2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Device Power Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C) 2010 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, Novell Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Most of the code in Linux is device drivers, so most of the Linux power
|
|
|
|
management code is also driver-specific. Most drivers will do very little;
|
|
|
|
others, especially for platforms with small batteries (like cell phones),
|
|
|
|
will do a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This writeup gives an overview of how drivers interact with system-wide
|
|
|
|
power management goals, emphasizing the models and interfaces that are
|
|
|
|
shared by everything that hooks up to the driver model core. Read it as
|
|
|
|
background for the domain-specific work you'd do with any specific driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Models for Device Power Management
|
|
|
|
======================================
|
|
|
|
Drivers will use one or both of these models to put devices into low-power
|
|
|
|
states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System Sleep model:
|
|
|
|
Drivers can enter low power states as part of entering system-wide
|
|
|
|
low-power states like "suspend-to-ram", or (mostly for systems with
|
|
|
|
disks) "hibernate" (suspend-to-disk).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is something that device, bus, and class drivers collaborate on
|
|
|
|
by implementing various role-specific suspend and resume methods to
|
|
|
|
cleanly power down hardware and software subsystems, then reactivate
|
|
|
|
them without loss of data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some drivers can manage hardware wakeup events, which make the system
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
leave that low-power state. This feature may be enabled or disabled
|
|
|
|
using the relevant /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup file (for Ethernet
|
|
|
|
drivers the ioctl interface used by ethtool may also be used for this
|
|
|
|
purpose); enabling it may cost some power usage, but let the whole
|
|
|
|
system enter low power states more often.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runtime Power Management model:
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Devices may also be put into low power states while the system is
|
|
|
|
running, independently of other power management activity in principle.
|
|
|
|
However, devices are not generally independent of each other (for
|
|
|
|
example, parent device cannot be suspended unless all of its child
|
|
|
|
devices have been suspended). Moreover, depending on the bus type the
|
|
|
|
device is on, it may be necessary to carry out some bus-specific
|
|
|
|
operations on the device for this purpose. Also, devices put into low
|
|
|
|
power states at run time may require special handling during system-wide
|
|
|
|
power transitions, like suspend to RAM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For these reasons not only the device driver itself, but also the
|
|
|
|
appropriate subsystem (bus type, device type or device class) driver
|
|
|
|
and the PM core are involved in the runtime power management of devices.
|
|
|
|
Like in the system sleep power management case, they need to collaborate
|
|
|
|
by implementing various role-specific suspend and resume methods, so
|
|
|
|
that the hardware is cleanly powered down and reactivated without data
|
|
|
|
or service loss.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's not a lot to be said about those low power states except that they
|
|
|
|
are very system-specific, and often device-specific. Also, that if enough
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
devices have been put into low power states (at "run time"), the effect may be
|
|
|
|
very similar to entering some system-wide low-power state (system sleep) ... and
|
|
|
|
that synergies exist, so that several drivers using runtime PM might put the
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
system into a state where even deeper power saving options are available.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Most suspended devices will have quiesced all I/O: no more DMA or IRQs, no
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
more data read or written, and requests from upstream drivers are no longer
|
|
|
|
accepted. A given bus or platform may have different requirements though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of hardware wakeup events include an alarm from a real time clock,
|
|
|
|
network wake-on-LAN packets, keyboard or mouse activity, and media insertion
|
|
|
|
or removal (for PCMCIA, MMC/SD, USB, and so on).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interfaces for Entering System Sleep States
|
|
|
|
===========================================
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
There are programming interfaces provided for subsystem (bus type, device type,
|
|
|
|
device class) and device drivers in order to allow them to participate in the
|
|
|
|
power management of devices they are concerned with. They cover the system
|
|
|
|
sleep power management as well as the runtime power management of devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Device Power Management Operations
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Device power management operations, at the subsystem level as well as at the
|
|
|
|
device driver level, are implemented by defining and populating objects of type
|
|
|
|
struct dev_pm_ops:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct dev_pm_ops {
|
|
|
|
int (*prepare)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
void (*complete)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*suspend)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*resume)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*freeze)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*thaw)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*poweroff)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*restore)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*suspend_noirq)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*resume_noirq)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*freeze_noirq)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*thaw_noirq)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*poweroff_noirq)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*restore_noirq)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*runtime_suspend)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*runtime_resume)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
int (*runtime_idle)(struct device *dev);
|
|
|
|
};
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
This structure is defined in include/linux/pm.h and the methods included in it
|
|
|
|
are also described in that file. Their roles will be explained in what follows.
