OpenCloudOS-Kernel/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c

812 lines
22 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
*
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2012
* Author Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
*
* Cgroup v2
* Copyright (C) 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
* Author: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of version 2.1 of the GNU Lesser General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
*
*/
#include <linux/cgroup.h>
#include <linux/page_counter.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
#include <linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h>
#define MEMFILE_PRIVATE(x, val) (((x) << 16) | (val))
#define MEMFILE_IDX(val) (((val) >> 16) & 0xffff)
#define MEMFILE_ATTR(val) ((val) & 0xffff)
#define hugetlb_cgroup_from_counter(counter, idx) \
container_of(counter, struct hugetlb_cgroup, hugepage[idx])
static struct hugetlb_cgroup *root_h_cgroup __read_mostly;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
static inline struct page_counter *
__hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg, int idx,
bool rsvd)
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
{
if (rsvd)
return &h_cg->rsvd_hugepage[idx];
return &h_cg->hugepage[idx];
}
static inline struct page_counter *
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg, int idx)
{
return __hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx, false);
}
static inline struct page_counter *
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg, int idx)
{
return __hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx, true);
}
static inline
struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
{
return s ? container_of(s, struct hugetlb_cgroup, css) : NULL;
}
static inline
struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *task)
{
cgroup: clean up cgroup_subsys names and initialization cgroup_subsys is a bit messier than it needs to be. * The name of a subsys can be different from its internal identifier defined in cgroup_subsys.h. Most subsystems use the matching name but three - cpu, memory and perf_event - use different ones. * cgroup_subsys_id enums are postfixed with _subsys_id and each cgroup_subsys is postfixed with _subsys. cgroup.h is widely included throughout various subsystems, it doesn't and shouldn't have claim on such generic names which don't have any qualifier indicating that they belong to cgroup. * cgroup_subsys->subsys_id should always equal the matching cgroup_subsys_id enum; however, we require each controller to initialize it and then BUG if they don't match, which is a bit silly. This patch cleans up cgroup_subsys names and initialization by doing the followings. * cgroup_subsys_id enums are now postfixed with _cgrp_id, and each cgroup_subsys with _cgrp_subsys. * With the above, renaming subsys identifiers to match the userland visible names doesn't cause any naming conflicts. All non-matching identifiers are renamed to match the official names. cpu_cgroup -> cpu mem_cgroup -> memory perf -> perf_event * controllers no longer need to initialize ->subsys_id and ->name. They're generated in cgroup core and set automatically during boot. * Redundant cgroup_subsys declarations removed. * While updating BUG_ON()s in cgroup_init_early(), convert them to WARN()s. BUGging that early during boot is stupid - the kernel can't print anything, even through serial console and the trap handler doesn't even link stack frame properly for back-tracing. This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes. v2: Rebased on top of fe1217c4f3f7 ("net: net_cls: move cgroupfs classid handling into core"). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
2014-02-08 23:36:58 +08:00
return hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(task_css(task, hugetlb_cgrp_id));
}
static inline bool hugetlb_cgroup_is_root(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
return (h_cg == root_h_cgroup);
}
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *
parent_hugetlb_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
return hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(h_cg->css.parent);
}
static inline bool hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
int idx;
for (idx = 0; idx < hugetlb_max_hstate; idx++) {
if (page_counter_read(
hugetlb_cgroup: fix offline of hugetlb cgroup with reservations Adrian Moreno was ruuning a kubernetes 1.19 + containerd/docker workload using hugetlbfs. In this environment the issue is reproduced by: - Start a simple pod that uses the recently added HugePages medium feature (pod yaml attached) - Start a DPDK app. It doesn't need to run successfully (as in transfer packets) nor interact with real hardware. It seems just initializing the EAL layer (which handles hugepage reservation and locking) is enough to trigger the issue - Delete the Pod (or let it "Complete"). This would result in a kworker thread going into a tight loop (top output): 1425 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 99.7 0.0 5:22.45 kworker/28:7+cgroup_destroy 'perf top -g' reports: - 63.28% 0.01% [kernel] [k] worker_thread - 49.97% worker_thread - 52.64% process_one_work - 62.08% css_killed_work_fn - hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline 41.52% _raw_spin_lock - 2.82% _cond_resched rcu_all_qs 2.66% PageHuge - 0.57% schedule - 0.57% __schedule We are spinning in the do-while loop in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline. Worse yet, we are holding the master cgroup lock (cgroup_mutex) while infinitely spinning. Little else can be done on the system as the cgroup_mutex can not be acquired. Do note that the issue can be reproduced by simply offlining a hugetlb cgroup containing pages with reservation counts. The loop in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline is moving page counts from the cgroup being offlined to the parent cgroup. This is done for each hstate, and is repeated until hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage returns false. The routine moving counts (hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent) is only moving 'usage' counts. The routine hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage is checking for both 'usage' and 'reservation' counts. Discussion about what to do with reservation counts when reparenting was discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAHS8izMFAYTgxym-Hzb_JmkTK1N_S9tGN71uS6MFV+R7swYu5A@mail.gmail.com/ The decision was made to leave a zombie cgroup for with reservation counts. Unfortunately, the code checking reservation counts was incorrectly added to hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage. To fix the issue, simply remove the check for reservation counts. While fixing this issue, a related bug in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline was noticed. The hstate index is not reinitialized each time through the do-while loop. Fix this as well. Fixes: 1adc4d419aa2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add interface for charge/uncharge hugetlb reservations") Reported-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203220242.158165-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-06 14:15:12 +08:00
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx)))
return true;
}
return false;
}
static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *parent_h_cgroup)
{
int idx;
for (idx = 0; idx < HUGE_MAX_HSTATE; idx++) {
struct page_counter *fault_parent = NULL;
struct page_counter *rsvd_parent = NULL;
unsigned long limit;
int ret;
if (parent_h_cgroup) {
fault_parent = hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(
