OpenCloudOS-Kernel/fs/crypto/crypto.c

412 lines
13 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* This contains encryption functions for per-file encryption.
*
* Copyright (C) 2015, Google, Inc.
* Copyright (C) 2015, Motorola Mobility
*
* Written by Michael Halcrow, 2014.
*
* Filename encryption additions
* Uday Savagaonkar, 2014
* Encryption policy handling additions
* Ildar Muslukhov, 2014
* Add fscrypt_pullback_bio_page()
* Jaegeuk Kim, 2015.
*
* This has not yet undergone a rigorous security audit.
*
* The usage of AES-XTS should conform to recommendations in NIST
* Special Publication 800-38E and IEEE P1619/D16.
*/
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/mempool.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <crypto/skcipher.h>
#include "fscrypt_private.h"
static unsigned int num_prealloc_crypto_pages = 32;
module_param(num_prealloc_crypto_pages, uint, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_prealloc_crypto_pages,
"Number of crypto pages to preallocate");
static mempool_t *fscrypt_bounce_page_pool = NULL;
static struct workqueue_struct *fscrypt_read_workqueue;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(fscrypt_init_mutex);
struct kmem_cache *fscrypt_info_cachep;
void fscrypt_enqueue_decrypt_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
queue_work(fscrypt_read_workqueue, work);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_enqueue_decrypt_work);
struct page *fscrypt_alloc_bounce_page(gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
return mempool_alloc(fscrypt_bounce_page_pool, gfp_flags);
}
/**
* fscrypt_free_bounce_page() - free a ciphertext bounce page
* @bounce_page: the bounce page to free, or NULL
*
* Free a bounce page that was allocated by fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks(),
* or by fscrypt_alloc_bounce_page() directly.
*/
void fscrypt_free_bounce_page(struct page *bounce_page)
{
if (!bounce_page)
return;
set_page_private(bounce_page, (unsigned long)NULL);
ClearPagePrivate(bounce_page);
mempool_free(bounce_page, fscrypt_bounce_page_pool);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_free_bounce_page);
/*
* Generate the IV for the given logical block number within the given file.
* For filenames encryption, lblk_num == 0.
*
* Keep this in sync with fscrypt_limit_io_blocks(). fscrypt_limit_io_blocks()
* needs to know about any IV generation methods where the low bits of IV don't
* simply contain the lblk_num (e.g., IV_INO_LBLK_32).
*/
fscrypt: add Adiantum support Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-06 21:36:21 +08:00
void fscrypt_generate_iv(union fscrypt_iv *iv, u64 lblk_num,
const struct fscrypt_info *ci)
{
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-25 05:54:36 +08:00
u8 flags = fscrypt_policy_flags(&ci->ci_policy);
fscrypt: add Adiantum support Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-06 21:36:21 +08:00
memset(iv, 0, ci->ci_mode->ivsize);
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-25 05:54:36 +08:00
if (flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64) {
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permits the moving of encrypted file contents (as f2fs's garbage collector requires) is still desirable. To support such hardware, add a new encryption format IV_INO_LBLK_32 that makes the best use of the 32 bits: the IV is set to 'SipHash-2-4(inode_number) + file_logical_block_number mod 2^32', where the SipHash key is derived from the fscrypt master key. We hash only the inode number and not also the block number, because we need to maintain contiguity of DUNs to merge bios. Unlike with IV_INO_LBLK_64, with this format IV reuse is possible; this is unavoidable given the size of the DUN. This means this format should only be used where the requirements of the first paragraph apply. However, the hash spreads out the IVs in the whole usable range, and the use of a keyed hash makes it difficult for an attacker to determine which files use which IVs. Besides the above differences, this flag works like IV_INO_LBLK_64 in that on ext4 it is only allowed if the stable_inodes feature has been enabled to prevent inode numbers and the filesystem UUID from changing. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515204141.251098-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-16 04:41:41 +08:00
WARN_ON_ONCE(lblk_num > U32_MAX);
