OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-crypto.c

244 lines
7.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* CQHCI crypto engine (inline encryption) support
*
* Copyright 2020 Google LLC
*/
#include <linux/blk-crypto.h>
#include <linux/blk-crypto-profile.h>
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
#include <linux/mmc/host.h>
#include "cqhci-crypto.h"
/* Map from blk-crypto modes to CQHCI crypto algorithm IDs and key sizes */
static const struct cqhci_crypto_alg_entry {
enum cqhci_crypto_alg alg;
enum cqhci_crypto_key_size key_size;
} cqhci_crypto_algs[BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_MAX] = {
[BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_XTS] = {
.alg = CQHCI_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS,
.key_size = CQHCI_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_256,
},
};
static inline struct cqhci_host *
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
cqhci_host_from_crypto_profile(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile)
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
{
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
struct mmc_host *mmc =
container_of(profile, struct mmc_host, crypto_profile);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
return mmc->cqe_private;
}
static int cqhci_crypto_program_key(struct cqhci_host *cq_host,
const union cqhci_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg,
int slot)
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
{
u32 slot_offset = cq_host->crypto_cfg_register + slot * sizeof(*cfg);
int i;
if (cq_host->ops->program_key)
return cq_host->ops->program_key(cq_host, cfg, slot);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
/* Clear CFGE */
cqhci_writel(cq_host, 0, slot_offset + 16 * sizeof(cfg->reg_val[0]));
/* Write the key */
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
cqhci_writel(cq_host, le32_to_cpu(cfg->reg_val[i]),
slot_offset + i * sizeof(cfg->reg_val[0]));
}
/* Write dword 17 */
cqhci_writel(cq_host, le32_to_cpu(cfg->reg_val[17]),
slot_offset + 17 * sizeof(cfg->reg_val[0]));
/* Write dword 16, which includes the new value of CFGE */
cqhci_writel(cq_host, le32_to_cpu(cfg->reg_val[16]),
slot_offset + 16 * sizeof(cfg->reg_val[0]));
return 0;
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
}
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
static int cqhci_crypto_keyslot_program(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
unsigned int slot)
{
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
struct cqhci_host *cq_host = cqhci_host_from_crypto_profile(profile);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
const union cqhci_crypto_cap_entry *ccap_array =
cq_host->crypto_cap_array;
const struct cqhci_crypto_alg_entry *alg =
&cqhci_crypto_algs[key->crypto_cfg.crypto_mode];
u8 data_unit_mask = key->crypto_cfg.data_unit_size / 512;
int i;
int cap_idx = -1;
union cqhci_crypto_cfg_entry cfg = {};
int err;
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
BUILD_BUG_ON(CQHCI_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_INVALID != 0);
for (i = 0; i < cq_host->crypto_capabilities.num_crypto_cap; i++) {
if (ccap_array[i].algorithm_id == alg->alg &&
ccap_array[i].key_size == alg->key_size &&
(ccap_array[i].sdus_mask & data_unit_mask)) {
cap_idx = i;
break;
}
}
if (WARN_ON(cap_idx < 0))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
cfg.data_unit_size = data_unit_mask;
cfg.crypto_cap_idx = cap_idx;
cfg.config_enable = CQHCI_CRYPTO_CONFIGURATION_ENABLE;
if (ccap_array[cap_idx].algorithm_id == CQHCI_CRYPTO_ALG_AES_XTS) {
/* In XTS mode, the blk_crypto_key's size is already doubled */
memcpy(cfg.crypto_key, key->raw, key->size/2);
memcpy(cfg.crypto_key + CQHCI_CRYPTO_KEY_MAX_SIZE/2,
key->raw + key->size/2, key->size/2);
} else {
memcpy(cfg.crypto_key, key->raw, key->size);
}
err = cqhci_crypto_program_key(cq_host, &cfg, slot);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
memzero_explicit(&cfg, sizeof(cfg));
return err;
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
}
static int cqhci_crypto_clear_keyslot(struct cqhci_host *cq_host, int slot)
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
{
/*
* Clear the crypto cfg on the device. Clearing CFGE
* might not be sufficient, so just clear the entire cfg.
*/
union cqhci_crypto_cfg_entry cfg = {};
return cqhci_crypto_program_key(cq_host, &cfg, slot);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
}
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
static int cqhci_crypto_keyslot_evict(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
unsigned int slot)
{
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
struct cqhci_host *cq_host = cqhci_host_from_crypto_profile(profile);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
return cqhci_crypto_clear_keyslot(cq_host, slot);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
}
/*
* The keyslot management operations for CQHCI crypto.
*
* Note that the block layer ensures that these are never called while the host
* controller is runtime-suspended. However, the CQE won't necessarily be
* "enabled" when these are called, i.e. CQHCI_ENABLE might not be set in the
* CQHCI_CFG register. But the hardware allows that.