parent_h_cgroup, idx);
rsvd_parent = hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(
parent_h_cgroup, idx);
}
page_counter_init(hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cgroup,
idx),
fault_parent);
page_counter_init(
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(h_cgroup, idx),
rsvd_parent);
limit = round_down(PAGE_COUNTER_MAX,
pages_per_huge_page(&hstates[idx]));
ret = page_counter_set_max(
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cgroup, idx),
limit);
VM_BUG_ON(ret);
ret = page_counter_set_max(
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(h_cgroup, idx),
limit);
VM_BUG_ON(ret);
}
}
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in subsystem methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup * in subsystem implementations for the following reasons. * With unified hierarchy, subsystems will be dynamically bound and unbound from cgroups and thus css's (cgroup_subsys_state) may be created and destroyed dynamically over the lifetime of a cgroup, which is different from the current state where all css's are allocated and destroyed together with the associated cgroup. This in turn means that cgroup_css() should be synchronized and may return NULL, making it more cumbersome to use. * Differing levels of per-subsystem granularity in the unified hierarchy means that the task and descendant iterators should behave differently depending on the specific subsystem the iteration is being performed for. * In majority of the cases, subsystems only care about its part in the cgroup hierarchy - ie. the hierarchy of css's. Subsystem methods often obtain the matching css pointer from the cgroup and don't bother with the cgroup pointer itself. Passing around css fits much better. This patch converts all cgroup_subsys methods to take @css instead of @cgroup. The conversions are mostly straight-forward. A few noteworthy changes are * ->css_alloc() now takes css of the parent cgroup rather than the pointer to the new cgroup as the css for the new cgroup doesn't exist yet. Knowing the parent css is enough for all the existing subsystems. * In kernel/cgroup.c::offline_css(), unnecessary open coded css dereference is replaced with local variable access. This patch shouldn't cause any behavior differences. v2: Unnecessary explicit cgrp->subsys[] deref in css_online() replaced with local variable @css as suggested by Li Zefan. Rebased on top of new for-3.12 which includes for-3.11-fixes so that ->css_free() invocation added by da0a12caff ("cgroup: fix a leak when percpu_ref_init() fails") is converted too. Suggested by Li Zefan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:23 +08:00
static struct cgroup_subsys_state *
hugetlb_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent_css)
{
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in subsystem methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup * in subsystem implementations for the following reasons. * With unified hierarchy, subsystems will be dynamically bound and unbound from cgroups and thus css's (cgroup_subsys_state) may be created and destroyed dynamically over the lifetime of a cgroup, which is different from the current state where all css's are allocated and destroyed together with the associated cgroup. This in turn means that cgroup_css() should be synchronized and may return NULL, making it more cumbersome to use. * Differing levels of per-subsystem granularity in the unified hierarchy means that the task and descendant iterators should behave differently depending on the specific subsystem the iteration is being performed for. * In majority of the cases, subsystems only care about its part in the cgroup hierarchy - ie. the hierarchy of css's. Subsystem methods often obtain the matching css pointer from the cgroup and don't bother with the cgroup pointer itself. Passing around css fits much better. This patch converts all cgroup_subsys methods to take @css instead of @cgroup. The conversions are mostly straight-forward. A few noteworthy changes are * ->css_alloc() now takes css of the parent cgroup rather than the pointer to the new cgroup as the css for the new cgroup doesn't exist yet. Knowing the parent css is enough for all the existing subsystems. * In kernel/cgroup.c::offline_css(), unnecessary open coded css dereference is replaced with local variable access. This patch shouldn't cause any behavior differences. v2: Unnecessary explicit cgrp->subsys[] deref in css_online() replaced with local variable @css as suggested by Li Zefan. Rebased on top of new for-3.12 which includes for-3.11-fixes so that ->css_free() invocation added by da0a12caff ("cgroup: fix a leak when percpu_ref_init() fails") is converted too. Suggested by Li Zefan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:23 +08:00
struct hugetlb_cgroup *parent_h_cgroup = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(parent_css);
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup;
h_cgroup = kzalloc(sizeof(*h_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!h_cgroup)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (!parent_h_cgroup)
root_h_cgroup = h_cgroup;
hugetlb_cgroup_init(h_cgroup, parent_h_cgroup);
return &h_cgroup->css;
}
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in subsystem methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup * in subsystem implementations for the following reasons. * With unified hierarchy, subsystems will be dynamically bound and unbound from cgroups and thus css's (cgroup_subsys_state) may be created and destroyed dynamically over the lifetime of a cgroup, which is different from the current state where all css's are allocated and destroyed together with the associated cgroup. This in turn means that cgroup_css() should be synchronized and may return NULL, making it more cumbersome to use. * Differing levels of per-subsystem granularity in the unified hierarchy means that the task and descendant iterators should behave differently depending on the specific subsystem the iteration is being performed for. * In majority of the cases, subsystems only care about its part in the cgroup hierarchy - ie. the hierarchy of css's. Subsystem methods often obtain the matching css pointer from the cgroup and don't bother with the cgroup pointer itself. Passing around css fits much better. This patch converts all cgroup_subsys methods to take @css instead of @cgroup. The conversions are mostly straight-forward. A few noteworthy changes are * ->css_alloc() now takes css of the parent cgroup rather than the pointer to the new cgroup as the css for the new cgroup doesn't exist yet. Knowing the parent css is enough for all the existing subsystems. * In kernel/cgroup.c::offline_css(), unnecessary open coded css dereference is replaced with local variable access. This patch shouldn't cause any behavior differences. v2: Unnecessary explicit cgrp->subsys[] deref in css_online() replaced with local variable @css as suggested by Li Zefan. Rebased on top of new for-3.12 which includes for-3.11-fixes so that ->css_free() invocation added by da0a12caff ("cgroup: fix a leak when percpu_ref_init() fails") is converted too. Suggested by Li Zefan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:23 +08:00
static void hugetlb_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
{
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup;
