OpenCloudOS-Kernel/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c

363 lines
9.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (C) 2005,2006,2007,2008 IBM Corporation
*
* Authors:
* Reiner Sailer <sailer@watson.ibm.com>
* Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
* Kylene Hall <kylene@us.ibm.com>
* Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
* published by the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the
* License.
*
* File: ima_main.c
* implements the IMA hooks: ima_bprm_check, ima_file_mmap,
* and ima_file_check.
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/binfmts.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 16:04:11 +08:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
#include <linux/xattr.h>
#include <linux/ima.h>
#include <crypto/hash_info.h>
#include "ima.h"
int ima_initialized;
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE
int ima_appraise = IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE;
#else
int ima_appraise;
#endif
int ima_hash_algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
static int hash_setup_done;
static int __init hash_setup(char *str)
{
struct ima_template_desc *template_desc = ima_template_desc_current();
int i;
if (hash_setup_done)
return 1;
if (strcmp(template_desc->name, IMA_TEMPLATE_IMA_NAME) == 0) {
if (strncmp(str, "sha1", 4) == 0)
ima_hash_algo = HASH_ALGO_SHA1;
else if (strncmp(str, "md5", 3) == 0)
ima_hash_algo = HASH_ALGO_MD5;
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < HASH_ALGO__LAST; i++) {
if (strcmp(str, hash_algo_name[i]) == 0) {
ima_hash_algo = i;
break;
}
}
out:
hash_setup_done = 1;
return 1;
}
__setup("ima_hash=", hash_setup);
/*
* ima_rdwr_violation_check
*
* Only invalidate the PCR for measured files:
* - Opening a file for write when already open for read,
* results in a time of measure, time of use (ToMToU) error.
* - Opening a file for read when already open for write,
* could result in a file measurement error.
*
*/
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file,
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
int must_measure,
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
char **pathbuf,
const char **pathname)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
fmode_t mode = file->f_mode;
bool send_tomtou = false, send_writers = false;
if (mode & FMODE_WRITE) {
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount) && IS_IMA(inode)) {
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
if (!iint)
iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
/* IMA_MEASURE is set from reader side */
if (iint && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE))
send_tomtou = true;
}
} else {
if ((atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0) && must_measure)
send_writers = true;
}
if (!send_tomtou && !send_writers)
return;
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
*pathname = ima_d_path(&file->f_path, pathbuf);
if (send_tomtou)
ima_add_violation(file, *pathname, iint,
"invalid_pcr", "ToMToU");
if (send_writers)
ima_add_violation(file, *pathname, iint,
"invalid_pcr", "open_writers");
}
static void ima_check_last_writer(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
fmode_t mode = file->f_mode;
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
if (!(mode & FMODE_WRITE))
return;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1) {
if ((iint->version != inode->i_version) ||
(iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE)) {
iint->flags &= ~(IMA_DONE_MASK | IMA_NEW_FILE);
if (iint->flags & IMA_APPRAISE)
ima_update_xattr(iint, file);
}
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
}
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
}
/**
* ima_file_free - called on __fput()
* @file: pointer to file structure being freed
*
* Flag files that changed, based on i_version
*/
void ima_file_free(struct file *file)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
if (!ima_policy_flag || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
return;
iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
if (!iint)
return;
ima_check_last_writer(iint, inode, file);
}
static int process_measurement(struct file *file, int mask, int function,
int opened)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL;
struct ima_template_desc *template_desc;
char *pathbuf = NULL;
const char *pathname = NULL;
int rc = -ENOMEM, action, must_appraise;
struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = NULL, **xattr_ptr = NULL;
int xattr_len = 0;
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
bool violation_check;
if (!ima_policy_flag || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
return 0;
/* Return an IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE, IMA_AUDIT action
* bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy.
* Included is the appraise submask.