|
|
|
|
For now, it should be sufficient to remember that the last three of them are
|
|
|
|
specific to runtime power management, while the remaining ones are used during
|
|
|
|
system-wide power transitions.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
There also is an "old" or "legacy", deprecated way of implementing power
|
|
|
|
management operations available at least for some subsystems. This approach
|
|
|
|
does not use struct dev_pm_ops objects and it only is suitable for implementing
|
|
|
|
system sleep power management methods. Therefore it is not described in this
|
|
|
|
document, so please refer directly to the source code for more information about
|
|
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsystem-Level Methods
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
The core methods to suspend and resume devices reside in struct dev_pm_ops
|
|
|
|
pointed to by the pm member of struct bus_type, struct device_type and
|
|
|
|
struct class. They are mostly of interest to the people writing infrastructure
|
|
|
|
for buses, like PCI or USB, or device type and device class drivers.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Bus drivers implement these methods as appropriate for the hardware and
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
the drivers using it; PCI works differently from USB, and so on. Not many
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
people write subsystem-level drivers; most driver code is a "device driver" that
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
builds on top of bus-specific framework code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information on these driver calls, see the description later;
|
|
|
|
they are called in phases for every device, respecting the parent-child
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
sequencing in the driver model tree.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/sys/devices/.../power/wakeup files
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
All devices in the driver model have two flags to control handling of
|
|
|
|
wakeup events, which are hardware signals that can force the device and/or
|
|
|
|
system out of a low power state. These are initialized by bus or device
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
driver code using device_init_wakeup().
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "can_wakeup" flag just records whether the device (and its driver) can
|
|
|
|
physically support wakeup events. When that flag is clear, the sysfs
|
|
|
|
"wakeup" file is empty, and device_may_wakeup() returns false.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For devices that can issue wakeup events, a separate flag controls whether
|
|
|
|
that device should try to use its wakeup mechanism. The initial value of
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
device_may_wakeup() will be false for the majority of devices, except for
|
|
|
|
power buttons, keyboards, and Ethernet adapters whose WoL (wake-on-LAN) feature
|
|
|
|
has been set up with ethtool. Thus in the majority of cases the device's
|
|
|
|
"wakeup" file will initially hold the value "disabled". Userspace can change
|
|
|
|
that to "enabled", so that device_may_wakeup() returns true, or change it back
|
|
|
|
to "disabled", so that it returns false again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/sys/devices/.../power/control files
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
All devices in the driver model have a flag to control the desired behavior of
|
|
|
|
its driver with respect to runtime power management. This flag, called
|
|
|
|
runtime_auto, is initialized by the bus type (or generally subsystem) code using
|
|
|
|
pm_runtime_allow() or pm_runtime_forbid(), depending on whether or not the
|
|
|
|
driver is supposed to power manage the device at run time by default,
|
|
|
|
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This setting may be adjusted by user space by writing either "on" or "auto" to
|
|
|
|
the device's "control" file. If "auto" is written, the device's runtime_auto
|
|
|
|
flag will be set and the driver will be allowed to power manage the device if
|
|
|
|
capable of doing that. If "on" is written, the driver is not allowed to power
|
|
|
|
manage the device which in turn is supposed to remain in the full power state at
|
|
|
|
run time. User space can check the current value of the runtime_auto flag by
|
|
|
|
reading from the device's "control" file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The device's runtime_auto flag has no effect on the handling of system-wide
|
|
|
|
power transitions by its driver. In particular, the device can (and in the
|
|
|
|
majority of cases should and will) be put into a low power state during a
|
|
|
|
system-wide transition to a sleep state (like "suspend-to-RAM") even though its
|
|
|
|
runtime_auto flag is unset (in which case its "control" file contains "on").