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in subsystem methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup * in subsystem implementations for the following reasons. * With unified hierarchy, subsystems will be dynamically bound and unbound from cgroups and thus css's (cgroup_subsys_state) may be created and destroyed dynamically over the lifetime of a cgroup, which is different from the current state where all css's are allocated and destroyed together with the associated cgroup. This in turn means that cgroup_css() should be synchronized and may return NULL, making it more cumbersome to use. * Differing levels of per-subsystem granularity in the unified hierarchy means that the task and descendant iterators should behave differently depending on the specific subsystem the iteration is being performed for. * In majority of the cases, subsystems only care about its part in the cgroup hierarchy - ie. the hierarchy of css's. Subsystem methods often obtain the matching css pointer from the cgroup and don't bother with the cgroup pointer itself. Passing around css fits much better. This patch converts all cgroup_subsys methods to take @css instead of @cgroup. The conversions are mostly straight-forward. A few noteworthy changes are * ->css_alloc() now takes css of the parent cgroup rather than the pointer to the new cgroup as the css for the new cgroup doesn't exist yet. Knowing the parent css is enough for all the existing subsystems. * In kernel/cgroup.c::offline_css(), unnecessary open coded css dereference is replaced with local variable access. This patch shouldn't cause any behavior differences. v2: Unnecessary explicit cgrp->subsys[] deref in css_online() replaced with local variable @css as suggested by Li Zefan. Rebased on top of new for-3.12 which includes for-3.11-fixes so that ->css_free() invocation added by da0a12caff ("cgroup: fix a leak when percpu_ref_init() fails") is converted too. Suggested by Li Zefan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:23 +08:00
h_cgroup = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(css);
kfree(h_cgroup);
}
/*
* Should be called with hugetlb_lock held.
* Since we are holding hugetlb_lock, pages cannot get moved from
* active list or uncharged from the cgroup, So no need to get
* page reference and test for page active here. This function
* cannot fail.
*/
static void hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent(int idx, struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct page *page)
{
unsigned int nr_pages;
struct page_counter *counter;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *page_hcg;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *parent = parent_hugetlb_cgroup(h_cg);
page_hcg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_page(page);
/*
* We can have pages in active list without any cgroup
* ie, hugepage with less than 3 pages. We can safely
* ignore those pages.
*/
if (!page_hcg || page_hcg != h_cg)
goto out;
nr_pages = compound_nr(page);
if (!parent) {
parent = root_h_cgroup;
/* root has no limit */
page_counter_charge(&parent->hugepage[idx], nr_pages);
}
counter = &h_cg->hugepage[idx];
/* Take the pages off the local counter */
page_counter_cancel(counter, nr_pages);
set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, parent);
out:
return;
}
/*
* Force the hugetlb cgroup to empty the hugetlb resources by moving them to
* the parent cgroup.
*/
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in subsystem methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup * in subsystem implementations for the following reasons. * With unified hierarchy, subsystems will be dynamically bound and unbound from cgroups and thus css's (cgroup_subsys_state) may be created and destroyed dynamically over the lifetime of a cgroup, which is different from the current state where all css's are allocated and destroyed together with the associated cgroup. This in turn means that cgroup_css() should be synchronized and may return NULL, making it more cumbersome to use. * Differing levels of per-subsystem granularity in the unified hierarchy means that the task and descendant iterators should behave differently depending on the specific subsystem the iteration is being performed for. * In majority of the cases, subsystems only care about its part in the cgroup hierarchy - ie. the hierarchy of css's. Subsystem methods often obtain the matching css pointer from the cgroup and don't bother with the cgroup pointer itself. Passing around css fits much better. This patch converts all cgroup_subsys methods to take @css instead of @cgroup. The conversions are mostly straight-forward. A few noteworthy changes are * ->css_alloc() now takes css of the parent cgroup rather than the pointer to the new cgroup as the css for the new cgroup doesn't exist yet. Knowing the parent css is enough for all the existing subsystems. * In kernel/cgroup.c::offline_css(), unnecessary open coded css dereference is replaced with local variable access. This patch shouldn't cause any behavior differences. v2: Unnecessary explicit cgrp->subsys[] deref in css_online() replaced with local variable @css as suggested by Li Zefan. Rebased on top of new for-3.12 which includes for-3.11-fixes so that ->css_free() invocation added by da0a12caff ("cgroup: fix a leak when percpu_ref_init() fails") is converted too. Suggested by Li Zefan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:23 +08:00
static void hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
{
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in subsystem methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup * in subsystem implementations for the following reasons. * With unified hierarchy, subsystems will be dynamically bound and unbound from cgroups and thus css's (cgroup_subsys_state) may be created and destroyed dynamically over the lifetime of a cgroup, which is different from the current state where all css's are allocated and destroyed together with the associated cgroup. This in turn means that cgroup_css() should be synchronized and may return NULL, making it more cumbersome to use. * Differing levels of per-subsystem granularity in the unified hierarchy means that the task and descendant iterators should behave differently depending on the specific subsystem the iteration is being performed for. * In majority of the cases, subsystems only care about its part in the cgroup hierarchy - ie. the hierarchy of css's. Subsystem methods often obtain the matching css pointer from the cgroup and don't bother with the cgroup pointer itself. Passing around css fits much better. This patch converts all cgroup_subsys methods to take @css instead of @cgroup. The conversions are mostly straight-forward. A few noteworthy changes are * ->css_alloc() now takes css of the parent cgroup rather than the pointer to the new cgroup as the css for the new cgroup doesn't exist yet. Knowing the parent css is enough for all the existing subsystems. * In kernel/cgroup.c::offline_css(), unnecessary open coded css dereference is replaced with local variable access. This patch shouldn't cause any behavior differences. v2: Unnecessary explicit cgrp->subsys[] deref in css_online() replaced with local variable @css as suggested by Li Zefan. Rebased on top of new for-3.12 which includes for-3.11-fixes so that ->css_free() invocation added by da0a12caff ("cgroup: fix a leak when percpu_ref_init() fails") is converted too. Suggested by Li Zefan. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:23 +08:00
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(css);
struct hstate *h;
struct page *page;
