OpenCloudOS-Kernel/tools/perf/tests/attr.py

393 lines
11 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#! /usr/bin/python
License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 22:07:57 +08:00
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
import os
import sys
import glob
import optparse
import tempfile
import logging
import shutil
import ConfigParser
def data_equal(a, b):
# Allow multiple values in assignment separated by '|'
a_list = a.split('|')
b_list = b.split('|')
for a_item in a_list:
for b_item in b_list:
if (a_item == b_item):
return True
elif (a_item == '*') or (b_item == '*'):
return True
return False
class Fail(Exception):
def __init__(self, test, msg):
self.msg = msg
self.test = test
def getMsg(self):
return '\'%s\' - %s' % (self.test.path, self.msg)
perf tests: Add platform dependency to test 15 This patch adds platform dependency into the test case 15 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from Jiri Olsa. Add a new optional attribute named 'arch' in the [config] section of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture names this test can be executed on. For example: arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. This does not break existing behavior. The values listed for this attribute should be identical to uname -m output. If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is inverted, for example for arch = !s390x,ppc the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. Here is an example debug output: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C2 arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' test limitation 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 ..... Here is the output when a test is skipped: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C1 arch = !s390x [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: test limitation '!s390x' <--- new skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new The test is skipped with return code 0. Suggested-and-Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622073625.86762-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-06-22 15:36:25 +08:00
class Notest(Exception):
def __init__(self, test, arch):
self.arch = arch
self.test = test
def getMsg(self):
return '[%s] \'%s\'' % (self.arch, self.test.path)
class Unsup(Exception):
def __init__(self, test):
self.test = test
def getMsg(self):
return '\'%s\'' % self.test.path
class Event(dict):
terms = [
'cpu',
'flags',
'type',
'size',
'config',
'sample_period',
'sample_type',
'read_format',
'disabled',
'inherit',
'pinned',
'exclusive',
'exclude_user',
'exclude_kernel',
'exclude_hv',
'exclude_idle',
'mmap',
'comm',
'freq',
'inherit_stat',
'enable_on_exec',
'task',
'watermark',
'precise_ip',
'mmap_data',
'sample_id_all',
'exclude_host',
'exclude_guest',
'exclude_callchain_kernel',
'exclude_callchain_user',
'wakeup_events',
'bp_type',
'config1',
'config2',
'branch_sample_type',
'sample_regs_user',
'sample_stack_user',
]
def add(self, data):
for key, val in data:
log.debug(" %s = %s" % (key, val))
self[key] = val
def __init__(self, name, data, base):
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" Event %s" % name);
self.name = name;
self.group = ''
self.add(base)
self.add(data)
def equal(self, other):
for t in Event.terms:
log.debug(" [%s] %s %s" % (t, self[t], other[t]));
if not self.has_key(t) or not other.has_key(t):
return False
if not data_equal(self[t], other[t]):
return False
return True
def optional(self):
if self.has_key('optional') and self['optional'] == '1':
return True
return False
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
def diff(self, other):
for t in Event.terms:
if not self.has_key(t) or not other.has_key(t):
continue
if not data_equal(self[t], other[t]):
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.warning("expected %s=%s, got %s" % (t, self[t], other[t]))
# Test file description needs to have following sections:
# [config]
# - just single instance in file
# - needs to specify:
# 'command' - perf command name
# 'args' - special command arguments
# 'ret' - expected command return value (0 by default)
perf tests: Add platform dependency to test 15 This patch adds platform dependency into the test case 15 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from Jiri Olsa. Add a new optional attribute named 'arch' in the [config] section of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture names this test can be executed on. For example: arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. This does not break existing behavior. The values listed for this attribute should be identical to uname -m output. If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is inverted, for example for arch = !s390x,ppc the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. Here is an example debug output: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C2 arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' test limitation 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 ..... Here is the output when a test is skipped: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C1 arch = !s390x [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: test limitation '!s390x' <--- new skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new The test is skipped with return code 0. Suggested-and-Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622073625.86762-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-06-22 15:36:25 +08:00
