2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
============================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
can.txt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readme file for the Controller Area Network Protocol Family (aka Socket CAN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This file contains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Overview / What is Socket CAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Motivation / Why using the socket API
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Socket CAN concept
|
|
|
|
3.1 receive lists
|
|
|
|
3.2 local loopback of sent frames
|
|
|
|
3.3 network security issues (capabilities)
|
|
|
|
3.4 network problem notifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 How to use Socket CAN
|
|
|
|
4.1 RAW protocol sockets with can_filters (SOCK_RAW)
|
|
|
|
4.1.1 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_FILTER
|
|
|
|
4.1.2 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER
|
|
|
|
4.1.3 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK
|
|
|
|
4.1.4 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS
|
|
|
|
4.2 Broadcast Manager protocol sockets (SOCK_DGRAM)
|
|
|
|
4.3 connected transport protocols (SOCK_SEQPACKET)
|
|
|
|
4.4 unconnected transport protocols (SOCK_DGRAM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Socket CAN core module
|
|
|
|
5.1 can.ko module params
|
|
|
|
5.2 procfs content
|
|
|
|
5.3 writing own CAN protocol modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 CAN network drivers
|
|
|
|
6.1 general settings
|
|
|
|
6.2 local loopback of sent frames
|
|
|
|
6.3 CAN controller hardware filters
|
2008-09-24 05:53:14 +08:00
|
|
|
6.4 The virtual CAN driver (vcan)
|
|
|
|
6.5 currently supported CAN hardware
|
|
|
|
6.6 todo
|
2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Credits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
============================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Overview / What is Socket CAN
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The socketcan package is an implementation of CAN protocols
|
|
|
|
(Controller Area Network) for Linux. CAN is a networking technology
|
|
|
|
which has widespread use in automation, embedded devices, and
|
|
|
|
automotive fields. While there have been other CAN implementations
|
|
|
|
for Linux based on character devices, Socket CAN uses the Berkeley
|
|
|
|
socket API, the Linux network stack and implements the CAN device
|
|
|
|
drivers as network interfaces. The CAN socket API has been designed
|
|
|
|
as similar as possible to the TCP/IP protocols to allow programmers,
|
|
|
|
familiar with network programming, to easily learn how to use CAN
|
|
|
|
sockets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Motivation / Why using the socket API
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There have been CAN implementations for Linux before Socket CAN so the
|
|
|
|
question arises, why we have started another project. Most existing
|
|
|
|
implementations come as a device driver for some CAN hardware, they
|
|
|
|
are based on character devices and provide comparatively little
|
|
|
|
functionality. Usually, there is only a hardware-specific device
|
|
|
|
driver which provides a character device interface to send and
|
|
|
|
receive raw CAN frames, directly to/from the controller hardware.
|
|
|
|
Queueing of frames and higher-level transport protocols like ISO-TP
|
|
|
|
have to be implemented in user space applications. Also, most
|
|
|
|
character-device implementations support only one single process to
|
|
|
|
open the device at a time, similar to a serial interface. Exchanging
|
|
|
|
the CAN controller requires employment of another device driver and
|
|
|
|
often the need for adaption of large parts of the application to the
|
|
|
|
new driver's API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Socket CAN was designed to overcome all of these limitations. A new
|
|
|
|
protocol family has been implemented which provides a socket interface
|
|
|
|
to user space applications and which builds upon the Linux network
|
|
|
|
layer, so to use all of the provided queueing functionality. A device
|
|
|
|
driver for CAN controller hardware registers itself with the Linux
|
|
|
|
network layer as a network device, so that CAN frames from the
|
|
|
|
controller can be passed up to the network layer and on to the CAN
|
|
|
|
protocol family module and also vice-versa. Also, the protocol family
|
|
|
|
module provides an API for transport protocol modules to register, so
|
|
|
|
that any number of transport protocols can be loaded or unloaded
|
|
|
|
dynamically. In fact, the can core module alone does not provide any
|
|
|
|
protocol and cannot be used without loading at least one additional
|
|
|
|
protocol module. Multiple sockets can be opened at the same time,
|
|
|
|
on different or the same protocol module and they can listen/send
|
|
|
|
frames on different or the same CAN IDs. Several sockets listening on
|
|
|
|
the same interface for frames with the same CAN ID are all passed the
|
|
|
|
same received matching CAN frames. An application wishing to
|
|
|
|
communicate using a specific transport protocol, e.g. ISO-TP, just
|
|
|
|
selects that protocol when opening the socket, and then can read and
|
|
|
|
write application data byte streams, without having to deal with
|
|
|
|
CAN-IDs, frames, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar functionality visible from user-space could be provided by a
|
|
|
|
character device, too, but this would lead to a technically inelegant
|
|
|
|
solution for a couple of reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Intricate usage. Instead of passing a protocol argument to
|
|
|
|
socket(2) and using bind(2) to select a CAN interface and CAN ID, an
|
|
|
|
application would have to do all these operations using ioctl(2)s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Code duplication. A character device cannot make use of the Linux
|
|
|
|
network queueing code, so all that code would have to be duplicated
|
|
|
|
for CAN networking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Abstraction. In most existing character-device implementations, the
|
|
|
|
hardware-specific device driver for a CAN controller directly
|
|
|
|
provides the character device for the application to work with.
