2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
Specifying GPIO information for devices
|
2018-09-13 15:28:13 +08:00
|
|
|
=======================================
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) gpios property
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-29 16:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
GPIO properties should be named "[<name>-]gpios", with <name> being the purpose
|
|
|
|
of this GPIO for the device. While a non-existent <name> is considered valid
|
|
|
|
for compatibility reasons (resolving to the "gpios" property), it is not allowed
|
2015-09-21 20:57:25 +08:00
|
|
|
for new bindings. Also, GPIO properties named "[<name>-]gpio" are valid and old
|
|
|
|
bindings use it, but are only supported for compatibility reasons and should not
|
|
|
|
be used for newer bindings since it has been deprecated.
|
2011-06-04 01:07:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-29 16:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
GPIO properties can contain one or more GPIO phandles, but only in exceptional
|
|
|
|
cases should they contain more than one. If your device uses several GPIOs with
|
|
|
|
distinct functions, reference each of them under its own property, giving it a
|
|
|
|
meaningful name. The only case where an array of GPIOs is accepted is when
|
|
|
|
several GPIOs serve the same function (e.g. a parallel data line).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exact purpose of each gpios property must be documented in the device tree
|
|
|
|
binding of the device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following example could be used to describe GPIO pins used as device enable
|
|
|
|
and bit-banged data signals:
|
2011-06-04 01:07:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gpio1: gpio1 {
|
2018-01-21 20:12:43 +08:00
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
2011-06-04 01:07:16 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
2014-10-29 16:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data-gpios = <&gpio1 12 0>,
|
|
|
|
<&gpio1 13 0>,
|
|
|
|
<&gpio1 14 0>,
|
|
|
|
<&gpio1 15 0>;
|
2011-06-04 01:07:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-13 15:44:21 +08:00
|
|
|
In the above example, &gpio1 uses 2 cells to specify a gpio. The first cell is
|
|
|
|
a local offset to the GPIO line and the second cell represent consumer flags,
|
|
|
|
such as if the consumer desire the line to be active low (inverted) or open
|
|
|
|
drain. This is the recommended practice.
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-13 15:44:21 +08:00
|
|
|
The exact meaning of each specifier cell is controller specific, and must be
|
|
|
|
documented in the device tree binding for the device, but it is strongly
|
|
|
|
recommended to use the two-cell approach.
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-13 15:44:21 +08:00
|
|
|
Most controllers are specifying a generic flag bitfield in the last cell, so
|
|
|
|
for these, use the macros defined in
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h whenever possible:
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
Example of a node using GPIOs:
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node {
|
2014-10-29 16:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
enable-gpios = <&qe_pio_e 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-29 16:13:14 +08:00
|
|
|
GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH is 0, so in this example gpio-specifier is "18 0" and encodes
|
|
|
|
GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Optional standard bitfield specifiers for the last cell:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Bit 0: 0 means active high, 1 means active low
|
2017-05-23 22:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
- Bit 1: 0 mean push-pull wiring, see:
|
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push-pull_output
|
|
|
|
1 means single-ended wiring, see:
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-ended_triode
|
2017-05-23 22:47:28 +08:00
|
|
|
- Bit 2: 0 means open-source, 1 means open drain, see:
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_collector
|
2017-05-23 22:47:31 +08:00
|
|
|
- Bit 3: 0 means the output should be maintained during sleep/low-power mode
|
|
|
|
1 means the output state can be lost during sleep/low-power mode
|
2019-02-08 00:28:55 +08:00
|
|
|
- Bit 4: 0 means no pull-up resistor should be enabled
|
|
|
|
1 means a pull-up resistor should be enabled
|
|
|
|
This setting only applies to hardware with a simple on/off
|
|
|
|
control for pull-up configuration. If the hardware has more
|
|
|
|
elaborate pull-up configuration, it should be represented
|
|
|
|
using a pin control binding.
|
|
|
|
- Bit 5: 0 means no pull-down resistor should be enabled
|
|
|
|
1 means a pull-down resistor should be enabled
|
|
|
|
This setting only applies to hardware with a simple on/off
|
|
|
|
control for pull-down configuration. If the hardware has more
|
|
|
|
elaborate pull-down configuration, it should be represented
|
|
|
|
using a pin control binding.
