OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c

496 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright © 2016 Intel Corporation
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
*/
#include "intel_uc.h"
#include "intel_guc_submission.h"
drm/i915/guc: Move shared data allocation away from submission path We need shared data for actions (e.g. guc suspend/resume), and we're using those with GuC submission disabled. Let's introduce intel_guc_init and move shared data alloc there. This fixes GPF during module unload with HuC, but without GuC submission: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000005aee7809 IP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: i915(O-) netconsole x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel mei_me i2c_i801 mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: i915] CPU: 2 PID: 2794 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G U W O 4.15.0-rc2+ #297 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0054.2016.0930.1102 09/30/2016 task: 0000000055945c61 task.stack: 00000000264ccb43 RIP: 0010:intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000483df8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880829180000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffff880844c2c938 RDI: ffff880844c2c000 RBP: ffff880829180000 R08: 00000000a29c58c1 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffa040ba40 R13: ffffffffa040bab0 R14: ffff88084a195060 R15: 000055df3ef357a0 FS: 00007ff43c043740(0000) GS:ffff88084e200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000f9 CR3: 000000083f179005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 Call Trace: i915_gem_suspend+0x9d/0x130 [i915] ? i915_driver_unload+0x68/0x180 [i915] i915_driver_unload+0x70/0x180 [i915] i915_pci_remove+0x15/0x20 [i915] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 device_release_driver_internal+0x15f/0x220 driver_detach+0x3a/0x80 bus_remove_driver+0x58/0xd0 pci_unregister_driver+0x29/0x90 SyS_delete_module+0x150/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a RIP: 0033:0x7ff43b51b5c7 RSP: 002b:00007ffe6825a758 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007ff43b51b5c7 RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055df3ef35808 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffe682596d1 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007ff43b594880 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055df3ef357a0 R13: 00007ffe68259740 R14: 000055df3ef35260 R15: 000055df3ef357a0 Code: 00 00 02 74 03 31 c0 c3 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 52 0f f8 ff 48 b8 01 05 00 00 02 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 04 48 8b 83 00 12 00 00 <f6> 80 f9 00 00 00 01 0f 84 a7 00 00 00 f6 80 98 00 00 00 01 0f RIP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] RSP: ffffc90000483df8 CR2: 00000000000000f9 ---[ end trace 23a192a61d937a3e ]--- Fixes: b8e5eb960b28 ("drm/i915/guc: Allocate separate shared data object for GuC communication") Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:46 +08:00
#include "intel_guc.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
drm/i915/guc: Don't forget to free GuC error log We're freeing GuC error log in uc_fini_hw() that matches corresponding uc_init_hw() but we missed the point that this log object is copied on error path and in case of failure in uc_init_hw() we will leak this object as uc_fini_hw() is never called. If we free this log object as part of the late uC cleanup, where we also release other firmware objects, we can avoid this BUG: [70841.001413] BUG drm_i915_gem_object (Tainted: G U W ): Objects remaining in drm_i915_gem_object on __kmem_cache_shutdown() [70841.001436] INFO: Slab 0x00000000c94e41af objects=21 used=1 fp=0x000000001d60c40a flags=0x8000000000008100 [70841.001466] Call Trace: [70841.001471] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [70841.001476] slab_err+0x99/0xb0 [70841.001483] ? __slab_alloc.isra.24.constprop.29+0x62/0x70 [70841.001491] ? __kmalloc+0x1f5/0x320 [70841.001497] __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x18b/0x400 [70841.001505] shutdown_cache+0x13/0x1c0 [70841.001511] kmem_cache_destroy+0x1c2/0x240 [70841.001517] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x38/0x270 [70841.001559] i915_gem_load_cleanup+0xbc/0x130 [i915] [70841.001595] i915_driver_cleanup_early+0x11/0x60 [i915] [70841.001630] i915_driver_load+0x708/0x1720 [i915] [70841.001638] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe2/0x1c0 [70841.001673] i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915] [70841.001680] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 [70841.001687] driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490 [70841.001694] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 [70841.001700] ? driver_probe_device+0x490/0x490 [70841.001705] bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 [70841.001712] bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260 [70841.001717] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.001723] driver_register+0x52/0xc0 [70841.001728] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.001733] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170 [70841.001739] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [70841.001746] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x27b/0x2e0 [70841.001753] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ec [70841.001759] load_module+0x219e/0x2550 [70841.001766] ? vfs_read+0x121/0x140 [70841.001774] ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.001779] SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.001788] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x22/0x8f [70841.001806] INFO: Object 0x00000000eab7ed96 @offset=6208 [70841.001850] INFO: Allocated in i915_gem_object_create.part.32+0x1f/0x260 [i915] age=38 cpu=0 pid=2708 [70841.001861] kmem_cache_alloc+0x23d/0x2d0 [70841.001897] i915_gem_object_create.part.32+0x1f/0x260 [i915] [70841.001937] intel_guc_allocate_vma+0x15/0x100 [i915] [70841.001977] intel_guc_log_create+0x34/0x1c0 [i915] [70841.002014] intel_guc_init+0x5a/0x100 [i915] [70841.002051] intel_uc_init+0x3e/0xb0 [i915] [70841.002089] i915_gem_init+0x18e/0x540 [i915] [70841.002123] i915_driver_load+0xa7a/0x1720 [i915] [70841.002159] i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915] [70841.002165] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 [70841.002171] driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490 [70841.002177] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 [70841.002182] bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 [70841.002188] bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260 [70841.002193] driver_register+0x52/0xc0 [70841.002198] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170 [70841.002462] kmem_cache_destroy drm_i915_gem_object: Slab cache still has objects [70841.002491] Call Trace: [70841.002497] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [70841.002503] kmem_cache_destroy+0x1e0/0x240 [70841.002509] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x38/0x270 [70841.002551] i915_gem_load_cleanup+0xbc/0x130 [i915] [70841.002586] i915_driver_cleanup_early+0x11/0x60 [i915] [70841.002621] i915_driver_load+0x708/0x1720 [i915] [70841.002629] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe2/0x1c0 [70841.002664] i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915] [70841.002671] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 [70841.002678] driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490 [70841.002684] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 [70841.002690] ? driver_probe_device+0x490/0x490 [70841.002696] bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 [70841.002702] bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260 [70841.002708] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.002713] driver_register+0x52/0xc0 [70841.002719] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.002724] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170 [70841.002731] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [70841.002737] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x27b/0x2e0 [70841.002745] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ec [70841.002751] load_module+0x219e/0x2550 [70841.002758] ? vfs_read+0x121/0x140 [70841.002766] ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.002772] SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.002781] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x22/0x8f Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180131173241.19704-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2018-02-01 01:32:37 +08:00
static void guc_free_load_err_log(struct intel_guc *guc);
/* Reset GuC providing us with fresh state for both GuC and HuC.
*/
static int __intel_uc_reset_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
int ret;
u32 guc_status;
ret = intel_reset_guc(dev_priv);
if (ret) {
DRM_ERROR("Failed to reset GuC, ret = %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
guc_status = I915_READ(GUC_STATUS);
WARN(!(guc_status & GS_MIA_IN_RESET),
"GuC status: 0x%x, MIA core expected to be in reset\n",
guc_status);
return ret;
}
static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &i915->guc.fw;
struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &i915->huc.fw;
int enable_guc = 0;
/* Default is to enable GuC/HuC if we know their firmwares */
if (intel_uc_fw_is_selected(guc_fw))
enable_guc |= ENABLE_GUC_SUBMISSION;
if (intel_uc_fw_is_selected(huc_fw))
enable_guc |= ENABLE_GUC_LOAD_HUC;
/* Any platform specific fine-tuning can be done here */
return enable_guc;
}
static int __get_default_guc_log_level(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
int guc_log_level;
if (!HAS_GUC(i915) || !intel_uc_is_using_guc())
guc_log_level = GUC_LOG_LEVEL_DISABLED;
else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) ||
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
guc_log_level = GUC_LOG_LEVEL_MAX;
else
guc_log_level = GUC_LOG_LEVEL_NON_VERBOSE;
/* Any platform specific fine-tuning can be done here */
return guc_log_level;
}
/**
* sanitize_options_early - sanitize uC related modparam options
* @i915: device private
*
* In case of "enable_guc" option this function will attempt to modify
* it only if it was initially set to "auto(-1)". Default value for this
* modparam varies between platforms and it is hardcoded in driver code.
* Any other modparam value is only monitored against availability of the
* related hardware or firmware definitions.
*
* In case of "guc_log_level" option this function will attempt to modify
* it only if it was initially set to "auto(-1)" or if initial value was
* "enable(1..4)" on platforms without the GuC. Default value for this
* modparam varies between platforms and is usually set to "disable(0)"
* unless GuC is enabled on given platform and the driver is compiled with
* debug config when this modparam will default to "enable(1..4)".
