OpenCloudOS-Kernel/Documentation/admin-guide/perf-security.rst

267 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

.. _perf_security:
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
Perf events and tool security
=============================
Overview
--------
Usage of Performance Counters for Linux (perf_events) [1]_ , [2]_ , [3]_
can impose a considerable risk of leaking sensitive data accessed by
monitored processes. The data leakage is possible both in scenarios of
direct usage of perf_events system call API [2]_ and over data files
generated by Perf tool user mode utility (Perf) [3]_ , [4]_ . The risk
depends on the nature of data that perf_events performance monitoring
units (PMU) [2]_ and Perf collect and expose for performance analysis.
Collected system and performance data may be split into several
categories:
1. System hardware and software configuration data, for example: a CPU
model and its cache configuration, an amount of available memory and
its topology, used kernel and Perf versions, performance monitoring
setup including experiment time, events configuration, Perf command
line parameters, etc.
2. User and kernel module paths and their load addresses with sizes,
process and thread names with their PIDs and TIDs, timestamps for
captured hardware and software events.
3. Content of kernel software counters (e.g., for context switches, page
faults, CPU migrations), architectural hardware performance counters
(PMC) [8]_ and machine specific registers (MSR) [9]_ that provide
execution metrics for various monitored parts of the system (e.g.,
memory controller (IMC), interconnect (QPI/UPI) or peripheral (PCIe)
uncore counters) without direct attribution to any execution context
state.
4. Content of architectural execution context registers (e.g., RIP, RSP,
RBP on x86_64), process user and kernel space memory addresses and
data, content of various architectural MSRs that capture data from
this category.
Data that belong to the fourth category can potentially contain
sensitive process data. If PMUs in some monitoring modes capture values
of execution context registers or data from process memory then access
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
to such monitoring modes requires to be ordered and secured properly.
So, perf_events performance monitoring and observability operations are
the subject for security access control management [5]_ .
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
perf_events access control
-------------------------------
To perform security checks, the Linux implementation splits processes
into two categories [6]_ : a) privileged processes (whose effective user
ID is 0, referred to as superuser or root), and b) unprivileged
processes (whose effective UID is nonzero). Privileged processes bypass
all kernel security permission checks so perf_events performance
monitoring is fully available to privileged processes without access,
scope and resource restrictions.
Unprivileged processes are subject to a full security permission check
based on the process's credentials [5]_ (usually: effective UID,
effective GID, and supplementary group list).
Linux divides the privileges traditionally associated with superuser
into distinct units, known as capabilities [6]_ , which can be
independently enabled and disabled on per-thread basis for processes and
files of unprivileged users.
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
Unprivileged processes with enabled CAP_PERFMON capability are treated
as privileged processes with respect to perf_events performance
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
monitoring and observability operations, thus, bypass *scope* permissions
checks in the kernel. CAP_PERFMON implements the principle of least
privilege [13]_ (POSIX 1003.1e: 2.2.2.39) for performance monitoring and
observability operations in the kernel and provides a secure approach to
perfomance monitoring and observability in the system.
For backward compatibility reasons the access to perf_events monitoring and
observability operations is also open for CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileged
processes but CAP_SYS_ADMIN usage for secure monitoring and observability
use cases is discouraged with respect to the CAP_PERFMON capability.
If system audit records [14]_ for a process using perf_events system call
API contain denial records of acquiring both CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN
capabilities then providing the process with CAP_PERFMON capability singly
is recommended as the preferred secure approach to resolve double access
denial logging related to usage of performance monitoring and observability.
Unprivileged processes using perf_events system call are also subject
for PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS ptrace access mode check [7]_ , whose
outcome determines whether monitoring is permitted. So unprivileged
processes provided with CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability are effectively
permitted to pass the check.
Other capabilities being granted to unprivileged processes can
effectively enable capturing of additional data required for later
performance analysis of monitored processes or a system. For example,
CAP_SYSLOG capability permits reading kernel space memory addresses from
/proc/kallsyms file.
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
Privileged Perf users groups
---------------------------------
Mechanisms of capabilities, privileged capability-dumb files [6]_ and
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
file system ACLs [10]_ can be used to create dedicated groups of
privileged Perf users who are permitted to execute performance monitoring
and observability without scope limits. The following steps can be
taken to create such groups of privileged Perf users.
1. Create perf_users group of privileged Perf users, assign perf_users
group to Perf tool executable and limit access to the executable for
other users in the system who are not in the perf_users group:
::
# groupadd perf_users
# ls -alhF
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 11M Oct 19 15:12 perf
# chgrp perf_users perf
# ls -alhF
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root perf_users 11M Oct 19 15:12 perf
# chmod o-rwx perf
# ls -alhF
-rwxr-x--- 2 root perf_users 11M Oct 19 15:12 perf
2. Assign the required capabilities to the Perf tool executable file and
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
enable members of perf_users group with monitoring and observability
privileges [6]_ :
::
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
# setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
# setcap -v "cap_perfmon,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
perf: OK
# getcap perf
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
perf = cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog,cap_perfmon+ep
If the libcap installed doesn't yet support "cap_perfmon", use "38" instead,
i.e.:
::
# setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf
Note that you may need to have 'cap_ipc_lock' in the mix for tools such as
'perf top', alternatively use 'perf top -m N', to reduce the memory that
it uses for the perf ring buffer, see the memory allocation section below.
Using a libcap without support for CAP_PERFMON will make cap_get_flag(caps, 38,
CAP_EFFECTIVE, &val) fail, which will lead the default event to be 'cycles:u',
so as a workaround explicitly ask for the 'cycles' event, i.e.:
::
# perf top -e cycles
To get kernel and user samples with a perf binary with just CAP_PERFMON.
