OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c

605 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
* http://www.samsung.com
*
* CPU frequency scaling for S5PC110/S5PV210
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <mach/map.h>
#include <mach/regs-clock.h>
static struct clk *cpu_clk;
static struct clk *dmc0_clk;
static struct clk *dmc1_clk;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
/* APLL M,P,S values for 1G/800Mhz */
#define APLL_VAL_1000 ((1 << 31) | (125 << 16) | (3 << 8) | 1)
#define APLL_VAL_800 ((1 << 31) | (100 << 16) | (3 << 8) | 1)
/* Use 800MHz when entering sleep mode */
#define SLEEP_FREQ (800 * 1000)
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
/* Tracks if cpu freqency can be updated anymore */
static bool no_cpufreq_access;
/*
* DRAM configurations to calculate refresh counter for changing
* frequency of memory.
*/
struct dram_conf {
unsigned long freq; /* HZ */
unsigned long refresh; /* DRAM refresh counter * 1000 */
};
/* DRAM configuration (DMC0 and DMC1) */
static struct dram_conf s5pv210_dram_conf[2];
enum perf_level {
L0, L1, L2, L3, L4,
};
enum s5pv210_mem_type {
LPDDR = 0x1,
LPDDR2 = 0x2,
DDR2 = 0x4,
};
enum s5pv210_dmc_port {
DMC0 = 0,
DMC1,
};
static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s5pv210_freq_table[] = {
{L0, 1000*1000},
{L1, 800*1000},
{L2, 400*1000},
{L3, 200*1000},
{L4, 100*1000},
{0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END},
};
static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
static struct regulator *int_regulator;
struct s5pv210_dvs_conf {
int arm_volt; /* uV */
int int_volt; /* uV */
};
static const int arm_volt_max = 1350000;
static const int int_volt_max = 1250000;
static struct s5pv210_dvs_conf dvs_conf[] = {
[L0] = {
.arm_volt = 1250000,
.int_volt = 1100000,
},
[L1] = {
.arm_volt = 1200000,
.int_volt = 1100000,
},
[L2] = {
.arm_volt = 1050000,
.int_volt = 1100000,
},
[L3] = {
.arm_volt = 950000,
.int_volt = 1100000,
},
[L4] = {
.arm_volt = 950000,
.int_volt = 1000000,
},
};
static u32 clkdiv_val[5][11] = {
/*
* Clock divider value for following
* { APLL, A2M, HCLK_MSYS, PCLK_MSYS,
* HCLK_DSYS, PCLK_DSYS, HCLK_PSYS, PCLK_PSYS,
* ONEDRAM, MFC, G3D }
*/
/* L0 : [1000/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
{0, 4, 4, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
/* L1 : [800/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
{0, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
/* L2 : [400/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
{1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
/* L3 : [200/200/100][166/83][133/66][200/200] */
{3, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 0, 0},
/* L4 : [100/100/100][83/83][66/66][100/100] */
{7, 7, 0, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, 7, 0, 0},
};
/*
* This function set DRAM refresh counter
* accoriding to operating frequency of DRAM
* ch: DMC port number 0 or 1
* freq: Operating frequency of DRAM(KHz)
*/
static void s5pv210_set_refresh(enum s5pv210_dmc_port ch, unsigned long freq)
{
unsigned long tmp, tmp1;
void __iomem *reg = NULL;
if (ch == DMC0) {
reg = (S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30);
} else if (ch == DMC1) {
reg = (S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30);
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find DMC port\n");
return;
}
/* Find current DRAM frequency */
tmp = s5pv210_dram_conf[ch].freq;
do_div(tmp, freq);
tmp1 = s5pv210_dram_conf[ch].refresh;
do_div(tmp1, tmp);
__raw_writel(tmp1, reg);
}
static unsigned int s5pv210_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
{
if (cpu)
return 0;
return clk_get_rate(cpu_clk) / 1000;
}
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned long reg;
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
unsigned int priv_index;
unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
int arm_volt, int_volt;
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&set_freq_lock);
if (no_cpufreq_access) {
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
"temporarily\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
#endif
ret = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
}
old_freq = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Finding current running level index */
if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
old_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
&priv_index)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
}
arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
if (new_freq > old_freq) {
ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
if (ret)
goto exit;
ret = regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator,
int_volt, int_volt_max);
if (ret)
goto exit;
}
/* Check if there need to change PLL */
if ((index == L0) || (priv_index == L0))
pll_changing = 1;
/* Check if there need to change System bus clock */
if ((index == L4) || (priv_index == L4))
bus_speed_changing = 1;
if (bus_speed_changing) {
/*
* Reconfigure DRAM refresh counter value for minimum
* temporary clock while changing divider.