hugetlb_cgroup: fix offline of hugetlb cgroup with reservations Adrian Moreno was ruuning a kubernetes 1.19 + containerd/docker workload using hugetlbfs. In this environment the issue is reproduced by: - Start a simple pod that uses the recently added HugePages medium feature (pod yaml attached) - Start a DPDK app. It doesn't need to run successfully (as in transfer packets) nor interact with real hardware. It seems just initializing the EAL layer (which handles hugepage reservation and locking) is enough to trigger the issue - Delete the Pod (or let it "Complete"). This would result in a kworker thread going into a tight loop (top output): 1425 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 99.7 0.0 5:22.45 kworker/28:7+cgroup_destroy 'perf top -g' reports: - 63.28% 0.01% [kernel] [k] worker_thread - 49.97% worker_thread - 52.64% process_one_work - 62.08% css_killed_work_fn - hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline 41.52% _raw_spin_lock - 2.82% _cond_resched rcu_all_qs 2.66% PageHuge - 0.57% schedule - 0.57% __schedule We are spinning in the do-while loop in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline. Worse yet, we are holding the master cgroup lock (cgroup_mutex) while infinitely spinning. Little else can be done on the system as the cgroup_mutex can not be acquired. Do note that the issue can be reproduced by simply offlining a hugetlb cgroup containing pages with reservation counts. The loop in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline is moving page counts from the cgroup being offlined to the parent cgroup. This is done for each hstate, and is repeated until hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage returns false. The routine moving counts (hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent) is only moving 'usage' counts. The routine hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage is checking for both 'usage' and 'reservation' counts. Discussion about what to do with reservation counts when reparenting was discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAHS8izMFAYTgxym-Hzb_JmkTK1N_S9tGN71uS6MFV+R7swYu5A@mail.gmail.com/ The decision was made to leave a zombie cgroup for with reservation counts. Unfortunately, the code checking reservation counts was incorrectly added to hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage. To fix the issue, simply remove the check for reservation counts. While fixing this issue, a related bug in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline was noticed. The hstate index is not reinitialized each time through the do-while loop. Fix this as well. Fixes: 1adc4d419aa2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add interface for charge/uncharge hugetlb reservations") Reported-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203220242.158165-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-06 14:15:12 +08:00
int idx;
do {
hugetlb_cgroup: fix offline of hugetlb cgroup with reservations Adrian Moreno was ruuning a kubernetes 1.19 + containerd/docker workload using hugetlbfs. In this environment the issue is reproduced by: - Start a simple pod that uses the recently added HugePages medium feature (pod yaml attached) - Start a DPDK app. It doesn't need to run successfully (as in transfer packets) nor interact with real hardware. It seems just initializing the EAL layer (which handles hugepage reservation and locking) is enough to trigger the issue - Delete the Pod (or let it "Complete"). This would result in a kworker thread going into a tight loop (top output): 1425 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 99.7 0.0 5:22.45 kworker/28:7+cgroup_destroy 'perf top -g' reports: - 63.28% 0.01% [kernel] [k] worker_thread - 49.97% worker_thread - 52.64% process_one_work - 62.08% css_killed_work_fn - hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline 41.52% _raw_spin_lock - 2.82% _cond_resched rcu_all_qs 2.66% PageHuge - 0.57% schedule - 0.57% __schedule We are spinning in the do-while loop in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline. Worse yet, we are holding the master cgroup lock (cgroup_mutex) while infinitely spinning. Little else can be done on the system as the cgroup_mutex can not be acquired. Do note that the issue can be reproduced by simply offlining a hugetlb cgroup containing pages with reservation counts. The loop in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline is moving page counts from the cgroup being offlined to the parent cgroup. This is done for each hstate, and is repeated until hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage returns false. The routine moving counts (hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent) is only moving 'usage' counts. The routine hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage is checking for both 'usage' and 'reservation' counts. Discussion about what to do with reservation counts when reparenting was discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAHS8izMFAYTgxym-Hzb_JmkTK1N_S9tGN71uS6MFV+R7swYu5A@mail.gmail.com/ The decision was made to leave a zombie cgroup for with reservation counts. Unfortunately, the code checking reservation counts was incorrectly added to hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage. To fix the issue, simply remove the check for reservation counts. While fixing this issue, a related bug in hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline was noticed. The hstate index is not reinitialized each time through the do-while loop. Fix this as well. Fixes: 1adc4d419aa2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add interface for charge/uncharge hugetlb reservations") Reported-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203220242.158165-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-06 14:15:12 +08:00
idx = 0;
for_each_hstate(h) {
hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1]. : Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(hugetlb_lock); : local_irq_disable(); : lock(slock-AF_INET); : lock(hugetlb_lock); : <Interrupt> : lock(slock-AF_INET); Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead to a deadlock. This commit addresses the issue by doing the following: - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls. - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner. - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 09:35:07 +08:00
spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
list_for_each_entry(page, &h->hugepage_activelist, lru)
hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent(idx, h_cg, page);
hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1]. : Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(hugetlb_lock); : local_irq_disable(); : lock(slock-AF_INET); : lock(hugetlb_lock); : <Interrupt> : lock(slock-AF_INET); Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead to a deadlock. This commit addresses the issue by doing the following: - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls. - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner. - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 09:35:07 +08:00
spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
idx++;
}
cond_resched();
} while (hugetlb_cgroup_have_usage(h_cg));
}
static inline void hugetlb_event(struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb, int idx,
enum hugetlb_memory_event event)
{
atomic_long_inc(&hugetlb->events_local[idx][event]);
cgroup_file_notify(&hugetlb->events_local_file[idx]);
do {
atomic_long_inc(&hugetlb->events[idx][event]);
cgroup_file_notify(&hugetlb->events_file[idx]);
} while ((hugetlb = parent_hugetlb_cgroup(hugetlb)) &&
!hugetlb_cgroup_is_root(hugetlb));
}
static int __hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr,
bool rsvd)
{
int ret = 0;
struct page_counter *counter;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = NULL;
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled())
goto done;
/*
* We don't charge any cgroup if the compound page have less
* than 3 pages.
