2019-05-27 14:55:21 +08:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* APEI Error Record Serialization Table debug support
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ERST is a way provided by APEI to save and retrieve hardware error
|
2010-09-08 00:49:45 +08:00
|
|
|
* information to and from a persistent store. This file provide the
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
* debugging/testing support for ERST kernel support and firmware
|
|
|
|
* implementation.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2010 Intel Corp.
|
|
|
|
* Author: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <acpi/apei.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "apei-internal.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define ERST_DBG_PFX "ERST DBG: "
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-13 13:14:14 +08:00
|
|
|
#define ERST_DBG_RECORD_LEN_MAX 0x4000
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void *erst_dbg_buf;
|
|
|
|
static unsigned int erst_dbg_buf_len;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Prevent erst_dbg_read/write from being invoked concurrently */
|
|
|
|
static DEFINE_MUTEX(erst_dbg_mutex);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int erst_dbg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|
|
|
{
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
int rc, *pos;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (erst_disable)
|
|
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
|
|
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
pos = (int *)&file->private_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rc = erst_get_record_id_begin(pos);
|
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
return nonseekable_open(inode, file);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
static int erst_dbg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
erst_get_record_id_end();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
static long erst_dbg_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int rc;
|
|
|
|
u64 record_id;
|
|
|
|
u32 record_count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (cmd) {
|
|
|
|
case APEI_ERST_CLEAR_RECORD:
|
|
|
|
rc = copy_from_user(&record_id, (void __user *)arg,
|
|
|
|
sizeof(record_id));
|
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
return -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
return erst_clear(record_id);
|
|
|
|
case APEI_ERST_GET_RECORD_COUNT:
|
|
|
|
rc = erst_get_record_count();
|
|
|
|
if (rc < 0)
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
record_count = rc;
|
|
|
|
rc = put_user(record_count, (u32 __user *)arg);
|
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return -ENOTTY;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static ssize_t erst_dbg_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
|
|
|
|
size_t usize, loff_t *off)
|
|
|
|
{
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
int rc, *pos;
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
ssize_t len = 0;
|
|
|
|
u64 id;
|
|
|
|
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
if (*off)
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&erst_dbg_mutex) != 0)
|
|
|
|
return -EINTR;
|
|
|
|
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
pos = (int *)&filp->private_data;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
retry_next:
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
rc = erst_get_record_id_next(pos, &id);
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (rc)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
/* no more record */
|
2012-12-15 07:30:07 +08:00
|
|
|
if (id == APEI_ERST_INVALID_RECORD_ID) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the persistent store is empty initially, the function
|
|
|
|
* 'erst_read' below will return "-ENOENT" value. This causes
|
|
|
|
* 'retry_next' label is entered again. The returned value
|
|
|
|
* should be zero indicating the read operation is EOF.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
len = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2012-12-15 07:30:07 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
retry:
|
|
|
|
rc = len = erst_read(id, erst_dbg_buf, erst_dbg_buf_len);
|
|
|
|
/* The record may be cleared by others, try read next record */
|
|
|
|
if (rc == -ENOENT)
|
|
|
|
goto retry_next;
|
|
|
|
if (rc < 0)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
if (len > ERST_DBG_RECORD_LEN_MAX) {
|
|
|
|
pr_warning(ERST_DBG_PFX
|
|
|
|
"Record (ID: 0x%llx) length is too long: %zd\n",
|
|
|
|
id, len);
|
|
|
|
rc = -EIO;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (len > erst_dbg_buf_len) {
|
2010-09-29 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
void *p;
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
rc = -ENOMEM;
|
2010-09-29 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
p = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!p)
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2010-09-29 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(erst_dbg_buf);
|
|
|
|
erst_dbg_buf = p;
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
erst_dbg_buf_len = len;
|
|
|
|
goto retry;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rc = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
if (len > usize)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rc = -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
if (copy_to_user(ubuf, erst_dbg_buf, len))
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
rc = 0;
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&erst_dbg_mutex);
|
|
|
|
return rc ? rc : len;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static ssize_t erst_dbg_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
|
|
|
|
size_t usize, loff_t *off)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int rc;
|
|
|
|
struct cper_record_header *rcd;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
|
|
|
|
return -EPERM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (usize > ERST_DBG_RECORD_LEN_MAX) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err(ERST_DBG_PFX "Too long record to be written\n");
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&erst_dbg_mutex))
|
|
|
|
return -EINTR;
|
|
|
|
if (usize > erst_dbg_buf_len) {
|
2010-09-29 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
void *p;
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
rc = -ENOMEM;
|
2010-09-29 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
p = kmalloc(usize, GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!p)
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2010-09-29 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
kfree(erst_dbg_buf);
|
|
|
|
erst_dbg_buf = p;
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
erst_dbg_buf_len = usize;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rc = copy_from_user(erst_dbg_buf, ubuf, usize);
|
|
|
|
if (rc) {
|
|
|
|
rc = -EFAULT;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rcd = erst_dbg_buf;
|
|
|
|
rc = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
if (rcd->record_length != usize)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rc = erst_write(erst_dbg_buf);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&erst_dbg_mutex);
|
|
|
|
return rc < 0 ? rc : usize;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct file_operations erst_dbg_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
|
|
|
.open = erst_dbg_open,
|
ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind. For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,
reader 1 reader 2
1
2
3
4
-1
-1
where -1 signals there is no more record ID.
Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3. And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.
This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.
To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented. When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller. So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-02-21 13:54:41 +08:00
|
|
|
.release = erst_dbg_release,
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
.read = erst_dbg_read,
|
|
|
|
.write = erst_dbg_write,
|
|
|
|
.unlocked_ioctl = erst_dbg_ioctl,
|
llseek: automatically add .llseek fop
All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make
nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a
.llseek pointer.
The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek
and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that
the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains
the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek.
New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek
and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted
to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code
relies on calling seek on the device file.
The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains
comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was
chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will
be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not
seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle.
Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get
the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window.
Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic
patch that does all this.
===== begin semantic patch =====
// This adds an llseek= method to all file operations,
// as a preparation for making no_llseek the default.
//
// The rules are
// - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open
// - use seq_lseek for sequential files
// - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos
// - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos,
// but we still want to allow users to call lseek
//
@ open1 exists @
identifier nested_open;
@@
nested_open(...)
{
<+...
nonseekable_open(...)
...+>
}
@ open exists@
identifier open_f;
identifier i, f;
identifier open1.nested_open;
@@
int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f)
{
<+...
(
nonseekable_open(...)
|
nested_open(...)
)
...+>
}
@ read disable optional_qualifier exists @
identifier read_f;
identifier f, p, s, off;
type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t;
expression E;
identifier func;
@@
ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off)
{
<+...
(
*off = E
|
*off += E
|
func(..., off, ...)
|
E = *off
)
...+>
}
@ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @
identifier read_f;
identifier f, p, s, off;
type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t;
@@
ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off)
{
... when != off
}
@ write @
identifier write_f;
identifier f, p, s, off;
type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t;
expression E;
identifier func;
@@
ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off)
{
<+...
(
*off = E
|
*off += E
|
func(..., off, ...)
|
E = *off
)
...+>
}
@ write_no_fpos @
identifier write_f;
identifier f, p, s, off;
type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t;
@@
ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off)
{
... when != off
}
@ fops0 @
identifier fops;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
};
@ has_llseek depends on fops0 @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier llseek_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
.llseek = llseek_f,
...
};
@ has_read depends on fops0 @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier read_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
.read = read_f,
...
};
@ has_write depends on fops0 @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier write_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
.write = write_f,
...
};
@ has_open depends on fops0 @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier open_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
.open = open_f,
...
};
// use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open
////////////////////////////////////////////
@ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open";
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
... .open = nso, ...
+.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */
};
@ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier open.open_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
... .open = open_f, ...
+.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */
};
// use seq_lseek for sequential files
/////////////////////////////////////
@ seq depends on !has_llseek @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier sr ~= "seq_read";
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
... .read = sr, ...
+.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */
};
// use default_llseek if there is a readdir
///////////////////////////////////////////
@ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier readdir_e;
@@
// any other fop is used that changes pos
struct file_operations fops = {
... .readdir = readdir_e, ...
+.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */
};
// use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
@ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier read.read_f;
@@
// read fops use offset
struct file_operations fops = {
... .read = read_f, ...
+.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */
};
@ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier write.write_f;
@@
// write fops use offset
struct file_operations fops = {
... .write = write_f, ...
+ .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */
};
// Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
@ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier read_no_fpos.read_f;
identifier write_no_fpos.write_f;
@@
// write fops use offset
struct file_operations fops = {
...
.write = write_f,
.read = read_f,
...
+.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */
};
@ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier write_no_fpos.write_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
... .write = write_f, ...
+.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */
};
@ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
identifier read_no_fpos.read_f;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
... .read = read_f, ...
+.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */
};
@ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @
identifier fops0.fops;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
+.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */
};
===== End semantic patch =====
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
2010-08-16 00:52:59 +08:00
|
|
|
.llseek = no_llseek,
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct miscdevice erst_dbg_dev = {
|
|
|
|
.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
|
|
|
|
.name = "erst_dbg",
|
|
|
|
.fops = &erst_dbg_ops,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __init int erst_dbg_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-07-13 13:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
if (erst_disable) {
|
|
|
|
pr_info(ERST_DBG_PFX "ERST support is disabled.\n");
|
|
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-08-12 11:55:17 +08:00
|
|
|
return misc_register(&erst_dbg_dev);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static __exit void erst_dbg_exit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
misc_deregister(&erst_dbg_dev);
|
|
|
|
kfree(erst_dbg_buf);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
module_init(erst_dbg_init);
|
|
|
|
module_exit(erst_dbg_exit);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MODULE_AUTHOR("Huang Ying");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("APEI Error Record Serialization Table debug support");
|
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|