2007-02-10 17:46:01 +08:00
|
|
|
Semantics and Behavior of Local Atomic Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mathieu Desnoyers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document explains the purpose of the local atomic operations, how
|
|
|
|
to implement them for any given architecture and shows how they can be used
|
|
|
|
properly. It also stresses on the precautions that must be taken when reading
|
|
|
|
those local variables across CPUs when the order of memory writes matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Purpose of local atomic operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local atomic operations are meant to provide fast and highly reentrant per CPU
|
|
|
|
counters. They minimize the performance cost of standard atomic operations by
|
|
|
|
removing the LOCK prefix and memory barriers normally required to synchronize
|
|
|
|
across CPUs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Having fast per CPU atomic counters is interesting in many cases : it does not
|
|
|
|
require disabling interrupts to protect from interrupt handlers and it permits
|
|
|
|
coherent counters in NMI handlers. It is especially useful for tracing purposes
|
|
|
|
and for various performance monitoring counters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local atomic operations only guarantee variable modification atomicity wrt the
|
|
|
|
CPU which owns the data. Therefore, care must taken to make sure that only one
|
|
|
|
CPU writes to the local_t data. This is done by using per cpu data and making
|
|
|
|
sure that we modify it from within a preemption safe context. It is however
|
|
|
|
permitted to read local_t data from any CPU : it will then appear to be written
|
2007-10-17 14:29:29 +08:00
|
|
|
out of order wrt other memory writes by the owner CPU.
|
2007-02-10 17:46:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Implementation for a given architecture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It can be done by slightly modifying the standard atomic operations : only
|
|
|
|
their UP variant must be kept. It typically means removing LOCK prefix (on
|
|
|
|
i386 and x86_64) and any SMP sychronization barrier. If the architecture does
|
|
|
|
not have a different behavior between SMP and UP, including asm-generic/local.h
|
2008-07-26 10:45:33 +08:00
|
|
|
in your architecture's local.h is sufficient.
|
2007-02-10 17:46:01 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The local_t type is defined as an opaque signed long by embedding an
|
|
|
|
atomic_long_t inside a structure. This is made so a cast from this type to a
|
|
|
|
long fails. The definition looks like :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct { atomic_long_t a; } local_t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-17 14:29:28 +08:00
|
|
|
* Rules to follow when using local atomic operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Variables touched by local ops must be per cpu variables.
|
|
|
|
- _Only_ the CPU owner of these variables must write to them.
|
|
|
|
- This CPU can use local ops from any context (process, irq, softirq, nmi, ...)
|
|
|
|
to update its local_t variables.
|
|
|
|
- Preemption (or interrupts) must be disabled when using local ops in
|
|
|
|
process context to make sure the process won't be migrated to a
|
|
|
|
different CPU between getting the per-cpu variable and doing the
|
|
|
|
actual local op.
|
|
|
|
- When using local ops in interrupt context, no special care must be
|
|
|
|
taken on a mainline kernel, since they will run on the local CPU with
|
|
|
|
preemption already disabled. I suggest, however, to explicitly
|
|
|
|
disable preemption anyway to make sure it will still work correctly on
|
|
|
|
-rt kernels.
|
|
|
|
- Reading the local cpu variable will provide the current copy of the
|
|
|
|
variable.
|
|
|
|
- Reads of these variables can be done from any CPU, because updates to
|
|
|
|
"long", aligned, variables are always atomic. Since no memory
|
|
|
|
synchronization is done by the writer CPU, an outdated copy of the
|
|
|
|
variable can be read when reading some _other_ cpu's variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-02-10 17:46:01 +08:00
|
|
|
* How to use local atomic operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/local.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, counters) = LOCAL_INIT(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Counting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counting is done on all the bits of a signed long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In preemptible context, use get_cpu_var() and put_cpu_var() around local atomic
|
|
|
|
operations : it makes sure that preemption is disabled around write access to
|
|
|
|
the per cpu variable. For instance :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local_inc(&get_cpu_var(counters));
|
|
|
|
put_cpu_var(counters);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are already in a preemption-safe context, you can directly use
|
|
|
|
__get_cpu_var() instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local_inc(&__get_cpu_var(counters));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Reading the counters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those local counters can be read from foreign CPUs to sum the count. Note that
|
|
|
|
the data seen by local_read across CPUs must be considered to be out of order
|
|
|
|
relatively to other memory writes happening on the CPU that owns the data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
long sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
|
|
|
|
sum += local_read(&per_cpu(counters, cpu));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to use a remote local_read to synchronize access to a resource
|
|
|
|
between CPUs, explicit smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() memory barriers must be used
|
|
|
|
respectively on the writer and the reader CPUs. It would be the case if you use
|
|
|
|
the local_t variable as a counter of bytes written in a buffer : there should
|
|
|
|
be a smp_wmb() between the buffer write and the counter increment and also a
|
|
|
|
smp_rmb() between the counter read and the buffer read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a sample module which implements a basic per cpu counter using local.h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--- BEGIN ---
|
|
|
|
/* test-local.c
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Sample module for local.h usage.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/local.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/timer.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, counters) = LOCAL_INIT(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct timer_list test_timer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* IPI called on each CPU. */
|
|
|
|
static void test_each(void *info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Increment the counter from a non preemptible context */
|
|
|
|
printk("Increment on cpu %d\n", smp_processor_id());
|
|
|
|
local_inc(&__get_cpu_var(counters));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* This is what incrementing the variable would look like within a
|
|
|
|
* preemptible context (it disables preemption) :
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* local_inc(&get_cpu_var(counters));
|
|
|
|
* put_cpu_var(counters);
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void do_test_timer(unsigned long data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int cpu;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Increment the counters */
|
2008-12-01 18:46:38 +08:00
|
|
|
on_each_cpu(test_each, NULL, 1);
|
2007-02-10 17:46:01 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Read all the counters */
|
|
|
|
printk("Counters read from CPU %d\n", smp_processor_id());
|
|
|
|
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
|
|
|
|
printk("Read : CPU %d, count %ld\n", cpu,
|
|
|
|
local_read(&per_cpu(counters, cpu)));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
del_timer(&test_timer);
|
|
|
|
test_timer.expires = jiffies + 1000;
|
|
|
|
add_timer(&test_timer);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int __init test_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* initialize the timer that will increment the counter */
|
|
|
|
init_timer(&test_timer);
|
|
|
|
test_timer.function = do_test_timer;
|
|
|
|
test_timer.expires = jiffies + 1;
|
|
|
|
add_timer(&test_timer);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __exit test_exit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
del_timer_sync(&test_timer);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module_init(test_init);
|
|
|
|
module_exit(test_exit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_AUTHOR("Mathieu Desnoyers");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Local Atomic Ops");
|
|
|
|
--- END ---
|