* expected clock is 83Mhz : 7.8usec/(1/83Mhz) = 0x287
*/
if (pll_changing)
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 83000);
else
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 100000);
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC0, 83000);
}
/*
* APLL should be changed in this level
* APLL -> MPLL(for stable transition) -> APLL
* Some clock source's clock API are not prepared.
* Do not use clock API in below code.
*/
if (pll_changing) {
/*
* 1. Temporary Change divider for MFC and G3D
* SCLKA2M(200/1=200)->(200/4=50)Mhz
*/
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
/* For MFC, G3D dividing */
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
} while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
/*
* 2. Change SCLKA2M(200Mhz)to SCLKMPLL in MFC_MUX, G3D MUX
* (200/4=50)->(667/4=166)Mhz
*/
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT1);
} while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
/*
* 3. DMC1 refresh count for 133Mhz if (index == L4) is
* true refresh counter is already programed in upper
* code. 0x287@83Mhz
*/
if (!bus_speed_changing)
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 133000);
/* 4. SCLKAPLL -> SCLKMPLL */
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT0);
} while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
}
/* Change divider */
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV0);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_MASK |
S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_MASK |
S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_MASK |
S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_MASK);
reg |= ((clkdiv_val[index][0] << S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][1] << S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][2] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][3] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][4] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK166_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][5] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK83_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][6] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][7] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT));
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV0);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
} while (reg & 0xff);
/* ARM MCS value changed */
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
reg &= ~0x3;
if (index >= L3)
reg |= 0x3;
else
reg |= 0x1;
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
if (pll_changing) {
/* 5. Set Lock time = 30us*24Mhz = 0x2cf */
__raw_writel(0x2cf, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
/*
* 6. Turn on APLL
* 6-1. Set PMS values
* 6-2. Wait untile the PLL is locked
*/
if (index == L0)
__raw_writel(APLL_VAL_1000, S5P_APLL_CON);
else
__raw_writel(APLL_VAL_800, S5P_APLL_CON);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_APLL_CON);
} while (!(reg & (0x1 << 29)));
/*
* 7. Change souce clock from SCLKMPLL(667Mhz)
* to SCLKA2M(200Mhz) in MFC_MUX and G3D MUX
* (667/4=166)->(200/4=50)Mhz
*/
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT1);
} while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
/*
* 8. Change divider for MFC and G3D
* (200/4=50)->(200/1=200)Mhz
*/
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][10] << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][9] << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
/* For MFC, G3D dividing */
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
} while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
/* 9. Change MPLL to APLL in MSYS_MUX */
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
reg |= (0x0 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT0);
} while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
/*
* 10. DMC1 refresh counter
* L4 : DMC1 = 100Mhz 7.8us/(1/100) = 0x30c
* Others : DMC1 = 200Mhz 7.8us/(1/200) = 0x618
*/
if (!bus_speed_changing)
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 200000);
}
/*
* L4 level need to change memory bus speed, hence onedram clock divier
* and memory refresh parameter should be changed
*/
if (bus_speed_changing) {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6);
reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK;
reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][8] << S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT);
__raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV6);
do {
reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT1);
