OpenCloudOS-Kernel/kernel/delayacct.c

268 lines
6.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/* delayacct.c - per-task delay accounting
*
* Copyright (C) Shailabh Nagar, IBM Corp. 2006
*/
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
#include <linux/sched/cputime.h>
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/taskstats.h>
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
#include <linux/delayacct.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(delayacct_key);
int delayacct_on __read_mostly; /* Delay accounting turned on/off */
struct kmem_cache *delayacct_cache;
static void set_delayacct(bool enabled)
{
if (enabled) {
static_branch_enable(&delayacct_key);
delayacct_on = 1;
} else {
delayacct_on = 0;
static_branch_disable(&delayacct_key);
}
}
static int __init delayacct_setup_enable(char *str)
{
delayacct_on = 1;
return 1;
}
__setup("delayacct", delayacct_setup_enable);
void delayacct_init(void)
{
2016-01-15 07:18:21 +08:00
delayacct_cache = KMEM_CACHE(task_delay_info, SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT);
delayacct_tsk_init(&init_task);
set_delayacct(delayacct_on);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
static int sysctl_delayacct(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
int state = delayacct_on;
struct ctl_table t;
int err;
if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
t = *table;
t.data = &state;
err = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
if (err < 0)
return err;
if (write)
set_delayacct(state);
return err;
}
static struct ctl_table kern_delayacct_table[] = {
{
.procname = "task_delayacct",
.data = NULL,
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = sysctl_delayacct,
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
.extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
},
{ }
};
static __init int kernel_delayacct_sysctls_init(void)
{
register_sysctl_init("kernel", kern_delayacct_table);
return 0;
}
late_initcall(kernel_delayacct_sysctls_init);
#endif
void __delayacct_tsk_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
tsk->delays = kmem_cache_zalloc(delayacct_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (tsk->delays)
raw_spin_lock_init(&tsk->delays->lock);
}
/*
* Finish delay accounting for a statistic using its timestamps (@start),
* accumalator (@total) and @count
*/
static void delayacct_end(raw_spinlock_t *lock, u64 *start, u64 *total, u32 *count)
{
s64 ns = local_clock() - *start;
unsigned long flags;
if (ns > 0) {
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
*total += ns;
(*count)++;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
}
}
void __delayacct_blkio_start(void)
{
current->delays->blkio_start = local_clock();
}
delayacct: Account blkio completion on the correct task Before commit: e33a9bba85a8 ("sched/core: move IO scheduling accounting from io_schedule_timeout() into scheduler") delayacct_blkio_end() was called after context-switching into the task which completed I/O. This resulted in double counting: the task would account a delay both waiting for I/O and for time spent in the runqueue. With e33a9bba85a8, delayacct_blkio_end() is called by try_to_wake_up(). In ttwu, we have not yet context-switched. This is more correct, in that the delay accounting ends when the I/O is complete. But delayacct_blkio_end() relies on 'get_current()', and we have not yet context-switched into the task whose I/O completed. This results in the wrong task having its delay accounting statistics updated. Instead of doing that, pass the task_struct being woken to delayacct_blkio_end(), so that it can update the statistics of the correct task. Signed-off-by: Josh Snyder <joshs@netflix.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e33a9bba85a8 ("sched/core: move IO scheduling accounting from io_schedule_timeout() into scheduler") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513613712-571-1-git-send-email-joshs@netflix.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-19 00:15:10 +08:00
/*
* We cannot rely on the `current` macro, as we haven't yet switched back to
* the process being woken.
