OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c

1594 lines
38 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* AT86RF230/RF231 driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2009-2012 Siemens AG
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
* as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
* 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Written by:
* Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
* Alexander Smirnov <alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
#include <linux/spi/at86rf230.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
#include <net/ieee802154.h>
#include <net/mac802154.h>
#include <net/wpan-phy.h>
struct at86rf230_local;
/* at86rf2xx chip depend data.
* All timings are in us.
*/
struct at86rf2xx_chip_data {
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
u16 t_frame;
u16 t_p_ack;
/* short interframe spacing time */
u16 t_sifs;
/* long interframe spacing time */
u16 t_lifs;
/* completion timeout for tx in msecs */
u16 t_tx_timeout;
int rssi_base_val;
int (*set_channel)(struct at86rf230_local *, int, int);
int (*get_desense_steps)(struct at86rf230_local *, s32);
};
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
#define AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF (127 + 3)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
struct at86rf230_state_change {
struct at86rf230_local *lp;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
struct spi_message msg;
struct spi_transfer trx;
u8 buf[AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF];
void (*complete)(void *context);
u8 from_state;
u8 to_state;
};
struct at86rf230_local {
struct spi_device *spi;
struct ieee802154_dev *dev;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
struct at86rf2xx_chip_data *data;
struct regmap *regmap;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
struct at86rf230_state_change irq;
bool tx_aret;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
bool is_tx;
/* spinlock for is_tx protection */
spinlock_t lock;
struct completion tx_complete;
struct sk_buff *tx_skb;
struct at86rf230_state_change tx;
};
#define RG_TRX_STATUS (0x01)
#define SR_TRX_STATUS 0x01, 0x1f, 0
#define SR_RESERVED_01_3 0x01, 0x20, 5
#define SR_CCA_STATUS 0x01, 0x40, 6
#define SR_CCA_DONE 0x01, 0x80, 7
#define RG_TRX_STATE (0x02)
#define SR_TRX_CMD 0x02, 0x1f, 0
#define SR_TRAC_STATUS 0x02, 0xe0, 5
#define RG_TRX_CTRL_0 (0x03)
#define SR_CLKM_CTRL 0x03, 0x07, 0
#define SR_CLKM_SHA_SEL 0x03, 0x08, 3
#define SR_PAD_IO_CLKM 0x03, 0x30, 4
#define SR_PAD_IO 0x03, 0xc0, 6
#define RG_TRX_CTRL_1 (0x04)
#define SR_IRQ_POLARITY 0x04, 0x01, 0
#define SR_IRQ_MASK_MODE 0x04, 0x02, 1
#define SR_SPI_CMD_MODE 0x04, 0x0c, 2
#define SR_RX_BL_CTRL 0x04, 0x10, 4
#define SR_TX_AUTO_CRC_ON 0x04, 0x20, 5
#define SR_IRQ_2_EXT_EN 0x04, 0x40, 6
#define SR_PA_EXT_EN 0x04, 0x80, 7
#define RG_PHY_TX_PWR (0x05)
#define SR_TX_PWR 0x05, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_PA_LT 0x05, 0x30, 4
#define SR_PA_BUF_LT 0x05, 0xc0, 6
#define RG_PHY_RSSI (0x06)
#define SR_RSSI 0x06, 0x1f, 0
#define SR_RND_VALUE 0x06, 0x60, 5
#define SR_RX_CRC_VALID 0x06, 0x80, 7
#define RG_PHY_ED_LEVEL (0x07)
#define SR_ED_LEVEL 0x07, 0xff, 0
#define RG_PHY_CC_CCA (0x08)
#define SR_CHANNEL 0x08, 0x1f, 0
#define SR_CCA_MODE 0x08, 0x60, 5
#define SR_CCA_REQUEST 0x08, 0x80, 7
#define RG_CCA_THRES (0x09)
#define SR_CCA_ED_THRES 0x09, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_RESERVED_09_1 0x09, 0xf0, 4
#define RG_RX_CTRL (0x0a)
#define SR_PDT_THRES 0x0a, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_RESERVED_0a_1 0x0a, 0xf0, 4
#define RG_SFD_VALUE (0x0b)
#define SR_SFD_VALUE 0x0b, 0xff, 0
#define RG_TRX_CTRL_2 (0x0c)
#define SR_OQPSK_DATA_RATE 0x0c, 0x03, 0
#define SR_SUB_MODE 0x0c, 0x04, 2
#define SR_BPSK_QPSK 0x0c, 0x08, 3
#define SR_OQPSK_SUB1_RC_EN 0x0c, 0x10, 4
#define SR_RESERVED_0c_5 0x0c, 0x60, 5
#define SR_RX_SAFE_MODE 0x0c, 0x80, 7
#define RG_ANT_DIV (0x0d)
#define SR_ANT_CTRL 0x0d, 0x03, 0
#define SR_ANT_EXT_SW_EN 0x0d, 0x04, 2
#define SR_ANT_DIV_EN 0x0d, 0x08, 3
#define SR_RESERVED_0d_2 0x0d, 0x70, 4
#define SR_ANT_SEL 0x0d, 0x80, 7
#define RG_IRQ_MASK (0x0e)
#define SR_IRQ_MASK 0x0e, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IRQ_STATUS (0x0f)
#define SR_IRQ_0_PLL_LOCK 0x0f, 0x01, 0
#define SR_IRQ_1_PLL_UNLOCK 0x0f, 0x02, 1
#define SR_IRQ_2_RX_START 0x0f, 0x04, 2
#define SR_IRQ_3_TRX_END 0x0f, 0x08, 3
#define SR_IRQ_4_CCA_ED_DONE 0x0f, 0x10, 4
#define SR_IRQ_5_AMI 0x0f, 0x20, 5
#define SR_IRQ_6_TRX_UR 0x0f, 0x40, 6
#define SR_IRQ_7_BAT_LOW 0x0f, 0x80, 7
#define RG_VREG_CTRL (0x10)
#define SR_RESERVED_10_6 0x10, 0x03, 0
#define SR_DVDD_OK 0x10, 0x04, 2
#define SR_DVREG_EXT 0x10, 0x08, 3
#define SR_RESERVED_10_3 0x10, 0x30, 4
#define SR_AVDD_OK 0x10, 0x40, 6
#define SR_AVREG_EXT 0x10, 0x80, 7
#define RG_BATMON (0x11)
#define SR_BATMON_VTH 0x11, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_BATMON_HR 0x11, 0x10, 4
#define SR_BATMON_OK 0x11, 0x20, 5
#define SR_RESERVED_11_1 0x11, 0xc0, 6
#define RG_XOSC_CTRL (0x12)
#define SR_XTAL_TRIM 0x12, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_XTAL_MODE 0x12, 0xf0, 4
#define RG_RX_SYN (0x15)