|
|
|
|
This is at least very unusual in Unix systems for both, char and
|
|
|
|
block devices. For example you don't have a character device for a
|
|
|
|
certain UART of a serial interface, a certain sound chip in your
|
|
|
|
computer, a SCSI or IDE controller providing access to your hard
|
|
|
|
disk or tape streamer device. Instead, you have abstraction layers
|
|
|
|
which provide a unified character or block device interface to the
|
|
|
|
application on the one hand, and a interface for hardware-specific
|
|
|
|
device drivers on the other hand. These abstractions are provided
|
|
|
|
by subsystems like the tty layer, the audio subsystem or the SCSI
|
|
|
|
and IDE subsystems for the devices mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to implement a CAN device driver is as a character
|
|
|
|
device without such a (complete) abstraction layer, as is done by most
|
|
|
|
existing drivers. The right way, however, would be to add such a
|
|
|
|
layer with all the functionality like registering for certain CAN
|
|
|
|
IDs, supporting several open file descriptors and (de)multiplexing
|
|
|
|
CAN frames between them, (sophisticated) queueing of CAN frames, and
|
|
|
|
providing an API for device drivers to register with. However, then
|
|
|
|
it would be no more difficult, or may be even easier, to use the
|
|
|
|
networking framework provided by the Linux kernel, and this is what
|
|
|
|
Socket CAN does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of the networking framework of the Linux kernel is just the
|
|
|
|
natural and most appropriate way to implement CAN for Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Socket CAN concept
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in chapter 2 it is the main goal of Socket CAN to
|
|
|
|
provide a socket interface to user space applications which builds
|
|
|
|
upon the Linux network layer. In contrast to the commonly known
|
|
|
|
TCP/IP and ethernet networking, the CAN bus is a broadcast-only(!)
|
|
|
|
medium that has no MAC-layer addressing like ethernet. The CAN-identifier
|
|
|
|
(can_id) is used for arbitration on the CAN-bus. Therefore the CAN-IDs
|
|
|
|
have to be chosen uniquely on the bus. When designing a CAN-ECU
|
|
|
|
network the CAN-IDs are mapped to be sent by a specific ECU.
|
|
|
|
For this reason a CAN-ID can be treated best as a kind of source address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 receive lists
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network transparent access of multiple applications leads to the
|
|
|
|
problem that different applications may be interested in the same
|
|
|
|
CAN-IDs from the same CAN network interface. The Socket CAN core
|
|
|
|
module - which implements the protocol family CAN - provides several
|
|
|
|
high efficient receive lists for this reason. If e.g. a user space
|
|
|
|
application opens a CAN RAW socket, the raw protocol module itself
|
|
|
|
requests the (range of) CAN-IDs from the Socket CAN core that are
|
|
|
|
requested by the user. The subscription and unsubscription of
|
|
|
|
CAN-IDs can be done for specific CAN interfaces or for all(!) known
|
|
|
|
CAN interfaces with the can_rx_(un)register() functions provided to
|
|
|
|
CAN protocol modules by the SocketCAN core (see chapter 5).