WARN_ON_ONCE(ci->ci_inode->i_ino > U32_MAX);
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-25 05:54:36 +08:00
lblk_num |= (u64)ci->ci_inode->i_ino << 32;
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permits the moving of encrypted file contents (as f2fs's garbage collector requires) is still desirable. To support such hardware, add a new encryption format IV_INO_LBLK_32 that makes the best use of the 32 bits: the IV is set to 'SipHash-2-4(inode_number) + file_logical_block_number mod 2^32', where the SipHash key is derived from the fscrypt master key. We hash only the inode number and not also the block number, because we need to maintain contiguity of DUNs to merge bios. Unlike with IV_INO_LBLK_64, with this format IV reuse is possible; this is unavoidable given the size of the DUN. This means this format should only be used where the requirements of the first paragraph apply. However, the hash spreads out the IVs in the whole usable range, and the use of a keyed hash makes it difficult for an attacker to determine which files use which IVs. Besides the above differences, this flag works like IV_INO_LBLK_64 in that on ext4 it is only allowed if the stable_inodes feature has been enabled to prevent inode numbers and the filesystem UUID from changing. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515204141.251098-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-05-16 04:41:41 +08:00
} else if (flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(lblk_num > U32_MAX);
lblk_num = (u32)(ci->ci_hashed_ino + lblk_num);
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-25 05:54:36 +08:00
} else if (flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY) {
memcpy(iv->nonce, ci->ci_nonce, FSCRYPT_FILE_NONCE_SIZE);
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com> Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-10-25 05:54:36 +08:00
}
iv->lblk_num = cpu_to_le64(lblk_num);
fscrypt: add Adiantum support Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-06 21:36:21 +08:00
}
/* Encrypt or decrypt a single filesystem block of file contents */
int fscrypt_crypt_block(const struct inode *inode, fscrypt_direction_t rw,
u64 lblk_num, struct page *src_page,
struct page *dest_page, unsigned int len,
unsigned int offs, gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
fscrypt: add Adiantum support Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-06 21:36:21 +08:00
union fscrypt_iv iv;
Merge tag 'for-f2fs-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs Pull f2fs updates from Jaegeuk Kim: "New Features: - uplift filesystem encryption into fs/crypto/ - give sysfs entries to control memroy consumption Enhancements: - aio performance by preallocating blocks in ->write_iter - use writepages lock for only WB_SYNC_ALL - avoid redundant inline_data conversion - enhance forground GC - use wait_for_stable_page as possible - speed up SEEK_DATA and fiiemap Bug Fixes: - corner case in terms of -ENOSPC for inline_data - hung task caused by long latency in shrinker - corruption between atomic write and f2fs_trace_pid - avoid garbage lengths in dentries - revoke atomicly written pages if an error occurs In addition, there are various minor bug fixes and clean-ups" * tag 'for-f2fs-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs: (81 commits) f2fs: submit node page write bios when really required f2fs: add missing argument to f2fs_setxattr stub f2fs: fix to avoid unneeded unlock_new_inode f2fs: clean up opened code with f2fs_update_dentry f2fs: declare static functions f2fs: use cryptoapi crc32 functions f2fs: modify the readahead method in ra_node_page() f2fs crypto: sync ext4_lookup and ext4_file_open fs crypto: move per-file encryption from f2fs tree to fs/crypto f2fs: mutex can't be used by down_write_nest_lock() f2fs: recovery missing dot dentries in root directory f2fs: fix to avoid deadlock when merging inline data f2fs: introduce f2fs_flush_merged_bios for cleanup f2fs: introduce f2fs_update_data_blkaddr for cleanup f2fs crypto: fix incorrect positioning for GCing encrypted data page f2fs: fix incorrect upper bound when iterating inode mapping tree f2fs: avoid hungtask problem caused by losing wake_up f2fs: trace old block address for CoWed page f2fs: try to flush inode after merging inline data f2fs: show more info about superblock recovery ...