# 'arch' - architecture specific test (optional)
# comma separated list, ! at the beginning
# negates it.
#
# [eventX:base]
# - one or multiple instances in file
# - expected values assignments
class Test(object):
def __init__(self, path, options):
parser = ConfigParser.SafeConfigParser()
parser.read(path)
log.warning("running '%s'" % path)
self.path = path
self.test_dir = options.test_dir
self.perf = options.perf
self.command = parser.get('config', 'command')
self.args = parser.get('config', 'args')
try:
self.ret = parser.get('config', 'ret')
except:
self.ret = 0
perf tests: Add platform dependency to test 15 This patch adds platform dependency into the test case 15 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from Jiri Olsa. Add a new optional attribute named 'arch' in the [config] section of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture names this test can be executed on. For example: arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. This does not break existing behavior. The values listed for this attribute should be identical to uname -m output. If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is inverted, for example for arch = !s390x,ppc the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. Here is an example debug output: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C2 arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' test limitation 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 ..... Here is the output when a test is skipped: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C1 arch = !s390x [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: test limitation '!s390x' <--- new skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new The test is skipped with return code 0. Suggested-and-Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622073625.86762-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-06-22 15:36:25 +08:00
try:
self.arch = parser.get('config', 'arch')
log.warning("test limitation '%s'" % self.arch)
except:
self.arch = ''
self.expect = {}
self.result = {}
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" loading expected events");
self.load_events(path, self.expect)
def is_event(self, name):
if name.find("event") == -1:
return False
else:
return True
perf tests: Add platform dependency to test 15 This patch adds platform dependency into the test case 15 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from Jiri Olsa. Add a new optional attribute named 'arch' in the [config] section of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture names this test can be executed on. For example: arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. This does not break existing behavior. The values listed for this attribute should be identical to uname -m output. If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is inverted, for example for arch = !s390x,ppc the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. Here is an example debug output: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C2 arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' test limitation 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 ..... Here is the output when a test is skipped: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C1 arch = !s390x [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: test limitation '!s390x' <--- new skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new The test is skipped with return code 0. Suggested-and-Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622073625.86762-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-06-22 15:36:25 +08:00
def skip_test(self, myarch):
# If architecture not set always run test
if self.arch == '':
# log.warning("test for arch %s is ok" % myarch)
return False
# Allow multiple values in assignment separated by ','
arch_list = self.arch.split(',')
# Handle negated list such as !s390x,ppc
if arch_list[0][0] == '!':
arch_list[0] = arch_list[0][1:]
log.warning("excluded architecture list %s" % arch_list)
for arch_item in arch_list:
# log.warning("test for %s arch is %s" % (arch_item, myarch))
if arch_item == myarch:
return True
return False
for arch_item in arch_list:
# log.warning("test for architecture '%s' current '%s'" % (arch_item, myarch))
if arch_item == myarch:
return False
return True
def load_events(self, path, events):
parser_event = ConfigParser.SafeConfigParser()
parser_event.read(path)
# The event record section header contains 'event' word,
# optionaly followed by ':' allowing to load 'parent
# event' first as a base
for section in filter(self.is_event, parser_event.sections()):
parser_items = parser_event.items(section);
base_items = {}
# Read parent event if there's any
if (':' in section):
base = section[section.index(':') + 1:]
parser_base = ConfigParser.SafeConfigParser()
parser_base.read(self.test_dir + '/' + base)
base_items = parser_base.items('event')
e = Event(section, parser_items, base_items)
events[section] = e
def run_cmd(self, tempdir):
perf tests: Add platform dependency to test 15 This patch adds platform dependency into the test case 15 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from Jiri Olsa. Add a new optional attribute named 'arch' in the [config] section of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture names this test can be executed on. For example: arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. This does not break existing behavior. The values listed for this attribute should be identical to uname -m output. If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is inverted, for example for arch = !s390x,ppc the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. Here is an example debug output: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C2 arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' test limitation 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 ..... Here is the output when a test is skipped: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C1 arch = !s390x [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: test limitation '!s390x' <--- new skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new The test is skipped with return code 0. Suggested-and-Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622073625.86762-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-06-22 15:36:25 +08:00
junk1, junk2, junk3, junk4, myarch = (os.uname())
if self.skip_test(myarch):
raise Notest(self, myarch)
cmd = "PERF_TEST_ATTR=%s %s %s -o %s/perf.data %s" % (tempdir,
self.perf, self.command, tempdir, self.args)
ret = os.WEXITSTATUS(os.system(cmd))
log.info(" '%s' ret '%s', expected '%s'" % (cmd, str(ret), str(self.ret)))
if not data_equal(str(ret), str(self.ret)):
raise Unsup(self)
def compare(self, expect, result):
match = {}
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" compare");