*/
action = ima_get_action(inode, mask, function);
violation_check = ((function == FILE_CHECK || function == MMAP_CHECK) &&
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
(ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
if (!action && !violation_check)
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
return 0;
must_appraise = action & IMA_APPRAISE;
/* Is the appraise rule hook specific? */
if (action & IMA_FILE_APPRAISE)
function = FILE_CHECK;
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
if (action) {
iint = integrity_inode_get(inode);
if (!iint)
goto out;
}
if (violation_check) {
ima_rdwr_violation_check(file, iint, action & IMA_MEASURE,
&pathbuf, &pathname);
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
if (!action) {
rc = 0;
goto out_free;
}
}
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
/* Determine if already appraised/measured based on bitmask
* (IMA_MEASURE, IMA_MEASURED, IMA_XXXX_APPRAISE, IMA_XXXX_APPRAISED,
* IMA_AUDIT, IMA_AUDITED)
*/
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
iint->flags |= action;
action &= IMA_DO_MASK;
action &= ~((iint->flags & IMA_DONE_MASK) >> 1);
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
/* Nothing to do, just return existing appraised status */
if (!action) {
if (must_appraise)
rc = ima_get_cache_status(iint, function);
goto out_digsig;
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
}
template_desc = ima_template_desc_current();
if ((action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) ||
strcmp(template_desc->name, IMA_TEMPLATE_IMA_NAME) != 0)
xattr_ptr = &xattr_value;
rc = ima_collect_measurement(iint, file, xattr_ptr, &xattr_len);
if (rc != 0) {
if (file->f_flags & O_DIRECT)
rc = (iint->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO) ? 0 : -EACCES;
goto out_digsig;
}
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
if (!pathname) /* ima_rdwr_violation possibly pre-fetched */
pathname = ima_d_path(&file->f_path, &pathbuf);
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
if (action & IMA_MEASURE)
ima_store_measurement(iint, file, pathname,
xattr_value, xattr_len);
if (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
rc = ima_appraise_measurement(function, iint, file, pathname,
xattr_value, xattr_len, opened);
if (action & IMA_AUDIT)
ima_audit_measurement(iint, pathname);
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
out_digsig:
if ((mask & MAY_WRITE) && (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG))
rc = -EACCES;
ima: fix race condition on ima_rdwr_violation_check and process_measurement This patch fixes a race condition between two functions that try to access the same inode. Since the i_mutex lock is held and released separately in the two functions, there may be the possibility that a violation is not correctly detected. Suppose there are two processes, A (reader) and B (writer), if the following sequence happens: A: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: ima_rdwr_violation_check() B: process_measurement() B: starts writing the inode A: process_measurement() the ToMToU violation (a reader may be accessing a content different from that measured, due to a concurrent modification by a writer) will not be detected. To avoid this issue, the violation check and the measurement must be done atomically. This patch fixes the problem by moving the violation check inside process_measurement() when the i_mutex lock is held. Differently from the old code, the violation check is executed also for the MMAP_CHECK hook (other than for FILE_CHECK). This allows to detect ToMToU violations that are possible because shared libraries can be opened for writing while they are in use (according to the output of 'man mmap', the mmap() flag MAP_DENYWRITE is ignored). Changes in v5 (Roberto Sassu): * get iint if action is not zero * exit process_measurement() after the violation check if action is zero * reverse order process_measurement() exit cleanup (Mimi) Changes in v4 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * iint allocation is done before calling ima_rdrw_violation_check() (Suggested-by Mimi) * do not check for violations if the policy does not contain 'measure' rules (done by Roberto Sassu) Changes in v3 (Dmitry Kasatkin): * no violation checking for MMAP_CHECK function in this patch * remove use of filename from violation * removes checking if ima is enabled from ima_rdrw_violation_check * slight style change Suggested-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-09-13 01:35:55 +08:00
kfree(xattr_value);
out_free:
if (pathbuf)
__putname(pathbuf);
out:
ima: integrity appraisal extension IMA currently maintains an integrity measurement list used to assert the integrity of the running system to a third party. The IMA-appraisal extension adds local integrity validation and enforcement of the measurement against a "good" value stored as an extended attribute 'security.ima'. The initial methods for validating 'security.ima' are hashed based, which provides file data integrity, and digital signature based, which in addition to providing file data integrity, provides authenticity. This patch creates and maintains the 'security.ima' xattr, containing the file data hash measurement. Protection of the xattr is provided by EVM, if enabled and configured. Based on policy, IMA calls evm_verifyxattr() to verify a file's metadata integrity and, assuming success, compares the file's current hash value with the one stored as an extended attribute in 'security.ima'. Changelov v4: - changed iint cache flags to hex values