2016-03-22 02:03:02 +08:00
struct skcipher_request *req = NULL;
DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
struct scatterlist dst, src;
struct fscrypt_info *ci = inode->i_crypt_info;
fscrypt: add inline encryption support Add support for inline encryption to fs/crypto/. With "inline encryption", the block layer handles the decryption/encryption as part of the bio, instead of the filesystem doing the crypto itself via Linux's crypto API. This model is needed in order to take advantage of the inline encryption hardware present on most modern mobile SoCs. To use inline encryption, the filesystem needs to be mounted with '-o inlinecrypt'. Blk-crypto will then be used instead of the traditional filesystem-layer crypto whenever possible to encrypt the contents of any encrypted files in that filesystem. Fscrypt still provides the key and IV to use, and the actual ciphertext on-disk is still the same; therefore it's testable using the existing fscrypt ciphertext verification tests. Note that since blk-crypto has a fallback to Linux's crypto API, and also supports all the encryption modes currently supported by fscrypt, this feature is usable and testable even without actual inline encryption hardware. Per-filesystem changes will be needed to set encryption contexts when submitting bios and to implement the 'inlinecrypt' mount option. This patch just adds the common code. Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702015607.1215430-3-satyat@google.com Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2020-07-02 09:56:05 +08:00
struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = ci->ci_enc_key.tfm;
int res = 0;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len <= 0))
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len % FSCRYPT_CONTENTS_ALIGNMENT != 0))
return -EINVAL;
fscrypt: add Adiantum support Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-06 21:36:21 +08:00
fscrypt_generate_iv(&iv, lblk_num, ci);
req = skcipher_request_alloc(tfm, gfp_flags);
if (!req)
return -ENOMEM;
Merge tag 'for-f2fs-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs Pull f2fs updates from Jaegeuk Kim: "New Features: - uplift filesystem encryption into fs/crypto/ - give sysfs entries to control memroy consumption Enhancements: - aio performance by preallocating blocks in ->write_iter - use writepages lock for only WB_SYNC_ALL - avoid redundant inline_data conversion - enhance forground GC - use wait_for_stable_page as possible - speed up SEEK_DATA and fiiemap Bug Fixes: - corner case in terms of -ENOSPC for inline_data - hung task caused by long latency in shrinker - corruption between atomic write and f2fs_trace_pid - avoid garbage lengths in dentries - revoke atomicly written pages if an error occurs In addition, there are various minor bug fixes and clean-ups" * tag 'for-f2fs-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs: (81 commits) f2fs: submit node page write bios when really required f2fs: add missing argument to f2fs_setxattr stub f2fs: fix to avoid unneeded unlock_new_inode f2fs: clean up opened code with f2fs_update_dentry f2fs: declare static functions f2fs: use cryptoapi crc32 functions f2fs: modify the readahead method in ra_node_page() f2fs crypto: sync ext4_lookup and ext4_file_open fs crypto: move per-file encryption from f2fs tree to fs/crypto f2fs: mutex can't be used by down_write_nest_lock() f2fs: recovery missing dot dentries in root directory f2fs: fix to avoid deadlock when merging inline data f2fs: introduce f2fs_flush_merged_bios for cleanup f2fs: introduce f2fs_update_data_blkaddr for cleanup f2fs crypto: fix incorrect positioning for GCing encrypted data page f2fs: fix incorrect upper bound when iterating inode mapping tree f2fs: avoid hungtask problem caused by losing wake_up f2fs: trace old block address for CoWed page f2fs: try to flush inode after merging inline data f2fs: show more info about superblock recovery ...
2016-03-22 02:03:02 +08:00
skcipher_request_set_callback(
req, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG | CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP,
crypto_req_done, &wait);
sg_init_table(&dst, 1);
sg_set_page(&dst, dest_page, len, offs);
sg_init_table(&src, 1);
sg_set_page(&src, src_page, len, offs);
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &src, &dst, len, &iv);
if (rw == FS_DECRYPT)
res = crypto_wait_req(crypto_skcipher_decrypt(req), &wait);
else
res = crypto_wait_req(crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req), &wait);
Merge tag 'for-f2fs-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs Pull f2fs updates from Jaegeuk Kim: "New Features: - uplift filesystem encryption into fs/crypto/ - give sysfs entries to control memroy consumption Enhancements: - aio performance by preallocating blocks in ->write_iter - use writepages lock for only WB_SYNC_ALL - avoid redundant inline_data conversion - enhance forground GC - use wait_for_stable_page as possible - speed up SEEK_DATA and fiiemap Bug Fixes: - corner case in terms of -ENOSPC for inline_data - hung task caused by long latency in shrinker - corruption between atomic write and f2fs_trace_pid - avoid garbage lengths in dentries - revoke atomicly written pages if an error occurs In addition, there are various minor bug fixes and clean-ups" * tag 'for-f2fs-4.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs: (81 commits) f2fs: submit node page write bios when really required f2fs: add missing argument to f2fs_setxattr stub f2fs: fix to avoid unneeded unlock_new_inode f2fs: clean up opened code with f2fs_update_dentry f2fs: declare static functions f2fs: use cryptoapi crc32 functions f2fs: modify the readahead method in ra_node_page() f2fs crypto: sync ext4_lookup and ext4_file_open fs crypto: move per-file encryption from f2fs tree to fs/crypto f2fs: mutex can't be used by down_write_nest_lock() f2fs: recovery missing dot dentries in root directory f2fs: fix to avoid deadlock when merging inline data f2fs: introduce f2fs_flush_merged_bios for cleanup f2fs: introduce f2fs_update_data_blkaddr for cleanup f2fs crypto: fix incorrect positioning for GCing encrypted data page f2fs: fix incorrect upper bound when iterating inode mapping tree f2fs: avoid hungtask problem caused by losing wake_up f2fs: trace old block address for CoWed page f2fs: try to flush inode after merging inline data f2fs: show more info about superblock recovery ...