*/
if (huge_page_order(&hstates[idx]) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
goto done;
again:
rcu_read_lock();
h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_task(current);
if (!css_tryget(&h_cg->css)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
goto again;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
if (!page_counter_try_charge(
__hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx, rsvd),
nr_pages, &counter)) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
hugetlb_event(h_cg, idx, HUGETLB_MAX);
css_put(&h_cg->css);
goto done;
}
/* Reservations take a reference to the css because they do not get
* reparented.
*/
if (!rsvd)
css_put(&h_cg->css);
done:
*ptr = h_cg;
return ret;
}
int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr)
{
return __hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(idx, nr_pages, ptr, false);
}
int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr)
{
return __hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(idx, nr_pages, ptr, true);
}
/* Should be called with hugetlb_lock held */
static void __hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct page *page, bool rsvd)
{
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled() || !h_cg)
return;
__set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, h_cg, rsvd);
return;
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct page *page)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(idx, nr_pages, h_cg, page, false);
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct page *page)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(idx, nr_pages, h_cg, page, true);
}
/*
* Should be called with hugetlb_lock held
*/
static void __hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct page *page, bool rsvd)
{
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg;
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled())
return;
lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
h_cg = __hugetlb_cgroup_from_page(page, rsvd);
if (unlikely(!h_cg))
return;
__set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, NULL, rsvd);
page_counter_uncharge(__hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx,
rsvd),
nr_pages);
if (rsvd)
css_put(&h_cg->css);
return;
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct page *page)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(idx, nr_pages, page, false);
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct page *page)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(idx, nr_pages, page, true);
}
static void __hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
bool rsvd)
{
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled() || !h_cg)
return;
if (huge_page_order(&hstates[idx]) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
return;
page_counter_uncharge(__hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx,
rsvd),
nr_pages);
if (rsvd)
css_put(&h_cg->css);
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(idx, nr_pages, h_cg, false);
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(idx, nr_pages, h_cg, true);
}
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:21 +08:00
void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_counter(struct resv_map *resv, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:21 +08:00
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled() || !resv || !resv->reservation_counter ||
!resv->css)
return;
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:21 +08:00
page_counter_uncharge(resv->reservation_counter,
(end - start) * resv->pages_per_hpage);
css_put(resv->css);
}
void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_file_region(struct resv_map *resv,
struct file_region *rg,
hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 12:37:17 +08:00
unsigned long nr_pages,
bool region_del)
{
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled() || !resv || !rg || !nr_pages)
return;
if (rg->reservation_counter && resv->pages_per_hpage && nr_pages > 0 &&
!resv->reservation_counter) {
page_counter_uncharge(rg->reservation_counter,
nr_pages * resv->pages_per_hpage);
hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 12:37:17 +08:00
/*
* Only do css_put(rg->css) when we delete the entire region
* because one file_region must hold exactly one css reference.