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about the runtime power management framework for devices
|
|
|
|
refer to Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calling Drivers to Enter System Sleep States
|
|
|
|
============================================
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
When the system goes into a sleep state, each device's driver is asked
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
to suspend the device by putting it into state compatible with the target
|
|
|
|
system state. That's usually some version of "off", but the details are
|
|
|
|
system-specific. Also, wakeup-enabled devices will usually stay partly
|
|
|
|
functional in order to wake the system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the system leaves that low power state, the device's driver is asked
|
|
|
|
to resume it. The suspend and resume operations always go together, and
|
|
|
|
both are multi-phase operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For simple drivers, suspend might quiesce the device using the class code
|
|
|
|
and then turn its hardware as "off" as possible with late_suspend. The
|
|
|
|
matching resume calls would then completely reinitialize the hardware
|
|
|
|
before reactivating its class I/O queues.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
More power-aware drivers might prepare the devices for triggering system wakeup
|
|
|
|
events.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call Sequence Guarantees
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
To ensure that bridges and similar links needing to talk to a device are
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
available when the device is suspended or resumed, the device tree is
|
|
|
|
walked in a bottom-up order to suspend devices. A top-down order is
|
|
|
|
used to resume those devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ordering of the device tree is defined by the order in which devices
|
|
|
|
get registered: a child can never be registered, probed or resumed before
|
|
|
|
its parent; and can't be removed or suspended after that parent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The policy is that the device tree should match hardware bus topology.
|
|
|
|
(Or at least the control bus, for devices which use multiple busses.)
|
PM: Handle device registrations during suspend/resume
Modify the PM core to protect its data structures, specifically the
dpm_active list, from being corrupted if a child of the currently
suspending device is registered concurrently with its ->suspend()
callback. In that case, since the new device (the child) is added
to dpm_active after its parent, the PM core will attempt to
suspend it after the parent, which is wrong.
Introduce a new member of struct dev_pm_info, called 'sleeping',
and use it to check if the parent of the device being added to
dpm_active has been suspended, in which case the device registration
fails. Also, use 'sleeping' for checking if the ordering of devices
on dpm_active is correct.
Introduce variable 'all_sleeping' that will be set to 'true' once all
devices have been suspended and make new device registrations fail
until 'all_sleeping' is reset to 'false', in order to avoid having
unsuspended devices around while the system is going into a sleep state.
Remove pm_sleep_rwsem which is not necessary any more.
Special thanks to Alan Stern for discussions and suggestions that
lead to the creation of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-12 07:57:22 +08:00
|
|
|
In particular, this means that a device registration may fail if the parent of
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
the device is suspending (i.e. has been chosen by the PM core as the next
|
PM: Handle device registrations during suspend/resume
Modify the PM core to protect its data structures, specifically the
dpm_active list, from being corrupted if a child of the currently
suspending device is registered concurrently with its ->suspend()
callback. In that case, since the new device (the child) is added
to dpm_active after its parent, the PM core will attempt to
suspend it after the parent, which is wrong.
Introduce a new member of struct dev_pm_info, called 'sleeping',
and use it to check if the parent of the device being added to
dpm_active has been suspended, in which case the device registration
fails. Also, use 'sleeping' for checking if the ordering of devices
on dpm_active is correct.
Introduce variable 'all_sleeping' that will be set to 'true' once all
devices have been suspended and make new device registrations fail
until 'all_sleeping' is reset to 'false', in order to avoid having
unsuspended devices around while the system is going into a sleep state.
Remove pm_sleep_rwsem which is not necessary any more.
Special thanks to Alan Stern for discussions and suggestions that
lead to the creation of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2008-03-12 07:57:22 +08:00
|
|
|
device to suspend) or has already suspended, as well as after all of the other
|
|
|
|
devices have been suspended. Device drivers must be prepared to cope with such
|
|
|
|
situations.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suspending Devices
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Suspending a given device is done in several phases. Suspending the
|
|
|
|
system always includes every phase, executing calls for every device
|
|
|
|
before the next phase begins. Not all busses or classes support all
|
|
|
|
these callbacks; and not all drivers use all the callbacks.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Generally, different callbacks are used depending on whether the system is
|
|
|
|
going to the standby or memory sleep state ("suspend-to-RAM") or it is going to
|
|
|
|
be hibernated ("suspend-to-disk").