2016-03-22 02:03:02 +08:00
skcipher_request_free(req);
if (res) {
fscrypt_err(inode, "%scryption failed for block %llu: %d",
(rw == FS_DECRYPT ? "De" : "En"), lblk_num, res);
return res;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks() - Encrypt filesystem blocks from a
* pagecache page
* @page: The locked pagecache page containing the block(s) to encrypt
* @len: Total size of the block(s) to encrypt. Must be a nonzero
* multiple of the filesystem's block size.
* @offs: Byte offset within @page of the first block to encrypt. Must be
* a multiple of the filesystem's block size.
* @gfp_flags: Memory allocation flags. See details below.
*
* A new bounce page is allocated, and the specified block(s) are encrypted into
* it. In the bounce page, the ciphertext block(s) will be located at the same
* offsets at which the plaintext block(s) were located in the source page; any
* other parts of the bounce page will be left uninitialized. However, normally
* blocksize == PAGE_SIZE and the whole page is encrypted at once.
*
* This is for use by the filesystem's ->writepages() method.
*
* The bounce page allocation is mempool-backed, so it will always succeed when
* @gfp_flags includes __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, e.g. when it's GFP_NOFS. However,
* only the first page of each bio can be allocated this way. To prevent
* deadlocks, for any additional pages a mask like GFP_NOWAIT must be used.
*
* Return: the new encrypted bounce page on success; an ERR_PTR() on failure
*/
struct page *fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks(struct page *page,
unsigned int len,
unsigned int offs,
gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
const struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
const unsigned int blockbits = inode->i_blkbits;
const unsigned int blocksize = 1 << blockbits;
struct page *ciphertext_page;
u64 lblk_num = ((u64)page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - blockbits)) +
(offs >> blockbits);
unsigned int i;
int err;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageLocked(page)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len <= 0 || !IS_ALIGNED(len | offs, blocksize)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
ciphertext_page = fscrypt_alloc_bounce_page(gfp_flags);
if (!ciphertext_page)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
for (i = offs; i < offs + len; i += blocksize, lblk_num++) {
err = fscrypt_crypt_block(inode, FS_ENCRYPT, lblk_num,
page, ciphertext_page,
blocksize, i, gfp_flags);
if (err) {
fscrypt_free_bounce_page(ciphertext_page);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
}
SetPagePrivate(ciphertext_page);
set_page_private(ciphertext_page, (unsigned long)page);
return ciphertext_page;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks);
/**
* fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace() - Encrypt a filesystem block in-place
* @inode: The inode to which this block belongs
* @page: The page containing the block to encrypt
* @len: Size of block to encrypt. This must be a multiple of
* FSCRYPT_CONTENTS_ALIGNMENT.
* @offs: Byte offset within @page at which the block to encrypt begins
* @lblk_num: Filesystem logical block number of the block, i.e. the 0-based
* number of the block within the file
* @gfp_flags: Memory allocation flags
*
* Encrypt a possibly-compressed filesystem block that is located in an
* arbitrary page, not necessarily in the original pagecache page. The @inode
* and @lblk_num must be specified, as they can't be determined from @page.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure
*/
int fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace(const struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
unsigned int len, unsigned int offs,
u64 lblk_num, gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
return fscrypt_crypt_block(inode, FS_ENCRYPT, lblk_num, page, page,
len, offs, gfp_flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace);
/**
* fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks() - Decrypt filesystem blocks in a
* pagecache folio
* @folio: The locked pagecache folio containing the block(s) to decrypt
* @len: Total size of the block(s) to decrypt. Must be a nonzero
* multiple of the filesystem's block size.
* @offs: Byte offset within @folio of the first block to decrypt. Must be
* a multiple of the filesystem's block size.
*
* The specified block(s) are decrypted in-place within the pagecache folio,
* which must still be locked and not uptodate.
