot CPUs ... intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting =============================== smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die... [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted ------------------------------- include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: RCU used illegally from offline CPU! rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0 no locks held by swapper/1/0. stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013 0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e370d 0000000000000011 ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847 ffff8800c66b9600 0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 ffffffff81cb3900 ffff88011a44fe78 Call Trace: [<ffffffff817e370d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65 [<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120 [<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0 [<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50 [<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140 [<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20 [<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580 [<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150 intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting ... By converting the tlb_flush tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION where the condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id()), we can avoid calling RCU protected code when the CPU is offline. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=JB8B9a0EQv-eGzQ@mail.gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.17+ Fixes: d17d8f9dedb9 "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes" Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2015-02-07 03:18:19 +08:00
TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush,
x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes are being attempted. Right now, we can try to use the vm counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually _requested_. This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones that we have very little control over (the ones at context switch). Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.com Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-07-31 23:40:59 +08:00
TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages),
TP_ARGS(reason, pages),
x86/tlb/trace: Do not trace on CPU that is offline When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline. Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in this scenario as was noted by LOCKDEP: ... Disabling non-boot CPUs ... intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting =============================== smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die... [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted ------------------------------- include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: RCU used illegally from offline CPU! rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0 no locks held by swapper/1/0. stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013 0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e370d 0000000000000011 ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847 ffff8800c66b9600 0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 ffffffff81cb3900 ffff88011a44fe78 Call Trace: [<ffffffff817e370d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65 [<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120 [<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0 [<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50 [<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140 [<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20 [<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580 [<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150 intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting ... By converting the tlb_flush tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION where the condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id()), we can avoid calling RCU protected code when the CPU is offline. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=JB8B9a0EQv-eGzQ@mail.gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.17+ Fixes: d17d8f9dedb9 "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes" Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2015-02-07 03:18:19 +08:00
TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),
x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes are being attempted. Right now, we can try to use the vm counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually _requested_. This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones that we have very little control over (the ones at context switch). Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.com Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2014-07-31 23:40:59 +08:00
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( int, reason)
__field(unsigned long, pages)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->reason = reason;
__entry->pages = pages;
),
TP_printk("pages:%ld reason:%s (%d)",
__entry->pages,
__print_symbolic(__entry->reason, TLB_FLUSH_REASON),
__entry->reason)
);
#endif /* _TRACE_TLB_H */
/* This part must be outside protection */
#include <trace/define_trace.h>