|
|
|
|
To optimize the CPU usage at runtime the receive lists are split up
|
|
|
|
into several specific lists per device that match the requested
|
|
|
|
filter complexity for a given use-case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 local loopback of sent frames
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As known from other networking concepts the data exchanging
|
|
|
|
applications may run on the same or different nodes without any
|
|
|
|
change (except for the according addressing information):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
___ ___ ___ _______ ___
|
|
|
|
| _ | | _ | | _ | | _ _ | | _ |
|
|
|
|
||A|| ||B|| ||C|| ||A| |B|| ||C||
|
|
|
|
|___| |___| |___| |_______| |___|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
-----------------(1)- CAN bus -(2)---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To ensure that application A receives the same information in the
|
|
|
|
example (2) as it would receive in example (1) there is need for
|
|
|
|
some kind of local loopback of the sent CAN frames on the appropriate
|
|
|
|
node.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Linux network devices (by default) just can handle the
|
|
|
|
transmission and reception of media dependent frames. Due to the
|
2008-07-26 10:45:33 +08:00
|
|
|
arbitration on the CAN bus the transmission of a low prio CAN-ID
|
2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
may be delayed by the reception of a high prio CAN frame. To
|
|
|
|
reflect the correct* traffic on the node the loopback of the sent
|
|
|
|
data has to be performed right after a successful transmission. If
|
|
|
|
the CAN network interface is not capable of performing the loopback for
|
|
|
|
some reason the SocketCAN core can do this task as a fallback solution.
|
|
|
|
See chapter 6.2 for details (recommended).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loopback functionality is enabled by default to reflect standard
|
|
|
|
networking behaviour for CAN applications. Due to some requests from
|
|
|
|
the RT-SocketCAN group the loopback optionally may be disabled for each
|
|
|
|
separate socket. See sockopts from the CAN RAW sockets in chapter 4.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* = you really like to have this when you're running analyser tools
|
|
|
|
like 'candump' or 'cansniffer' on the (same) node.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 network security issues (capabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Controller Area Network is a local field bus transmitting only
|
|
|
|
broadcast messages without any routing and security concepts.
|
|
|
|
In the majority of cases the user application has to deal with
|
|
|
|
raw CAN frames. Therefore it might be reasonable NOT to restrict
|
|
|
|
the CAN access only to the user root, as known from other networks.
|
|
|
|
Since the currently implemented CAN_RAW and CAN_BCM sockets can only
|
|
|
|
send and receive frames to/from CAN interfaces it does not affect
|
|
|
|
security of others networks to allow all users to access the CAN.
|
|
|
|
To enable non-root users to access CAN_RAW and CAN_BCM protocol
|
|
|
|
sockets the Kconfig options CAN_RAW_USER and/or CAN_BCM_USER may be
|
|
|
|
selected at kernel compile time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 network problem notifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of the CAN bus may lead to several problems on the physical
|
|
|
|
and media access control layer. Detecting and logging of these lower
|
|
|
|
layer problems is a vital requirement for CAN users to identify
|
|
|
|
hardware issues on the physical transceiver layer as well as
|
|
|
|
arbitration problems and error frames caused by the different
|
|
|
|
ECUs. The occurrence of detected errors are important for diagnosis
|
|
|
|
and have to be logged together with the exact timestamp. For this
|
|
|
|
reason the CAN interface driver can generate so called Error Frames
|
|
|
|
that can optionally be passed to the user application in the same
|
|
|
|
way as other CAN frames. Whenever an error on the physical layer
|
|
|
|
or the MAC layer is detected (e.g. by the CAN controller) the driver
|
|
|
|
creates an appropriate error frame. Error frames can be requested by
|
|
|
|
the user application using the common CAN filter mechanisms. Inside
|
|
|
|
this filter definition the (interested) type of errors may be
|
|
|
|
selected. The reception of error frames is disabled by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. How to use Socket CAN
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like TCP/IP, you first need to open a socket for communicating over a
|
|
|
|
CAN network. Since Socket CAN implements a new protocol family, you
|
|
|
|
need to pass PF_CAN as the first argument to the socket(2) system
|
|
|
|
call. Currently, there are two CAN protocols to choose from, the raw
|
|
|
|
socket protocol and the broadcast manager (BCM). So to open a socket,
|
|
|
|
you would write
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_DGRAM, CAN_BCM);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respectively. After the successful creation of the socket, you would
|
|
|
|
normally use the bind(2) system call to bind the socket to a CAN
|
|
|
|
interface (which is different from TCP/IP due to different addressing
|
|
|
|
- see chapter 3). After binding (CAN_RAW) or connecting (CAN_BCM)
|
|
|
|
the socket, you can read(2) and write(2) from/to the socket or use
|
|
|
|
send(2), sendto(2), sendmsg(2) and the recv* counterpart operations
|
|
|
|
on the socket as usual. There are also CAN specific socket options