*/
static void sanitize_options_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw = &i915->guc.fw;
struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &i915->huc.fw;
/* A negative value means "use platform default" */
if (i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0)
i915_modparams.enable_guc = __get_platform_enable_guc(i915);
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("enable_guc=%d (submission:%s huc:%s)\n",
i915_modparams.enable_guc,
yesno(intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission()),
yesno(intel_uc_is_using_huc()));
/* Verify GuC firmware availability */
if (intel_uc_is_using_guc() && !intel_uc_fw_is_selected(guc_fw)) {
DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
"enable_guc", i915_modparams.enable_guc,
!HAS_GUC(i915) ? "no GuC hardware" :
"no GuC firmware");
}
/* Verify HuC firmware availability */
if (intel_uc_is_using_huc() && !intel_uc_fw_is_selected(huc_fw)) {
DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
"enable_guc", i915_modparams.enable_guc,
!HAS_HUC(i915) ? "no HuC hardware" :
"no HuC firmware");
}
/* A negative value means "use platform/config default" */
if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0)
i915_modparams.guc_log_level =
__get_default_guc_log_level(i915);
if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > 0 && !intel_uc_is_using_guc()) {
DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
"guc_log_level", i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
!HAS_GUC(i915) ? "no GuC hardware" :
"GuC not enabled");
i915_modparams.guc_log_level = 0;
}
if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level > GUC_LOG_LEVEL_MAX) {
DRM_WARN("Incompatible option detected: %s=%d, %s!\n",
"guc_log_level", i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
"verbosity too high");
i915_modparams.guc_log_level = GUC_LOG_LEVEL_MAX;
}
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("guc_log_level=%d (enabled:%s, verbose:%s, verbosity:%d)\n",
i915_modparams.guc_log_level,
yesno(i915_modparams.guc_log_level),
yesno(GUC_LOG_LEVEL_IS_VERBOSE(i915_modparams.guc_log_level)),
GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(i915_modparams.guc_log_level));
/* Make sure that sanitization was done */
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.enable_guc < 0);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_modparams.guc_log_level < 0);
}
void intel_uc_init_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
struct intel_huc *huc = &i915->huc;
intel_guc_init_early(guc);
intel_huc_init_early(huc);
sanitize_options_early(i915);
}
void intel_uc_cleanup_early(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
drm/i915/guc: Don't forget to free GuC error log We're freeing GuC error log in uc_fini_hw() that matches corresponding uc_init_hw() but we missed the point that this log object is copied on error path and in case of failure in uc_init_hw() we will leak this object as uc_fini_hw() is never called. If we free this log object as part of the late uC cleanup, where we also release other firmware objects, we can avoid this BUG: [70841.001413] BUG drm_i915_gem_object (Tainted: G U W ): Objects remaining in drm_i915_gem_object on __kmem_cache_shutdown() [70841.001436] INFO: Slab 0x00000000c94e41af objects=21 used=1 fp=0x000000001d60c40a flags=0x8000000000008100 [70841.001466] Call Trace: [70841.001471] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [70841.001476] slab_err+0x99/0xb0 [70841.001483] ? __slab_alloc.isra.24.constprop.29+0x62/0x70 [70841.001491] ? __kmalloc+0x1f5/0x320 [70841.001497] __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x18b/0x400 [70841.001505] shutdown_cache+0x13/0x1c0 [70841.001511] kmem_cache_destroy+0x1c2/0x240 [70841.001517] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x38/0x270 [70841.001559] i915_gem_load_cleanup+0xbc/0x130 [i915] [70841.001595] i915_driver_cleanup_early+0x11/0x60 [i915] [70841.001630] i915_driver_load+0x708/0x1720 [i915] [70841.001638] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe2/0x1c0 [70841.001673] i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915] [70841.001680] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 [70841.001687] driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490 [70841.001694] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 [70841.001700] ? driver_probe_device+0x490/0x490 [70841.001705] bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 [70841.001712] bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260 [70841.001717] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.001723] driver_register+0x52/0xc0 [70841.001728] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.001733] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170 [70841.001739] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [70841.001746] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x27b/0x2e0 [70841.001753] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ec [70841.001759] load_module+0x219e/0x2550 [70841.001766] ? vfs_read+0x121/0x140 [70841.001774] ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.001779] SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.001788] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x22/0x8f [70841.001806] INFO: Object 0x00000000eab7ed96 @offset=6208 [70841.001850] INFO: Allocated in i915_gem_object_create.part.32+0x1f/0x260 [i915] age=38 cpu=0 pid=2708 [70841.001861] kmem_cache_alloc+0x23d/0x2d0 [70841.001897] i915_gem_object_create.part.32+0x1f/0x260 [i915] [70841.001937] intel_guc_allocate_vma+0x15/0x100 [i915] [70841.001977] intel_guc_log_create+0x34/0x1c0 [i915] [70841.002014] intel_guc_init+0x5a/0x100 [i915] [70841.002051] intel_uc_init+0x3e/0xb0 [i915] [70841.002089] i915_gem_init+0x18e/0x540 [i915] [70841.002123] i915_driver_load+0xa7a/0x1720 [i915] [70841.002159] i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915] [70841.002165] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 [70841.002171] driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490 [70841.002177] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 [70841.002182] bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 [70841.002188] bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260 [70841.002193] driver_register+0x52/0xc0 [70841.002198] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170 [70841.002462] kmem_cache_destroy drm_i915_gem_object: Slab cache still has objects [70841.002491] Call Trace: [70841.002497] dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e [70841.002503] kmem_cache_destroy+0x1e0/0x240 [70841.002509] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x38/0x270 [70841.002551] i915_gem_load_cleanup+0xbc/0x130 [i915] [70841.002586] i915_driver_cleanup_early+0x11/0x60 [i915] [70841.002621] i915_driver_load+0x708/0x1720 [i915] [70841.002629] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe2/0x1c0 [70841.002664] i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915] [70841.002671] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 [70841.002678] driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490 [70841.002684] __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 [70841.002690] ? driver_probe_device+0x490/0x490 [70841.002696] bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 [70841.002702] bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260 [70841.002708] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.002713] driver_register+0x52/0xc0 [70841.002719] ? 0xffffffffa0685000 [70841.002724] do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170 [70841.002731] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 [70841.002737] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x27b/0x2e0 [70841.002745] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ec [70841.002751] load_module+0x219e/0x2550 [70841.002758] ? vfs_read+0x121/0x140 [70841.002766] ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.002772] SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 [70841.002781] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x22/0x8f Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180131173241.19704-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2018-02-01 01:32:37 +08:00
guc_free_load_err_log(guc);
}
/**
* intel_uc_init_mmio - setup uC MMIO access
* @i915: device private
*
* Setup minimal state necessary for MMIO accesses later in the
* initialization sequence.
*/
void intel_uc_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
intel_guc_init_send_regs(&i915->guc);
}
static void guc_capture_load_err_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
if (!guc->log.vma || !intel_guc_log_get_level(&guc->log))
return;
if (!guc->load_err_log)
guc->load_err_log = i915_gem_object_get(guc->log.vma->obj);
return;
}
static void guc_free_load_err_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
if (guc->load_err_log)
i915_gem_object_put(guc->load_err_log);
}
static int guc_enable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_i915(guc);
gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(i915);
if (HAS_GUC_CT(i915))
return intel_guc_ct_enable(&guc->ct);
guc->send = intel_guc_send_mmio;
guc->handler = intel_guc_to_host_event_handler_mmio;
return 0;
}
static void guc_disable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_i915(guc);
if (HAS_GUC_CT(i915))
intel_guc_ct_disable(&guc->ct);
gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(i915);
guc->send = intel_guc_send_nop;
guc->handler = intel_guc_to_host_event_handler_nop;
}
int intel_uc_init_misc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
struct intel_huc *huc = &i915->huc;
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
int ret;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
return 0;
ret = intel_guc_init_misc(guc);
if (ret)
return ret;
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
if (USES_HUC(i915)) {
ret = intel_huc_init_misc(huc);
if (ret)
goto err_guc;
}
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
return 0;
err_guc:
intel_guc_fini_misc(guc);
return ret;
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
}
void intel_uc_fini_misc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
struct intel_huc *huc = &i915->huc;
drm/i915/guc: Fix lockdep due to log relay channel handling under struct_mutex This patch fixes lockdep issue due to circular locking dependency of struct_mutex, i_mutex_key, mmap_sem, relay_channels_mutex. For GuC log relay channel we create debugfs file that requires i_mutex_key lock and we are doing that under struct_mutex. So we introduced newer dependency as: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 --> &mm->mmap_sem However, there is dependency from mmap_sem to struct_mutex. Hence we separate the relay create/destroy operation from under struct_mutex. Also added runtime check of relay buffer status. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc6-CI-Patchwork_7614+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1388 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000d5e1d915>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<0000000029a9c131>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xdc/0x140 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}: start_creating+0x59/0x110 __debugfs_create_file+0x2e/0xe0 relay_create_buf_file+0x62/0x80 relay_late_setup_files+0x84/0x250 guc_log_late_setup+0x4f/0x110 [i915] i915_guc_log_register+0x32/0x40 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x7b6/0x1720 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #1 (relay_channels_mutex){+.+.