OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c

467 lines
11 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Driver for Aeroflex Gaisler GRGPIO General Purpose I/O cores.
*
* 2013 (c) Aeroflex Gaisler AB
*
* This driver supports the GRGPIO GPIO core available in the GRLIB VHDL
* IP core library.
*
* Full documentation of the GRGPIO core can be found here:
* http://www.gaisler.com/products/grlib/grip.pdf
*
* See "Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-grgpio.txt" for
* information on open firmware properties.
*
* Contributors: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#define GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO 32
#define GRGPIO_DATA 0x00
#define GRGPIO_OUTPUT 0x04
#define GRGPIO_DIR 0x08
#define GRGPIO_IMASK 0x0c
#define GRGPIO_IPOL 0x10
#define GRGPIO_IEDGE 0x14
#define GRGPIO_BYPASS 0x18
#define GRGPIO_IMAP_BASE 0x20
/* Structure for an irq of the core - called an underlying irq */
struct grgpio_uirq {
u8 refcnt; /* Reference counter to manage requesting/freeing of uirq */
u8 uirq; /* Underlying irq of the gpio driver */
};
/*
* Structure for an irq of a gpio line handed out by this driver. The index is
* used to map to the corresponding underlying irq.
*/
struct grgpio_lirq {
s8 index; /* Index into struct grgpio_priv's uirqs, or -1 */
u8 irq; /* irq for the gpio line */
};
struct grgpio_priv {
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
struct gpio_chip gc;
void __iomem *regs;
struct device *dev;
u32 imask; /* irq mask shadow register */
/*
* The grgpio core can have multiple "underlying" irqs. The gpio lines
* can be mapped to any one or none of these underlying irqs
* independently of each other. This driver sets up an irq domain and
* hands out separate irqs to each gpio line
*/
struct irq_domain *domain;
/*
* This array contains information on each underlying irq, each
* irq of the grgpio core itself.
*/
struct grgpio_uirq uirqs[GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO];
/*
* This array contains information for each gpio line on the irqs
* obtains from this driver. An index value of -1 for a certain gpio
* line indicates that the line has no irq. Otherwise the index connects
* the irq to the underlying irq by pointing into the uirqs array.
*/
struct grgpio_lirq lirqs[GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO];
};
static void grgpio_set_imask(struct grgpio_priv *priv, unsigned int offset,
int val)
{
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
struct gpio_chip *gc = &priv->gc;
if (val)
priv->imask |= BIT(offset);
else
priv->imask &= ~BIT(offset);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
gc->write_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IMASK, priv->imask);
}
static int grgpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
{
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
struct grgpio_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
if (offset >= gc->ngpio)
return -ENXIO;
if (priv->lirqs[offset].index < 0)
return -ENXIO;
return irq_create_mapping(priv->domain, offset);
}
/* -------------------- IRQ chip functions -------------------- */
static int grgpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
unsigned long flags;
u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq);
u32 ipol;
u32 iedge;
u32 pol;
u32 edge;
switch (type) {
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
pol = 0;
edge = 0;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
pol = mask;
edge = 0;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
pol = 0;
edge = mask;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
pol = mask;
edge = mask;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
ipol = priv->gc.read_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IPOL) & ~mask;
iedge = priv->gc.read_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IEDGE) & ~mask;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
priv->gc.write_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IPOL, ipol | pol);
priv->gc.write_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IEDGE, iedge | edge);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
static void grgpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
int offset = d->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
grgpio_set_imask(priv, offset, 0);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static void grgpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
int offset = d->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
grgpio_set_imask(priv, offset, 1);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static struct irq_chip grgpio_irq_chip = {
.name = "grgpio",
.irq_mask = grgpio_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = grgpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = grgpio_irq_set_type,
};
static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = dev;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
int ngpio = priv->gc.ngpio;
unsigned long flags;
int i;
int match = 0;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/*
* For each gpio line, call its interrupt handler if it its underlying
* irq matches the current irq that is handled.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ngpio; i++) {
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq = &priv->lirqs[i];
if (priv->imask & BIT(i) && lirq->index >= 0 &&
priv->uirqs[lirq->index].uirq == irq) {
generic_handle_irq(lirq->irq);
match = 1;
}
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
if (!match)
dev_warn(priv->dev, "No gpio line matched irq %d\n", irq);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
/*
* This function will be called as a consequence of the call to
* irq_create_mapping in grgpio_to_irq
*/