*/
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
static const struct blk_crypto_ll_ops cqhci_crypto_ops = {
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
.keyslot_program = cqhci_crypto_keyslot_program,
.keyslot_evict = cqhci_crypto_keyslot_evict,
};
static enum blk_crypto_mode_num
cqhci_find_blk_crypto_mode(union cqhci_crypto_cap_entry cap)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cqhci_crypto_algs); i++) {
BUILD_BUG_ON(CQHCI_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE_INVALID != 0);
if (cqhci_crypto_algs[i].alg == cap.algorithm_id &&
cqhci_crypto_algs[i].key_size == cap.key_size)
return i;
}
return BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_INVALID;
}
/**
* cqhci_crypto_init - initialize CQHCI crypto support
* @cq_host: a cqhci host
*
* If the driver previously set MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO and the CQE declares
* CQHCI_CAP_CS, initialize the crypto support. This involves reading the
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
* crypto capability registers, initializing the blk_crypto_profile, clearing
* all keyslots, and enabling 128-bit task descriptors.
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
*
* Return: 0 if crypto was initialized or isn't supported; whether
* MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO remains set indicates which one of those cases it is.
* Also can return a negative errno value on unexpected error.
*/
int cqhci_crypto_init(struct cqhci_host *cq_host)
{
struct mmc_host *mmc = cq_host->mmc;
struct device *dev = mmc_dev(mmc);
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
struct blk_crypto_profile *profile = &mmc->crypto_profile;
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
unsigned int num_keyslots;
unsigned int cap_idx;
enum blk_crypto_mode_num blk_mode_num;
unsigned int slot;
int err = 0;
if (!(mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO) ||
!(cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CAP) & CQHCI_CAP_CS))
goto out;
cq_host->crypto_capabilities.reg_val =
cpu_to_le32(cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CCAP));
cq_host->crypto_cfg_register =
(u32)cq_host->crypto_capabilities.config_array_ptr * 0x100;
cq_host->crypto_cap_array =
devm_kcalloc(dev, cq_host->crypto_capabilities.num_crypto_cap,
sizeof(cq_host->crypto_cap_array[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cq_host->crypto_cap_array) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
/*
* CCAP.CFGC is off by one, so the actual number of crypto
* configurations (a.k.a. keyslots) is CCAP.CFGC + 1.
*/
num_keyslots = cq_host->crypto_capabilities.config_count + 1;
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
err = devm_blk_crypto_profile_init(dev, profile, num_keyslots);
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
if (err)
goto out;
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
profile->ll_ops = cqhci_crypto_ops;
profile->dev = dev;
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
/* Unfortunately, CQHCI crypto only supports 32 DUN bits. */
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
profile->max_dun_bytes_supported = 4;
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
/*
* Cache all the crypto capabilities and advertise the supported crypto
* modes and data unit sizes to the block layer.
*/
for (cap_idx = 0; cap_idx < cq_host->crypto_capabilities.num_crypto_cap;
cap_idx++) {
cq_host->crypto_cap_array[cap_idx].reg_val =
cpu_to_le32(cqhci_readl(cq_host,
CQHCI_CRYPTOCAP +
cap_idx * sizeof(__le32)));
blk_mode_num = cqhci_find_blk_crypto_mode(
cq_host->crypto_cap_array[cap_idx]);
if (blk_mode_num == BLK_ENCRYPTION_MODE_INVALID)
continue;
blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage keyslots. It actually does several different things: - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device. - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware. Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots; however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new functions here which are unrelated to keyslots. Moreover, device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key eviction requests to their underlying devices even though device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict"). - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots. Originally it always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which doesn't actually manage keyslots. This hack works, but the terminology is unnatural. Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually). Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots. Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile. This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments -- not just the actual struct name. However it's still a fairly straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality. Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-19 02:04:52 +08:00
profile->modes_supported[blk_mode_num] |=
mmc: cqhci: add support for inline encryption Add support for eMMC inline encryption using the blk-crypto framework (Documentation/block/inline-encryption.rst). eMMC inline encryption support is specified by the upcoming JEDEC eMMC v5.2 specification. It is only specified for the CQ interface, not the non-CQ interface. Although the eMMC v5.2 specification hasn't been officially released yet, the crypto support was already agreed on several years ago, and it was already implemented by at least two major hardware vendors. Lots of hardware in the field already supports and uses it, e.g. Snapdragon 630 to give one example. eMMC inline encryption support is very similar to the UFS inline encryption support which was standardized in the UFS v2.1 specification and was already upstreamed. The only major difference is that eMMC limits data unit numbers to 32 bits, unlike UFS's 64 bits. Like we did with UFS, make the crypto support opt-in by individual drivers; don't enable it automatically whenever the hardware declares crypto support. This is necessary because in every case we've seen, some extra vendor-specific logic is needed to use the crypto support. Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peng Zhou <peng.zhou@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210125183810.198008-5-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2021-01-26 02:38:05 +08:00
cq_host->crypto_cap_array[cap_idx].sdus_mask * 512;
}
/* Clear all the keyslots so that we start in a known state. */
for (slot = 0; slot < num_keyslots; slot++)
cqhci_crypto_clear_keyslot(cq_host, slot);
/* CQHCI crypto requires the use of 128-bit task descriptors. */
cq_host->caps |= CQHCI_TASK_DESC_SZ_128;
return 0;
out:
mmc->caps2 &= ~MMC_CAP2_CRYPTO;
return err;
}