OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_mn.c

342 lines
8.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright 2014 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* All Rights Reserved.
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
* "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
* without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
* distribute, sub license, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
* permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
* the following conditions:
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS, AUTHORS AND/OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM,
* DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR
* OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE
* USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the
* next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
* of the Software.
*
*/
/*
* Authors:
* Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
*/
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <drm/drmP.h>
#include <drm/drm.h>
#include "radeon.h"
struct radeon_mn {
/* constant after initialisation */
struct radeon_device *rdev;
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct mmu_notifier mn;
/* only used on destruction */
struct work_struct work;
/* protected by rdev->mn_lock */
struct hlist_node node;
/* objects protected by lock */
struct mutex lock;
struct rb_root_cached objects;
};
struct radeon_mn_node {
struct interval_tree_node it;
struct list_head bos;
};
/**
* radeon_mn_destroy - destroy the rmn
*
* @work: previously sheduled work item
*
* Lazy destroys the notifier from a work item
*/
static void radeon_mn_destroy(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct radeon_mn *rmn = container_of(work, struct radeon_mn, work);
struct radeon_device *rdev = rmn->rdev;
struct radeon_mn_node *node, *next_node;
struct radeon_bo *bo, *next_bo;
mutex_lock(&rdev->mn_lock);
mutex_lock(&rmn->lock);
hash_del(&rmn->node);
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(node, next_node,
&rmn->objects.rb_root, it.rb) {
interval_tree_remove(&node->it, &rmn->objects);
list_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next_bo, &node->bos, mn_list) {
bo->mn = NULL;
list_del_init(&bo->mn_list);
}
kfree(node);
}
mutex_unlock(&rmn->lock);
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mn_lock);
mmu_notifier_unregister(&rmn->mn, rmn->mm);
kfree(rmn);
}
/**
* radeon_mn_release - callback to notify about mm destruction
*
* @mn: our notifier
* @mn: the mm this callback is about
*
* Shedule a work item to lazy destroy our notifier.
*/
static void radeon_mn_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct radeon_mn *rmn = container_of(mn, struct radeon_mn, mn);
INIT_WORK(&rmn->work, radeon_mn_destroy);
schedule_work(&rmn->work);
}
/**
* radeon_mn_invalidate_range_start - callback to notify about mm change
*
* @mn: our notifier
* @mn: the mm this callback is about
* @start: start of updated range
* @end: end of updated range
*
* We block for all BOs between start and end to be idle and
* unmap them by move them into system domain again.
*/
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
static int radeon_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
unsigned long end,
bool blockable)
{
struct radeon_mn *rmn = container_of(mn, struct radeon_mn, mn);
struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
struct interval_tree_node *it;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
int ret = 0;
/* notification is exclusive, but interval is inclusive */
end -= 1;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
/* TODO we should be able to split locking for interval tree and
* the tear down.
*/
if (blockable)
mutex_lock(&rmn->lock);
else if (!mutex_trylock(&rmn->lock))
return -EAGAIN;
it = interval_tree_iter_first(&rmn->objects, start, end);
while (it) {
struct radeon_mn_node *node;
struct radeon_bo *bo;
long r;
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
if (!blockable) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out_unlock;
}
node = container_of(it, struct radeon_mn_node, it);
it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end);
list_for_each_entry(bo, &node->bos, mn_list) {
if (!bo->tbo.ttm || bo->tbo.ttm->state != tt_bound)
continue;
r = radeon_bo_reserve(bo, true);
if (r) {
DRM_ERROR("(%ld) failed to reserve user bo\n", r);
continue;
}
r = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->tbo.resv,
true, false, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
if (r <= 0)
DRM_ERROR("(%ld) failed to wait for user bo\n", r);
radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU);
r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
if (r)
DRM_ERROR("(%ld) failed to validate user bo\n", r);
radeon_bo_unreserve(bo);
}
}
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&rmn->lock);
mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers There are several blockable mmu notifiers which might sleep in mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and that is a problem for the oom_reaper because it needs to guarantee a forward progress so it cannot depend on any sleepable locks. Currently we simply back off and mark an oom victim with blockable mmu notifiers as done after a short sleep. That can result in selecting a new oom victim prematurely because the previous one still hasn't torn its memory down yet. We can do much better though. Even if mmu notifiers use sleepable locks there is no reason to automatically assume those locks are held. Moreover majority of notifiers only care about a portion of the address space and there is absolutely zero reason to fail when we are unmapping an unrelated range. Many notifiers do really block and wait for HW which is harder to handle and we have to bail out though. This patch handles the low hanging fruit. __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start gets a blockable flag and callbacks are not allowed to sleep if the flag is set to false. This is achieved by using trylock instead of the sleepable lock for most callbacks and continue as long as we do not block down the call chain. I think we can improve that even further because there is a common pattern to do a range lookup first and then do something about that. The first part can be done without a sleeping lock in most cases AFAICS. The oom_reaper end then simply retries if there is at least one notifier which couldn't make any progress in !blockable mode. A retry loop is already implemented to wait for the mmap_sem and this is basically the same thing. The simplest way for driver developers to test this code path is to wrap userspace code which uses these notifiers into a memcg and set the hard limit to hit the oom. This can be done e.g. after the test faults in all the mmu notifier managed memory and set the hard limit to something really small. Then we are looking for a proper process tear down. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: minor code simplification] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716115058.5559-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> # AMD notifiers Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx and umem_odp Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 12:52:33 +08:00
return ret;
}
static const struct mmu_notifier_ops radeon_mn_ops = {
.release = radeon_mn_release,
.invalidate_range_start = radeon_mn_invalidate_range_start,
};
/**
* radeon_mn_get - create notifier context
*
* @rdev: radeon device pointer
*
* Creates a notifier context for current->mm.