# For each expected event find all matching
# events in result. Fail if there's not any.
for exp_name, exp_event in expect.items():
exp_list = []
perf test attr: Fix python error on empty result Commit d78ada4a767 ("perf tests attr: Do not store failed events") does not create an event file in the /tmp directory when the perf_open_event() system call failed. This can lead to a situation where not /tmp/event-xx-yy-zz result file exists at all (for example on a s390x virtual machine environment) where no CPUMF hardware is available. The following command then fails with a python call back chain instead of printing failure: [root@s8360046 perf]# /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py -d ./tests/attr/ \ -p ./perf -v -ttest-stat-basic running './tests/attr//test-stat-basic' Traceback (most recent call last): File "./tests/attr.py", line 379, in <module> main() File "./tests/attr.py", line 370, in main run_tests(options) File "./tests/attr.py", line 311, in run_tests Test(f, options).run() File "./tests/attr.py", line 300, in run self.compare(self.expect, self.result) File "./tests/attr.py", line 248, in compare exp_event.diff(res_event) UnboundLocalError: local variable 'res_event' referenced before assignment [root@s8360046 perf]# This patch catches this pitfall and prints an error message instead: [root@s8360047 perf]# /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py -d ./tests/attr/ \ -p ./perf -vvv -ttest-stat-basic running './tests/attr//test-stat-basic' loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 flags = 0|8 [....] sample_regs_user = 0 sample_stack_user = 0 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpJbMQMP ./perf stat -o /tmp/tmpJbMQMP/perf.data -e cycles kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret '1', expected '1' loading result events compare matching [event:base-stat] match: [event:base-stat] matches [] res_event is empty FAILED './tests/attr//test-stat-basic' - match failure [root@s8360047 perf]# Signed-off-by: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LPU-Reference: 20170913081209.39570-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-04d63nn7svfgxdhi60gq2mlm@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-09-13 16:12:08 +08:00
res_event = {}
log.debug(" matching [%s]" % exp_name)
for res_name, res_event in result.items():
log.debug(" to [%s]" % res_name)
if (exp_event.equal(res_event)):
exp_list.append(res_name)
log.debug(" ->OK")
else:
log.debug(" ->FAIL");
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" match: [%s] matches %s" % (exp_name, str(exp_list)))
# we did not any matching event - fail
if not exp_list:
if exp_event.optional():
log.debug(" %s does not match, but is optional" % exp_name)
else:
perf test attr: Fix python error on empty result Commit d78ada4a767 ("perf tests attr: Do not store failed events") does not create an event file in the /tmp directory when the perf_open_event() system call failed. This can lead to a situation where not /tmp/event-xx-yy-zz result file exists at all (for example on a s390x virtual machine environment) where no CPUMF hardware is available. The following command then fails with a python call back chain instead of printing failure: [root@s8360046 perf]# /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py -d ./tests/attr/ \ -p ./perf -v -ttest-stat-basic running './tests/attr//test-stat-basic' Traceback (most recent call last): File "./tests/attr.py", line 379, in <module> main() File "./tests/attr.py", line 370, in main run_tests(options) File "./tests/attr.py", line 311, in run_tests Test(f, options).run() File "./tests/attr.py", line 300, in run self.compare(self.expect, self.result) File "./tests/attr.py", line 248, in compare exp_event.diff(res_event) UnboundLocalError: local variable 'res_event' referenced before assignment [root@s8360046 perf]# This patch catches this pitfall and prints an error message instead: [root@s8360047 perf]# /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py -d ./tests/attr/ \ -p ./perf -vvv -ttest-stat-basic running './tests/attr//test-stat-basic' loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 flags = 0|8 [....] sample_regs_user = 0 sample_stack_user = 0 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpJbMQMP ./perf stat -o /tmp/tmpJbMQMP/perf.data -e cycles kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret '1', expected '1' loading result events compare matching [event:base-stat] match: [event:base-stat] matches [] res_event is empty FAILED './tests/attr//test-stat-basic' - match failure [root@s8360047 perf]# Signed-off-by: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LPU-Reference: 20170913081209.39570-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-04d63nn7svfgxdhi60gq2mlm@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-09-13 16:12:08 +08:00
if not res_event:
log.debug(" res_event is empty");
else:
exp_event.diff(res_event)
raise Fail(self, 'match failure');