}: relay_open+0x12c/0x2b0 intel_guc_log_runtime_create+0xab/0x230 [i915] intel_guc_init+0x81/0x120 [i915] intel_uc_init+0x29/0xa0 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x182/0x530 [i915] i915_driver_load+0xaa9/0x1720 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x790 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x677/0xdc0 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x4c/0x60 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1388: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<0000000029a9c131>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1388 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc6-CI-Patchwork_7614+ #1 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./J4205-ITX, BIOS P1.10 09/29/2016 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug.isra.18+0x1d0/0x2c0 __lock_acquire+0x14ae/0x1b60 ? lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x790 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 __handle_mm_fault+0x677/0xdc0 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 ? page_fault+0x36/0x60 page_fault+0x4c/0x60 v2: Added lock protection to guc->log.runtime.relay_chan (Chris) Fixed locking inside guc_flush_logs uncovered by new lockdep. v3: Locking guc_read_update_log_buffer entirely with relay_lock. (Chris) Prepared intel_guc_init_early. Moved relay_lock inside relay_create relay_destroy, relay_file_create, guc_read_update_log_buffer. (Michal) Removed struct_mutex lock around guc_log_flush and removed usage of guc_log_has_relay() from runtime_create path as it needs struct_mutex lock. v4: Handle NULL relay sub buffer pointer earlier in read_update_log_buffer (Chris). Fixed comment suffix **/. (Michal) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104693 Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with enable_guc=1 and guc_log_level=1 Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1516808821-3638-3-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
2018-01-24 23:46:58 +08:00
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
return;
if (USES_HUC(i915))
intel_huc_fini_misc(huc);
intel_guc_fini_misc(guc);
drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex This gets rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] but task is already holding lock: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x63/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70 filldir+0x8c/0xf0 dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160 iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150 SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}: lockref_get+0x9/0x20 -> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}: wait_for_common+0x54/0x210 devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150 device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0 device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0 device_create+0x35/0x40 msr_device_create+0x22/0x40 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210 smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270 kthread+0x173/0x1b0 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}: cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0 __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50 page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26 start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0 apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40 __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1 intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915] intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915] i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915] i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915] i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915] i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915] pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120 driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480 __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0 bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90 bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260 driver_register+0x52/0xc0 do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150 do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef load_module+0x231c/0x2d70 SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89 -> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(&dev->struct_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351: #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915] __do_fault+0x15/0x70 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560 page_fault+0x22/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116 RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680 RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0 R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0 v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris) v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris) Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1 Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:47 +08:00
}
int intel_uc_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
int ret;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return 0;
if (!HAS_GUC(i915))
return -ENODEV;
drm/i915/guc: Move shared data allocation away from submission path We need shared data for actions (e.g. guc suspend/resume), and we're using those with GuC submission disabled. Let's introduce intel_guc_init and move shared data alloc there. This fixes GPF during module unload with HuC, but without GuC submission: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000005aee7809 IP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: i915(O-) netconsole x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel mei_me i2c_i801 mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: i915] CPU: 2 PID: 2794 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G U W O 4.15.0-rc2+ #297 Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0054.2016.0930.1102 09/30/2016 task: 0000000055945c61 task.stack: 00000000264ccb43 RIP: 0010:intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000483df8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880829180000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffff880844c2c938 