#define SR_RX_PDT_LEVEL 0x15, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_RESERVED_15_2 0x15, 0x70, 4
#define SR_RX_PDT_DIS 0x15, 0x80, 7
#define RG_XAH_CTRL_1 (0x17)
#define SR_RESERVED_17_8 0x17, 0x01, 0
#define SR_AACK_PROM_MODE 0x17, 0x02, 1
#define SR_AACK_ACK_TIME 0x17, 0x04, 2
#define SR_RESERVED_17_5 0x17, 0x08, 3
#define SR_AACK_UPLD_RES_FT 0x17, 0x10, 4
#define SR_AACK_FLTR_RES_FT 0x17, 0x20, 5
#define SR_CSMA_LBT_MODE 0x17, 0x40, 6
#define SR_RESERVED_17_1 0x17, 0x80, 7
#define RG_FTN_CTRL (0x18)
#define SR_RESERVED_18_2 0x18, 0x7f, 0
#define SR_FTN_START 0x18, 0x80, 7
#define RG_PLL_CF (0x1a)
#define SR_RESERVED_1a_2 0x1a, 0x7f, 0
#define SR_PLL_CF_START 0x1a, 0x80, 7
#define RG_PLL_DCU (0x1b)
#define SR_RESERVED_1b_3 0x1b, 0x3f, 0
#define SR_RESERVED_1b_2 0x1b, 0x40, 6
#define SR_PLL_DCU_START 0x1b, 0x80, 7
#define RG_PART_NUM (0x1c)
#define SR_PART_NUM 0x1c, 0xff, 0
#define RG_VERSION_NUM (0x1d)
#define SR_VERSION_NUM 0x1d, 0xff, 0
#define RG_MAN_ID_0 (0x1e)
#define SR_MAN_ID_0 0x1e, 0xff, 0
#define RG_MAN_ID_1 (0x1f)
#define SR_MAN_ID_1 0x1f, 0xff, 0
#define RG_SHORT_ADDR_0 (0x20)
#define SR_SHORT_ADDR_0 0x20, 0xff, 0
#define RG_SHORT_ADDR_1 (0x21)
#define SR_SHORT_ADDR_1 0x21, 0xff, 0
#define RG_PAN_ID_0 (0x22)
#define SR_PAN_ID_0 0x22, 0xff, 0
#define RG_PAN_ID_1 (0x23)
#define SR_PAN_ID_1 0x23, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_0 (0x24)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_0 0x24, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_1 (0x25)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_1 0x25, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_2 (0x26)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_2 0x26, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_3 (0x27)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_3 0x27, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_4 (0x28)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_4 0x28, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_5 (0x29)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_5 0x29, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_6 (0x2a)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_6 0x2a, 0xff, 0
#define RG_IEEE_ADDR_7 (0x2b)
#define SR_IEEE_ADDR_7 0x2b, 0xff, 0
#define RG_XAH_CTRL_0 (0x2c)
#define SR_SLOTTED_OPERATION 0x2c, 0x01, 0
#define SR_MAX_CSMA_RETRIES 0x2c, 0x0e, 1
#define SR_MAX_FRAME_RETRIES 0x2c, 0xf0, 4
#define RG_CSMA_SEED_0 (0x2d)
#define SR_CSMA_SEED_0 0x2d, 0xff, 0
#define RG_CSMA_SEED_1 (0x2e)
#define SR_CSMA_SEED_1 0x2e, 0x07, 0
#define SR_AACK_I_AM_COORD 0x2e, 0x08, 3
#define SR_AACK_DIS_ACK 0x2e, 0x10, 4
#define SR_AACK_SET_PD 0x2e, 0x20, 5
#define SR_AACK_FVN_MODE 0x2e, 0xc0, 6
#define RG_CSMA_BE (0x2f)
#define SR_MIN_BE 0x2f, 0x0f, 0
#define SR_MAX_BE 0x2f, 0xf0, 4
#define CMD_REG 0x80
#define CMD_REG_MASK 0x3f
#define CMD_WRITE 0x40
#define CMD_FB 0x20
#define IRQ_BAT_LOW (1 << 7)
#define IRQ_TRX_UR (1 << 6)
#define IRQ_AMI (1 << 5)
#define IRQ_CCA_ED (1 << 4)
#define IRQ_TRX_END (1 << 3)
#define IRQ_RX_START (1 << 2)
#define IRQ_PLL_UNL (1 << 1)
#define IRQ_PLL_LOCK (1 << 0)
#define IRQ_ACTIVE_HIGH 0
#define IRQ_ACTIVE_LOW 1
#define STATE_P_ON 0x00 /* BUSY */
#define STATE_BUSY_RX 0x01
#define STATE_BUSY_TX 0x02
#define STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF 0x03
#define STATE_FORCE_TX_ON 0x04 /* IDLE */
/* 0x05 */ /* INVALID_PARAMETER */
#define STATE_RX_ON 0x06
/* 0x07 */ /* SUCCESS */
#define STATE_TRX_OFF 0x08
#define STATE_TX_ON 0x09
/* 0x0a - 0x0e */ /* 0x0a - UNSUPPORTED_ATTRIBUTE */
#define STATE_SLEEP 0x0F
#define STATE_PREP_DEEP_SLEEP 0x10
#define STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK 0x11
#define STATE_BUSY_TX_ARET 0x12
#define STATE_RX_AACK_ON 0x16
#define STATE_TX_ARET_ON 0x19
#define STATE_RX_ON_NOCLK 0x1C
#define STATE_RX_AACK_ON_NOCLK 0x1D
#define STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK_NOCLK 0x1E
#define STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS 0x1F
#define AT86RF2XX_NUMREGS 0x3F
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
static int
at86rf230_async_state_change(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
const u8 state, void (*complete)(void *context));
static inline int
__at86rf230_write(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int data)
{
return regmap_write(lp->regmap, addr, data);
}
static inline int
__at86rf230_read(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int *data)
{
return regmap_read(lp->regmap, addr, data);
}
static inline int
at86rf230_read_subreg(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int mask,
unsigned int shift, unsigned int *data)
{
int rc;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, addr, data);
if (rc > 0)
*data = (*data & mask) >> shift;
return rc;
}
static inline int
at86rf230_write_subreg(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
unsigned int addr, unsigned int mask,
unsigned int shift, unsigned int data)
{
return regmap_update_bits(lp->regmap, addr, mask, data << shift);
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
switch (reg) {
case RG_TRX_STATE:
case RG_TRX_CTRL_0:
case RG_TRX_CTRL_1:
case RG_PHY_TX_PWR:
case RG_PHY_ED_LEVEL:
case RG_PHY_CC_CCA:
case RG_CCA_THRES:
case RG_RX_CTRL:
case RG_SFD_VALUE:
case RG_TRX_CTRL_2:
case RG_ANT_DIV:
case RG_IRQ_MASK:
case RG_VREG_CTRL:
case RG_BATMON:
case RG_XOSC_CTRL:
case RG_RX_SYN:
case RG_XAH_CTRL_1:
case RG_FTN_CTRL:
case RG_PLL_CF:
case RG_PLL_DCU:
case RG_SHORT_ADDR_0:
case RG_SHORT_ADDR_1:
case RG_PAN_ID_0:
case RG_PAN_ID_1:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_0:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_1:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_2:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_3:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_4:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_5:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_6:
case RG_IEEE_ADDR_7:
case RG_XAH_CTRL_0:
case RG_CSMA_SEED_0:
case RG_CSMA_SEED_1:
case RG_CSMA_BE:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_readable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
bool rc;
/* all writeable are also readable */
rc = at86rf230_reg_writeable(dev, reg);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* readonly regs */
switch (reg) {
case RG_TRX_STATUS:
case RG_PHY_RSSI:
case RG_IRQ_STATUS:
case RG_PART_NUM:
case RG_VERSION_NUM:
case RG_MAN_ID_1:
case RG_MAN_ID_0:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
/* can be changed during runtime */
switch (reg) {
case RG_TRX_STATUS:
case RG_TRX_STATE:
case RG_PHY_RSSI:
case RG_PHY_ED_LEVEL:
case RG_IRQ_STATUS:
case RG_VREG_CTRL:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static bool
at86rf230_reg_precious(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
/* don't clear irq line on read */
switch (reg) {
case RG_IRQ_STATUS:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
static struct regmap_config at86rf230_regmap_spi_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
.write_flag_mask = CMD_REG | CMD_WRITE,
.read_flag_mask = CMD_REG,
.cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
.max_register = AT86RF2XX_NUMREGS,
.writeable_reg = at86rf230_reg_writeable,
.readable_reg = at86rf230_reg_readable,
.volatile_reg = at86rf230_reg_volatile,
.precious_reg = at86rf230_reg_precious,
};
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
static void
at86rf230_async_error_recover(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_RX_AACK_ON, NULL);
}
static void
at86rf230_async_error(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx, int rc)
{
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "spi_async error %d\n", rc);
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF,
at86rf230_async_error_recover);
}
/* Generic function to get some register value in async mode */
static int
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
at86rf230_async_read_reg(struct at86rf230_local *lp, const u8 reg,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
void (*complete)(void *context))
{
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
u8 *tx_buf = ctx->buf;
tx_buf[0] = (reg & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG;
ctx->trx.len = 2;
ctx->msg.complete = complete;
return spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
}
static void
at86rf230_async_state_assert(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
const u8 trx_state = buf[1] & 0x1f;
/* Assert state change */
if (trx_state != ctx->to_state) {
/* Special handling if transceiver state is in
* STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK and a SHR was detected.
*/
if (trx_state == STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK) {
/* Undocumented race condition. If we send a state
* change to STATE_RX_AACK_ON the transceiver could
* change his state automatically to STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK
* if a SHR was detected. This is not an error, but we
* can't assert this.
*/
if (ctx->to_state == STATE_RX_AACK_ON)
goto done;
/* If we change to STATE_TX_ON without forcing and
* transceiver state is STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK, we wait
* 'tFrame + tPAck' receiving time. In this time the
* PDU should be received. If the transceiver is still
* in STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK, we run a force state change
* to STATE_TX_ON. This is a timeout handling, if the
* transceiver stucks in STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK.
*/
if (ctx->to_state == STATE_TX_ON) {
at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx,
STATE_FORCE_TX_ON,
ctx->complete);
return;
}
}
dev_warn(&lp->spi->dev, "unexcept state change from 0x%02x to 0x%02x. Actual state: 0x%02x\n",
ctx->from_state, ctx->to_state, trx_state);
}
done:
if (ctx->complete)
ctx->complete(context);
}
/* Do state change timing delay. */
static void
at86rf230_async_state_delay(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
struct at86rf2xx_chip_data *c = lp->data;
bool force = false;
int rc;
/* The force state changes are will show as normal states in the
* state status subregister. We change the to_state to the
* corresponding one and remember if it was a force change, this
* differs if we do a state change from STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK.