|
|
|
|
described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The basic CAN frame structure and the sockaddr structure are defined
|
|
|
|
in include/linux/can.h:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct can_frame {
|
|
|
|
canid_t can_id; /* 32 bit CAN_ID + EFF/RTR/ERR flags */
|
|
|
|
__u8 can_dlc; /* data length code: 0 .. 8 */
|
|
|
|
__u8 data[8] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The alignment of the (linear) payload data[] to a 64bit boundary
|
|
|
|
allows the user to define own structs and unions to easily access the
|
|
|
|
CAN payload. There is no given byteorder on the CAN bus by
|
|
|
|
default. A read(2) system call on a CAN_RAW socket transfers a
|
|
|
|
struct can_frame to the user space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sockaddr_can structure has an interface index like the
|
|
|
|
PF_PACKET socket, that also binds to a specific interface:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct sockaddr_can {
|
|
|
|
sa_family_t can_family;
|
|
|
|
int can_ifindex;
|
|
|
|
union {
|
2008-04-15 15:46:38 +08:00
|
|
|
/* transport protocol class address info (e.g. ISOTP) */
|
|
|
|
struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } tp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* reserved for future CAN protocols address information */
|
2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
} can_addr;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To determine the interface index an appropriate ioctl() has to
|
|
|
|
be used (example for CAN_RAW sockets without error checking):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int s;
|
|
|
|
struct sockaddr_can addr;
|
|
|
|
struct ifreq ifr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "can0" );
|
|
|
|
ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
addr.can_family = AF_CAN;
|
|
|
|
addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(..)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To bind a socket to all(!) CAN interfaces the interface index must
|
|
|
|
be 0 (zero). In this case the socket receives CAN frames from every
|
|
|
|
enabled CAN interface. To determine the originating CAN interface
|
|
|
|
the system call recvfrom(2) may be used instead of read(2). To send
|
|
|
|
on a socket that is bound to 'any' interface sendto(2) is needed to
|
|
|
|
specify the outgoing interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading CAN frames from a bound CAN_RAW socket (see above) consists
|
|
|
|
of reading a struct can_frame:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct can_frame frame;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nbytes = read(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (nbytes < 0) {
|
|
|
|
perror("can raw socket read");
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* paraniod check ... */
|
|
|
|
if (nbytes < sizeof(struct can_frame)) {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "read: incomplete CAN frame\n");
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* do something with the received CAN frame */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writing CAN frames can be done similarly, with the write(2) system call:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nbytes = write(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the CAN interface is bound to 'any' existing CAN interface
|
|
|
|
(addr.can_ifindex = 0) it is recommended to use recvfrom(2) if the
|
|
|
|
information about the originating CAN interface is needed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct sockaddr_can addr;
|
|
|
|
struct ifreq ifr;
|
|
|
|
socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
|
|
|
|
struct can_frame frame;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nbytes = recvfrom(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame),
|
|
|
|
0, (struct sockaddr*)&addr, &len);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* get interface name of the received CAN frame */
|
|
|
|
ifr.ifr_ifindex = addr.can_ifindex;
|
|
|
|
ioctl(s, SIOCGIFNAME, &ifr);
|
|
|
|
printf("Received a CAN frame from interface %s", ifr.ifr_name);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To write CAN frames on sockets bound to 'any' CAN interface the
|
|
|
|
outgoing interface has to be defined certainly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "can0");
|
|
|
|
ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr);
|
|
|
|
addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex;
|
|
|
|
addr.can_family = AF_CAN;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nbytes = sendto(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame),
|
|
|
|
0, (struct sockaddr*)&addr, sizeof(addr));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 RAW protocol sockets with can_filters (SOCK_RAW)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using CAN_RAW sockets is extensively comparable to the commonly
|
|
|
|
known access to CAN character devices. To meet the new possibilities
|
|
|
|
provided by the multi user SocketCAN approach, some reasonable
|
|
|
|
defaults are set at RAW socket binding time:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The filters are set to exactly one filter receiving everything
|
|
|
|
- The socket only receives valid data frames (=> no error frames)
|
|
|
|
- The loopback of sent CAN frames is enabled (see chapter 3.2)
|
|
|
|
- The socket does not receive its own sent frames (in loopback mode)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These default settings may be changed before or after binding the socket.