match[exp_name] = exp_list
# For each defined group in the expected events
# check we match the same group in the result.
for exp_name, exp_event in expect.items():
group = exp_event.group
if (group == ''):
continue
for res_name in match[exp_name]:
res_group = result[res_name].group
if res_group not in match[group]:
raise Fail(self, 'group failure')
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" group: [%s] matches group leader %s" %
(exp_name, str(match[group])))
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" matched")
def resolve_groups(self, events):
for name, event in events.items():
group_fd = event['group_fd'];
if group_fd == '-1':
continue;
for iname, ievent in events.items():
if (ievent['fd'] == group_fd):
event.group = iname
log.debug('[%s] has group leader [%s]' % (name, iname))
break;
def run(self):
tempdir = tempfile.mkdtemp();
try:
# run the test script
self.run_cmd(tempdir);
# load events expectation for the test
perf tests: Adjust some message log levels to help diagnosing problems in attr tests Now we'll see the command being run and if it fails, the fields that had unexpected values and the expected values, example testing a problem in the next patch: # perf test -v 13 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : --- start --- SNIP running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpDNIE6M /home/acme/bin/perf record -o /tmp/tmpDNIE6M/perf.data --group -e cycles,instructions kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 0 running 'PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp/tmpV5lKro /home/acme/bin/perf stat -o /tmp/tmpV5lKro/perf.data -dd kill >/dev/null 2>&1' ret 1 expected config=3, got 65540 expected exclude_guest=1, got 0 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-stat-detailed-2' - match failure ---- end ---- struct perf_event_attr setup: FAILED! # While in the past we would see at the '-v' level many more messages for the fields that matched, something we may want to see only in the '-vv' log level. Keeping the 'running' messages so that we can see the tools tests that succeeded so that we can compare it to the one that failed, helping pinpointing the command line switch combo that leads to the problem. Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9avmwxv5ipxyafwqxbk52ylg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2012-12-19 01:14:24 +08:00
log.debug(" loading result events");
for f in glob.glob(tempdir + '/event*'):
self.load_events(f, self.result);
# resolve group_fd to event names
self.resolve_groups(self.expect);
self.resolve_groups(self.result);
# do the expectation - results matching - both ways
self.compare(self.expect, self.result)
self.compare(self.result, self.expect)
finally:
# cleanup
shutil.rmtree(tempdir)
def run_tests(options):
for f in glob.glob(options.test_dir + '/' + options.test):
try:
Test(f, options).run()
except Unsup, obj:
log.warning("unsupp %s" % obj.getMsg())
perf tests: Add platform dependency to test 15 This patch adds platform dependency into the test case 15 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from Jiri Olsa. Add a new optional attribute named 'arch' in the [config] section of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture names this test can be executed on. For example: arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. This does not break existing behavior. The values listed for this attribute should be identical to uname -m output. If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is inverted, for example for arch = !s390x,ppc the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. Here is an example debug output: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C2 arch = x86_64,alpha,ppc [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' test limitation 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new loading expected events Event event:base-stat fd = 1 group_fd = -1 ..... Here is the output when a test is skipped: [root@s35lp76]# fgrep arch tests/attr/test-stat-C1 arch = !s390x [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 provides the following output: test limitation '!s390x' <--- new skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new The test is skipped with return code 0. Suggested-and-Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622073625.86762-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-06-22 15:36:25 +08:00
except Notest, obj:
log.warning("skipped %s" % obj.getMsg())
def setup_log(verbose):
global log
level = logging.CRITICAL
if verbose == 1:
level = logging.WARNING
if verbose == 2:
level = logging.INFO
if verbose >= 3:
level = logging.DEBUG
log = logging.getLogger('test')
log.setLevel(level)
ch = logging.StreamHandler()
ch.setLevel(level)
formatter = logging.Formatter('%(message)s')
ch.setFormatter(formatter)
log.addHandler(ch)
USAGE = '''%s [OPTIONS]
-d dir # tests dir
-p path # perf binary
-t test # single test
-v # verbose level
''' % sys.argv[0]
def main():
parser = optparse.OptionParser(usage=USAGE)
parser.add_option("-t", "--test",
action="store", type="string", dest="test")
parser.add_option("-d", "--test-dir",
action="store", type="string", dest="test_dir")
parser.add_option("-p", "--perf",
action="store", type="string", dest="perf")
parser.add_option("-v", "--verbose",
action="count", dest="verbose")
options, args = parser.parse_args()
if args:
parser.error('FAILED wrong arguments %s' % ' '.join(args))
return -1
setup_log(options.verbose)
if not options.test_dir:
print 'FAILED no -d option specified'
sys.exit(-1)
if not options.test:
options.test = 'test*'
try:
run_tests(options)
except Fail, obj:
print "FAILED %s" % obj.getMsg();
sys.exit(-1)
sys.exit(0)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()