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the system goes to the standby or memory sleep state the phases are seen by
|
|
|
|
driver notifications issued in this order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 bus->pm.prepare(dev) is called after tasks are frozen and it is supposed
|
|
|
|
to call the device driver's ->pm.prepare() method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this method is mainly to prevent new children of the
|
|
|
|
device from being registered after it has returned. It also may be used
|
|
|
|
to generally prepare the device for the upcoming system transition, but
|
|
|
|
it should not put the device into a low power state.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
2 class->pm.suspend(dev) is called if dev is associated with a class that
|
|
|
|
has such a method. It may invoke the device driver's ->pm.suspend()
|
|
|
|
method, unless type->pm.suspend(dev) or bus->pm.suspend() does that.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
3 type->pm.suspend(dev) is called if dev is associated with a device type
|
|
|
|
that has such a method. It may invoke the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.suspend() method, unless class->pm.suspend(dev) or
|
|
|
|
bus->pm.suspend() does that.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
4 bus->pm.suspend(dev) is called, if implemented. It usually calls the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.suspend() method.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
This call should generally quiesce the device so that it doesn't do any
|
|
|
|
I/O after the call has returned. It also may save the device registers
|
|
|
|
and put it into the appropriate low power state, depending on the bus
|
|
|
|
type the device is on.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
5 bus->pm.suspend_noirq(dev) is called, if implemented. It may call the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.suspend_noirq() method, depending on the bus type
|
|
|
|
in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This method is invoked after device interrupts have been suspended,
|
|
|
|
which means that the driver's interrupt handler will not be called
|
|
|
|
while it is running. It should save the values of the device's
|
|
|
|
registers that weren't saved previously and finally put the device into
|
|
|
|
the appropriate low power state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of subsystems and device drivers need not implement this
|
|
|
|
method. However, bus types allowing devices to share interrupt vectors,
|
|
|
|
like PCI, generally need to use it to prevent interrupt handling issues
|
|
|
|
from happening during suspend.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of those phases, drivers should normally have stopped all I/O
|
|
|
|
transactions (DMA, IRQs), saved enough state that they can re-initialize
|
|
|
|
or restore previous state (as needed by the hardware), and placed the
|
|
|
|
device into a low-power state. On many platforms they will also use
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
gate off one or more clock sources; sometimes they will also switch off power
|
|
|
|
supplies, or reduce voltages. [Drivers supporting runtime PM may already have
|
|
|
|
performed some or all of the steps needed to prepare for the upcoming system
|
|
|
|
state transition.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If device_may_wakeup(dev) returns true, the device should be prepared for
|
|
|
|
generating hardware wakeup signals when the system is in the sleep state to
|
|
|
|
trigger a system wakeup event. For example, enable_irq_wake() might identify
|
|
|
|
GPIO signals hooked up to a switch or other external hardware, and
|
|
|
|
pci_enable_wake() does something similar for the PCI PME signal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a driver (or subsystem) fails it suspend method, the system won't enter the
|
|
|
|
desired low power state; it will resume all the devices it's suspended so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hibernation Phases
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Hibernating the system is more complicated than putting it into the standby or
|
|
|
|
memory sleep state, because it involves creating a system image and saving it.
|
|
|
|
Therefore there are more phases of hibernation and special device PM methods are
|
|
|
|
used in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, it is necessary to prepare the system for creating a hibernation image.