*/
void __delayacct_blkio_end(struct task_struct *p)
{
delayacct_end(&p->delays->lock,
&p->delays->blkio_start,
&p->delays->blkio_delay,
&p->delays->blkio_count);
}
int delayacct_add_tsk(struct taskstats *d, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
u64 utime, stime, stimescaled, utimescaled;
unsigned long long t2, t3;
unsigned long flags, t1;
s64 tmp;
task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
tmp = (s64)d->cpu_run_real_total;
tmp += utime + stime;
d->cpu_run_real_total = (tmp < (s64)d->cpu_run_real_total) ? 0 : tmp;
task_cputime_scaled(tsk, &utimescaled, &stimescaled);
tmp = (s64)d->cpu_scaled_run_real_total;
tmp += utimescaled + stimescaled;
d->cpu_scaled_run_real_total =
(tmp < (s64)d->cpu_scaled_run_real_total) ? 0 : tmp;
/*
* No locking available for sched_info (and too expensive to add one)
* Mitigate by taking snapshot of values
*/
t1 = tsk->sched_info.pcount;
t2 = tsk->sched_info.run_delay;
t3 = tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;
d->cpu_count += t1;
tmp = (s64)d->cpu_delay_total + t2;
d->cpu_delay_total = (tmp < (s64)d->cpu_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
tmp = (s64)d->cpu_run_virtual_total + t3;
d->cpu_run_virtual_total =
(tmp < (s64)d->cpu_run_virtual_total) ? 0 : tmp;
if (!tsk->delays)
return 0;
/* zero XXX_total, non-zero XXX_count implies XXX stat overflowed */
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
tmp = d->blkio_delay_total + tsk->delays->blkio_delay;
d->blkio_delay_total = (tmp < d->blkio_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
tmp = d->swapin_delay_total + tsk->delays->swapin_delay;
d->swapin_delay_total = (tmp < d->swapin_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
tmp = d->freepages_delay_total + tsk->delays->freepages_delay;
d->freepages_delay_total = (tmp < d->freepages_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
delayacct: track delays from thrashing cache pages Delay accounting already measures the time a task spends in direct reclaim and waiting for swapin, but in low memory situations tasks spend can spend a significant amount of their time waiting on thrashing page cache. This isn't tracked right now. To know the full impact of memory contention on an individual task, measure the delay when waiting for a recently evicted active cache page to read back into memory. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: [hannes@computer accounting]$ sudo ./getdelays -d -p 1 print delayacct stats ON PID 1 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 50318 745000000 847346785 400533713 0.008ms IO count delay total delay average 435 122601218 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 19 12621439 0ms Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828172258.3185-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@fb.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-27 06:06:08 +08:00
tmp = d->thrashing_delay_total + tsk->delays->thrashing_delay;
d->thrashing_delay_total = (tmp < d->thrashing_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
tmp = d->compact_delay_total + tsk->delays->compact_delay;
d->compact_delay_total = (tmp < d->compact_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
delayacct: track delays from write-protect copy Delay accounting does not track the delay of write-protect copy. When tasks trigger many write-protect copys(include COW and unsharing of anonymous pages[1]), it may spend a amount of time waiting for them. To get the delay of tasks in write-protect copy, could help users to evaluate the impact of using KSM or fork() or GUP. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: / # ./getdelays -dl -p 231 print delayacct stats ON listen forever PID 231 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 6247 1859000000 2154070021 1674255063 0.268ms IO count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms COMPACT count delay total delay average 3 72758 0ms WPCOPY count delay total delay average 3635 271567604 0ms [1] commit 31cc5bc4af70("mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous pages") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220409014342.2505532-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-02 06:55:25 +08:00
tmp = d->wpcopy_delay_total + tsk->delays->wpcopy_delay;
d->wpcopy_delay_total = (tmp < d->wpcopy_delay_total) ? 0 : tmp;
d->blkio_count += tsk->delays->blkio_count;
d->swapin_count += tsk->delays->swapin_count;
d->freepages_count += tsk->delays->freepages_count;
delayacct: track delays from thrashing cache pages Delay accounting already measures the time a task spends in direct reclaim and waiting for swapin, but in low memory situations tasks spend can spend a significant amount of their time waiting on thrashing page cache. This isn't tracked right now. To know the full impact of memory contention on an individual task, measure the delay when waiting for a recently evicted active cache page to read back into memory. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: [hannes@computer accounting]$ sudo ./getdelays -d -p 1 print delayacct stats ON PID 1 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 50318 745000000 847346785 400533713 0.008ms IO count delay total delay average 435 122601218 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 19 12621439 0ms Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828172258.3185-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@fb.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-27 06:06:08 +08:00
d->thrashing_count += tsk->delays->thrashing_count;
d->compact_count += tsk->delays->compact_count;