As a result, members of perf_users group are capable of conducting
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
performance monitoring and observability by using functionality of the
configured Perf tool executable that, when executes, passes perf_events
subsystem scope checks.
This specific access control management is only available to superuser
or root running processes with CAP_SETPCAP, CAP_SETFCAP [6]_
capabilities.
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
Unprivileged users
-----------------------------------
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
perf_events *scope* and *access* control for unprivileged processes
is governed by perf_event_paranoid [2]_ setting:
-1:
Impose no *scope* and *access* restrictions on using perf_events
performance monitoring. Per-user per-cpu perf_event_mlock_kb [2]_
locking limit is ignored when allocating memory buffers for storing
performance data. This is the least secure mode since allowed
monitored *scope* is maximized and no perf_events specific limits
are imposed on *resources* allocated for performance monitoring.
>=0:
*scope* includes per-process and system wide performance monitoring
but excludes raw tracepoints and ftrace function tracepoints
monitoring. CPU and system events happened when executing either in
user or in kernel space can be monitored and captured for later
analysis. Per-user per-cpu perf_event_mlock_kb locking limit is
imposed but ignored for unprivileged processes with CAP_IPC_LOCK
[6]_ capability.
>=1:
*scope* includes per-process performance monitoring only and
excludes system wide performance monitoring. CPU and system events
happened when executing either in user or in kernel space can be
monitored and captured for later analysis. Per-user per-cpu
perf_event_mlock_kb locking limit is imposed but ignored for
unprivileged processes with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
>=2:
*scope* includes per-process performance monitoring only. CPU and
system events happened when executing in user space only can be
monitored and captured for later analysis. Per-user per-cpu
perf_event_mlock_kb locking limit is imposed but ignored for
unprivileged processes with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
Resource control
---------------------------------
Open file descriptors
+++++++++++++++++++++
The perf_events system call API [2]_ allocates file descriptors for
every configured PMU event. Open file descriptors are a per-process
accountable resource governed by the RLIMIT_NOFILE [11]_ limit
(ulimit -n), which is usually derived from the login shell process. When
configuring Perf collection for a long list of events on a large server
system, this limit can be easily hit preventing required monitoring
configuration. RLIMIT_NOFILE limit can be increased on per-user basis
modifying content of the limits.conf file [12]_ . Ordinarily, a Perf
sampling session (perf record) requires an amount of open perf_event
file descriptors that is not less than the number of monitored events
multiplied by the number of monitored CPUs.
Memory allocation
+++++++++++++++++
The amount of memory available to user processes for capturing
performance monitoring data is governed by the perf_event_mlock_kb [2]_
setting. This perf_event specific resource setting defines overall
per-cpu limits of memory allowed for mapping by the user processes to
execute performance monitoring. The setting essentially extends the
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK [11]_ limit, but only for memory regions mapped
specifically for capturing monitored performance events and related data.
For example, if a machine has eight cores and perf_event_mlock_kb limit
is set to 516 KiB, then a user process is provided with 516 KiB * 8 =
4128 KiB of memory above the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit (ulimit -l) for
perf_event mmap buffers. In particular, this means that, if the user
wants to start two or more performance monitoring processes, the user is
required to manually distribute the available 4128 KiB between the
monitoring processes, for example, using the --mmap-pages Perf record
mode option. Otherwise, the first started performance monitoring process
allocates all available 4128 KiB and the other processes will fail to
proceed due to the lack of memory.
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK and perf_event_mlock_kb resource constraints are ignored
for processes with the CAP_IPC_LOCK capability. Thus, perf_events/Perf
privileged users can be provided with memory above the constraints for
perf_events/Perf performance monitoring purpose by providing the Perf
executable with CAP_IPC_LOCK capability.
Bibliography
------------
.. [1] `<https://lwn.net/Articles/337493/>`_
.. [2] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/perf_event_open.2.html>`_
.. [3] `<http://web.eece.maine.edu/~vweaver/projects/perf_events/>`_
.. [4] `<https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page>`_
.. [5] `<https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/security/credentials.html>`_
.. [6] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html>`_
.. [7] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/ptrace.2.html>`_
.. [8] `<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_performance_counter>`_
.. [9] `<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-specific_register>`_
.. [10] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/acl.5.html>`_
.. [11] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/getrlimit.2.html>`_
.. [12] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/limits.conf.5.html>`_
doc/admin-guide: Update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Update perf-security.rst documentation file with the information related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance monitoring and observability operations in system. Committer notes: While testing 'perf top' under cap_perfmon I noticed that it needs some more capability and Alexey pointed out cap_ipc_lock, as needed by this kernel chunk: kernel/events/core.c: 6101 if ((locked > lock_limit) && perf_is_paranoid() && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock; } So I added it to the documentation, and also mentioned that if the libcap version doesn't yet supports 'cap_perfmon', its numeric value can be used instead, i.e. if: # setcap "cap_perfmon,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf Fails, try: # setcap "38,cap_ipc_lock,cap_sys_ptrace,cap_syslog=ep" perf I also added a paragraph stating that using an unpatched libcap will fail the check for CAP_PERFMON, as it checks the cap number against a maximum to see if it is valid, which makes it use as the default the 'cycles:u' event, even tho a cap_perfmon capable perf binary can get kernel samples, to workaround that just use, e.g.: # perf top -e cycles # perf record -e cycles And it will sample kernel and user modes. Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17278551-9399-9ebe-d665-8827016a217d@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-02 16:54:01 +08:00
.. [13] `<https://sites.google.com/site/fullycapable>`_
.. [14] `<http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/auditd.8.html>`_