|
|
|
|
This is similar to putting the system into the standby or memory sleep state,
|
|
|
|
although it generally doesn't require that devices be put into low power states
|
|
|
|
(that is even not desirable at this point). Driver notifications are then
|
|
|
|
issued in the following order:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 bus->pm.prepare(dev) is called after tasks have been frozen and enough
|
|
|
|
memory has been freed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 class->pm.freeze(dev) is called if implemented. It may invoke the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.freeze() method, unless type->pm.freeze(dev) or
|
|
|
|
bus->pm.freeze() does that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 type->pm.freeze(dev) is called if implemented. It may invoke the device
|
|
|
|
driver's ->pm.suspend() method, unless class->pm.freeze(dev) or
|
|
|
|
bus->pm.freeze() does that.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
4 bus->pm.freeze(dev) is called, if implemented. It usually calls the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.freeze() method.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
5 bus->pm.freeze_noirq(dev) is called, if implemented. It may call the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.freeze_noirq() method, depending on the bus type
|
|
|
|
in question.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
The difference between ->pm.freeze() and the corresponding ->pm.suspend() (and
|
|
|
|
similarly for the "noirq" variants) is that the former should avoid preparing
|
|
|
|
devices to trigger system wakeup events and putting devices into low power
|
|
|
|
states, although they generally have to save the values of device registers
|
|
|
|
so that it's possible to restore them during system resume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second, after the system image has been created, the functionality of devices
|
|
|
|
has to be restored so that the image can be saved. That is similar to resuming
|
|
|
|
devices after the system has been woken up from the standby or memory sleep
|
|
|
|
state, which is described below, and causes the following device notifications
|
|
|
|
to be issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 bus->pm.thaw_noirq(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.thaw_noirq() method, depending on the bus type in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 bus->pm.thaw(dev), if implemented; usually calls the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.thaw() method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 type->pm.thaw(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.thaw() method if not called by the bus type or class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 class->pm.thaw(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.thaw() method if not called by the bus type or device type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 bus->pm.complete(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.complete() method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, the role of the ->pm.thaw() methods (including the "noirq" variants)
|
|
|
|
is to bring the device back to the fully functional state, so that it may be
|
|
|
|
used for saving the image, if necessary. The role of bus->pm.complete() is to
|
|
|
|
reverse whatever bus->pm.prepare() did (likewise for the analogous device driver
|
|
|
|
callbacks).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the image has been saved, the devices need to be prepared for putting the
|
|
|
|
system into the low power state. That is analogous to suspending them before
|
|
|
|
putting the system into the standby or memory sleep state and involves the
|
|
|
|
following device notifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 bus->pm.prepare(dev).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 class->pm.poweroff(dev), if implemented; may invoke the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.poweroff() method if not called by the bus type or device type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 type->pm.poweroff(dev), if implemented; may invoke the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.poweroff() method if not called by the bus type or device class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 bus->pm.poweroff(dev), if implemented; usually calls the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.poweroff() method (if not called by the device class or type).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 bus->pm.poweroff_noirq(dev), if implemented; may call the device
|
|
|
|
driver's ->pm.poweroff_noirq() method, depending on the bus type
|
|
|
|
in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between ->pm.poweroff() and the corresponding ->pm.suspend() (and
|
|
|
|
analogously for the "noirq" variants) is that the former need not save the
|
|
|
|
device's registers. Still, they should prepare the device for triggering
|
|
|
|
system wakeup events if necessary and finally put it into the appropriate low
|
|
|
|
power state.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Device Low Power (suspend) States
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Device low-power states aren't standard. One device might only handle
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
"on" and "off, while another might support a dozen different versions of
|
|
|
|
"on" (how many engines are active?), plus a state that gets back to "on"
|
|
|
|
faster than from a full "off".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some busses define rules about what different suspend states mean. PCI
|
|
|
|
gives one example: after the suspend sequence completes, a non-legacy
|
|
|
|
PCI device may not perform DMA or issue IRQs, and any wakeup events it
|
|
|
|
issues would be issued through the PME# bus signal. Plus, there are
|
|
|
|
several PCI-standard device states, some of which are optional.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
In contrast, integrated system-on-chip processors often use IRQs as the
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
wakeup event sources (so drivers would call enable_irq_wake) and might
|
|
|
|
be able to treat DMA completion as a wakeup event (sometimes DMA can stay
|
|
|
|
active too, it'd only be the CPU and some peripherals that sleep).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some details here may be platform-specific. Systems may have devices that
|
|
|
|
can be fully active in certain sleep states, such as an LCD display that's
|
|
|
|
refreshed using DMA while most of the system is sleeping lightly ... and
|
|
|
|
its frame buffer might even be updated by a DSP or other non-Linux CPU while
|
|
|
|
the Linux control processor stays idle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, the specific actions taken may depend on the target system state.