*/
switch (ctx->to_state) {
case STATE_FORCE_TX_ON:
ctx->to_state = STATE_TX_ON;
force = true;
break;
case STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF:
ctx->to_state = STATE_TRX_OFF;
force = true;
break;
default:
break;
}
switch (ctx->from_state) {
case STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK:
switch (ctx->to_state) {
case STATE_TX_ON:
/* Wait for worst case receiving time if we
* didn't make a force change from BUSY_RX_AACK
* to TX_ON.
*/
if (!force) {
usleep_range(c->t_frame + c->t_p_ack,
c->t_frame + c->t_p_ack + 1000);
goto change;
}
break;
default:
break;
}
break;
default:
break;
}
/* Default delay is 1us in the most cases */
udelay(1);
change:
rc = at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATUS, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_assert);
if (rc)
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "spi_async error %d\n", rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_async_state_change_start(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
const u8 trx_state = buf[1] & 0x1f;
int rc;
/* Check for "possible" STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS */
if (trx_state == STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) {
udelay(1);
rc = at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATUS, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_change_start);
if (rc)
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "spi_async error %d\n", rc);
return;
}
/* Check if we already are in the state which we change in */
if (trx_state == ctx->to_state) {
if (ctx->complete)
ctx->complete(context);
return;
}
/* Set current state to the context of state change */
ctx->from_state = trx_state;
/* Going into the next step for a state change which do a timing
* relevant delay.
*/
buf[0] = (RG_TRX_STATE & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG | CMD_WRITE;
buf[1] = ctx->to_state;
ctx->trx.len = 2;
ctx->msg.complete = at86rf230_async_state_delay;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc)
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "spi_async error %d\n", rc);
}
static int
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
at86rf230_async_state_change(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx,
const u8 state, void (*complete)(void *context))
{
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
/* Initialization for the state change context */
ctx->to_state = state;
ctx->complete = complete;
return at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATUS, ctx,
at86rf230_async_state_change_start);
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
static void
at86rf230_tx_complete(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
complete(&lp->tx_complete);
}
static void
at86rf230_tx_on(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
int rc;
rc = at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, &lp->irq, STATE_RX_AACK_ON,
at86rf230_tx_complete);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_tx_trac_error(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
int rc;
rc = at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ON,
at86rf230_tx_on);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_tx_trac_check(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
const u8 trac = (buf[1] & 0xe0) >> 5;
int rc;
/* If trac status is different than zero we need to do a state change
* to STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF then STATE_TX_ON to recover the transceiver
* state to TX_ON.
*/
if (trac) {
rc = at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF,
at86rf230_tx_trac_error);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
return;
}
at86rf230_tx_on(context);
}
static void
at86rf230_tx_trac_status(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
int rc;
rc = at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATE, ctx,
at86rf230_tx_trac_check);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_rx(struct at86rf230_local *lp,
const u8 *data, u8 len)
{
u8 lqi;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u8 rx_local_buf[AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF];
if (len < 2)
return;
/* read full frame buffer and invalid lqi value to lowest
* indicator if frame was is in a corrupted state.
*/
if (len > IEEE802154_MTU) {
lqi = 0;
len = IEEE802154_MTU;
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "corrupted frame received\n");
} else {
lqi = data[len];
}
memcpy(rx_local_buf, data, len);
enable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
skb = alloc_skb(IEEE802154_MTU, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb) {
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "failed to allocate sk_buff\n");
return;
}
memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), rx_local_buf, len);
/* We do not put CRC into the frame */
skb_trim(skb, len - 2);
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(lp->dev, skb, lqi);
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
static void
at86rf230_rx_read_frame_complete(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = lp->irq.buf;
const u8 len = buf[1];
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
at86rf230_rx(lp, buf + 2, len);
}
static int
at86rf230_rx_read_frame(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
u8 *buf = lp->irq.buf;
buf[0] = CMD_FB;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
lp->irq.trx.len = AT86RF2XX_MAX_BUF;
lp->irq.msg.complete = at86rf230_rx_read_frame_complete;
return spi_async(lp->spi, &lp->irq.msg);
}
static void
at86rf230_rx_trac_check(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
int rc;
/* Possible check on trac status here. This could be useful to make
* some stats why receive is failed. Not used at the moment, but it's
* maybe timing relevant. Datasheet doesn't say anything about this.
* The programming guide say do it so.
*/
rc = at86rf230_rx_read_frame(lp);
if (rc) {
enable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
}
static int
at86rf230_irq_trx_end(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
spin_lock(&lp->lock);
if (lp->is_tx) {
lp->is_tx = 0;
spin_unlock(&lp->lock);
enable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
if (lp->tx_aret)
return at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, &lp->irq,
STATE_FORCE_TX_ON,
at86rf230_tx_trac_status);
else
return at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, &lp->irq,
STATE_RX_AACK_ON,
at86rf230_tx_complete);
} else {
spin_unlock(&lp->lock);
return at86rf230_async_read_reg(lp, RG_TRX_STATE, &lp->irq,
at86rf230_rx_trac_check);
}
}
static void
at86rf230_irq_status(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
const u8 *buf = lp->irq.buf;
const u8 irq = buf[1];
int rc;
if (irq & IRQ_TRX_END) {
rc = at86rf230_irq_trx_end(lp);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
} else {
enable_irq(lp->spi->irq);
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "not supported irq %02x received\n",
irq);
}
}
static irqreturn_t at86rf230_isr(int irq, void *data)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = data;
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = &lp->irq;
u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
int rc;
disable_irq_nosync(lp->spi->irq);
buf[0] = (RG_IRQ_STATUS & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG;
ctx->trx.len = 2;
ctx->msg.complete = at86rf230_irq_status;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc) {
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
return IRQ_NONE;
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
static void
at86rf230_write_frame_complete(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
u8 *buf = ctx->buf;
int rc;
buf[0] = (RG_TRX_STATE & CMD_REG_MASK) | CMD_REG | CMD_WRITE;
buf[1] = STATE_BUSY_TX;
ctx->trx.len = 2;
ctx->msg.complete = NULL;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &ctx->msg);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_write_frame(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
struct sk_buff *skb = lp->tx_skb;
u8 *buf = lp->tx.buf;
int rc;
spin_lock(&lp->lock);
lp->is_tx = 1;
spin_unlock(&lp->lock);
buf[0] = CMD_FB | CMD_WRITE;
buf[1] = skb->len + 2;
memcpy(buf + 2, skb->data, skb->len);
lp->tx.trx.len = skb->len + 2;
lp->tx.msg.complete = at86rf230_write_frame_complete;
rc = spi_async(lp->spi, &lp->tx.msg);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static void
at86rf230_xmit_tx_on(void *context)
{
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = context;
struct at86rf230_local *lp = ctx->lp;
int rc;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
rc = at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ARET_ON,
at86rf230_write_frame);
if (rc)
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
}
static int
at86rf230_xmit(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
struct at86rf230_state_change *ctx = &lp->tx;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
void (*tx_complete)(void *context) = at86rf230_write_frame;
int rc;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
lp->tx_skb = skb;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
/* In ARET mode we need to go into STATE_TX_ARET_ON after we
* are in STATE_TX_ON. The pfad differs here, so we change
* the complete handler.