|
2015-09-25 06:05:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
1.1) GPIO specifier best practices
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active-
|
2015-01-15 16:52:40 +08:00
|
|
|
high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices should be
|
|
|
|
followed:
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the
|
|
|
|
GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted
|
|
|
|
value at the device. The exact definition of logically asserted should be
|
|
|
|
defined by the binding for the device. If the board inverts the signal between
|
|
|
|
the GPIO controller and the device, then the gpio-specifier will represent the
|
|
|
|
opposite physical level than the signal at the device's pin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the device's signal polarity is configurable, the binding for the
|
|
|
|
device must either:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Define a single static polarity for the signal, with the expectation that
|
|
|
|
any software using that binding would statically program the device to use
|
|
|
|
that signal polarity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The static choice of polarity may be either:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a1) (Preferred) Dictated by a binding-specific DT property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a2) Defined statically by the DT binding itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In particular, the polarity cannot be derived from the gpio-specifier, since
|
|
|
|
that would prevent the DT from separately representing the two orthogonal
|
|
|
|
concepts of configurable signal polarity in the device, and possible board-
|
|
|
|
level signal inversion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Pick a single option for device signal polarity, and document this choice
|
|
|
|
in the binding. The gpio-specifier should represent the polarity of the signal
|
|
|
|
(at the GPIO controller) assuming that the device is configured for this
|
|
|
|
particular signal polarity choice. If software chooses to program the device
|
|
|
|
to generate or receive a signal of the opposite polarity, software will be
|
|
|
|
responsible for correctly interpreting (inverting) the GPIO signal at the GPIO
|
|
|
|
controller.
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) gpio-controller nodes
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
Every GPIO controller node must contain both an empty "gpio-controller"
|
|
|
|
property, and a #gpio-cells integer property, which indicates the number of
|
|
|
|
cells in a gpio-specifier.
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-31 17:09:11 +08:00
|
|
|
Some system-on-chips (SoCs) use the concept of GPIO banks. A GPIO bank is an
|
|
|
|
instance of a hardware IP core on a silicon die, usually exposed to the
|
|
|
|
programmer as a coherent range of I/O addresses. Usually each such bank is
|
|
|
|
exposed in the device tree as an individual gpio-controller node, reflecting
|
|
|
|
the fact that the hardware was synthesized by reusing the same IP block a
|
|
|
|
few times over.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-30 18:58:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Optionally, a GPIO controller may have a "ngpios" property. This property
|
|
|
|
indicates the number of in-use slots of available slots for GPIOs. The
|
|
|
|
typical example is something like this: the hardware register is 32 bits
|
|
|
|
wide, but only 18 of the bits have a physical counterpart. The driver is
|
|
|
|
generally written so that all 32 bits can be used, but the IP block is reused
|
|
|
|
in a lot of designs, some using all 32 bits, some using 18 and some using
|
|
|
|
12. In this case, setting "ngpios = <18>;" informs the driver that only the
|
|
|
|
first 18 GPIOs, at local offset 0 .. 17, are in use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If these GPIOs do not happen to be the first N GPIOs at offset 0...N-1, an
|
2018-03-24 00:34:49 +08:00
|
|
|
additional set of tuples is needed to specify which GPIOs are unusable, with
|
|
|
|
the gpio-reserved-ranges binding. This property indicates the start and size
|
|
|
|
of the GPIOs that can't be used.
|
2015-10-30 18:58:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-19 21:26:26 +08:00
|
|
|
Optionally, a GPIO controller may have a "gpio-line-names" property. This is
|
|
|
|
an array of strings defining the names of the GPIO lines going out of the
|
|
|
|
GPIO controller. This name should be the most meaningful producer name
|
|
|
|
for the system, such as a rail name indicating the usage. Package names
|
|
|
|
such as pin name are discouraged: such lines have opaque names (since they
|
|
|
|
are by definition generic purpose) and such names are usually not very
|
|
|
|
helpful. For example "MMC-CD", "Red LED Vdd" and "ethernet reset" are
|
|
|
|
reasonable line names as they describe what the line is used for. "GPIO0"
|
|
|
|
is not a good name to give to a GPIO line. Placeholders are discouraged:
|
|
|
|
rather use the "" (blank string) if the use of the GPIO line is undefined
|
|
|
|
in your design. The names are assigned starting from line offset 0 from
|
|
|
|
left to right from the passed array. An incomplete array (where the number
|
|
|
|
of passed named are less than ngpios) will still be used up until the last
|
|
|
|
provided valid line index.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-30 18:58:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller@00000000 {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "foo";
|
|
|
|
reg = <0x00000000 0x1000>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|
|
|
ngpios = <18>;
|
2018-03-24 00:34:49 +08:00
|
|
|
gpio-reserved-ranges = <0 4>, <12 2>;
|
2016-04-19 21:26:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gpio-line-names = "MMC-CD", "MMC-WP", "VDD eth", "RST eth", "LED R",
|
|
|
|
"LED G", "LED B", "Col A", "Col B", "Col C", "Col D",
|
|
|
|
"Row A", "Row B", "Row C", "Row D", "NMI button",
|
|
|
|
"poweroff", "reset";
|
2015-10-30 18:58:28 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-03 01:44:45 +08:00
|
|
|
The GPIO chip may contain GPIO hog definitions. GPIO hogging is a mechanism
|
|
|
|
providing automatic GPIO request and configuration as part of the
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller's driver probe function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each GPIO hog definition is represented as a child node of the GPIO controller.