*
* This is for use by the filesystem's ->readahead() method.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure
*/
int fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks(struct folio *folio, size_t len,
size_t offs)
{
const struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
const unsigned int blockbits = inode->i_blkbits;
const unsigned int blocksize = 1 << blockbits;
u64 lblk_num = ((u64)folio->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - blockbits)) +
(offs >> blockbits);
size_t i;
int err;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio)))
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len <= 0 || !IS_ALIGNED(len | offs, blocksize)))
return -EINVAL;
for (i = offs; i < offs + len; i += blocksize, lblk_num++) {
struct page *page = folio_page(folio, i >> PAGE_SHIFT);
err = fscrypt_crypt_block(inode, FS_DECRYPT, lblk_num, page,
page, blocksize, i & ~PAGE_MASK,
GFP_NOFS);
if (err)
return err;
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_decrypt_pagecache_blocks);
/**
* fscrypt_decrypt_block_inplace() - Decrypt a filesystem block in-place
* @inode: The inode to which this block belongs
* @page: The page containing the block to decrypt
* @len: Size of block to decrypt. This must be a multiple of
* FSCRYPT_CONTENTS_ALIGNMENT.
* @offs: Byte offset within @page at which the block to decrypt begins
* @lblk_num: Filesystem logical block number of the block, i.e. the 0-based
* number of the block within the file
*
* Decrypt a possibly-compressed filesystem block that is located in an
* arbitrary page, not necessarily in the original pagecache page. The @inode
* and @lblk_num must be specified, as they can't be determined from @page.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure
*/
int fscrypt_decrypt_block_inplace(const struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
unsigned int len, unsigned int offs,
u64 lblk_num)
{
return fscrypt_crypt_block(inode, FS_DECRYPT, lblk_num, page, page,
len, offs, GFP_NOFS);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fscrypt_decrypt_block_inplace);
/**
* fscrypt_initialize() - allocate major buffers for fs encryption.
* @sb: the filesystem superblock
*
* We only call this when we start accessing encrypted files, since it
* results in memory getting allocated that wouldn't otherwise be used.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure
*/
int fscrypt_initialize(struct super_block *sb)
{
int err = 0;
mempool_t *pool;
/* pairs with smp_store_release() below */
if (likely(smp_load_acquire(&fscrypt_bounce_page_pool)))
return 0;
/* No need to allocate a bounce page pool if this FS won't use it. */
if (sb->s_cop->flags & FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES)
return 0;
mutex_lock(&fscrypt_init_mutex);
if (fscrypt_bounce_page_pool)
goto out_unlock;
err = -ENOMEM;
pool = mempool_create_page_pool(num_prealloc_crypto_pages, 0);
if (!pool)
goto out_unlock;
/* pairs with smp_load_acquire() above */
smp_store_release(&fscrypt_bounce_page_pool, pool);
err = 0;
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&fscrypt_init_mutex);
return err;
}
void fscrypt_msg(const struct inode *inode, const char *level,
const char *fmt, ...)
{
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
struct va_format vaf;
va_list args;
if (!__ratelimit(&rs))
return;
va_start(args, fmt);
vaf.fmt = fmt;
vaf.va = &args;
if (inode && inode->i_ino)
printk("%sfscrypt (%s, inode %lu): %pV\n",
level, inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino, &vaf);
else if (inode)
printk("%sfscrypt (%s): %pV\n", level, inode->i_sb->s_id, &vaf);
else
printk("%sfscrypt: %pV\n", level, &vaf);
va_end(args);
}
/**
* fscrypt_init() - Set up for fs encryption.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure
*/
static int __init fscrypt_init(void)
{
fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl Add a new fscrypt ioctl, FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY. This ioctl adds an encryption key to the filesystem's fscrypt keyring ->s_master_keys, making any files encrypted with that key appear "unlocked". Why we need this ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The main problem is that the "locked/unlocked" (ciphertext/plaintext) status of encrypted files is global, but the fscrypt keys are not. fscrypt only looks for keys in the keyring(s) the process accessing the filesystem is subscribed to: the thread keyring, process keyring, and session keyring, where the session keyring may contain the user keyring. Therefore, userspace has to put fscrypt keys in the keyrings for individual users or sessions. But this means that when a process with a different keyring tries to access encrypted files, whether they appear "unlocked" or not is nondeterministic. This is because it depends on whether the files are currently present in the inode cache. Fixing this by consistently providing each process its own view of the filesystem depending on whether it has the key or not isn't feasible due to how the VFS caches work. Furthermore, while sometimes users expect this behavior, it is misguided for two reasons. First, it would be an OS-level access control mechanism largely redundant with existing access control mechanisms such as UNIX file permissions, ACLs, LSMs, etc. Encryption is actually for protecting the data at rest. Second, almost all users of fscrypt actually do need the keys to be global. The largest users of fscrypt, Android and Chromium OS, achieve this by having PID 1 create a "session keyring" that is inherited by every process. This works, but it isn't scalable because it prevents session keyrings from being used for any other purpose. On