OpenCloudOS-Kernel/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da830.c

1220 lines
39 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
/*
* TI DA830/OMAP L137 chip specific setup
*
* Author: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
*
* 2009 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
* the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. This program
* is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind, whether express
* or implied.
*/
#include <linux/gpio.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/gpio-davinci.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
#include "psc.h"
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
#include <mach/irqs.h>
#include <mach/cputype.h>
#include <mach/common.h>
#include <mach/time.h>
#include <mach/da8xx.h>
#include "clock.h"
#include "mux.h"
/* Offsets of the 8 compare registers on the da830 */
#define DA830_CMP12_0 0x60
#define DA830_CMP12_1 0x64
#define DA830_CMP12_2 0x68
#define DA830_CMP12_3 0x6c
#define DA830_CMP12_4 0x70
#define DA830_CMP12_5 0x74
#define DA830_CMP12_6 0x78
#define DA830_CMP12_7 0x7c
#define DA830_REF_FREQ 24000000
static struct pll_data pll0_data = {
.num = 1,
.phys_base = DA8XX_PLL0_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.flags = PLL_HAS_PREDIV | PLL_HAS_POSTDIV,
};
static struct clk ref_clk = {
.name = "ref_clk",
.rate = DA830_REF_FREQ,
};
static struct clk pll0_clk = {
.name = "pll0",
.parent = &ref_clk,
.pll_data = &pll0_data,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
};
static struct clk pll0_aux_clk = {
.name = "pll0_aux_clk",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL | PRE_PLL,
};
static struct clk pll0_sysclk2 = {
.name = "pll0_sysclk2",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
.div_reg = PLLDIV2,
};
static struct clk pll0_sysclk3 = {
.name = "pll0_sysclk3",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
.div_reg = PLLDIV3,
};
static struct clk pll0_sysclk4 = {
.name = "pll0_sysclk4",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
.div_reg = PLLDIV4,
};
static struct clk pll0_sysclk5 = {
.name = "pll0_sysclk5",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
.div_reg = PLLDIV5,
};
static struct clk pll0_sysclk6 = {
.name = "pll0_sysclk6",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
.div_reg = PLLDIV6,
};
static struct clk pll0_sysclk7 = {
.name = "pll0_sysclk7",
.parent = &pll0_clk,
.flags = CLK_PLL,
.div_reg = PLLDIV7,
};
static struct clk i2c0_clk = {
.name = "i2c0",
.parent = &pll0_aux_clk,
};
static struct clk timerp64_0_clk = {
.name = "timer0",
.parent = &pll0_aux_clk,
};
static struct clk timerp64_1_clk = {
.name = "timer1",
.parent = &pll0_aux_clk,
};
static struct clk arm_rom_clk = {
.name = "arm_rom",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_ARM_RAM_ROM,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk scr0_ss_clk = {
.name = "scr0_ss",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_SCR0_SS,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk scr1_ss_clk = {
.name = "scr1_ss",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_SCR1_SS,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk scr2_ss_clk = {
.name = "scr2_ss",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_SCR2_SS,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk dmax_clk = {
.name = "dmax",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_PRUSS,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk tpcc_clk = {
.name = "tpcc",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_TPCC,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED | CLK_PSC,
};
static struct clk tptc0_clk = {
.name = "tptc0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_TPTC0,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk tptc1_clk = {
.name = "tptc1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_TPTC1,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk mmcsd_clk = {
.name = "mmcsd",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_MMC_SD,
};
static struct clk uart0_clk = {
.name = "uart0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_UART0,
};
static struct clk uart1_clk = {
.name = "uart1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_UART1,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk uart2_clk = {
.name = "uart2",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_UART2,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk spi0_clk = {
.name = "spi0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_SPI0,
};
static struct clk spi1_clk = {
.name = "spi1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_SPI1,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk ecap0_clk = {
.name = "ecap0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_ECAP,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk ecap1_clk = {
.name = "ecap1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_ECAP,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk ecap2_clk = {
.name = "ecap2",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_ECAP,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk pwm0_clk = {
.name = "pwm0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_PWM,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk pwm1_clk = {
.name = "pwm1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_PWM,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk pwm2_clk = {
.name = "pwm2",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_PWM,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk eqep0_clk = {
.name = "eqep0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA830_LPSC1_EQEP,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk eqep1_clk = {
.name = "eqep1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA830_LPSC1_EQEP,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk lcdc_clk = {