|
|
|
|
Required properties:
|
2016-12-20 02:21:34 +08:00
|
|
|
- gpio-hog: A property specifying that this child node represents a GPIO hog.
|
|
|
|
- gpios: Store the GPIO information (id, flags, ...) for each GPIO to
|
|
|
|
affect. Shall contain an integer multiple of the number of cells
|
|
|
|
specified in its parent node (GPIO controller node).
|
2015-02-03 01:44:45 +08:00
|
|
|
Only one of the following properties scanned in the order shown below.
|
|
|
|
This means that when multiple properties are present they will be searched
|
|
|
|
in the order presented below and the first match is taken as the intended
|
|
|
|
configuration.
|
|
|
|
- input: A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as input.
|
|
|
|
- output-low A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output with
|
|
|
|
the value low.
|
|
|
|
- output-high A property specifying to set the GPIO direction as output with
|
|
|
|
the value high.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional properties:
|
|
|
|
- line-name: The GPIO label name. If not present the node name is used.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@1400 {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-a", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
|
|
|
|
reg = <0x1400 0x18>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
2015-02-03 01:44:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
line_b {
|
|
|
|
gpio-hog;
|
|
|
|
gpios = <6 0>;
|
|
|
|
output-low;
|
|
|
|
line-name = "foo-bar-gpio";
|
|
|
|
};
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qe_pio_e: gpio-controller@1460 {
|
|
|
|
compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-e", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
|
|
|
|
reg = <0x1460 0x18>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
2014-02-20 02:43:26 +08:00
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation
This change makes documentation of the the gpio-ranges property shorter
and more succinct, more consistent with the style of the rest of the
document, and not mention Linux-specifics such as the API
pinctrl_request_gpio(); DT binding documents should be OS independant
where at all possible. As part of this, the gpio-ranges property's format
is described in BNF form, in order to match the rest of the document.
This change also deprecates the #gpio-range-cells property. Such
properties are useful when one node references a second node, and that
second node dictates the format of the reference. However, that is not
the case here; the definition of gpio-ranges itself always dictates its
format entirely, and hence the value #gpio-range-cells must always be 3,
and hence there is no point requiring any referenced node to include
this property. The only remaining need for this property is to ensure
compatibility of DTs with older SW that was written to support the
previous version of the binding.
v4:
* Mention #gpio-range-cells as being deprecated, rather than removing all
documentation of that property. This allows DTs to be written in a
backwards-compatible way if desired, and also allows older DTs to be
interpreted fully using the latest documentation.
v3:
* Mention BNF in commit description.
* Fixed typo.
* Dropped patch that removed the deprecated property from *.dts, since
it's required to boot older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-08-10 00:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
2.1) gpio- and pin-controller interaction
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
2009-06-19 21:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation
This change makes documentation of the the gpio-ranges property shorter
and more succinct, more consistent with the style of the rest of the
document, and not mention Linux-specifics such as the API
pinctrl_request_gpio(); DT binding documents should be OS independant
where at all possible. As part of this, the gpio-ranges property's format
is described in BNF form, in order to match the rest of the document.
This change also deprecates the #gpio-range-cells property. Such
properties are useful when one node references a second node, and that
second node dictates the format of the reference. However, that is not
the case here; the definition of gpio-ranges itself always dictates its
format entirely, and hence the value #gpio-range-cells must always be 3,
and hence there is no point requiring any referenced node to include
this property. The only remaining need for this property is to ensure
compatibility of DTs with older SW that was written to support the
previous version of the binding.
v4:
* Mention #gpio-range-cells as being deprecated, rather than removing all
documentation of that property. This allows DTs to be written in a
backwards-compatible way if desired, and also allows older DTs to be
interpreted fully using the latest documentation.
v3:
* Mention BNF in commit description.
* Fixed typo.