*/
static struct radeon_mn *radeon_mn_get(struct radeon_device *rdev)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct radeon_mn *rmn;
int r;
if (down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_sem))
return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
mutex_lock(&rdev->mn_lock);
hash_for_each_possible(rdev->mn_hash, rmn, node, (unsigned long)mm)
if (rmn->mm == mm)
goto release_locks;
rmn = kzalloc(sizeof(*rmn), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rmn) {
rmn = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
goto release_locks;
}
rmn->rdev = rdev;
rmn->mm = mm;
rmn->mn.ops = &radeon_mn_ops;
mutex_init(&rmn->lock);
rmn->objects = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
r = __mmu_notifier_register(&rmn->mn, mm);
if (r)
goto free_rmn;
hash_add(rdev->mn_hash, &rmn->node, (unsigned long)mm);
release_locks:
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mn_lock);
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
return rmn;
free_rmn:
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mn_lock);
up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
kfree(rmn);
return ERR_PTR(r);
}
/**
* radeon_mn_register - register a BO for notifier updates
*
* @bo: radeon buffer object
* @addr: userptr addr we should monitor
*
* Registers an MMU notifier for the given BO at the specified address.
* Returns 0 on success, -ERRNO if anything goes wrong.
*/
int radeon_mn_register(struct radeon_bo *bo, unsigned long addr)
{
unsigned long end = addr + radeon_bo_size(bo) - 1;
struct radeon_device *rdev = bo->rdev;
struct radeon_mn *rmn;
struct radeon_mn_node *node = NULL;
struct list_head bos;
struct interval_tree_node *it;
rmn = radeon_mn_get(rdev);
if (IS_ERR(rmn))
return PTR_ERR(rmn);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bos);
mutex_lock(&rmn->lock);
while ((it = interval_tree_iter_first(&rmn->objects, addr, end))) {
kfree(node);
node = container_of(it, struct radeon_mn_node, it);
interval_tree_remove(&node->it, &rmn->objects);
addr = min(it->start, addr);
end = max(it->last, end);
list_splice(&node->bos, &bos);
}
if (!node) {
node = kmalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_mn_node), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!node) {
mutex_unlock(&rmn->lock);
return -ENOMEM;
}
}
bo->mn = rmn;
node->it.start = addr;
node->it.last = end;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->bos);
list_splice(&bos, &node->bos);
list_add(&bo->mn_list, &node->bos);
interval_tree_insert(&node->it, &rmn->objects);
mutex_unlock(&rmn->lock);
return 0;
}
/**
* radeon_mn_unregister - unregister a BO for notifier updates
*
* @bo: radeon buffer object
*
* Remove any registration of MMU notifier updates from the buffer object.
*/
void radeon_mn_unregister(struct radeon_bo *bo)
{
struct radeon_device *rdev = bo->rdev;
struct radeon_mn *rmn;
struct list_head *head;
mutex_lock(&rdev->mn_lock);
rmn = bo->mn;
if (rmn == NULL) {
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mn_lock);
return;
}
mutex_lock(&rmn->lock);
/* save the next list entry for later */
head = bo->mn_list.next;
bo->mn = NULL;
list_del(&bo->mn_list);
if (list_empty(head)) {
struct radeon_mn_node *node;
node = container_of(head, struct radeon_mn_node, bos);
interval_tree_remove(&node->it, &rmn->objects);
kfree(node);
}
mutex_unlock(&rmn->lock);
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mn_lock);
}