*/
if (lp->tx_aret)
tx_complete = at86rf230_xmit_tx_on;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
rc = at86rf230_async_state_change(lp, ctx, STATE_TX_ON,
tx_complete);
if (rc) {
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
return rc;
}
rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&lp->tx_complete,
msecs_to_jiffies(lp->data->t_tx_timeout));
if (!rc) {
at86rf230_async_error(lp, ctx, rc);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
/* Interfame spacing time, which is phy depend.
* TODO
* Move this handling in MAC 802.15.4 layer.
* This is currently a workaround to avoid fragmenation issues.
*/
if (skb->len > 18)
usleep_range(lp->data->t_lifs, lp->data->t_lifs + 10);
else
usleep_range(lp->data->t_sifs, lp->data->t_sifs + 10);
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_ed(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, u8 *level)
{
might_sleep();
BUG_ON(!level);
*level = 0xbe;
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_state(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, int state)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
int rc;
unsigned int val;
u8 desired_status;
might_sleep();
if (state == STATE_FORCE_TX_ON)
desired_status = STATE_TX_ON;
else if (state == STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF)
desired_status = STATE_TRX_OFF;
else
desired_status = state;
do {
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, SR_TRX_STATUS, &val);
if (rc)
goto err;
} while (val == STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS);
if (val == desired_status)
return 0;
/* state is equal to phy states */
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_TRX_CMD, state);
if (rc)
goto err;
do {
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, SR_TRX_STATUS, &val);
if (rc)
goto err;
} while (val == STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS);
if (val == desired_status ||
(desired_status == STATE_RX_ON && val == STATE_BUSY_RX) ||
(desired_status == STATE_RX_AACK_ON && val == STATE_BUSY_RX_AACK))
return 0;
pr_err("unexpected state change: %d, asked for %d\n", val, state);
return -EBUSY;
err:
pr_err("error: %d\n", rc);
return rc;
}
static int
at86rf230_start(struct ieee802154_dev *dev)
{
u8 rc;
at86rf230: fix unexpected state change This patch fix a unexpected state change for the at86rf231 chip. We can't change into STATE_FORCE_TX_ON while the chip is in one of SLEEP, P_ON, RESET, TRX_OFF, and all *_NOCLK states. In this case we are in the TRX_OFF state. See datasheet [1] page 71 for more information. Without this patch you will get the following message on a at86rf231 device: [ 20.065218] unexpected state change: 8, asked for 4 [ 20.070527] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 20.075414] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 160 at net/mac802154/ieee802154_dev.c:43 mac802154_slave_open+0x70/0xb8() [ 20.085594] Modules linked in: autofs4 [ 20.089667] CPU: 0 PID: 160 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 3.14.0-20140108-1-00993-g905c192 #162 [ 20.098612] [<c00127b8>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010b1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 20.106819] [<c0010b1c>] (show_stack) from [<c0033838>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x80) [ 20.115311] [<c0033838>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c00338e8>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20) [ 20.124590] [<c00338e8>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c057b7e8>] (mac802154_slave_open+0x70/0xb8) [ 20.133880] [<c057b7e8>] (mac802154_slave_open) from [<c0488a58>] (__dev_open+0xa8/0x108) [ 20.142553] [<c0488a58>] (__dev_open) from [<c0488cb0>] (__dev_change_flags+0x8c/0x148) [ 20.151051] [<c0488cb0>] (__dev_change_flags) from [<c0488d84>] (dev_change_flags+0x18/0x48) [ 20.159968] [<c0488d84>] (dev_change_flags) from [<c04e2e9c>] (devinet_ioctl+0x2b0/0x63c) [ 20.168623] [<c04e2e9c>] (devinet_ioctl) from [<c04712e4>] (sock_ioctl+0x23c/0x29c) [ 20.176727] [<c04712e4>] (sock_ioctl) from [<c00e3cb8>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x4a8/0x578) [ 20.184671] [<c00e3cb8>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c00e3dd4>] (SyS_ioctl+0x4c/0x78) [ 20.192402] [<c00e3dd4>] (SyS_ioctl) from [<c000da00>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48) [ 20.200392] ---[ end trace 9a34542f4ea08e47 ]--- This patch was tested on at86rf231 and at86rf212. [1] http://www.atmel.com/images/doc8111.pdf Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-03-15 16:29:03 +08:00
rc = at86rf230_state(dev, STATE_TX_ON);
if (rc)
return rc;
return at86rf230_state(dev, STATE_RX_AACK_ON);
}
static void
at86rf230_stop(struct ieee802154_dev *dev)
{
at86rf230_state(dev, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF);
}
static int
at86rf23x_set_channel(struct at86rf230_local *lp, int page, int channel)
{
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CHANNEL, channel);
}
static int
at86rf212_set_channel(struct at86rf230_local *lp, int page, int channel)
{
int rc;
if (channel == 0)
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_SUB_MODE, 0);
else
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_SUB_MODE, 1);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
if (page == 0) {
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_BPSK_QPSK, 0);
lp->data->rssi_base_val = -100;
} else {
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_BPSK_QPSK, 1);
lp->data->rssi_base_val = -98;
}
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CHANNEL, channel);
}
static int
at86rf230_channel(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, int page, int channel)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
int rc;
might_sleep();
if (page < 0 || page > 31 ||
!(lp->dev->phy->channels_supported[page] & BIT(channel))) {
WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
rc = lp->data->set_channel(lp, page, channel);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
msleep(1); /* Wait for PLL */
dev->phy->current_channel = channel;
dev->phy->current_page = page;
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt(struct ieee802154_dev *dev,