.name = "lcdc",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_LCDC,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk mcasp0_clk = {
.name = "mcasp0",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_McASP0,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk mcasp1_clk = {
.name = "mcasp1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA830_LPSC1_McASP1,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk mcasp2_clk = {
.name = "mcasp2",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA830_LPSC1_McASP2,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk usb20_clk = {
.name = "usb20",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk2,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_USB20,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk aemif_clk = {
.name = "aemif",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk3,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_EMIF25,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk aintc_clk = {
.name = "aintc",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_AINTC,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk secu_mgr_clk = {
.name = "secu_mgr",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_SECU_MGR,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk emac_clk = {
.name = "emac",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_CPGMAC,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk gpio_clk = {
.name = "gpio",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_GPIO,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk i2c1_clk = {
.name = "i2c1",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_I2C,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk usb11_clk = {
.name = "usb11",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk4,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_USB11,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
};
static struct clk emif3_clk = {
.name = "emif3",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk5,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC1_EMIF3C,
.gpsc = 1,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk arm_clk = {
.name = "arm",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk6,
.lpsc = DA8XX_LPSC0_ARM,
.flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
};
static struct clk rmii_clk = {
.name = "rmii",
.parent = &pll0_sysclk7,
};
static struct clk_lookup da830_clks[] = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
CLK(NULL, "ref", &ref_clk),
CLK(NULL, "pll0", &pll0_clk),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_aux", &pll0_aux_clk),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_sysclk2", &pll0_sysclk2),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_sysclk3", &pll0_sysclk3),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_sysclk4", &pll0_sysclk4),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_sysclk5", &pll0_sysclk5),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_sysclk6", &pll0_sysclk6),
CLK(NULL, "pll0_sysclk7", &pll0_sysclk7),
CLK("i2c_davinci.1", NULL, &i2c0_clk),
CLK(NULL, "timer0", &timerp64_0_clk),
CLK("davinci-wdt", NULL, &timerp64_1_clk),
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
CLK(NULL, "arm_rom", &arm_rom_clk),
CLK(NULL, "scr0_ss", &scr0_ss_clk),
CLK(NULL, "scr1_ss", &scr1_ss_clk),
CLK(NULL, "scr2_ss", &scr2_ss_clk),
CLK(NULL, "dmax", &dmax_clk),
CLK(NULL, "tpcc", &tpcc_clk),
CLK(NULL, "tptc0", &tptc0_clk),
CLK(NULL, "tptc1", &tptc1_clk),
CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd_clk),
CLK("serial8250.0", NULL, &uart0_clk),
CLK("serial8250.1", NULL, &uart1_clk),
CLK("serial8250.2", NULL, &uart2_clk),
CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk),
CLK("spi_davinci.1", NULL, &spi1_clk),
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
CLK(NULL, "ecap0", &ecap0_clk),
CLK(NULL, "ecap1", &ecap1_clk),
CLK(NULL, "ecap2", &ecap2_clk),
CLK(NULL, "pwm0", &pwm0_clk),
CLK(NULL, "pwm1", &pwm1_clk),
CLK(NULL, "pwm2", &pwm2_clk),
CLK("eqep.0", NULL, &eqep0_clk),
CLK("eqep.1", NULL, &eqep1_clk),
CLK("da8xx_lcdc.0", "fck", &lcdc_clk),
CLK("davinci-mcasp.0", NULL, &mcasp0_clk),
CLK("davinci-mcasp.1", NULL, &mcasp1_clk),
CLK("davinci-mcasp.2", NULL, &mcasp2_clk),
CLK("musb-da8xx", "usb20", &usb20_clk),
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_clk),
CLK(NULL, "aintc", &aintc_clk),
CLK(NULL, "secu_mgr", &secu_mgr_clk),
CLK("davinci_emac.1", NULL, &emac_clk),
CLK("davinci_mdio.0", "fck", &emac_clk),
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
CLK(NULL, "gpio", &gpio_clk),
CLK("i2c_davinci.2", NULL, &i2c1_clk),
CLK("ohci-da8xx", "usb11", &usb11_clk),
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
CLK(NULL, "emif3", &emif3_clk),
CLK(NULL, "arm", &arm_clk),
CLK(NULL, "rmii", &rmii_clk),
CLK(NULL, NULL, NULL),
};
/*
* Device specific mux setup
*
* soc description mux mode mode mux dbg
* reg offset mask mode
*/
static const struct mux_config da830_pins[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_DAVINCI_MUX