delayacct: track delays from write-protect copy Delay accounting does not track the delay of write-protect copy. When tasks trigger many write-protect copys(include COW and unsharing of anonymous pages[1]), it may spend a amount of time waiting for them. To get the delay of tasks in write-protect copy, could help users to evaluate the impact of using KSM or fork() or GUP. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: / # ./getdelays -dl -p 231 print delayacct stats ON listen forever PID 231 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 6247 1859000000 2154070021 1674255063 0.268ms IO count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms COMPACT count delay total delay average 3 72758 0ms WPCOPY count delay total delay average 3635 271567604 0ms [1] commit 31cc5bc4af70("mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous pages") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220409014342.2505532-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-02 06:55:25 +08:00
d->wpcopy_count += tsk->delays->wpcopy_count;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
__u64 __delayacct_blkio_ticks(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
__u64 ret;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
ret = nsec_to_clock_t(tsk->delays->blkio_delay);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->delays->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
per-task-delay-accounting: add memory reclaim delay Sometimes, application responses become bad under heavy memory load. Applications take a bit time to reclaim memory. The statistics, how long memory reclaim takes, will be useful to measure memory usage. This patch adds accounting memory reclaim to per-task-delay-accounting for accounting the time of do_try_to_free_pages(). <i.e> - When System is under low memory load, memory reclaim may not occur. $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 8197800 1577300 6620500 0 4808 1516724 -/+ buffers/cache: 55768 8142032 Swap: 16386292 0 16386292 $ vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 4 22 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 3 18 0 0 100 0 Measure the time of tar command. $ ls -s test.dat 1501472 test.dat $ time tar cvf test.tar test.dat real 0m13.388s user 0m0.116s sys 0m5.304s $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> CPU count real total virtual total delay total 428 5528345500 5477116080 62749891 IO count delay total 338 8078977189 SWAP count delay total 0 0 RECLAIM count delay total 0 0 - When system is under heavy memory load memory reclaim may occur. $ vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 7159032 49724 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 3 24 0 0 100 0 0 0 7159032 49724 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 0 100 0 0 0 7159032 49848 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 3 22 0 0 100 0 In this case, one process uses more 8G memory by execution of malloc() and memset(). $ time tar cvf test.tar test.dat real 1m38.563s <- increased by 85 sec user 0m0.140s sys 0m7.060s $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> CPU count real total virtual total delay total 9021 7140446250 7315277975 923201824 IO count delay total 8965 90466349669 SWAP count delay total 3 21036367 RECLAIM count delay total 740 61011951153 In the later case, the value of RECLAIM is increasing. So, taskstats can show how much memory reclaim influences TAT. Signed-off-by: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujistu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 16:48:52 +08:00
void __delayacct_freepages_start(void)
{
current->delays->freepages_start = local_clock();
per-task-delay-accounting: add memory reclaim delay Sometimes, application responses become bad under heavy memory load. Applications take a bit time to reclaim memory. The statistics, how long memory reclaim takes, will be useful to measure memory usage. This patch adds accounting memory reclaim to per-task-delay-accounting for accounting the time of do_try_to_free_pages(). <i.e> - When System is under low memory load, memory reclaim may not occur. $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 8197800 1577300 6620500 0 4808 1516724 -/+ buffers/cache: 55768 8142032 Swap: 16386292 0 16386292 $ vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 4 22 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 3 18 0 0 100 0 Measure the time of tar command. $ ls -s test.dat 1501472 test.dat $ time tar cvf test.tar test.dat real 0m13.388s user 0m0.116s sys 0m5.304s $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> CPU count real total virtual total delay total 428 5528345500 5477116080 62749891 IO count delay total 338 8078977189 SWAP count delay total 0 0 RECLAIM count delay total 0 0 - When system is under heavy memory load memory reclaim may occur. $ vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 7159032 49724 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 3 24 0 0 100 0 0 0 7159032 49724 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 0 100 0 0 0 7159032 49848 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 3 22 0 0 100 0 In this case, one process uses more 8G memory by execution of malloc() and memset(). $ time tar cvf test.tar test.dat real 1m38.563s <- increased by 85 sec user 0m0.140s sys 0m7.060s $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> CPU count real total virtual total delay total 9021 7140446250 7315277975 923201824 IO count delay total 8965 90466349669 SWAP count delay total 3 21036367 RECLAIM count delay total 740 61011951153 In the later case, the value of RECLAIM is increasing. So, taskstats can show how much memory reclaim influences TAT. Signed-off-by: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujistu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 16:48:52 +08:00
}
void __delayacct_freepages_end(void)
{
delayacct_end(&current->delays->lock,
&current->delays->freepages_start,
&current->delays->freepages_delay,
&current->delays->freepages_count);