general-purpose Linux distros, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool [1] can't similarly abuse the session keyring, so to make 'sudo' work on all systems it has to link all the user keyrings into root's user keyring [2]. This is ugly and raises security concerns. Moreover it can't make the keys available to system services, such as sshd trying to access the user's '~/.ssh' directory (see [3], [4]) or NetworkManager trying to read certificates from the user's home directory (see [5]); or to Docker containers (see [6], [7]). By having an API to add a key to the *filesystem* we'll be able to fix the above bugs, remove userspace workarounds, and clearly express the intended semantics: the locked/unlocked status of an encrypted directory is global, and encryption is orthogonal to OS-level access control. Why not use the add_key() syscall ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We use an ioctl for this API rather than the existing add_key() system call because the ioctl gives us the flexibility needed to implement fscrypt-specific semantics that will be introduced in later patches: - Supporting key removal with the semantics such that the secret is removed immediately and any unused inodes using the key are evicted; also, the eviction of any in-use inodes can be retried. - Calculating a key-dependent cryptographic identifier and returning it to userspace. - Allowing keys to be added and removed by non-root users, but only keys for v2 encryption policies; and to prevent denial-of-service attacks, users can only remove keys they themselves have added, and a key is only really removed after all users who added it have removed it. Trying to shoehorn these semantics into the keyrings syscalls would be very difficult, whereas the ioctls make things much easier. However, to reuse code the implementation still uses the keyrings service internally. Thus we get lockless RCU-mode key lookups without having to re-implement it, and the keys automatically show up in /proc/keys for debugging purposes. References: [1] https://github.com/google/fscrypt [2] https://goo.gl/55cCrI#heading=h.vf09isp98isb [3] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/111#issuecomment-444347939 [4] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/116 [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fscrypt/+bug/1770715 [6] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/128 [7] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1130306/cannot-run-docker-on-an-encrypted-filesystem Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-05 10:35:46 +08:00
int err = -ENOMEM;
/*
* Use an unbound workqueue to allow bios to be decrypted in parallel
* even when they happen to complete on the same CPU. This sacrifices
* locality, but it's worthwhile since decryption is CPU-intensive.
*
* Also use a high-priority workqueue to prioritize decryption work,
* which blocks reads from completing, over regular application tasks.
*/
fscrypt_read_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("fscrypt_read_queue",
WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI,
num_online_cpus());
if (!fscrypt_read_workqueue)
goto fail;
fscrypt_info_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(fscrypt_info, SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT);
if (!fscrypt_info_cachep)
goto fail_free_queue;
fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl Add a new fscrypt ioctl, FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY. This ioctl adds an encryption key to the filesystem's fscrypt keyring ->s_master_keys, making any files encrypted with that key appear "unlocked". Why we need this ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The main problem is that the "locked/unlocked" (ciphertext/plaintext) status of encrypted files is global, but the fscrypt keys are not. fscrypt only looks for keys in the keyring(s) the process accessing the filesystem is subscribed to: the thread keyring, process keyring, and session keyring, where the session keyring may contain the user keyring. Therefore, userspace has to put fscrypt keys in the keyrings for individual users or sessions. But this means that when a process with a different keyring tries to access encrypted files, whether they appear "unlocked" or not is nondeterministic. This is because it depends on whether the files are currently present in the inode cache. Fixing this by consistently providing each process its own view of the filesystem depending on whether it has the key or not isn't feasible due to how the VFS caches work. Furthermore, while sometimes users expect this behavior, it is misguided for two reasons. First, it would be an OS-level access control mechanism largely redundant with existing access control mechanisms such as UNIX file permissions, ACLs, LSMs, etc. Encryption is actually for protecting the data at rest. Second, almost all users of fscrypt actually do need the keys to be global. The largest users of fscrypt, Android and Chromium OS, achieve this by having PID 1 create a "session keyring" that is inherited by every process. This works, but it isn't scalable because it prevents session keyrings from being used for any other purpose. On general-purpose Linux distros, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool [1] can't similarly abuse the session keyring, so to make 'sudo' work on all systems it has to link all the user keyrings into root's user keyring [2]. This is ugly and raises security concerns. Moreover it can't make the keys available to system services, such as sshd trying to access the user's '~/.ssh' directory (see [3], [4]) or NetworkManager trying