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_14, 0, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RTCK, 0, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_15, 0, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMU_0, 0, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_SDCKE, 0, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_CLK_GLUE, 0, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_CLK, 0, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_CS_0, 0, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_CAS, 0, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_RAS, 0, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE, 0, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_BA_1, 1, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_BA_0, 1, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_0, 1, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_1, 1, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_2, 1, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_3, 1, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_4, 1, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_5, 1, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_0, 1, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_1, 1, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_2, 1, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_3, 1, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_4, 1, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_5, 1, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_6, 1, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_7, 1, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_6, 2, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_7, 2, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_8, 2, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_9, 2, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_10, 2, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_11, 2, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_A_12, 2, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_31, 2, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_8, 2, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_9, 2, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_10, 2, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_11, 2, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_12, 2, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO7_13, 2, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_13, 2, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_30, 3, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_29, 3, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_28, 3, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_27, 3, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_26, 3, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_25, 3, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_24, 3, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_23, 3, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_22, 4, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_21, 4, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_20, 4, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_19, 4, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_18, 4, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_17, 4, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_16, 4, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_3, 4, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_2, 5, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_0, 5, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_1, 5, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_2, 5, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_3, 5, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_4, 5, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_5, 5, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_6, 5, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_0, 5, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_1, 5, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_2, 5, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_3, 5, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_4, 5, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_5, 5, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_6, 5, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_7, 6, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_8, 6, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_9, 6, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_10, 6, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_11, 6, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_12, 6, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_13, 6, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_14, 6, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_7, 6, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_8, 6, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_9, 6, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_10, 6, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_11, 6, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_12, 6, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_13, 6, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_14, 6, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMB_D_15, 7, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_1, 7, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMB_WE_DQM_0, 7, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI0_SOMI_0, 7, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI0_SIMO_0, 7, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI0_CLK, 7, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI0_ENA, 7, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI0_SCS_0, 7, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0I, 7, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0S, 7, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1I, 7, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUART0_CTS, 7, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUART0_RTS, 7, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0A, 7, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP0B, 7, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO6_15, 7, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_14, 7, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_15, 7, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_0, 7, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_1, 7, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_2, 7, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_3, 7, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_4, 7, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI1_SOMI_0, 8, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI1_SIMO_0, 8, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, SPI1_CLK, 8, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART0_RXD, 8, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART0_TXD, 8, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_10, 8, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_11, 8, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI1_ENA, 8, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C1_SCL, 8, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C1_SDA, 8, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1S, 8, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C0_SDA, 8, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, I2C0_SCL, 8, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART2_RXD, 8, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, TM64P0_IN12, 8, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, TM64P0_OUT12, 8, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_5, 8, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_6, 8, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_7, 8, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_8, 8, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_9, 8, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_10, 8, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_11, 8, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_12, 8, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NSPI1_SCS_0, 9, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, USB0_DRVVBUS, 9, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKX0, 9, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKX0, 9, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSX0, 9, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKR0, 9, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKR0, 9, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSR0, 9, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART2_TXD, 9, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKX2, 9, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ECAP0_APWM0, 9, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_MHZ_50_CLK, 9, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ECAP1_APWM1, 9, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, USB_REFCLKIN, 9, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO5_13, 9, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_15, 9, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_11, 9, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_12, 9, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_13, 9, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_14, 9, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_15, 9, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_12, 9, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AMUTE0, 10, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_0, 10, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_1, 10, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_2, 10, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_3, 10, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_4, 10, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_5, 10, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_6, 10, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_TXD_0, 10, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_TXD_1, 10, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_TXEN, 10, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_CRS_DV, 10, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_RXD_0, 10, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_RXD_1, 10, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, RMII_RXER, 10, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSR2, 10, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKX2, 10, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_3, 10, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_2, 10, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_1, 10, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSX2, 10, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKR2, 10, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NRESETOUT, 10, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_0, 10, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_1, 10, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_2, 10, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_3, 10, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_4, 10, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_5, 10, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_6, 10, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_7, 11, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_8, 11, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART1_RXD, 11, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UART1_TXD, 11, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_11, 11, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKX1, 11, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKX1, 11, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSX1, 11, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MDIO_CLK, 11, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MDIO_D, 11, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_9, 11, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_10, 11, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM0B, 11, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM0A, 11, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWMSYNCI, 11, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR2_0, 11, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWMSYNC0, 11, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_7, 11, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_8, 11, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_9, 11, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_10, 11, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_11, 11, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_14, 11, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO3_15, 11, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_10, 11, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKR1, 12, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ACLKR1, 12, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AFSR1, 12, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AMUTE1, 12, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_0, 12, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_1, 12, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_2, 12, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_3, 12, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, ECAP2_APWM2, 12, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EHRPWMGLUETZ, 12, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1A, 12, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_11, 12, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_12, 12, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_13, 12, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_14, 12, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_0, 12, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_1, 12, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_2, 12, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_3, 12, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_4, 13, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_5, 13, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_6, 13, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_7, 13, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_8, 13, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR1_9, 13, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EQEP1B, 13, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM2B, 13, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM2A, 13, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM1B, 13, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EPWM1A, 13, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_4, 13, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_5, 13, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_6, 13, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_7, 13, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_8, 13, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO4_9, 13, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_0, 13, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_1, 13, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_DAT_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_2, 14, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_3, 14, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_4, 14, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_5, 14, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_6, 14, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_7, 14, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_8, 14, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_9, 14, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_D_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_0, 15, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_1, 15, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HD_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_7, 15, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_CLK, 15, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HCNTL0, 15, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_10, 15, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_11, 15, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_12, 15, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_13, 15, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_14, 15, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO0_15, 15, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_0, 15, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_1, 15, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_2, 16, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_3, 16, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_4, 16, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_5, 16, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_6, 16, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_7, 16, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_8, 16, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_9, 16, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, MMCSD_CMD, 16, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_6, 16, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_3, 16, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_2, 16, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_1, 16, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_0, 16, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_PCLK, 16, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_HSYNC, 16, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HCNTL1, 16, 0, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_2, 16, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_3, 16, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_4, 16, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_5, 16, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_6, 16, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_7, 16, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_8, 16, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_9, 16, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_10, 17, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_11, 17, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_A_12, 17, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_BA_1, 17, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_BA_0, 17, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_CLK, 17, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_SDCKE, 17, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CAS, 17, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_VSYNC, 17, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NLCD_AC_ENB_CS, 17, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_MCLK, 17, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_5, 17, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, LCD_D_4, 17, 16, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, OBSCLK, 17, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_4, 17, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HHWIL, 17, 12, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AHCLKR2, 17, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_10, 17, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_11, 17, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_12, 17, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_13, 17, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_14, 17, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO1_15, 17, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_0, 17, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_1, 17, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_RAS, 18, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_WE, 18, 4, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_0, 18, 8, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_2, 18, 12, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_3, 18, 16, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_OE, 18, 20, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_WE_DQM_1, 18, 24, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_WE_DQM_0, 18, 28, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NEMA_CS_5, 18, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, UHPI_HRNW, 18, 4, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HAS, 18, 8, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HCS, 18, 12, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HDS1, 18, 20, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HDS2, 18, 24, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HINT, 18, 28, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_12, 18, 4, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AMUTE2, 18, 16, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_13, 18, 20, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_14, 18, 24, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, AXR0_15, 18, 28, 0xf, 4, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_2, 18, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_3, 18, 4, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_4, 18, 8, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_5, 18, 12, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_6, 18, 16, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_7, 18, 20, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_8, 18, 24, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_9, 18, 28, 0xf, 8, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, EMA_WAIT_0, 19, 0, 0xf, 1, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, NUHPI_HRDY, 19, 0, 0xf, 2, false)
MUX_CFG(DA830, GPIO2_10, 19, 0, 0xf, 8, false)
#endif
};
const short da830_emif25_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EMA_D_0, DA830_EMA_D_1, DA830_EMA_D_2, DA830_EMA_D_3,
DA830_EMA_D_4, DA830_EMA_D_5, DA830_EMA_D_6, DA830_EMA_D_7,
DA830_EMA_D_8, DA830_EMA_D_9, DA830_EMA_D_10, DA830_EMA_D_11,
DA830_EMA_D_12, DA830_EMA_D_13, DA830_EMA_D_14, DA830_EMA_D_15,
DA830_EMA_A_0, DA830_EMA_A_1, DA830_EMA_A_2, DA830_EMA_A_3,
DA830_EMA_A_4, DA830_EMA_A_5, DA830_EMA_A_6, DA830_EMA_A_7,
DA830_EMA_A_8, DA830_EMA_A_9, DA830_EMA_A_10, DA830_EMA_A_11,
DA830_EMA_A_12, DA830_EMA_BA_0, DA830_EMA_BA_1, DA830_EMA_CLK,
DA830_EMA_SDCKE, DA830_NEMA_CS_4, DA830_NEMA_CS_5, DA830_NEMA_WE,
DA830_NEMA_CS_0, DA830_NEMA_CS_2, DA830_NEMA_CS_3, DA830_NEMA_OE,
DA830_NEMA_WE_DQM_1, DA830_NEMA_WE_DQM_0, DA830_EMA_WAIT_0,
-1
};
const short da830_spi0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_SPI0_SOMI_0, DA830_SPI0_SIMO_0, DA830_SPI0_CLK, DA830_NSPI0_ENA,
DA830_NSPI0_SCS_0,
-1
};
const short da830_spi1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_SPI1_SOMI_0, DA830_SPI1_SIMO_0, DA830_SPI1_CLK, DA830_NSPI1_ENA,
DA830_NSPI1_SCS_0,
-1
};
const short da830_mmc_sd_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_MMCSD_DAT_0, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_1, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_2,
DA830_MMCSD_DAT_3, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_4, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_5,
DA830_MMCSD_DAT_6, DA830_MMCSD_DAT_7, DA830_MMCSD_CLK,
DA830_MMCSD_CMD,
-1
};
const short da830_uart0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_NUART0_CTS, DA830_NUART0_RTS, DA830_UART0_RXD, DA830_UART0_TXD,
-1
};
const short da830_uart1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_UART1_RXD, DA830_UART1_TXD,
-1
};
const short da830_uart2_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_UART2_RXD, DA830_UART2_TXD,
-1
};
const short da830_usb20_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_USB0_DRVVBUS, DA830_USB_REFCLKIN,
-1
};
const short da830_usb11_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_USB_REFCLKIN,
-1
};
const short da830_uhpi_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_UHPI_HD_0, DA830_UHPI_HD_1, DA830_UHPI_HD_2, DA830_UHPI_HD_3,
DA830_UHPI_HD_4, DA830_UHPI_HD_5, DA830_UHPI_HD_6, DA830_UHPI_HD_7,
DA830_UHPI_HD_8, DA830_UHPI_HD_9, DA830_UHPI_HD_10, DA830_UHPI_HD_11,
DA830_UHPI_HD_12, DA830_UHPI_HD_13, DA830_UHPI_HD_14, DA830_UHPI_HD_15,
DA830_UHPI_HCNTL0, DA830_UHPI_HCNTL1, DA830_UHPI_HHWIL, DA830_UHPI_HRNW,