|
|
|
|
One target system state might allow a given device to be very operational;
|
|
|
|
another might require a hard shut down with re-initialization on resume.
|
|
|
|
And two different target systems might use the same device in different
|
|
|
|
ways; the aforementioned LCD might be active in one product's "standby",
|
|
|
|
but a different product using the same SOC might work differently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Resuming Devices
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Resuming is done in multiple phases, much like suspending, with all
|
|
|
|
devices processing each phase's calls before the next phase begins.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Again, however, different callbacks are used depending on whether the system is
|
|
|
|
waking up from the standby or memory sleep state ("suspend-to-RAM") or from
|
|
|
|
hibernation ("suspend-to-disk").
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
If the system is waking up from the standby or memory sleep state, the phases
|
|
|
|
are seen by driver notifications issued in this order:
|
2008-02-24 02:13:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
1 bus->pm.resume_noirq(dev) is called, if implemented. It may call the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.resume_noirq() method, depending on the bus type in
|
|
|
|
question.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
The role of this method is to perform actions that need to be performed
|
|
|
|
before device drivers' interrupt handlers are allowed to be invoked. If
|
|
|
|
the given bus type permits devices to share interrupt vectors, like PCI,
|
|
|
|
this method should bring the device and its driver into a state in which
|
|
|
|
the driver can recognize if the device is the source of incoming
|
|
|
|
interrupts, if any, and handle them correctly.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
For example, the PCI bus type's ->pm.resume_noirq() puts the device into
|
|
|
|
the full power state (D0 in the PCI terminology) and restores the
|
|
|
|
standard configuration registers of the device. Then, it calls the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.resume_noirq() method to perform device-specific
|
|
|
|
actions needed at this stage of resume.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
2 bus->pm.resume(dev) is called, if implemented. It usually calls the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.resume() method.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
This call should generally bring the the device back to the working
|
|
|
|
state, so that it can do I/O as requested after the call has returned.
|
|
|
|
However, it may be more convenient to use the device class or device
|
|
|
|
type ->pm.resume() for this purpose, in which case the bus type's
|
|
|
|
->pm.resume() method need not be implemented at all.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
3 type->pm.resume(dev) is called, if implemented. It may invoke the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.resume() method, unless class->pm.resume(dev) or
|
|
|
|
bus->pm.resume() does that.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
For devices that are not associated with any bus type or device class
|
|
|
|
this method plays the role of bus->pm.resume().
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
4 class->pm.resume(dev) is called, if implemented. It may invoke the
|
|
|
|
device driver's ->pm.resume() method, unless bus->pm.resume(dev) or
|
|
|
|
type->pm.resume() does that.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
For devices that are not associated with any bus type or device type
|
|
|
|
this method plays the role of bus->pm.resume().
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
5 bus->pm.complete(dev) is called, if implemented. It is supposed to
|
|
|
|
invoke the device driver's ->pm.complete() method.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
The role of this method is to reverse whatever bus->pm.prepare(dev)
|
|
|
|
(or the driver's ->pm.prepare()) did during suspend, if necessary.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of those phases, drivers should normally be as functional as
|
|
|
|
they were before suspending: I/O can be performed using DMA and IRQs, and
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
the relevant clocks are gated on. In principle the device need not be
|
|
|
|
"fully on"; it might be in a runtime lowpower/suspend state during suspend and
|
|
|
|
the resume callbacks may try to restore that state, but that need not be
|
|
|
|
desirable from the user's point of view. In fact, there are multiple reasons
|
|
|
|
why it's better to always put devices into the "fully working" state in the
|
|
|
|
system sleep resume callbacks and they are discussed in more detail in
|
|
|
|
Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, the details here may again be platform-specific. For example,
|
|
|
|
some systems support multiple "run" states, and the mode in effect at
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
the end of resume might not be the one which preceded suspension.
