86 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
86 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
||
|
.. Copyright © 2017-2020 Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
|
||
|
.. Copyright © 2019-2020 ANSSI
|
||
|
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
Landlock LSM: kernel documentation
|
||
|
==================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
:Author: Mickaël Salaün
|
||
|
:Date: March 2021
|
||
|
|
||
|
Landlock's goal is to create scoped access-control (i.e. sandboxing). To
|
||
|
harden a whole system, this feature should be available to any process,
|
||
|
including unprivileged ones. Because such process may be compromised or
|
||
|
backdoored (i.e. untrusted), Landlock's features must be safe to use from the
|
||
|
kernel and other processes point of view. Landlock's interface must therefore
|
||
|
expose a minimal attack surface.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Landlock is designed to be usable by unprivileged processes while following the
|
||
|
system security policy enforced by other access control mechanisms (e.g. DAC,
|
||
|
LSM). Indeed, a Landlock rule shall not interfere with other access-controls
|
||
|
enforced on the system, only add more restrictions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Any user can enforce Landlock rulesets on their processes. They are merged and
|
||
|
evaluated according to the inherited ones in a way that ensures that only more
|
||
|
constraints can be added.
|
||
|
|
||
|
User space documentation can be found here: :doc:`/userspace-api/landlock`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Guiding principles for safe access controls
|
||
|
===========================================
|
||
|
|
||
|
* A Landlock rule shall be focused on access control on kernel objects instead
|
||
|
of syscall filtering (i.e. syscall arguments), which is the purpose of
|
||
|
seccomp-bpf.
|
||
|
* To avoid multiple kinds of side-channel attacks (e.g. leak of security
|
||
|
policies, CPU-based attacks), Landlock rules shall not be able to
|
||
|
programmatically communicate with user space.
|
||
|
* Kernel access check shall not slow down access request from unsandboxed
|
||
|
processes.
|
||
|
* Computation related to Landlock operations (e.g. enforcing a ruleset) shall
|
||
|
only impact the processes requesting them.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tests
|
||
|
=====
|
||
|
|
||
|
Userspace tests for backward compatibility, ptrace restrictions and filesystem
|
||
|
support can be found here: `tools/testing/selftests/landlock/`_.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Kernel structures
|
||
|
=================
|
||
|
|
||
|
Object
|
||
|
------
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/object.h
|
||
|
:identifiers:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Filesystem
|
||
|
----------
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/fs.h
|
||
|
:identifiers:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ruleset and domain
|
||
|
------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
A domain is a read-only ruleset tied to a set of subjects (i.e. tasks'
|
||
|
credentials). Each time a ruleset is enforced on a task, the current domain is
|
||
|
duplicated and the ruleset is imported as a new layer of rules in the new
|
||
|
domain. Indeed, once in a domain, each rule is tied to a layer level. To
|
||
|
grant access to an object, at least one rule of each layer must allow the
|
||
|
requested action on the object. A task can then only transit to a new domain
|
||
|
that is the intersection of the constraints from the current domain and those
|
||
|
of a ruleset provided by the task.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The definition of a subject is implicit for a task sandboxing itself, which
|
||
|
makes the reasoning much easier and helps avoid pitfalls.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/ruleset.h
|
||
|
:identifiers:
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. Links
|
||
|
.. _tools/testing/selftests/landlock/:
|
||
|
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/
|