|
|
|
|
To use the referenced definitions of the socket options for CAN_RAW
|
|
|
|
sockets, include <linux/can/raw.h>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1.1 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_FILTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reception of CAN frames using CAN_RAW sockets can be controlled
|
|
|
|
by defining 0 .. n filters with the CAN_RAW_FILTER socket option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CAN filter structure is defined in include/linux/can.h:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct can_filter {
|
|
|
|
canid_t can_id;
|
|
|
|
canid_t can_mask;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A filter matches, when
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<received_can_id> & mask == can_id & mask
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which is analogous to known CAN controllers hardware filter semantics.
|
|
|
|
The filter can be inverted in this semantic, when the CAN_INV_FILTER
|
|
|
|
bit is set in can_id element of the can_filter structure. In
|
|
|
|
contrast to CAN controller hardware filters the user may set 0 .. n
|
|
|
|
receive filters for each open socket separately:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct can_filter rfilter[2];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rfilter[0].can_id = 0x123;
|
|
|
|
rfilter[0].can_mask = CAN_SFF_MASK;
|
|
|
|
rfilter[1].can_id = 0x200;
|
|
|
|
rfilter[1].can_mask = 0x700;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, &rfilter, sizeof(rfilter));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To disable the reception of CAN frames on the selected CAN_RAW socket:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, NULL, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To set the filters to zero filters is quite obsolete as not read
|
|
|
|
data causes the raw socket to discard the received CAN frames. But
|
|
|
|
having this 'send only' use-case we may remove the receive list in the
|
|
|
|
Kernel to save a little (really a very little!) CPU usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1.2 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in chapter 3.4 the CAN interface driver can generate so
|
|
|
|
called Error Frames that can optionally be passed to the user
|
|
|
|
application in the same way as other CAN frames. The possible
|
|
|
|
errors are divided into different error classes that may be filtered
|
|
|
|
using the appropriate error mask. To register for every possible
|
|
|
|
error condition CAN_ERR_MASK can be used as value for the error mask.
|
|
|
|
The values for the error mask are defined in linux/can/error.h .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
can_err_mask_t err_mask = ( CAN_ERR_TX_TIMEOUT | CAN_ERR_BUSOFF );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER,
|
|
|
|
&err_mask, sizeof(err_mask));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1.3 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To meet multi user needs the local loopback is enabled by default
|
|
|
|
(see chapter 3.2 for details). But in some embedded use-cases
|
|
|
|
(e.g. when only one application uses the CAN bus) this loopback
|
|
|
|
functionality can be disabled (separately for each socket):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int loopback = 0; /* 0 = disabled, 1 = enabled (default) */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK, &loopback, sizeof(loopback));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1.4 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the local loopback is enabled, all the sent CAN frames are
|
|
|
|
looped back to the open CAN sockets that registered for the CAN
|
|
|
|
frames' CAN-ID on this given interface to meet the multi user
|
|
|
|
needs. The reception of the CAN frames on the same socket that was
|
|
|
|
sending the CAN frame is assumed to be unwanted and therefore
|
|
|
|
disabled by default. This default behaviour may be changed on
|
|
|
|
demand:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int recv_own_msgs = 1; /* 0 = disabled (default), 1 = enabled */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS,
|
|
|
|
&recv_own_msgs, sizeof(recv_own_msgs));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 Broadcast Manager protocol sockets (SOCK_DGRAM)
|
|
|
|
4.3 connected transport protocols (SOCK_SEQPACKET)
|
|
|
|
4.4 unconnected transport protocols (SOCK_DGRAM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Socket CAN core module
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Socket CAN core module implements the protocol family
|
|
|
|
PF_CAN. CAN protocol modules are loaded by the core module at
|
|
|
|
runtime. The core module provides an interface for CAN protocol
|
|
|
|
modules to subscribe needed CAN IDs (see chapter 3.1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 can.ko module params
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- stats_timer: To calculate the Socket CAN core statistics
|
|
|
|
(e.g. current/maximum frames per second) this 1 second timer is
|
|
|
|
invoked at can.ko module start time by default. This timer can be
|
2008-07-26 10:45:33 +08:00
|
|
|
disabled by using stattimer=0 on the module commandline.