} while (reg & (1 << 15));
/* Reconfigure DRAM refresh counter value */
if (index != L4) {
/*
* DMC0 : 166Mhz
* DMC1 : 200Mhz
*/
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC0, 166000);
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 200000);
} else {
/*
* DMC0 : 83Mhz
* DMC1 : 100Mhz
*/
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC0, 83000);
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 100000);
}
}
if (new_freq < old_freq) {
regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator,
int_volt, int_volt_max);
regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
}
printk(KERN_DEBUG "Perf changed[L%d]\n", index);
exit:
mutex_unlock(&set_freq_lock);
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return 0;
}
static int s5pv210_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
static int check_mem_type(void __iomem *dmc_reg)
{
unsigned long val;
val = __raw_readl(dmc_reg + 0x4);
val = (val & (0xf << 8));
return val >> 8;
}
static int __init s5pv210_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
unsigned long mem_type;
int ret;
cpu_clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
if (IS_ERR(cpu_clk))
return PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
dmc0_clk = clk_get(NULL, "sclk_dmc0");
if (IS_ERR(dmc0_clk)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(dmc0_clk);
goto out_dmc0;
}
dmc1_clk = clk_get(NULL, "hclk_msys");
if (IS_ERR(dmc1_clk)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(dmc1_clk);
goto out_dmc1;
}
if (policy->cpu != 0) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_dmc1;
}
/*
* check_mem_type : This driver only support LPDDR & LPDDR2.
* other memory type is not supported.
*/
mem_type = check_mem_type(S5P_VA_DMC0);
if ((mem_type != LPDDR) && (mem_type != LPDDR2)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "CPUFreq doesn't support this memory type\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_dmc1;
}
/* Find current refresh counter and frequency each DMC */
s5pv210_dram_conf[0].refresh = (__raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC0 + 0x30) * 1000);
s5pv210_dram_conf[0].freq = clk_get_rate(dmc0_clk);
s5pv210_dram_conf[1].refresh = (__raw_readl(S5P_VA_DMC1 + 0x30) * 1000);
s5pv210_dram_conf[1].freq = clk_get_rate(dmc1_clk);
return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, s5pv210_freq_table, 40000);
out_dmc1:
clk_put(dmc0_clk);
out_dmc0:
clk_put(cpu_clk);
return ret;
}
static int s5pv210_cpufreq_notifier_event(struct notifier_block *this,
unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
int ret;
switch (event) {
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
ret = cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
/* Disable updation of cpu frequency */
no_cpufreq_access = true;
return NOTIFY_OK;
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
/* Enable updation of cpu frequency */
no_cpufreq_access = false;
cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ, 0);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static int s5pv210_cpufreq_reboot_notifier_event(struct notifier_block *this,
unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
int ret;
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
ret = cpufreq_driver_target(cpufreq_cpu_get(0), SLEEP_FREQ, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
no_cpufreq_access = true;
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static struct cpufreq_driver s5pv210_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-25 22:15:48 +08:00
.target_index = s5pv210_target,
.get = s5pv210_getspeed,
.init = s5pv210_cpu_init,
.name = "s5pv210",
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
.suspend = s5pv210_cpufreq_suspend,
.resume = s5pv210_cpufreq_resume,
#endif
};
static struct notifier_block s5pv210_cpufreq_notifier = {
.notifier_call = s5pv210_cpufreq_notifier_event,
};
static struct notifier_block s5pv210_cpufreq_reboot_notifier = {
.notifier_call = s5pv210_cpufreq_reboot_notifier_event,
};
static int __init s5pv210_cpufreq_init(void)
{
arm_regulator = regulator_get(NULL, "vddarm");
if (IS_ERR(arm_regulator)) {
pr_err("failed to get regulator vddarm");
return PTR_ERR(arm_regulator);
}
int_regulator = regulator_get(NULL, "vddint");
if (IS_ERR(int_regulator)) {
pr_err("failed to get regulator vddint");
regulator_put(arm_regulator);
return PTR_ERR(int_regulator);
}
register_pm_notifier(&s5pv210_cpufreq_notifier);
register_reboot_notifier(&s5pv210_cpufreq_reboot_notifier);
return cpufreq_register_driver(&s5pv210_driver);
}
late_initcall(s5pv210_cpufreq_init);