* Dropped patch that removed the deprecated property from *.dts, since
it's required to boot older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-08-10 00:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
Some or all of the GPIOs provided by a GPIO controller may be routed to pins
|
|
|
|
on the package via a pin controller. This allows muxing those pins between
|
2018-09-13 15:28:13 +08:00
|
|
|
GPIO and other functions. It is a fairly common practice among silicon
|
|
|
|
engineers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2) Ordinary (numerical) GPIO ranges
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
2012-10-27 17:51:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation
This change makes documentation of the the gpio-ranges property shorter
and more succinct, more consistent with the style of the rest of the
document, and not mention Linux-specifics such as the API
pinctrl_request_gpio(); DT binding documents should be OS independant
where at all possible. As part of this, the gpio-ranges property's format
is described in BNF form, in order to match the rest of the document.
This change also deprecates the #gpio-range-cells property. Such
properties are useful when one node references a second node, and that
second node dictates the format of the reference. However, that is not
the case here; the definition of gpio-ranges itself always dictates its
format entirely, and hence the value #gpio-range-cells must always be 3,
and hence there is no point requiring any referenced node to include
this property. The only remaining need for this property is to ensure
compatibility of DTs with older SW that was written to support the
previous version of the binding.
v4:
* Mention #gpio-range-cells as being deprecated, rather than removing all
documentation of that property. This allows DTs to be written in a
backwards-compatible way if desired, and also allows older DTs to be
interpreted fully using the latest documentation.
v3:
* Mention BNF in commit description.
* Fixed typo.
* Dropped patch that removed the deprecated property from *.dts, since
it's required to boot older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-08-10 00:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
It is useful to represent which GPIOs correspond to which pins on which pin
|
2018-09-13 15:28:13 +08:00
|
|
|
controllers. The gpio-ranges property described below represents this with
|
|
|
|
a discrete set of ranges mapping pins from the pin controller local number space
|
|
|
|
to pins in the GPIO controller local number space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The format is: <[pin controller phandle], [GPIO controller offset],
|
|
|
|
[pin controller offset], [number of pins]>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The GPIO controller offset pertains to the GPIO controller node containing the
|
|
|
|
range definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pin controller node referenced by the phandle must conform to the bindings
|
|
|
|
described in pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each offset runs from 0 to N. It is perfectly fine to pile any number of
|
|
|
|
ranges with just one pin-to-GPIO line mapping if the ranges are concocted, but
|
|
|
|
in practice these ranges are often lumped in discrete sets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gpio-ranges = <&foo 0 20 10>, <&bar 10 50 20>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means:
|
|
|
|
- pins 20..29 on pin controller "foo" is mapped to GPIO line 0..9 and
|
|
|
|
- pins 50..69 on pin controller "bar" is mapped to GPIO line 10..29
|
2013-10-15 21:37:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation
This change makes documentation of the the gpio-ranges property shorter
and more succinct, more consistent with the style of the rest of the
document, and not mention Linux-specifics such as the API
pinctrl_request_gpio(); DT binding documents should be OS independant
where at all possible. As part of this, the gpio-ranges property's format
is described in BNF form, in order to match the rest of the document.
This change also deprecates the #gpio-range-cells property. Such
properties are useful when one node references a second node, and that
second node dictates the format of the reference. However, that is not
the case here; the definition of gpio-ranges itself always dictates its
format entirely, and hence the value #gpio-range-cells must always be 3,
and hence there is no point requiring any referenced node to include
this property. The only remaining need for this property is to ensure
compatibility of DTs with older SW that was written to support the
previous version of the binding.
v4:
* Mention #gpio-range-cells as being deprecated, rather than removing all
documentation of that property. This allows DTs to be written in a
backwards-compatible way if desired, and also allows older DTs to be
interpreted fully using the latest documentation.
v3:
* Mention BNF in commit description.
* Fixed typo.
* Dropped patch that removed the deprecated property from *.dts, since
it's required to boot older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-08-10 00:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-13 15:28:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Verbose example:
|
2012-10-27 17:51:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qe_pio_e: gpio-controller@1460 {
|
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|
|
|
compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-e", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
|
|
|
|
reg = <0x1460 0x18>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
2013-02-17 19:42:47 +08:00
|
|
|
gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl1 0 20 10>, <&pinctrl2 10 50 20>;
|
gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation
This change makes documentation of the the gpio-ranges property shorter
and more succinct, more consistent with the style of the rest of the
document, and not mention Linux-specifics such as the API
pinctrl_request_gpio(); DT binding documents should be OS independant
where at all possible. As part of this, the gpio-ranges property's format
is described in BNF form, in order to match the rest of the document.