to read certificates from the user's home directory (see [5]); or to Docker containers (see [6], [7]). By having an API to add a key to the *filesystem* we'll be able to fix the above bugs, remove userspace workarounds, and clearly express the intended semantics: the locked/unlocked status of an encrypted directory is global, and encryption is orthogonal to OS-level access control. Why not use the add_key() syscall ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We use an ioctl for this API rather than the existing add_key() system call because the ioctl gives us the flexibility needed to implement fscrypt-specific semantics that will be introduced in later patches: - Supporting key removal with the semantics such that the secret is removed immediately and any unused inodes using the key are evicted; also, the eviction of any in-use inodes can be retried. - Calculating a key-dependent cryptographic identifier and returning it to userspace. - Allowing keys to be added and removed by non-root users, but only keys for v2 encryption policies; and to prevent denial-of-service attacks, users can only remove keys they themselves have added, and a key is only really removed after all users who added it have removed it. Trying to shoehorn these semantics into the keyrings syscalls would be very difficult, whereas the ioctls make things much easier. However, to reuse code the implementation still uses the keyrings service internally. Thus we get lockless RCU-mode key lookups without having to re-implement it, and the keys automatically show up in /proc/keys for debugging purposes. References: [1] https://github.com/google/fscrypt [2] https://goo.gl/55cCrI#heading=h.vf09isp98isb [3] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/111#issuecomment-444347939 [4] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/116 [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fscrypt/+bug/1770715 [6] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/128 [7] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1130306/cannot-run-docker-on-an-encrypted-filesystem Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-05 10:35:46 +08:00
err = fscrypt_init_keyring();
if (err)
goto fail_free_info;
return 0;
fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl Add a new fscrypt ioctl, FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY. This ioctl adds an encryption key to the filesystem's fscrypt keyring ->s_master_keys, making any files encrypted with that key appear "unlocked". Why we need this ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The main problem is that the "locked/unlocked" (ciphertext/plaintext) status of encrypted files is global, but the fscrypt keys are not. fscrypt only looks for keys in the keyring(s) the process accessing the filesystem is subscribed to: the thread keyring, process keyring, and session keyring, where the session keyring may contain the user keyring. Therefore, userspace has to put fscrypt keys in the keyrings for individual users or sessions. But this means that when a process with a different keyring tries to access encrypted files, whether they appear "unlocked" or not is nondeterministic. This is because it depends on whether the files are currently present in the inode cache. Fixing this by consistently providing each process its own view of the filesystem depending on whether it has the key or not isn't feasible due to how the VFS caches work. Furthermore, while sometimes users expect this behavior, it is misguided for two reasons. First, it would be an OS-level access control mechanism largely redundant with existing access control mechanisms such as UNIX file permissions, ACLs, LSMs, etc. Encryption is actually for protecting the data at rest. Second, almost all users of fscrypt actually do need the keys to be global. The largest users of fscrypt, Android and Chromium OS, achieve this by having PID 1 create a "session keyring" that is inherited by every process. This works, but it isn't scalable because it prevents session keyrings from being used for any other purpose. On general-purpose Linux distros, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool [1] can't similarly abuse the session keyring, so to make 'sudo' work on all systems it has to link all the user keyrings into root's user keyring [2]. This is ugly and raises security concerns. Moreover it can't make the keys available to system services, such as sshd trying to access the user's '~/.ssh' directory (see [3], [4]) or NetworkManager trying to read certificates from the user's home directory (see [5]); or to Docker containers (see [6], [7]). By having an API to add a key to the *filesystem* we'll be able to fix the above bugs, remove userspace workarounds, and clearly express the intended semantics: the locked/unlocked status of an encrypted directory is global, and encryption is orthogonal to OS-level access control. Why not use the add_key() syscall ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We use an ioctl for this API rather than the existing add_key() system call because the ioctl gives us the flexibility needed to implement fscrypt-specific semantics that will be introduced in later patches: - Supporting key removal with the semantics such that the secret is removed immediately and any unused inodes using the key are evicted; also, the eviction of any in-use inodes can be retried. - Calculating a key-dependent cryptographic identifier and returning it to userspace. - Allowing keys to be added and removed by non-root users, but only keys for v2 encryption policies; and to prevent denial-of-service attacks, users can only remove keys they