*/
if (region_del)
css_put(rg->css);
}
}
enum {
RES_USAGE,
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
RES_RSVD_USAGE,
RES_LIMIT,
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
RES_RSVD_LIMIT,
RES_MAX_USAGE,
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
RES_RSVD_MAX_USAGE,
RES_FAILCNT,
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
RES_RSVD_FAILCNT,
};
static u64 hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
struct cftype *cft)
{
struct page_counter *counter;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
struct page_counter *rsvd_counter;
cgroup: pass around cgroup_subsys_state instead of cgroup in file methods cgroup is currently in the process of transitioning to using struct cgroup_subsys_state * as the primary handle instead of struct cgroup. Please see the previous commit which converts the subsystem methods for rationale. This patch converts all cftype file operations to take @css instead of @cgroup. cftypes for the cgroup core files don't have their subsytem pointer set. These will automatically use the dummy_css added by the previous patch and can be converted the same way. Most subsystem conversions are straight forwards but there are some interesting ones. * freezer: update_if_frozen() is also converted to take @css instead of @cgroup for consistency. This will make the code look simpler too once iterators are converted to use css. * memory/vmpressure: mem_cgroup_from_css() needs to be exported to vmpressure while mem_cgroup_from_cont() can be made static. Updated accordingly. * cpu: cgroup_tg() doesn't have any user left. Removed. * cpuacct: cgroup_ca() doesn't have any user left. Removed. * hugetlb: hugetlb_cgroup_form_cgroup() doesn't have any user left. Removed. * net_cls: cgrp_cls_state() doesn't have any user left. Removed. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2013-08-09 08:11:24 +08:00
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(css);
counter = &h_cg->hugepage[MEMFILE_IDX(cft->private)];
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
rsvd_counter = &h_cg->rsvd_hugepage[MEMFILE_IDX(cft->private)];
switch (MEMFILE_ATTR(cft->private)) {
case RES_USAGE:
return (u64)page_counter_read(counter) * PAGE_SIZE;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_USAGE:
return (u64)page_counter_read(rsvd_counter) * PAGE_SIZE;
case RES_LIMIT:
return (u64)counter->max * PAGE_SIZE;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_LIMIT:
return (u64)rsvd_counter->max * PAGE_SIZE;
case RES_MAX_USAGE:
return (u64)counter->watermark * PAGE_SIZE;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_MAX_USAGE:
return (u64)rsvd_counter->watermark * PAGE_SIZE;
case RES_FAILCNT:
return counter->failcnt;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_FAILCNT:
return rsvd_counter->failcnt;
default:
BUG();
}
}
static int hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64_max(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
int idx;
u64 val;
struct cftype *cft = seq_cft(seq);
unsigned long limit;
struct page_counter *counter;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(seq_css(seq));
idx = MEMFILE_IDX(cft->private);
counter = &h_cg->hugepage[idx];
limit = round_down(PAGE_COUNTER_MAX,
pages_per_huge_page(&hstates[idx]));
switch (MEMFILE_ATTR(cft->private)) {
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_USAGE:
counter = &h_cg->rsvd_hugepage[idx];
fallthrough;
case RES_USAGE:
val = (u64)page_counter_read(counter);
seq_printf(seq, "%llu\n", val * PAGE_SIZE);
break;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_LIMIT:
counter = &h_cg->rsvd_hugepage[idx];
fallthrough;
case RES_LIMIT:
val = (u64)counter->max;
if (val == limit)
seq_puts(seq, "max\n");
else
seq_printf(seq, "%llu\n", val * PAGE_SIZE);
break;
default:
BUG();
}
return 0;
}
static DEFINE_MUTEX(hugetlb_limit_mutex);
static ssize_t hugetlb_cgroup_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off,
const char *max)
{
int ret, idx;
unsigned long nr_pages;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
bool rsvd = false;
if (hugetlb_cgroup_is_root(h_cg)) /* Can't set limit on root */
return -EINVAL;
buf = strstrip(buf);
ret = page_counter_memparse(buf, max, &nr_pages);
if (ret)
return ret;
idx = MEMFILE_IDX(of_cft(of)->private);
nr_pages = round_down(nr_pages, pages_per_huge_page(&hstates[idx]));
switch (MEMFILE_ATTR(of_cft(of)->private)) {
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_LIMIT:
rsvd = true;
fallthrough;
case RES_LIMIT:
mutex_lock(&hugetlb_limit_mutex);
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
ret = page_counter_set_max(
__hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cg, idx, rsvd),
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
nr_pages);
mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_limit_mutex);
break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
return ret ?: nbytes;
}
static ssize_t hugetlb_cgroup_write_legacy(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
{
return hugetlb_cgroup_write(of, buf, nbytes, off, "-1");
}
static ssize_t hugetlb_cgroup_write_dfl(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
{
return hugetlb_cgroup_write(of, buf, nbytes, off, "max");
}
static ssize_t hugetlb_cgroup_reset(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
{
int ret = 0;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
struct page_counter *counter, *rsvd_counter;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
counter = &h_cg->hugepage[MEMFILE_IDX(of_cft(of)->private)];
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
rsvd_counter = &h_cg->rsvd_hugepage[MEMFILE_IDX(of_cft(of)->private)];
switch (MEMFILE_ATTR(of_cft(of)->private)) {
case RES_MAX_USAGE:
page_counter_reset_watermark(counter);
break;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_MAX_USAGE:
page_counter_reset_watermark(rsvd_counter);
break;
case RES_FAILCNT:
counter->failcnt = 0;
break;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
case RES_RSVD_FAILCNT:
rsvd_counter->failcnt = 0;
break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
return ret ?: nbytes;
}
static char *mem_fmt(char *buf, int size, unsigned long hsize)
{
if (hsize >= (1UL << 30))
snprintf(buf, size, "%luGB", hsize >> 30);
else if (hsize >= (1UL << 20))
snprintf(buf, size, "%luMB", hsize >> 20);
else
snprintf(buf, size, "%luKB", hsize >> 10);
return buf;
}
static int __hugetlb_events_show(struct seq_file *seq, bool local)
{
int idx;
long max;
struct cftype *cft = seq_cft(seq);
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_css(seq_css(seq));
idx = MEMFILE_IDX(cft->private);
if (local)
max = atomic_long_read(&h_cg->events_local[idx][HUGETLB_MAX]);
else
max = atomic_long_read(&h_cg->events[idx][HUGETLB_MAX]);
seq_printf(seq, "max %lu\n", max);
return 0;
}
static int hugetlb_events_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
return __hugetlb_events_show(seq, false);
}
static int hugetlb_events_local_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
return __hugetlb_events_show(seq, true);
}
static void __init __hugetlb_cgroup_file_dfl_init(int idx)
{
char buf[32];
struct cftype *cft;
struct hstate *h = &hstates[idx];
/* format the size */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
mem_fmt(buf, sizeof(buf), huge_page_size(h));
/* Add the limit file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[0];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.max", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_LIMIT);
cft->seq_show = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64_max;