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
That means availability of certain clocks or power supplies changed,
|
|
|
|
which could easily affect how a driver works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drivers need to be able to handle hardware which has been reset since the
|
|
|
|
suspend methods were called, for example by complete reinitialization.
|
|
|
|
This may be the hardest part, and the one most protected by NDA'd documents
|
|
|
|
and chip errata. It's simplest if the hardware state hasn't changed since
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
the suspend was carried out, but that can't be guaranteed (in fact, it ususally
|
|
|
|
is not the case).
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drivers must also be prepared to notice that the device has been removed
|
|
|
|
while the system was powered off, whenever that's physically possible.
|
|
|
|
PCMCIA, MMC, USB, Firewire, SCSI, and even IDE are common examples of busses
|
|
|
|
where common Linux platforms will see such removal. Details of how drivers
|
|
|
|
will notice and handle such removals are currently bus-specific, and often
|
|
|
|
involve a separate thread.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Resume From Hibernation
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
Resuming from hibernation is, again, more complicated than resuming from a sleep
|
|
|
|
state in which the contents of main memory are preserved, because it requires
|
|
|
|
a system image to be loaded into memory and the pre-hibernation memory contents
|
|
|
|
to be restored before control can be passed back to the image kernel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In principle, the image might be loaded into memory and the pre-hibernation
|
|
|
|
memory contents might be restored by the boot loader. For this purpose,
|
|
|
|
however, the boot loader would need to know the image kernel's entry point and
|
|
|
|
there's no protocol defined for passing that information to boot loaders. As
|
|
|
|
a workaround, the boot loader loads a fresh instance of the kernel, called the
|
|
|
|
boot kernel, into memory and passes control to it in a usual way. Then, the
|
|
|
|
boot kernel reads the hibernation image, restores the pre-hibernation memory
|
|
|
|
contents and passes control to the image kernel. Thus, in fact, two different
|
|
|
|
kernels are involved in resuming from hibernation and in general they are not
|
|
|
|
only different because they play different roles in this operation. Actually,
|
|
|
|
the boot kernel may be completely different from the image kernel. Not only
|
|
|
|
the configuration of it, but also the version of it may be different.
|
|
|
|
The consequences of this are important to device drivers and their subsystems
|
|
|
|
(bus types, device classes and device types) too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Namely, to be able to load the hibernation image into memory, the boot kernel
|
|
|
|
needs to include at least the subset of device drivers allowing it to access the
|
|
|
|
storage medium containing the image, although it generally doesn't need to
|
|
|
|
include all of the drivers included into the image kernel. After the image has
|
|
|
|
been loaded the devices handled by those drivers need to be prepared for passing
|
|
|
|
control back to the image kernel. This is very similar to the preparation of
|
|
|
|
devices for creating a hibernation image described above. In fact, it is done
|
|
|
|
in the same way, with the help of the ->pm.prepare(), ->pm.freeze() and
|
|
|
|
->pm.freeze_noirq() callbacks, but only for device drivers included in the boot
|
|
|
|
kernel (whose versions may generally be different from the versions of the
|
|
|
|
analogous drivers from the image kernel).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should the restoration of the pre-hibernation memory contents fail, the boot
|
|
|
|
kernel would carry out the procedure of "thawing" devices described above, using
|
|
|
|
the ->pm.thaw_noirq(), ->pm.thaw(), and ->pm.complete() callbacks provided by
|
|
|
|
subsystems and device drivers. This, however, is a very rare condition. Most
|
|
|
|
often the pre-hibernation memory contents are restored successfully and control
|
|
|
|
is passed to the image kernel that is now responsible for bringing the system
|
|
|
|
back to the working state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To achieve this goal, among other things, the image kernel restores the
|
|
|
|
pre-hibernation functionality of devices. This operation is analogous to the
|
|
|
|
resuming of devices after waking up from the memory sleep state, although it
|
|
|
|
involves different device notifications which are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 bus->pm.restore_noirq(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.restore_noirq() method, depending on the bus type in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 bus->pm.restore(dev), if implemented; usually calls the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.restore() method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 type->pm.restore(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.restore() method if not called by the bus type or class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 class->pm.restore(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.restore() method if not called by the bus type or device type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 bus->pm.complete(dev), if implemented; may call the device driver's