struct ieee802154_hw_addr_filt *filt,
unsigned long changed)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
if (changed & IEEE802515_AFILT_SADDR_CHANGED) {
u16 addr = le16_to_cpu(filt->short_addr);
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
"at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for saddr\n");
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_SHORT_ADDR_0, addr);
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_SHORT_ADDR_1, addr >> 8);
}
if (changed & IEEE802515_AFILT_PANID_CHANGED) {
u16 pan = le16_to_cpu(filt->pan_id);
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
"at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for pan id\n");
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PAN_ID_0, pan);
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PAN_ID_1, pan >> 8);
}
if (changed & IEEE802515_AFILT_IEEEADDR_CHANGED) {
u8 i, addr[8];
memcpy(addr, &filt->ieee_addr, 8);
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
"at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for IEEE addr\n");
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_IEEE_ADDR_0 + i, addr[i]);
}
if (changed & IEEE802515_AFILT_PANC_CHANGED) {
dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
"at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for panc change\n");
if (filt->pan_coord)
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_I_AM_COORD, 1);
else
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_I_AM_COORD, 0);
}
return 0;
}
static int
at86rf230_set_txpower(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, int db)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
/* typical maximum output is 5dBm with RG_PHY_TX_PWR 0x60, lower five
* bits decrease power in 1dB steps. 0x60 represents extra PA gain of
* 0dB.
* thus, supported values for db range from -26 to 5, for 31dB of
* reduction to 0dB of reduction.
*/
if (db > 5 || db < -26)
return -EINVAL;
db = -(db - 5);
return __at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PHY_TX_PWR, 0x60 | db);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_lbt(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, bool on)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_LBT_MODE, on);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_cca_mode(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, u8 mode)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CCA_MODE, mode);
}
static int
at86rf212_get_desens_steps(struct at86rf230_local *lp, s32 level)
{
return (level - lp->data->rssi_base_val) * 100 / 207;
}
static int
at86rf23x_get_desens_steps(struct at86rf230_local *lp, s32 level)
{
return (level - lp->data->rssi_base_val) / 2;
}
static int
at86rf230_set_cca_ed_level(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, s32 level)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
if (level < lp->data->rssi_base_val || level > 30)
return -EINVAL;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CCA_ED_THRES,
lp->data->get_desense_steps(lp, level));
}
static int
at86rf230_set_csma_params(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, u8 min_be, u8 max_be,
u8 retries)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
int rc;
if (min_be > max_be || max_be > 8 || retries > 5)
return -EINVAL;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MIN_BE, min_be);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MAX_BE, max_be);
if (rc)
return rc;
return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MAX_CSMA_RETRIES, retries);
}
static int
at86rf230_set_frame_retries(struct ieee802154_dev *dev, s8 retries)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = dev->priv;
int rc = 0;
if (retries < -1 || retries > 15)
return -EINVAL;
lp->tx_aret = retries >= 0;
if (retries >= 0)
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_MAX_FRAME_RETRIES, retries);
return rc;
}
static struct ieee802154_ops at86rf230_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.xmit = at86rf230_xmit,
.ed = at86rf230_ed,
.set_channel = at86rf230_channel,
.start = at86rf230_start,
.stop = at86rf230_stop,
.set_hw_addr_filt = at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt,
.set_txpower = at86rf230_set_txpower,
.set_lbt = at86rf230_set_lbt,
.set_cca_mode = at86rf230_set_cca_mode,
.set_cca_ed_level = at86rf230_set_cca_ed_level,
.set_csma_params = at86rf230_set_csma_params,
.set_frame_retries = at86rf230_set_frame_retries,
};
static struct at86rf2xx_chip_data at86rf233_data = {
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
.t_frame = 4096,
.t_p_ack = 545,
.t_sifs = 192,
.t_lifs = 480,
.t_tx_timeout = 2000,
.rssi_base_val = -91,
.set_channel = at86rf23x_set_channel,
.get_desense_steps = at86rf23x_get_desens_steps
};
static struct at86rf2xx_chip_data at86rf231_data = {
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
.t_frame = 4096,
.t_p_ack = 545,
.t_sifs = 192,
.t_lifs = 480,
.t_tx_timeout = 2000,
.rssi_base_val = -91,
.set_channel = at86rf23x_set_channel,
.get_desense_steps = at86rf23x_get_desens_steps
};
static struct at86rf2xx_chip_data at86rf212_data = {
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
.t_frame = 4096,
.t_p_ack = 545,
.t_sifs = 192,
.t_lifs = 480,
.t_tx_timeout = 2000,
.rssi_base_val = -100,
.set_channel = at86rf212_set_channel,
.get_desense_steps = at86rf212_get_desens_steps
};
static int at86rf230_hw_init(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
int rc, irq_pol, irq_type;
unsigned int dvdd;
u8 csma_seed[2];
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_TRX_CMD, STATE_FORCE_TRX_OFF);
if (rc)
return rc;
irq_type = irq_get_trigger_type(lp->spi->irq);
/* configure irq polarity, defaults to high active */
if (irq_type & (IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW))
irq_pol = IRQ_ACTIVE_LOW;
else
irq_pol = IRQ_ACTIVE_HIGH;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_POLARITY, irq_pol);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_RX_SAFE_MODE, 1);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_MASK, IRQ_TRX_END);
if (rc)
return rc;
get_random_bytes(csma_seed, ARRAY_SIZE(csma_seed));