themselves have added, and a key is only really removed after all users who added it have removed it. Trying to shoehorn these semantics into the keyrings syscalls would be very difficult, whereas the ioctls make things much easier. However, to reuse code the implementation still uses the keyrings service internally. Thus we get lockless RCU-mode key lookups without having to re-implement it, and the keys automatically show up in /proc/keys for debugging purposes. References: [1] https://github.com/google/fscrypt [2] https://goo.gl/55cCrI#heading=h.vf09isp98isb [3] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/111#issuecomment-444347939 [4] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/116 [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fscrypt/+bug/1770715 [6] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/128 [7] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1130306/cannot-run-docker-on-an-encrypted-filesystem Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-05 10:35:46 +08:00
fail_free_info:
kmem_cache_destroy(fscrypt_info_cachep);
fail_free_queue:
destroy_workqueue(fscrypt_read_workqueue);
fail:
fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl Add a new fscrypt ioctl, FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY. This ioctl adds an encryption key to the filesystem's fscrypt keyring ->s_master_keys, making any files encrypted with that key appear "unlocked". Why we need this ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The main problem is that the "locked/unlocked" (ciphertext/plaintext) status of encrypted files is global, but the fscrypt keys are not. fscrypt only looks for keys in the keyring(s) the process accessing the filesystem is subscribed to: the thread keyring, process keyring, and session keyring, where the session keyring may contain the user keyring. Therefore, userspace has to put fscrypt keys in the keyrings for individual users or sessions. But this means that when a process with a different keyring tries to access encrypted files, whether they appear "unlocked" or not is nondeterministic. This is because it depends on whether the files are currently present in the inode cache. Fixing this by consistently providing each process its own view of the filesystem depending on whether it has the key or not isn't feasible due to how the VFS caches work. Furthermore, while sometimes users expect this behavior, it is misguided for two reasons. First, it would be an OS-level access control mechanism largely redundant with existing access control mechanisms such as UNIX file permissions, ACLs, LSMs, etc. Encryption is actually for protecting the data at rest. Second, almost all users of fscrypt actually do need the keys to be global. The largest users of fscrypt, Android and Chromium OS, achieve this by having PID 1 create a "session keyring" that is inherited by every process. This works, but it isn't scalable because it prevents session keyrings from being used for any other purpose. On general-purpose Linux distros, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool [1] can't similarly abuse the session keyring, so to make 'sudo' work on all systems it has to link all the user keyrings into root's user keyring [2]. This is ugly and raises security concerns. Moreover it can't make the keys available to system services, such as sshd trying to access the user's '~/.ssh' directory (see [3], [4]) or NetworkManager trying to read certificates from the user's home directory (see [5]); or to Docker containers (see [6], [7]). By having an API to add a key to the *filesystem* we'll be able to fix the above bugs, remove userspace workarounds, and clearly express the intended semantics: the locked/unlocked status of an encrypted directory is global, and encryption is orthogonal to OS-level access control. Why not use the add_key() syscall ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We use an ioctl for this API rather than the existing add_key() system call because the ioctl gives us the flexibility needed to implement fscrypt-specific semantics that will be introduced in later patches: - Supporting key removal with the semantics such that the secret is removed immediately and any unused inodes using the key are evicted; also, the eviction of any in-use inodes can be retried. - Calculating a key-dependent cryptographic identifier and returning it to userspace. - Allowing keys to be added and removed by non-root users, but only keys for v2 encryption policies; and to prevent denial-of-service attacks, users can only remove keys they themselves have added, and a key is only really removed after all users who added it have removed it. Trying to shoehorn these semantics into the keyrings syscalls would be very difficult, whereas the ioctls make things much easier. However, to reuse code the implementation still uses the keyrings service internally. Thus we get lockless RCU-mode key lookups without having to re-implement it, and the keys automatically show up in /proc/keys for debugging purposes. References: [1] https://github.com/google/fscrypt [2] https://goo.gl/55cCrI#heading=h.vf09isp98isb [3] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/111#issuecomment-444347939 [4] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/116 [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fscrypt/+bug/1770715 [6] https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/128 [7] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1130306/cannot-run-docker-on-an-encrypted-filesystem Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
2019-08-05 10:35:46 +08:00
return err;
}
late_initcall(fscrypt_init)