|
|
|
|
->pm.complete() method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The roles of the ->pm.restore_noirq() and ->pm.restore() callbacks are analogous
|
|
|
|
to the roles of the corresponding resume callbacks, but they must assume that
|
|
|
|
the device may have been accessed before by the boot kernel. Consequently, the
|
|
|
|
state of the device before they are called may be different from the state of it
|
|
|
|
right prior to calling the resume callbacks. That difference usually doesn't
|
|
|
|
matter, so the majority of device drivers can set their resume and restore
|
|
|
|
callback pointers to the same routine. Nevertheless, different callback
|
|
|
|
pointers are used in case there is a situation where it actually matters.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
System Devices
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
System devices follow a slightly different API, which can be found in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
include/linux/sysdev.h
|
|
|
|
drivers/base/sys.c
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
System devices will only be suspended with interrupts disabled, and after
|
|
|
|
all other devices have been suspended. On resume, they will be resumed
|
|
|
|
before any other devices, and also with interrupts disabled.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
That is, when the non-boot CPUs are all offline and IRQs are disabled on the
|
|
|
|
remaining online CPU, then the sysdev_driver.suspend() phase is carried out, and
|
|
|
|
the system enters a sleep state (or hibernation image is created). During
|
|
|
|
resume (or after the image has been created) the sysdev_driver.resume() phase
|
|
|
|
is carried out, IRQs are enabled on the only online CPU, the non-boot CPUs are
|
|
|
|
enabled and that is followed by the "early resume" phase (in which the "noirq"
|
|
|
|
callbacks provided by subsystems and device drivers are invoked).
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Code to actually enter and exit the system-wide low power state sometimes
|
|
|
|
involves hardware details that are only known to the boot firmware, and
|
|
|
|
may leave a CPU running software (from SRAM or flash memory) that monitors
|
|
|
|
the system and manages its wakeup sequence.
|
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Power Management Notifiers
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
As stated in Documentation/power/notifiers.txt, there are some operations that
|
|
|
|
cannot be carried out by the power management callbacks discussed above, because
|
|
|
|
carrying them out at these points would be too late or too early. To handle
|
|
|
|
these cases subsystems and device drivers may register power management
|
|
|
|
notifiers that are called before tasks are frozen and after they have been
|
|
|
|
thawed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally speaking, the PM notifiers are suitable for performing actions that
|
|
|
|
either require user space to be available, or at least won't interfere with user
|
|
|
|
space in a wrong way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For details refer to Documentation/power/notifiers.txt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-11 07:38:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Runtime Power Management
|
|
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
Many devices are able to dynamically power down while the system is still
|
|
|
|
running. This feature is useful for devices that are not being used, and
|
|
|
|
can offer significant power savings on a running system. These devices
|
|
|
|
often support a range of runtime power states, which might use names such
|
|
|
|
as "off", "sleep", "idle", "active", and so on. Those states will in some
|
|
|
|
cases (like PCI) be partially constrained by a bus the device uses, and will
|
|
|
|
usually include hardware states that are also used in system sleep states.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-27 06:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
Note, however, that a system-wide power transition can be started while some
|
|
|
|
devices are in low power states due to the runtime power management. The system
|
|
|
|
sleep PM callbacks should generally recognize such situations and react to them
|
|
|
|
appropriately, but the recommended actions to be taken in that cases are
|
|
|
|
subsystem-specific.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In some cases the decision may be made at the subsystem level while in some
|
|
|
|
other cases the device driver may be left to decide. In some cases it may be
|
|
|
|
desirable to leave a suspended device in that state during system-wide power
|
|
|
|
transition, but in some other cases the device ought to be put back into the
|
|
|
|
full power state, for example to be configured for system wakeup or so that its
|
|
|
|
system wakeup capability can be disabled. That all depends on the hardware
|
|
|
|
and the design of the subsystem and device driver in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During system-wide resume from a sleep state it's better to put devices into
|
|
|
|
the full power state, as explained in Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt. Refer
|
|
|
|
to that document for more information regarding this particular issue as well as
|
|
|
|
for information on the device runtime power management framework in general.
|