|
2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- debug: (removed since SocketCAN SVN r546)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 procfs content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in chapter 3.1 the Socket CAN core uses several filter
|
|
|
|
lists to deliver received CAN frames to CAN protocol modules. These
|
|
|
|
receive lists, their filters and the count of filter matches can be
|
|
|
|
checked in the appropriate receive list. All entries contain the
|
|
|
|
device and a protocol module identifier:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foo@bar:~$ cat /proc/net/can/rcvlist_all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receive list 'rx_all':
|
|
|
|
(vcan3: no entry)
|
|
|
|
(vcan2: no entry)
|
|
|
|
(vcan1: no entry)
|
|
|
|
device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident
|
|
|
|
vcan0 000 00000000 f88e6370 f6c6f400 0 raw
|
|
|
|
(any: no entry)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this example an application requests any CAN traffic from vcan0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rcvlist_all - list for unfiltered entries (no filter operations)
|
|
|
|
rcvlist_eff - list for single extended frame (EFF) entries
|
|
|
|
rcvlist_err - list for error frames masks
|
|
|
|
rcvlist_fil - list for mask/value filters
|
|
|
|
rcvlist_inv - list for mask/value filters (inverse semantic)
|
|
|
|
rcvlist_sff - list for single standard frame (SFF) entries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional procfs files in /proc/net/can
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stats - Socket CAN core statistics (rx/tx frames, match ratios, ...)
|
|
|
|
reset_stats - manual statistic reset
|
|
|
|
version - prints the Socket CAN core version and the ABI version
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 writing own CAN protocol modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To implement a new protocol in the protocol family PF_CAN a new
|
|
|
|
protocol has to be defined in include/linux/can.h .
|
|
|
|
The prototypes and definitions to use the Socket CAN core can be
|
|
|
|
accessed by including include/linux/can/core.h .
|
|
|
|
In addition to functions that register the CAN protocol and the
|
|
|
|
CAN device notifier chain there are functions to subscribe CAN
|
|
|
|
frames received by CAN interfaces and to send CAN frames:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
can_rx_register - subscribe CAN frames from a specific interface
|
|
|
|
can_rx_unregister - unsubscribe CAN frames from a specific interface
|
|
|
|
can_send - transmit a CAN frame (optional with local loopback)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For details see the kerneldoc documentation in net/can/af_can.c or
|
|
|
|
the source code of net/can/raw.c or net/can/bcm.c .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. CAN network drivers
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writing a CAN network device driver is much easier than writing a
|
|
|
|
CAN character device driver. Similar to other known network device
|
|
|
|
drivers you mainly have to deal with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- TX: Put the CAN frame from the socket buffer to the CAN controller.
|
|
|
|
- RX: Put the CAN frame from the CAN controller to the socket buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See e.g. at Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt . The differences
|
|
|
|
for writing CAN network device driver are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 general settings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev->type = ARPHRD_CAN; /* the netdevice hardware type */
|
|
|
|
dev->flags = IFF_NOARP; /* CAN has no arp */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev->mtu = sizeof(struct can_frame);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The struct can_frame is the payload of each socket buffer in the
|
|
|
|
protocol family PF_CAN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 local loopback of sent frames
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in chapter 3.2 the CAN network device driver should
|
|
|
|
support a local loopback functionality similar to the local echo
|
|
|
|
e.g. of tty devices. In this case the driver flag IFF_ECHO has to be
|
|
|
|
set to prevent the PF_CAN core from locally echoing sent frames
|
|
|
|
(aka loopback) as fallback solution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev->flags = (IFF_NOARP | IFF_ECHO);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 CAN controller hardware filters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To reduce the interrupt load on deep embedded systems some CAN
|
|
|
|
controllers support the filtering of CAN IDs or ranges of CAN IDs.
|
|
|
|
These hardware filter capabilities vary from controller to
|
|
|
|
controller and have to be identified as not feasible in a multi-user
|
|
|
|
networking approach. The use of the very controller specific
|
|
|
|
hardware filters could make sense in a very dedicated use-case, as a
|
|
|
|
filter on driver level would affect all users in the multi-user
|
|
|
|
system. The high efficient filter sets inside the PF_CAN core allow
|
|
|
|
to set different multiple filters for each socket separately.
|
|
|
|
Therefore the use of hardware filters goes to the category 'handmade
|
|
|
|
tuning on deep embedded systems'. The author is running a MPC603e
|
|
|
|
@133MHz with four SJA1000 CAN controllers from 2002 under heavy bus
|
|
|
|
load without any problems ...