Changelog v3: - change appraisal default for filesystems without xattr support to fail Changelog v2: - fix audit msg 'res' value - removed unused 'ima_appraise=' values Changelog v1: - removed unused iint mutex (Dmitry Kasatkin) - setattr hook must not reset appraised (Dmitry Kasatkin) - evm_verifyxattr() now differentiates between no 'security.evm' xattr (INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) and no EVM 'protected' xattrs included in the 'security.evm' (INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS). - replace hash_status with ima_status (Dmitry Kasatkin) - re-initialize slab element ima_status on free (Dmitry Kasatkin) - include 'security.ima' in EVM if CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE, not CONFIG_IMA - merged half "ima: ima_must_appraise_or_measure API change" (Dmitry Kasatkin) - removed unnecessary error variable in process_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - use ima_inode_post_setattr() stub function, if IMA_APPRAISE not configured (moved ima_inode_post_setattr() to ima_appraise.c) - make sure ima_collect_measurement() can read file Changelog: - add 'iint' to evm_verifyxattr() call (Dimitry Kasatkin) - fix the race condition between chmod, which takes the i_mutex and then iint->mutex, and ima_file_free() and process_measurement(), which take the locks in the reverse order, by eliminating iint->mutex. (Dmitry Kasatkin) - cleanup of ima_appraise_measurement() (Dmitry Kasatkin) - changes as a result of the iint not allocated for all regular files, but only for those measured/appraised. - don't try to appraise new/empty files - expanded ima_appraisal description in ima/Kconfig - IMA appraise definitions required even if IMA_APPRAISE not enabled - add return value to ima_must_appraise() stub - unconditionally set status = INTEGRITY_PASS *after* testing status, not before. (Found by Joe Perches) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
2012-02-13 23:15:05 +08:00
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
if ((rc && must_appraise) && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
return -EACCES;
return 0;
}
/**
* ima_file_mmap - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
* @file: pointer to the file to be measured (May be NULL)
* @prot: contains the protection that will be applied by the kernel.
*
* Measure files being mmapped executable based on the ima_must_measure()
* policy decision.
*
* On success return 0. On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
* is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
*/
int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
{
if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC))
return process_measurement(file, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK, 0);
return 0;
}
/**
* ima_bprm_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
* @bprm: contains the linux_binprm structure
*
* The OS protects against an executable file, already open for write,
* from being executed in deny_write_access() and an executable file,
* already open for execute, from being modified in get_write_access().
* So we can be certain that what we verify and measure here is actually
* what is being executed.
*
* On success return 0. On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
* is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
*/
int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
return process_measurement(bprm->file, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK, 0);
}
/**
* ima_path_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
* @file: pointer to the file to be measured
* @mask: contains MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE or MAY_EXECUTE
*
* Measure files based on the ima_must_measure() policy decision.
*
* On success return 0. On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
* is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
*/
int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask, int opened)
{
return process_measurement(file,
mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC),
FILE_CHECK, opened);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_file_check);
/**
* ima_module_check - based on policy, collect/store/appraise measurement.
* @file: pointer to the file to be measured/appraised
*
* Measure/appraise kernel modules based on policy.
*
* On success return 0. On integrity appraisal error, assuming the file
* is in policy and IMA-appraisal is in enforcing mode, return -EACCES.
*/
int ima_module_check(struct file *file)
{
if (!file) {
#ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) &&
(ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
#endif
return 0; /* We rely on module signature checking */
}
return process_measurement(file, MAY_EXEC, MODULE_CHECK, 0);
}
int ima_fw_from_file(struct file *file, char *buf, size_t size)
{
if (!file) {
if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIRMWARE) &&
(ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE))
return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
return 0;
}
return process_measurement(file, MAY_EXEC, FIRMWARE_CHECK, 0);
}
static int __init init_ima(void)
{
int error;
hash_setup(CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH);
error = ima_init();
if (!error) {
ima_initialized = 1;
ima_update_policy_flag();
}
return error;
}
late_initcall(init_ima); /* Start IMA after the TPM is available */
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Integrity Measurement Architecture");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");