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_SEED_0, csma_seed[0]);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CSMA_SEED_1, csma_seed[1]);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* CLKM changes are applied immediately */
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CLKM_SHA_SEL, 0x00);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* Turn CLKM Off */
rc = at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CLKM_CTRL, 0x00);
if (rc)
return rc;
/* Wait the next SLEEP cycle */
msleep(100);
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, SR_DVDD_OK, &dvdd);
if (rc)
return rc;
if (!dvdd) {
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "DVDD error\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static struct at86rf230_platform_data *
at86rf230_get_pdata(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct at86rf230_platform_data *pdata;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) || !spi->dev.of_node)
return spi->dev.platform_data;
pdata = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pdata)
goto done;
pdata->rstn = of_get_named_gpio(spi->dev.of_node, "reset-gpio", 0);
pdata->slp_tr = of_get_named_gpio(spi->dev.of_node, "sleep-gpio", 0);
spi->dev.platform_data = pdata;
done:
return pdata;
}
static int
at86rf230_detect_device(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
unsigned int part, version, val;
u16 man_id = 0;
const char *chip;
int rc;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_MAN_ID_0, &val);
if (rc)
return rc;
man_id |= val;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_MAN_ID_1, &val);
if (rc)
return rc;
man_id |= (val << 8);
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_PART_NUM, &part);
if (rc)
return rc;
rc = __at86rf230_read(lp, RG_PART_NUM, &version);
if (rc)
return rc;
if (man_id != 0x001f) {
dev_err(&lp->spi->dev, "Non-Atmel dev found (MAN_ID %02x %02x)\n",
man_id >> 8, man_id & 0xFF);
return -EINVAL;
}
lp->dev->extra_tx_headroom = 0;
lp->dev->flags = IEEE802154_HW_OMIT_CKSUM | IEEE802154_HW_AACK |
IEEE802154_HW_TXPOWER | IEEE802154_HW_CSMA;
switch (part) {
case 2:
chip = "at86rf230";
rc = -ENOTSUPP;
break;
case 3:
chip = "at86rf231";
lp->data = &at86rf231_data;
lp->dev->phy->channels_supported[0] = 0x7FFF800;
break;
case 7:
chip = "at86rf212";
if (version == 1) {
lp->data = &at86rf212_data;
lp->dev->flags |= IEEE802154_HW_LBT;
lp->dev->phy->channels_supported[0] = 0x00007FF;
lp->dev->phy->channels_supported[2] = 0x00007FF;
} else {
rc = -ENOTSUPP;
}
break;
case 11:
chip = "at86rf233";
lp->data = &at86rf233_data;
lp->dev->phy->channels_supported[0] = 0x7FFF800;
break;
default:
chip = "unkown";
rc = -ENOTSUPP;
break;
}
dev_info(&lp->spi->dev, "Detected %s chip version %d\n", chip, version);
return rc;
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
static void
at86rf230_setup_spi_messages(struct at86rf230_local *lp)
{
lp->irq.lp = lp;
spi_message_init(&lp->irq.msg);
lp->irq.msg.context = &lp->irq;
lp->irq.trx.tx_buf = lp->irq.buf;
lp->irq.trx.rx_buf = lp->irq.buf;
spi_message_add_tail(&lp->irq.trx, &lp->irq.msg);
lp->tx.lp = lp;
spi_message_init(&lp->tx.msg);
lp->tx.msg.context = &lp->tx;
lp->tx.trx.tx_buf = lp->tx.buf;
lp->tx.trx.rx_buf = lp->tx.buf;
spi_message_add_tail(&lp->tx.trx, &lp->tx.msg);
}
static int at86rf230_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct at86rf230_platform_data *pdata;
struct ieee802154_dev *dev;
struct at86rf230_local *lp;
unsigned int status;
int rc, irq_type;
if (!spi->irq) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "no IRQ specified\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
pdata = at86rf230_get_pdata(spi);
if (!pdata) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "no platform_data\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->rstn)) {
rc = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, pdata->rstn,
GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "rstn");
if (rc)
return rc;
}
if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->slp_tr)) {
rc = devm_gpio_request_one(&spi->dev, pdata->slp_tr,
GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "slp_tr");
if (rc)
return rc;
}
/* Reset */
if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->rstn)) {
udelay(1);
gpio_set_value(pdata->rstn, 0);
udelay(1);
gpio_set_value(pdata->rstn, 1);
usleep_range(120, 240);
}
dev = ieee802154_alloc_device(sizeof(*lp), &at86rf230_ops);
if (!dev)
return -ENOMEM;
lp = dev->priv;
lp->dev = dev;
lp->spi = spi;
dev->parent = &spi->dev;
lp->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &at86rf230_regmap_spi_config);
if (IS_ERR(lp->regmap)) {
rc = PTR_ERR(lp->regmap);
dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n",
rc);
goto free_dev;
}
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
at86rf230_setup_spi_messages(lp);
rc = at86rf230_detect_device(lp);
if (rc < 0)
goto free_dev;
spin_lock_init(&lp->lock);
init_completion(&lp->tx_complete);
spi_set_drvdata(spi, lp);
rc = at86rf230_hw_init(lp);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
goto free_dev;
/* Read irq status register to reset irq line */
rc = at86rf230_read_subreg(lp, RG_IRQ_STATUS, 0xff, 0, &status);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
goto free_dev;
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
irq_type = irq_get_trigger_type(spi->irq);
if (!irq_type)
irq_type = IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING;
rc = devm_request_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq, at86rf230_isr,
IRQF_SHARED | irq_type, dev_name(&spi->dev), lp);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
goto free_dev;
rc = ieee802154_register_device(lp->dev);
if (rc)