|
|
|
|
|
2008-09-24 05:53:14 +08:00
|
|
|
6.4 The virtual CAN driver (vcan)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar to the network loopback devices, vcan offers a virtual local
|
|
|
|
CAN interface. A full qualified address on CAN consists of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- a unique CAN Identifier (CAN ID)
|
|
|
|
- the CAN bus this CAN ID is transmitted on (e.g. can0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so in common use cases more than one virtual CAN interface is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The virtual CAN interfaces allow the transmission and reception of CAN
|
|
|
|
frames without real CAN controller hardware. Virtual CAN network
|
|
|
|
devices are usually named 'vcanX', like vcan0 vcan1 vcan2 ...
|
|
|
|
When compiled as a module the virtual CAN driver module is called vcan.ko
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since Linux Kernel version 2.6.24 the vcan driver supports the Kernel
|
|
|
|
netlink interface to create vcan network devices. The creation and
|
|
|
|
removal of vcan network devices can be managed with the ip(8) tool:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Create a virtual CAN network interface:
|
|
|
|
ip link add type vcan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Create a virtual CAN network interface with a specific name 'vcan42':
|
|
|
|
ip link add dev vcan42 type vcan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Remove a (virtual CAN) network interface 'vcan42':
|
|
|
|
ip link del vcan42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tool 'vcan' from the SocketCAN SVN repository on BerliOS is obsolete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtual CAN network device creation in older Kernels:
|
|
|
|
In Linux Kernel versions < 2.6.24 the vcan driver creates 4 vcan
|
|
|
|
netdevices at module load time by default. This value can be changed
|
|
|
|
with the module parameter 'numdev'. E.g. 'modprobe vcan numdev=8'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 currently supported CAN hardware
|
2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the project website http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan
|
|
|
|
there are different drivers available:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vcan: Virtual CAN interface driver (if no real hardware is available)
|
|
|
|
sja1000: Philips SJA1000 CAN controller (recommended)
|
|
|
|
i82527: Intel i82527 CAN controller
|
|
|
|
mscan: Motorola/Freescale CAN controller (e.g. inside SOC MPC5200)
|
|
|
|
ccan: CCAN controller core (e.g. inside SOC h7202)
|
|
|
|
slcan: For a bunch of CAN adaptors that are attached via a
|
|
|
|
serial line ASCII protocol (for serial / USB adaptors)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally the different CAN adaptors (ISA/PCI/PCMCIA/USB/Parport)
|
|
|
|
from PEAK Systemtechnik support the CAN netdevice driver model
|
|
|
|
since Linux driver v6.0: http://www.peak-system.com/linux/index.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please check the Mailing Lists on the berlios OSS project website.
|
|
|
|
|
2008-09-24 05:53:14 +08:00
|
|
|
6.6 todo
|
2007-11-17 08:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The configuration interface for CAN network drivers is still an open
|
|
|
|
issue that has not been finalized in the socketcan project. Also the
|
|
|
|
idea of having a library module (candev.ko) that holds functions
|
|
|
|
that are needed by all CAN netdevices is not ready to ship.
|
|
|
|
Your contribution is welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Credits
|
|
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oliver Hartkopp (PF_CAN core, filters, drivers, bcm)
|
|
|
|
Urs Thuermann (PF_CAN core, kernel integration, socket interfaces, raw, vcan)
|
|
|
|
Jan Kizka (RT-SocketCAN core, Socket-API reconciliation)
|
|
|
|
Wolfgang Grandegger (RT-SocketCAN core & drivers, Raw Socket-API reviews)
|
|
|
|
Robert Schwebel (design reviews, PTXdist integration)
|
|
|
|
Marc Kleine-Budde (design reviews, Kernel 2.6 cleanups, drivers)
|
|
|
|
Benedikt Spranger (reviews)
|
|
|
|
Thomas Gleixner (LKML reviews, coding style, posting hints)
|
|
|
|
Andrey Volkov (kernel subtree structure, ioctls, mscan driver)
|
|
|
|
Matthias Brukner (first SJA1000 CAN netdevice implementation Q2/2003)
|
|
|
|
Klaus Hitschler (PEAK driver integration)
|
|
|
|
Uwe Koppe (CAN netdevices with PF_PACKET approach)
|
|
|
|
Michael Schulze (driver layer loopback requirement, RT CAN drivers review)
|