static int grgpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = d->host_data;
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq;
struct grgpio_uirq *uirq;
unsigned long flags;
int offset = hwirq;
int ret = 0;
if (!priv)
return -EINVAL;
lirq = &priv->lirqs[offset];
if (lirq->index < 0)
return -EINVAL;
dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Mapping irq %d for gpio line %d\n",
irq, offset);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/* Request underlying irq if not already requested */
lirq->irq = irq;
uirq = &priv->uirqs[lirq->index];
if (uirq->refcnt == 0) {
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
ret = request_irq(uirq->uirq, grgpio_irq_handler, 0,
dev_name(priv->dev), priv);
if (ret) {
dev_err(priv->dev,
"Could not request underlying irq %d\n",
uirq->uirq);
return ret;
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
uirq->refcnt++;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/* Setup irq */
irq_set_chip_data(irq, priv);
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &grgpio_irq_chip,
handle_simple_irq);
irq_set_noprobe(irq);
return ret;
}
static void grgpio_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = d->host_data;
int index;
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq;
struct grgpio_uirq *uirq;
unsigned long flags;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
int ngpio = priv->gc.ngpio;
int i;
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/* Free underlying irq if last user unmapped */
index = -1;
for (i = 0; i < ngpio; i++) {
lirq = &priv->lirqs[i];
if (lirq->irq == irq) {
grgpio_set_imask(priv, i, 0);
lirq->irq = 0;
index = lirq->index;
break;
}
}
WARN_ON(index < 0);
if (index >= 0) {
uirq = &priv->uirqs[lirq->index];
uirq->refcnt--;
if (uirq->refcnt == 0) {
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
free_irq(uirq->uirq, priv);
return;
}
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
2022-04-19 09:28:10 +08:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static const struct irq_domain_ops grgpio_irq_domain_ops = {
.map = grgpio_irq_map,
.unmap = grgpio_irq_unmap,
};
/* ------------------------------------------------------------ */
static int grgpio_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
void __iomem *regs;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
struct grgpio_priv *priv;
int err;
u32 prop;
s32 *irqmap;
int size;
int i;
priv = devm_kzalloc(&ofdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;
regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(ofdev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(regs))
return PTR_ERR(regs);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
gc = &priv->gc;
err = bgpio_init(gc, &ofdev->dev, 4, regs + GRGPIO_DATA,
regs + GRGPIO_OUTPUT, NULL, regs + GRGPIO_DIR, NULL,
BGPIOF_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER);
if (err) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "bgpio_init() failed\n");
return err;
}
priv->regs = regs;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
priv->imask = gc->read_reg(regs + GRGPIO_IMASK);
priv->dev = &ofdev->dev;
gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
gc->to_irq = grgpio_to_irq;
gc->label = devm_kasprintf(&ofdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
gc->base = -1;
err = of_property_read_u32(np, "nbits", &prop);
if (err || prop <= 0 || prop > GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO) {
gc->ngpio = GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO;
dev_dbg(&ofdev->dev,
"No or invalid nbits property: assume %d\n", gc->ngpio);
} else {
gc->ngpio = prop;
}
/*
* The irqmap contains the index values indicating which underlying irq,
* if anyone, is connected to that line
*/
irqmap = (s32 *)of_get_property(np, "irqmap", &size);
if (irqmap) {
if (size < gc->ngpio) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev,
"irqmap shorter than ngpio (%d < %d)\n",
size, gc->ngpio);
return -EINVAL;
}
priv->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(np, gc->ngpio,
&grgpio_irq_domain_ops,
priv);
if (!priv->domain) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "Could not add irq domain\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq;
int ret;
lirq = &priv->lirqs[i];
lirq->index = irqmap[i];
if (lirq->index < 0)
continue;
ret = platform_get_irq(ofdev, lirq->index);
if (ret <= 0) {
/*
* Continue without irq functionality for that
* gpio line
*/
continue;
}
priv->uirqs[lirq->index].uirq = ret;
}
}
platform_set_drvdata(ofdev, priv);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
err = gpiochip_add_data(gc, priv);
if (err) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "Could not add gpiochip\n");
if (priv->domain)
irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
return err;
}
dev_info(&ofdev->dev, "regs=0x%p, base=%d, ngpio=%d, irqs=%s\n",
priv->regs, gc->base, gc->ngpio, priv->domain ? "on" : "off");
return 0;
}
static int grgpio_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(ofdev);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 21:02:58 +08:00
gpiochip_remove(&priv->gc);
if (priv->domain)
irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id grgpio_match[] = {
{.name = "GAISLER_GPIO"},
{.name = "01_01a"},
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, grgpio_match);
static struct platform_driver grgpio_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "grgpio",
.of_match_table = grgpio_match,
},
.probe = grgpio_probe,
.remove = grgpio_remove,
};
module_platform_driver(grgpio_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Aeroflex Gaisler AB.");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for Aeroflex Gaisler GRGPIO");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");