per-task-delay-accounting: add memory reclaim delay Sometimes, application responses become bad under heavy memory load. Applications take a bit time to reclaim memory. The statistics, how long memory reclaim takes, will be useful to measure memory usage. This patch adds accounting memory reclaim to per-task-delay-accounting for accounting the time of do_try_to_free_pages(). <i.e> - When System is under low memory load, memory reclaim may not occur. $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 8197800 1577300 6620500 0 4808 1516724 -/+ buffers/cache: 55768 8142032 Swap: 16386292 0 16386292 $ vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 3 26 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 4 22 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 5069748 10612 3014060 0 0 0 0 3 18 0 0 100 0 Measure the time of tar command. $ ls -s test.dat 1501472 test.dat $ time tar cvf test.tar test.dat real 0m13.388s user 0m0.116s sys 0m5.304s $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> CPU count real total virtual total delay total 428 5528345500 5477116080 62749891 IO count delay total 338 8078977189 SWAP count delay total 0 0 RECLAIM count delay total 0 0 - When system is under heavy memory load memory reclaim may occur. $ vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 7159032 49724 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 3 24 0 0 100 0 0 0 7159032 49724 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 4 24 0 0 100 0 0 0 7159032 49848 1812 3012 0 0 0 0 3 22 0 0 100 0 In this case, one process uses more 8G memory by execution of malloc() and memset(). $ time tar cvf test.tar test.dat real 1m38.563s <- increased by 85 sec user 0m0.140s sys 0m7.060s $ ./delayget -d -p <pid> CPU count real total virtual total delay total 9021 7140446250 7315277975 923201824 IO count delay total 8965 90466349669 SWAP count delay total 3 21036367 RECLAIM count delay total 740 61011951153 In the later case, the value of RECLAIM is increasing. So, taskstats can show how much memory reclaim influences TAT. Signed-off-by: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujistu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-25 16:48:52 +08:00
}
delayacct: track delays from thrashing cache pages Delay accounting already measures the time a task spends in direct reclaim and waiting for swapin, but in low memory situations tasks spend can spend a significant amount of their time waiting on thrashing page cache. This isn't tracked right now. To know the full impact of memory contention on an individual task, measure the delay when waiting for a recently evicted active cache page to read back into memory. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: [hannes@computer accounting]$ sudo ./getdelays -d -p 1 print delayacct stats ON PID 1 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 50318 745000000 847346785 400533713 0.008ms IO count delay total delay average 435 122601218 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 19 12621439 0ms Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828172258.3185-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@fb.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-27 06:06:08 +08:00
void __delayacct_thrashing_start(void)
{
current->delays->thrashing_start = local_clock();
delayacct: track delays from thrashing cache pages Delay accounting already measures the time a task spends in direct reclaim and waiting for swapin, but in low memory situations tasks spend can spend a significant amount of their time waiting on thrashing page cache. This isn't tracked right now. To know the full impact of memory contention on an individual task, measure the delay when waiting for a recently evicted active cache page to read back into memory. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: [hannes@computer accounting]$ sudo ./getdelays -d -p 1 print delayacct stats ON PID 1 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 50318 745000000 847346785 400533713 0.008ms IO count delay total delay average 435 122601218 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 19 12621439 0ms Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828172258.3185-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com> Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@fb.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-10-27 06:06:08 +08:00
}
void __delayacct_thrashing_end(void)
{
delayacct_end(&current->delays->lock,
&current->delays->thrashing_start,
&current->delays->thrashing_delay,
&current->delays->thrashing_count);
}
void __delayacct_swapin_start(void)
{
current->delays->swapin_start = local_clock();
}
void __delayacct_swapin_end(void)
{
delayacct_end(&current->delays->lock,
&current->delays->swapin_start,
&current->delays->swapin_delay,
&current->delays->swapin_count);
}
void __delayacct_compact_start(void)
{
current->delays->compact_start = local_clock();
}
void __delayacct_compact_end(void)
{
delayacct_end(&current->delays->lock,
&current->delays->compact_start,
&current->delays->compact_delay,
&current->delays->compact_count);
}
delayacct: track delays from write-protect copy Delay accounting does not track the delay of write-protect copy. When tasks trigger many write-protect copys(include COW and unsharing of anonymous pages[1]), it may spend a amount of time waiting for them. To get the delay of tasks in write-protect copy, could help users to evaluate the impact of using KSM or fork() or GUP. Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c: / # ./getdelays -dl -p 231 print delayacct stats ON listen forever PID 231 CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average 6247 1859000000 2154070021 1674255063 0.268ms IO count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms SWAP count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms RECLAIM count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms THRASHING count delay total delay average 0 0 0ms COMPACT count delay total delay average 3 72758 0ms WPCOPY count delay total delay average 3635 271567604 0ms [1] commit 31cc5bc4af70("mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous pages") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220409014342.2505532-1-yang.yang29@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-02 06:55:25 +08:00
void __delayacct_wpcopy_start(void)
{
current->delays->wpcopy_start = local_clock();
}
void __delayacct_wpcopy_end(void)
{
delayacct_end(&current->delays->lock,
&current->delays->wpcopy_start,
&current->delays->wpcopy_delay,
&current->delays->wpcopy_count);
}