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_write_dfl;
cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
/* Add the reservation limit file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[1];
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.rsvd.max", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_RSVD_LIMIT);
cft->seq_show = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64_max;
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_write_dfl;
cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
/* Add the current usage file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[2];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.current", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_USAGE);
cft->seq_show = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64_max;
cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
/* Add the current reservation usage file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[3];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.rsvd.current", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_RSVD_USAGE);
cft->seq_show = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64_max;
cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
/* Add the events file */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[4];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.events", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, 0);
cft->seq_show = hugetlb_events_show;
cft->file_offset = offsetof(struct hugetlb_cgroup, events_file[idx]);
cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
/* Add the events.local file */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[5];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.events.local", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, 0);
cft->seq_show = hugetlb_events_local_show;
cft->file_offset = offsetof(struct hugetlb_cgroup,
events_local_file[idx]);
cft->flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT;
/* NULL terminate the last cft */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft = &h->cgroup_files_dfl[6];
memset(cft, 0, sizeof(*cft));
WARN_ON(cgroup_add_dfl_cftypes(&hugetlb_cgrp_subsys,
h->cgroup_files_dfl));
}
static void __init __hugetlb_cgroup_file_legacy_init(int idx)
{
char buf[32];
struct cftype *cft;
struct hstate *h = &hstates[idx];
/* format the size */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
mem_fmt(buf, sizeof(buf), huge_page_size(h));
/* Add the limit file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[0];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.limit_in_bytes", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_LIMIT);
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_write_legacy;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
/* Add the reservation limit file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[1];
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.rsvd.limit_in_bytes", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_RSVD_LIMIT);
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_write_legacy;
/* Add the usage file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[2];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.usage_in_bytes", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_USAGE);
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
/* Add the reservation usage file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[3];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.rsvd.usage_in_bytes", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_RSVD_USAGE);
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
/* Add the MAX usage file */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[4];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.max_usage_in_bytes", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_MAX_USAGE);
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_reset;
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
/* Add the MAX reservation usage file */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[5];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_RSVD_MAX_USAGE);
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_reset;
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
/* Add the failcntfile */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[6];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.failcnt", buf);
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_FAILCNT);
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_reset;
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
/* Add the reservation failcntfile */
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[7];
snprintf(cft->name, MAX_CFTYPE_NAME, "%s.rsvd.failcnt", buf);
cft->private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(idx, RES_RSVD_FAILCNT);
cft->write = hugetlb_cgroup_reset;
cft->read_u64 = hugetlb_cgroup_read_u64;
/* NULL terminate the last cft */
hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation counter These counters will track hugetlb reservations rather than hugetlb memory faulted in. This patch only adds the counter, following patches add the charging and uncharging of the counter. This is patch 1 of an 9 patch series. Problem: Currently tasks attempting to reserve more hugetlb memory than is available get a failure at mmap/shmget time. This is thanks to Hugetlbfs Reservations [1]. However, if a task attempts to reserve more hugetlb memory than its hugetlb_cgroup limit allows, the kernel will allow the mmap/shmget call, but will SIGBUS the task when it attempts to fault in the excess memory. We have users hitting their hugetlb_cgroup limits and thus we've been looking at this failure mode. We'd like to improve this behavior such that users violating the hugetlb_cgroup limits get an error on mmap/shmget time, rather than getting SIGBUS'd when they try to fault the excess memory in. This gives the user an opportunity to fallback more gracefully to non-hugetlbfs memory for example. The underlying problem is that today's hugetlb_cgroup accounting happens at hugetlb memory *fault* time, rather than at *reservation* time. Thus, enforcing the hugetlb_cgroup limit only happens at fault time, and the offending task gets SIGBUS'd. Proposed Solution: A new page counter named 'hugetlb.xMB.rsvd.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes'. This counter has slightly different semantics than 'hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage|max_usage]_in_bytes': - While usage_in_bytes tracks all *faulted* hugetlb memory, rsvd.usage_in_bytes tracks all *reserved* hugetlb memory and hugetlb memory faulted in without a prior reservation. - If a task attempts to reserve more memory than limit_in_bytes allows, the kernel will allow it to do so. But if a task attempts to reserve more memory than rsvd.limit_in_bytes, the kernel will fail this reservation. This proposal is implemented in this patch series, with tests to verify functionality and show the usage. Alternatives considered: 1. A new cgroup, instead of only a new page_counter attached to the existing hugetlb_cgroup. Adding a new cgroup seemed like a lot of code duplication with hugetlb_cgroup. Keeping hugetlb related page counters under hugetlb_cgroup seemed cleaner as well. 2. Instead of adding a new counter, we considered adding a sysctl that modifies the behavior of hugetlb.xMB.[limit|usage]_in_bytes, to do accounting at reservation time rather than fault time. Adding a new page_counter seems better as userspace could, if it wants, choose to enforce different cgroups differently: one via limit_in_bytes, and another via rsvd.limit_in_bytes. This could be very useful if you're transitioning how hugetlb memory is partitioned on your system one cgroup at a time, for example. Also, someone may find usage for both limit_in_bytes and rsvd.limit_in_bytes concurrently, and this approach gives them the option to do so. Testing: - Added tests passing. - Used libhugetlbfs for regression testing. [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/vm/hugetlbfs_reserv.html Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 12:11:11 +08:00