RDI: ffff880844c2c000 RBP: ffff880829180000 R08: 00000000a29c58c1 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffa040ba40 R13: ffffffffa040bab0 R14: ffff88084a195060 R15: 000055df3ef357a0 FS: 00007ff43c043740(0000) GS:ffff88084e200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000f9 CR3: 000000083f179005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 Call Trace: i915_gem_suspend+0x9d/0x130 [i915] ? i915_driver_unload+0x68/0x180 [i915] i915_driver_unload+0x70/0x180 [i915] i915_pci_remove+0x15/0x20 [i915] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 device_release_driver_internal+0x15f/0x220 driver_detach+0x3a/0x80 bus_remove_driver+0x58/0xd0 pci_unregister_driver+0x29/0x90 SyS_delete_module+0x150/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a RIP: 0033:0x7ff43b51b5c7 RSP: 002b:00007ffe6825a758 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007ff43b51b5c7 RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055df3ef35808 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffe682596d1 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007ff43b594880 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055df3ef357a0 R13: 00007ffe68259740 R14: 000055df3ef35260 R15: 000055df3ef357a0 Code: 00 00 02 74 03 31 c0 c3 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 52 0f f8 ff 48 b8 01 05 00 00 02 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 04 48 8b 83 00 12 00 00 <f6> 80 f9 00 00 00 01 0f 84 a7 00 00 00 f6 80 98 00 00 00 01 0f RIP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] RSP: ffffc90000483df8 CR2: 00000000000000f9 ---[ end trace 23a192a61d937a3e ]--- Fixes: b8e5eb960b28 ("drm/i915/guc: Allocate separate shared data object for GuC communication") Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com
2017-12-14 06:13:46 +08:00
ret = intel_guc_init(guc);
if (ret)
return ret;
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915)) {
/*
* This is stuff we need to have available at fw load time
* if we are planning to enable submission later
*/
ret = intel_guc_submission_init(guc);
if (ret) {
intel_guc_fini(guc);
return ret;
}
}
return 0;
}
void intel_uc_fini(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return;
GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(i915));
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915))
intel_guc_submission_fini(guc);
intel_guc_fini(guc);
}
void intel_uc_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
struct intel_huc *huc = &i915->huc;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return;
GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(i915));
guc_disable_communication(guc);
intel_huc_sanitize(huc);
intel_guc_sanitize(guc);
__intel_uc_reset_hw(i915);
}
int intel_uc_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
struct intel_huc *huc = &i915->huc;
int ret, attempts;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return 0;
GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(i915));
gen9_reset_guc_interrupts(i915);
/* WaEnableuKernelHeaderValidFix:skl */
/* WaEnableGuCBootHashCheckNotSet:skl,bxt,kbl */
if (IS_GEN9(i915))
attempts = 3;
else
attempts = 1;
while (attempts--) {
/*
* Always reset the GuC just before (re)loading, so
* that the state and timing are fairly predictable
*/
ret = __intel_uc_reset_hw(i915);
if (ret)
goto err_out;
if (USES_HUC(i915)) {
ret = intel_huc_fw_upload(huc);
if (ret)
goto err_out;
}
intel_guc_init_params(guc);
ret = intel_guc_fw_upload(guc);
if (ret == 0 || ret != -EAGAIN)
break;
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GuC fw load failed: %d; will reset and "
"retry %d more time(s)\n", ret, attempts);
}
/* Did we succeded or run out of retries? */
if (ret)
goto err_log_capture;
ret = guc_enable_communication(guc);
if (ret)
goto err_log_capture;
if (USES_HUC(i915)) {
ret = intel_huc_auth(huc);
if (ret)
goto err_communication;
}
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915)) {
ret = intel_guc_submission_enable(guc);
if (ret)
goto err_communication;
} else if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 11) {
ret = intel_guc_sample_forcewake(guc);
if (ret)
goto err_communication;
}
dev_info(i915->drm.dev, "GuC firmware version %u.%u\n",
guc->fw.major_ver_found, guc->fw.minor_ver_found);
dev_info(i915->drm.dev, "GuC submission %s\n",
enableddisabled(USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915)));
dev_info(i915->drm.dev, "HuC %s\n",
enableddisabled(USES_HUC(i915)));
return 0;
/*
* We've failed to load the firmware :(
*/
err_communication:
guc_disable_communication(guc);
err_log_capture:
guc_capture_load_err_log(guc);
err_out:
/*
* Note that there is no fallback as either user explicitly asked for
* the GuC or driver default option was to run with the GuC enabled.
*/
if (GEM_WARN_ON(ret == -EIO))
ret = -EINVAL;
dev_err(i915->drm.dev, "GuC initialization failed %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return;
GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(i915));
if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915))
intel_guc_submission_disable(guc);
guc_disable_communication(guc);
}
int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
int err;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return 0;
if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
return 0;
err = intel_guc_suspend(guc);
if (err) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Failed to suspend GuC, err=%d", err);
return err;
}
gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(i915);
return 0;
}
int intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
int err;
if (!USES_GUC(i915))
return 0;
if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
return 0;
gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(i915);
err = intel_guc_resume(guc);
if (err) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Failed to resume GuC, err=%d", err);
return err;
}
return 0;
}