at86rf230: rework transmit and receive handling This patch is a complete reimplementation of transmit and receive handling for the at86rf230 driver. It solves also six bugs: First: The RX_SAFE_MODE is enabled and the transceiver doesn't leave the receive state while the framebuffer isn't read by a CMD_FB command. This is useful to read out the frame and don't get into another receive or transmit state, otherwise the frame would be overwritten. The current driver do twice CMD_FB calls, the first one leaves this protection. Second: Sometimes the CRC calculation is correct and the length field is greater 127. The current mac802154 layer and filter of a at86rf2xx doesn't check on this and the kernel crashes. In this case the frame is corrupted, we send the whole receive buffer to the next layer which can be useful for sniffing. Thrid: There is a undocumented race condition. When we are go into the RX_AACK_ON state the transceiver could be changed into RX_AACK_BUSY state. This is a normal behaviour. In this case the transceiver received a SHR while assert wasn't finished. Fourth: It also handle some more "correct" state changes. In aret mode the transceiver need to go to TX_ON before the transceiver go into RX_AACK_ON. Fifth: The programming model [0] describes also a error handling in ARET mode if the trac status is different than zero. This is patch adds support for handling this. Sixth: In receive handling the transceiver should also get the trac status according [0]. The driver could use the trac status as error statistic handling, but the driver doesn't use this currently. There is maybe some timing behaviour or the read of this register change some transceiver states. In addition the irqworker is removed. Instead we do async spi calls and no scheduling is involved anymore. The transmit function is also asynchron but with a wait_for_completion handling. The mac802154 layer doesn't support asynchron transmit handling right now. The state change behaviour is now changes, before it was: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) Sometimes a unexcepted state change occurs when 4. assert was violated. The new state change behaviour is: 1. assert while(!STATE_TRANSITION_IN_PROGRESS) 2. state change 3. wait state change timing according datasheet 4. assert once(wanted state != current state) This behaviour is described in the at86rf231 software programming model [0]. The state change documentation in this programming guide should also valid for at86rf212 and at86rf233 chips. The transceiver don't do a FORCE_TX_ON while we want to transmit a PDU. The new behaviour is a TX_ON and wait a receiving time (tFrame + tPAck). If we are still in RX_AACK_BUSY then we transmit a FORCE_TX_ON as timeout handling. The different is that FORCE_TX_ON aborts receiving and TX_ON waits if RX_AACK_BUSY is finished. This should decrease the drop rate of packets. [0] http://www.atmel.com/Images/AVR2022_swpm231-2.0.zip Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-07-03 06:20:48 +08:00
goto free_dev;
return rc;
free_dev:
ieee802154_free_device(lp->dev);
return rc;
}
static int at86rf230_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct at86rf230_local *lp = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
at86rf230: mask irq's before deregister device While transmit over a at86rf231 device and unloading the module I got: [ 29.643073] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3 at kernel/workqueue.c:1335 __queue_work+0xb4/0x224() [ 29.651457] Modules linked in: at86rf230(-) autofs4 [ 29.656612] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc6-01602-g902659e-dirty #294 [ 29.666490] [<c00124f0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0010ad0>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 29.674628] [<c0010ad0>] (show_stack) from [<c0032c80>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x80) [ 29.683116] [<c0032c80>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0032d30>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20) [ 29.692329] [<c0032d30>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0045b08>] (__queue_work+0xb4/0x224) [ 29.700906] [<c0045b08>] (__queue_work) from [<c0045cc8>] (queue_work_on+0x50/0x78) [ 29.708944] [<c0045cc8>] (queue_work_on) from [<c05669cc>] (mac802154_tx+0x1e4/0x240) [ 29.717164] [<c05669cc>] (mac802154_tx) from [<c0471814>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x2f0/0x43c) [ 29.725926] [<c0471814>] (dev_hard_start_xmit) from [<c04878d0>] (sch_direct_xmit+0x64/0x2a0) [ 29.734867] [<c04878d0>] (sch_direct_xmit) from [<c0487c38>] (__qdisc_run+0x12c/0x18c) [ 29.743169] [<c0487c38>] (__qdisc_run) from [<c046e1b0>] (net_tx_action+0xe0/0x178) [ 29.751205] [<c046e1b0>] (net_tx_action) from [<c0036690>] (__do_softirq+0x100/0x264) [ 29.759420] [<c0036690>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0036818>] (run_ksoftirqd+0x24/0x4c) [ 29.767453] [<c0036818>] (run_ksoftirqd) from [<c005232c>] (smpboot_thread_fn+0x128/0x13c) [ 29.776121] [<c005232c>] (smpboot_thread_fn) from [<c004c3fc>] (kthread+0xd0/0xe4) [ 29.784061] [<c004c3fc>] (kthread) from [<c000da88>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 29.791628] ---[ end trace 3406ff24bd973834 ]--- The problem is there are still interrupts after deregister ieee802154 device. This patch mask all interrupts in the at86rf2xx chips before deregister the device. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-03-31 09:26:51 +08:00
/* mask all at86rf230 irq's */
at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_IRQ_MASK, 0);
ieee802154_unregister_device(lp->dev);
ieee802154_free_device(lp->dev);
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "unregistered at86rf230\n");
return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id at86rf230_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf230", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf231", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf233", },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at86rf212", },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at86rf230_of_match);
static const struct spi_device_id at86rf230_device_id[] = {
{ .name = "at86rf230", },
{ .name = "at86rf231", },
{ .name = "at86rf233", },
{ .name = "at86rf212", },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, at86rf230_device_id);
static struct spi_driver at86rf230_driver = {
.id_table = at86rf230_device_id,
.driver = {
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(at86rf230_of_match),
.name = "at86rf230",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.probe = at86rf230_probe,
.remove = at86rf230_remove,
};
module_spi_driver(at86rf230_driver);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AT86RF230 Transceiver Driver");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");