cft = &h->cgroup_files_legacy[8];
memset(cft, 0, sizeof(*cft));
WARN_ON(cgroup_add_legacy_cftypes(&hugetlb_cgrp_subsys,
h->cgroup_files_legacy));
}
static void __init __hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(int idx)
{
__hugetlb_cgroup_file_dfl_init(idx);
__hugetlb_cgroup_file_legacy_init(idx);
}
void __init hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(void)
{
struct hstate *h;
for_each_hstate(h) {
/*
* Add cgroup control files only if the huge page consists
* of more than two normal pages. This is because we use
mm: make compound_head() robust Hugh has pointed that compound_head() call can be unsafe in some context. There's one example: CPU0 CPU1 isolate_migratepages_block() page_count() compound_head() !!PageTail() == true put_page() tail->first_page = NULL head = tail->first_page alloc_pages(__GFP_COMP) prep_compound_page() tail->first_page = head __SetPageTail(p); !!PageTail() == true <head == NULL dereferencing> The race is pure theoretical. I don't it's possible to trigger it in practice. But who knows. We can fix the race by changing how encode PageTail() and compound_head() within struct page to be able to update them in one shot. The patch introduces page->compound_head into third double word block in front of compound_dtor and compound_order. Bit 0 encodes PageTail() and the rest bits are pointer to head page if bit zero is set. The patch moves page->pmd_huge_pte out of word, just in case if an architecture defines pgtable_t into something what can have the bit 0 set. hugetlb_cgroup uses page->lru.next in the second tail page to store pointer struct hugetlb_cgroup. The patch switch it to use page->private in the second tail page instead. The space is free since ->first_page is removed from the union. The patch also opens possibility to remove HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER limitation, since there's now space in first tail page to store struct hugetlb_cgroup pointer. But that's out of scope of the patch. That means page->compound_head shares storage space with: - page->lru.next; - page->next; - page->rcu_head.next; That's too long list to be absolutely sure, but looks like nobody uses bit 0 of the word. page->rcu_head.next guaranteed[1] to have bit 0 clean as long as we use call_rcu(), call_rcu_bh(), call_rcu_sched(), or call_srcu(). But future call_rcu_lazy() is not allowed as it makes use of the bit and we can get false positive PageTail(). [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20150827163634.GD4029@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-11-07 08:29:54 +08:00
* page[2].private for storing cgroup details.
*/
if (huge_page_order(h) >= HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
__hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(hstate_index(h));
}
}
/*
* hugetlb_lock will make sure a parallel cgroup rmdir won't happen
* when we migrate hugepages
*/
void hugetlb_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldhpage, struct page *newhpage)
{
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg_rsvd;
struct hstate *h = page_hstate(oldhpage);
if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled())
return;
hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1]. : Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(hugetlb_lock); : local_irq_disable(); : lock(slock-AF_INET); : lock(hugetlb_lock); : <Interrupt> : lock(slock-AF_INET); Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead to a deadlock. This commit addresses the issue by doing the following: - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls. - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner. - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 09:35:07 +08:00
spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
h_cg = hugetlb_cgroup_from_page(oldhpage);
h_cg_rsvd = hugetlb_cgroup_from_page_rsvd(oldhpage);
set_hugetlb_cgroup(oldhpage, NULL);
set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(oldhpage, NULL);
/* move the h_cg details to new cgroup */
set_hugetlb_cgroup(newhpage, h_cg);
set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(newhpage, h_cg_rsvd);
list_move(&newhpage->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1]. : Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: : : CPU0 CPU1 : ---- ---- : lock(hugetlb_lock); : local_irq_disable(); : lock(slock-AF_INET); : lock(hugetlb_lock); : <Interrupt> : lock(slock-AF_INET); Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead to a deadlock. This commit addresses the issue by doing the following: - Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls. - Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner. - Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 09:35:07 +08:00
spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
return;
}
static struct cftype hugetlb_files[] = {
{} /* terminate */
};
cgroup: clean up cgroup_subsys names and initialization cgroup_subsys is a bit messier than it needs to be. * The name of a subsys can be different from its internal identifier defined in cgroup_subsys.h. Most subsystems use the matching name but three - cpu, memory and perf_event - use different ones. * cgroup_subsys_id enums are postfixed with _subsys_id and each cgroup_subsys is postfixed with _subsys. cgroup.h is widely included throughout various subsystems, it doesn't and shouldn't have claim on such generic names which don't have any qualifier indicating that they belong to cgroup. * cgroup_subsys->subsys_id should always equal the matching cgroup_subsys_id enum; however, we require each controller to initialize it and then BUG if they don't match, which is a bit silly. This patch cleans up cgroup_subsys names and initialization by doing the followings. * cgroup_subsys_id enums are now postfixed with _cgrp_id, and each cgroup_subsys with _cgrp_subsys. * With the above, renaming subsys identifiers to match the userland visible names doesn't cause any naming conflicts. All non-matching identifiers are renamed to match the official names. cpu_cgroup -> cpu mem_cgroup -> memory perf -> perf_event * controllers no longer need to initialize ->subsys_id and ->name. They're generated in cgroup core and set automatically during boot. * Redundant cgroup_subsys declarations removed. * While updating BUG_ON()s in cgroup_init_early(), convert them to WARN()s. BUGging that early during boot is stupid - the kernel can't print anything, even through serial console and the trap handler doesn't even link stack frame properly for back-tracing. This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes. v2: Rebased on top of fe1217c4f3f7 ("net: net_cls: move cgroupfs classid handling into core"). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
2014-02-08 23:36:58 +08:00
struct cgroup_subsys hugetlb_cgrp_subsys = {
.css_alloc = hugetlb_cgroup_css_alloc,
.css_offline = hugetlb_cgroup_css_offline,
.css_free = hugetlb_cgroup_css_free,
.dfl_cftypes = hugetlb_files,
.legacy_cftypes = hugetlb_files,
};