This change also deprecates the #gpio-range-cells property. Such
properties are useful when one node references a second node, and that
second node dictates the format of the reference. However, that is not
the case here; the definition of gpio-ranges itself always dictates its
format entirely, and hence the value #gpio-range-cells must always be 3,
and hence there is no point requiring any referenced node to include
this property. The only remaining need for this property is to ensure
compatibility of DTs with older SW that was written to support the
previous version of the binding.
v4:
* Mention #gpio-range-cells as being deprecated, rather than removing all
documentation of that property. This allows DTs to be written in a
backwards-compatible way if desired, and also allows older DTs to be
interpreted fully using the latest documentation.
v3:
* Mention BNF in commit description.
* Fixed typo.
* Dropped patch that removed the deprecated property from *.dts, since
it's required to boot older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-08-10 00:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
2012-10-27 17:51:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gpio: clean up gpio-ranges documentation
This change makes documentation of the the gpio-ranges property shorter
and more succinct, more consistent with the style of the rest of the
document, and not mention Linux-specifics such as the API
pinctrl_request_gpio(); DT binding documents should be OS independant
where at all possible. As part of this, the gpio-ranges property's format
is described in BNF form, in order to match the rest of the document.
This change also deprecates the #gpio-range-cells property. Such
properties are useful when one node references a second node, and that
second node dictates the format of the reference. However, that is not
the case here; the definition of gpio-ranges itself always dictates its
format entirely, and hence the value #gpio-range-cells must always be 3,
and hence there is no point requiring any referenced node to include
this property. The only remaining need for this property is to ensure
compatibility of DTs with older SW that was written to support the
previous version of the binding.
v4:
* Mention #gpio-range-cells as being deprecated, rather than removing all
documentation of that property. This allows DTs to be written in a
backwards-compatible way if desired, and also allows older DTs to be
interpreted fully using the latest documentation.
v3:
* Mention BNF in commit description.
* Fixed typo.
* Dropped patch that removed the deprecated property from *.dts, since
it's required to boot older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2013-08-10 00:57:46 +08:00
|
|
|
Here, a single GPIO controller has GPIOs 0..9 routed to pin controller
|
2017-05-08 16:41:48 +08:00
|
|
|
pinctrl1's pins 20..29, and GPIOs 10..29 routed to pin controller pinctrl2's
|
|
|
|
pins 50..69.
|
2013-10-15 21:37:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-13 15:28:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3) GPIO ranges from named pin groups
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to use pin groups for gpio ranges when pin groups are the
|
|
|
|
easiest and most convenient mapping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both both <pinctrl-base> and <count> must set to 0 when using named pin groups
|
|
|
|
names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The property gpio-ranges-group-names must contain exactly one string for each
|
|
|
|
range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elements of gpio-ranges-group-names must contain the name of a pin group
|
|
|
|
defined in the respective pin controller. The number of pins/GPIO lines in the
|
|
|
|
range is the number of pins in that pin group. The number of pins of that
|
|
|
|
group is defined int the implementation and not in the device tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If numerical and named pin groups are mixed, the string corresponding to a
|
|
|
|
numerical pin range in gpio-ranges-group-names must be empty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
2013-10-15 21:37:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-22 02:29:17 +08:00
|
|
|
gpio_pio_i: gpio-controller@14b0 {
|
2013-10-15 21:37:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|
|
|
compatible = "fsl,qe-pario-bank-e", "fsl,qe-pario-bank";
|
|
|
|
reg = <0x1480 0x18>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-controller;
|
|
|
|
gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl1 0 20 10>,
|
|
|
|
<&pinctrl2 10 0 0>,
|
|
|
|
<&pinctrl1 15 0 10>,
|
|
|
|
<&pinctrl2 25 0 0>;
|
|
|
|
gpio-ranges-group-names = "",
|
|
|
|
"foo",
|
|
|
|
"",
|
|
|
|
"bar";
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-13 15:28:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Here, three GPIO ranges are defined referring to two pin controllers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pinctrl1 GPIO ranges are defined using pin numbers whereas the GPIO ranges
|
|
|
|
in pinctrl2 are defined using the pin groups named "foo" and "bar".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous versions of this binding required all pin controller nodes that
|
|
|
|
were referenced by any gpio-ranges property to contain a property named
|
|
|
|
#gpio-range-cells with value <3>. This requirement is now deprecated.
|
|
|
|
However, that property may still exist in older device trees for
|
|
|
|
compatibility reasons, and would still be required even in new device
|
|
|
|
trees that need to be compatible with older software.
|