DA830_NUHPI_HAS, DA830_NUHPI_HCS, DA830_NUHPI_HDS1, DA830_NUHPI_HDS2,
DA830_NUHPI_HINT, DA830_NUHPI_HRDY,
-1
};
const short da830_cpgmac_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_RMII_TXD_0, DA830_RMII_TXD_1, DA830_RMII_TXEN, DA830_RMII_CRS_DV,
DA830_RMII_RXD_0, DA830_RMII_RXD_1, DA830_RMII_RXER, DA830_MDIO_CLK,
DA830_MDIO_D,
-1
};
const short da830_emif3c_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EMB_SDCKE, DA830_EMB_CLK_GLUE, DA830_EMB_CLK, DA830_NEMB_CS_0,
DA830_NEMB_CAS, DA830_NEMB_RAS, DA830_NEMB_WE, DA830_EMB_BA_1,
DA830_EMB_BA_0, DA830_EMB_A_0, DA830_EMB_A_1, DA830_EMB_A_2,
DA830_EMB_A_3, DA830_EMB_A_4, DA830_EMB_A_5, DA830_EMB_A_6,
DA830_EMB_A_7, DA830_EMB_A_8, DA830_EMB_A_9, DA830_EMB_A_10,
DA830_EMB_A_11, DA830_EMB_A_12, DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_3,
DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_2, DA830_EMB_D_0, DA830_EMB_D_1, DA830_EMB_D_2,
DA830_EMB_D_3, DA830_EMB_D_4, DA830_EMB_D_5, DA830_EMB_D_6,
DA830_EMB_D_7, DA830_EMB_D_8, DA830_EMB_D_9, DA830_EMB_D_10,
DA830_EMB_D_11, DA830_EMB_D_12, DA830_EMB_D_13, DA830_EMB_D_14,
DA830_EMB_D_15, DA830_EMB_D_16, DA830_EMB_D_17, DA830_EMB_D_18,
DA830_EMB_D_19, DA830_EMB_D_20, DA830_EMB_D_21, DA830_EMB_D_22,
DA830_EMB_D_23, DA830_EMB_D_24, DA830_EMB_D_25, DA830_EMB_D_26,
DA830_EMB_D_27, DA830_EMB_D_28, DA830_EMB_D_29, DA830_EMB_D_30,
DA830_EMB_D_31, DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_1, DA830_NEMB_WE_DQM_0,
-1
};
const short da830_mcasp0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_AHCLKX0, DA830_ACLKX0, DA830_AFSX0,
DA830_AHCLKR0, DA830_ACLKR0, DA830_AFSR0, DA830_AMUTE0,
DA830_AXR0_0, DA830_AXR0_1, DA830_AXR0_2, DA830_AXR0_3,
DA830_AXR0_4, DA830_AXR0_5, DA830_AXR0_6, DA830_AXR0_7,
DA830_AXR0_8, DA830_AXR0_9, DA830_AXR0_10, DA830_AXR0_11,
DA830_AXR0_12, DA830_AXR0_13, DA830_AXR0_14, DA830_AXR0_15,
-1
};
const short da830_mcasp1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_AHCLKX1, DA830_ACLKX1, DA830_AFSX1,
DA830_AHCLKR1, DA830_ACLKR1, DA830_AFSR1, DA830_AMUTE1,
DA830_AXR1_0, DA830_AXR1_1, DA830_AXR1_2, DA830_AXR1_3,
DA830_AXR1_4, DA830_AXR1_5, DA830_AXR1_6, DA830_AXR1_7,
DA830_AXR1_8, DA830_AXR1_9, DA830_AXR1_10, DA830_AXR1_11,
-1
};
const short da830_mcasp2_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_AHCLKX2, DA830_ACLKX2, DA830_AFSX2,
DA830_AHCLKR2, DA830_ACLKR2, DA830_AFSR2, DA830_AMUTE2,
DA830_AXR2_0, DA830_AXR2_1, DA830_AXR2_2, DA830_AXR2_3,
-1
};
const short da830_i2c0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_I2C0_SDA, DA830_I2C0_SCL,
-1
};
const short da830_i2c1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_I2C1_SCL, DA830_I2C1_SDA,
-1
};
const short da830_lcdcntl_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_LCD_D_0, DA830_LCD_D_1, DA830_LCD_D_2, DA830_LCD_D_3,
DA830_LCD_D_4, DA830_LCD_D_5, DA830_LCD_D_6, DA830_LCD_D_7,
DA830_LCD_D_8, DA830_LCD_D_9, DA830_LCD_D_10, DA830_LCD_D_11,
DA830_LCD_D_12, DA830_LCD_D_13, DA830_LCD_D_14, DA830_LCD_D_15,
DA830_LCD_PCLK, DA830_LCD_HSYNC, DA830_LCD_VSYNC, DA830_NLCD_AC_ENB_CS,
DA830_LCD_MCLK,
-1
};
const short da830_pwm_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP0_APWM0, DA830_ECAP1_APWM1, DA830_EPWM0B, DA830_EPWM0A,
DA830_EPWMSYNCI, DA830_EPWMSYNC0, DA830_ECAP2_APWM2, DA830_EHRPWMGLUETZ,
DA830_EPWM2B, DA830_EPWM2A, DA830_EPWM1B, DA830_EPWM1A,
-1
};
const short da830_ecap0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP0_APWM0,
-1
};
const short da830_ecap1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP1_APWM1,
-1
};
const short da830_ecap2_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_ECAP2_APWM2,
-1
};
const short da830_eqep0_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EQEP0I, DA830_EQEP0S, DA830_EQEP0A, DA830_EQEP0B,
-1
};
const short da830_eqep1_pins[] __initconst = {
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
DA830_EQEP1I, DA830_EQEP1S, DA830_EQEP1A, DA830_EQEP1B,
-1
};
/* FIQ are pri 0-1; otherwise 2-7, with 7 lowest priority */
static u8 da830_default_priorities[DA830_N_CP_INTC_IRQ] = {
[IRQ_DA8XX_COMMTX] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_COMMRX] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_NINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT3] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT4] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT5] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT6] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT7] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CCINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CCERRINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TCERRINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_AEMIFINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MMCSDINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MMCSDINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ALLINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_RTC] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_KEYMGRINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_MPUERR] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_CHIPINT3] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_TCERRINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_THRESH_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_RX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_TX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C0_MISC_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_RX_THRESH_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_RX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_TX_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_C1_MISC_PULSE] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MEMERR] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO3] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO4] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO5] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO6] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO7] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO8] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_I2CINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_LCDINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_MCASPINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ALLINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_SPINT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UHPI_INT1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_USB_INT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_IRQN] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_RWAKEUP] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_UARTINT2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_DFTSSINT] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM0TZ] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_EHRPWM1TZ] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EHRPWM2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EHRPWM2TZ] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ECAP0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ECAP1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ECAP2] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EQEP0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_EQEP1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT1_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT2_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT3_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT4_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT5_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT6_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT7_0] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT1_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT2_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT3_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT4_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT5_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT6_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT7_1] = 7,
[IRQ_DA8XX_ARMCLKSTOPREQ] = 7,
};
static struct map_desc da830_io_desc[] = {
{
.virtual = IO_VIRT,
.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(IO_PHYS),
.length = IO_SIZE,
.type = MT_DEVICE
},
{
.virtual = DA8XX_CP_INTC_VIRT,
.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(DA8XX_CP_INTC_BASE),
.length = DA8XX_CP_INTC_SIZE,
.type = MT_DEVICE
},
};
static u32 da830_psc_bases[] = { DA8XX_PSC0_BASE, DA8XX_PSC1_BASE };
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
/* Contents of JTAG ID register used to identify exact cpu type */
static struct davinci_id da830_ids[] = {
{
.variant = 0x0,
.part_no = 0xb7df,
.manufacturer = 0x017, /* 0x02f >> 1 */
.cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830,
.name = "da830/omap-l137 rev1.0",
},
{
.variant = 0x8,
.part_no = 0xb7df,
.manufacturer = 0x017,
.cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830,
.name = "da830/omap-l137 rev1.1",
},
{
.variant = 0x9,
.part_no = 0xb7df,
.manufacturer = 0x017,
.cpu_id = DAVINCI_CPU_ID_DA830,
.name = "da830/omap-l137 rev2.0",
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
},
};
static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data da830_gpio_platform_data = {
.ngpio = 128,
};
int __init da830_register_gpio(void)
{
return da8xx_register_gpio(&da830_gpio_platform_data);
}
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
static struct davinci_timer_instance da830_timer_instance[2] = {
{
.base = DA8XX_TIMER64P0_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.bottom_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_0,
.top_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_0,
.cmp_off = DA830_CMP12_0,
.cmp_irq = IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_0,
},
{
.base = DA8XX_TIMER64P1_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.bottom_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT12_1,
.top_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_TINT34_1,
.cmp_off = DA830_CMP12_0,
.cmp_irq = IRQ_DA830_T12CMPINT0_1,
},
};
/*
* T0_BOT: Timer 0, bottom : Used for clock_event & clocksource
* T0_TOP: Timer 0, top : Used by DSP
* T1_BOT, T1_TOP: Timer 1, bottom & top: Used for watchdog timer
*/
static struct davinci_timer_info da830_timer_info = {
.timers = da830_timer_instance,
.clockevent_id = T0_BOT,
.clocksource_id = T0_BOT,
};
static struct davinci_soc_info davinci_soc_info_da830 = {
.io_desc = da830_io_desc,
.io_desc_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_io_desc),
.jtag_id_reg = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_JTAG_ID_REG,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.ids = da830_ids,
.ids_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_ids),
.cpu_clks = da830_clks,
.psc_bases = da830_psc_bases,
.psc_bases_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_psc_bases),
.pinmux_base = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + 0x120,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.pinmux_pins = da830_pins,
.pinmux_pins_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da830_pins),
.intc_base = DA8XX_CP_INTC_BASE,
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
.intc_type = DAVINCI_INTC_TYPE_CP_INTC,
.intc_irq_prios = da830_default_priorities,
.intc_irq_num = DA830_N_CP_INTC_IRQ,
.timer_info = &da830_timer_info,
.emac_pdata = &da8xx_emac_pdata,
};
void __init da830_init(void)
{
davinci_common_init(&davinci_soc_info_da830);
da8xx_syscfg0_base = ioremap(DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE, SZ_4K);
WARN(!da8xx_syscfg0_base, "Unable to map syscfg0 module");
davinci_clk_init(davinci_soc_info_da830.cpu_clks);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
2009-06-04 09:36:54 +08:00
}