2019-06-04 16:11:33 +08:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2014-2017 Linaro Ltd. <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/elf.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/sort.h>
|
2019-10-07 21:55:55 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/moduleloader.h>
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/cache.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/opcodes.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define PLT_ENT_STRIDE L1_CACHE_BYTES
|
|
|
|
#define PLT_ENT_COUNT (PLT_ENT_STRIDE / sizeof(u32))
|
|
|
|
#define PLT_ENT_SIZE (sizeof(struct plt_entries) / PLT_ENT_COUNT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
|
|
|
|
#define PLT_ENT_LDR __opcode_to_mem_thumb32(0xf8dff000 | \
|
|
|
|
(PLT_ENT_STRIDE - 4))
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define PLT_ENT_LDR __opcode_to_mem_arm(0xe59ff000 | \
|
|
|
|
(PLT_ENT_STRIDE - 8))
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct plt_entries {
|
|
|
|
u32 ldr[PLT_ENT_COUNT];
|
|
|
|
u32 lit[PLT_ENT_COUNT];
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool in_init(const struct module *mod, unsigned long loc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return loc - (u32)mod->init_layout.base < mod->init_layout.size;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 get_module_plt(struct module *mod, unsigned long loc, Elf32_Addr val)
|
|
|
|
{
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
struct mod_plt_sec *pltsec = !in_init(mod, loc) ? &mod->arch.core :
|
|
|
|
&mod->arch.init;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct plt_entries *plt = (struct plt_entries *)pltsec->plt->sh_addr;
|
ARM: kernel: avoid brute force search on PLT generation
Given that we now sort the relocation sections in a way that guarantees
that entries that can share a single PLT entry end up adjacently, there
is no a longer a need to go over the entire list to look for an existing
entry that matches our jump target. If such a match exists, it was the
last one to be emitted, so we can simply check the preceding slot.
Note that this will still work correctly in the [theoretical] presence of
call/jump relocations against SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero addends,
although not optimally. Since the relocations are presented in the same
order that we checked them for duplicates, any duplicates that we failed
to spot the first time around will be accounted for in the PLT allocation
so there is guaranteed to be sufficient space for them when actually
emitting the PLT.
For instance, the following sequence of relocations:
000004d8 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000004fc 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000050e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000520 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000532 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000544 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000556 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000568 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000057a 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000058c 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000059e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005b0 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005c2 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005d4 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
may result in several PLT entries to be allocated, and also emitted, if
any of the entries in the middle refer to a Place that contains a non-zero
addend (i.e., one for all the preceding zero-addend relocations, one for
all the following zero-addend relocations, and one for the non-zero addend
relocation itself)
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-18 16:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
int idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Look for an existing entry pointing to 'val'. Given that the
|
|
|
|
* relocations are sorted, this will be the last entry we allocated.
|
|
|
|
* (if one exists).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (pltsec->plt_count > 0) {
|
|
|
|
plt += (pltsec->plt_count - 1) / PLT_ENT_COUNT;
|
|
|
|
idx = (pltsec->plt_count - 1) % PLT_ENT_COUNT;
|
ARM: kernel: avoid brute force search on PLT generation
Given that we now sort the relocation sections in a way that guarantees
that entries that can share a single PLT entry end up adjacently, there
is no a longer a need to go over the entire list to look for an existing
entry that matches our jump target. If such a match exists, it was the
last one to be emitted, so we can simply check the preceding slot.
Note that this will still work correctly in the [theoretical] presence of
call/jump relocations against SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero addends,
although not optimally. Since the relocations are presented in the same
order that we checked them for duplicates, any duplicates that we failed
to spot the first time around will be accounted for in the PLT allocation
so there is guaranteed to be sufficient space for them when actually
emitting the PLT.
For instance, the following sequence of relocations:
000004d8 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000004fc 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000050e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000520 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000532 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000544 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000556 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000568 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000057a 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000058c 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000059e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005b0 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005c2 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005d4 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
may result in several PLT entries to be allocated, and also emitted, if
any of the entries in the middle refer to a Place that contains a non-zero
addend (i.e., one for all the preceding zero-addend relocations, one for
all the following zero-addend relocations, and one for the non-zero addend
relocation itself)
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-18 16:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (plt->lit[idx] == val)
|
|
|
|
return (u32)&plt->ldr[idx];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
idx = (idx + 1) % PLT_ENT_COUNT;
|
|
|
|
if (!idx)
|
|
|
|
plt++;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
ARM: kernel: avoid brute force search on PLT generation
Given that we now sort the relocation sections in a way that guarantees
that entries that can share a single PLT entry end up adjacently, there
is no a longer a need to go over the entire list to look for an existing
entry that matches our jump target. If such a match exists, it was the
last one to be emitted, so we can simply check the preceding slot.
Note that this will still work correctly in the [theoretical] presence of
call/jump relocations against SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero addends,
although not optimally. Since the relocations are presented in the same
order that we checked them for duplicates, any duplicates that we failed
to spot the first time around will be accounted for in the PLT allocation
so there is guaranteed to be sufficient space for them when actually
emitting the PLT.
For instance, the following sequence of relocations:
000004d8 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000004fc 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000050e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000520 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000532 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000544 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000556 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000568 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000057a 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000058c 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000059e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005b0 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005c2 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005d4 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
may result in several PLT entries to be allocated, and also emitted, if
any of the entries in the middle refer to a Place that contains a non-zero
addend (i.e., one for all the preceding zero-addend relocations, one for
all the following zero-addend relocations, and one for the non-zero addend
relocation itself)
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-18 16:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
pltsec->plt_count++;
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(pltsec->plt_count * PLT_ENT_SIZE > pltsec->plt->sh_size);
|
ARM: kernel: avoid brute force search on PLT generation
Given that we now sort the relocation sections in a way that guarantees
that entries that can share a single PLT entry end up adjacently, there
is no a longer a need to go over the entire list to look for an existing
entry that matches our jump target. If such a match exists, it was the
last one to be emitted, so we can simply check the preceding slot.
Note that this will still work correctly in the [theoretical] presence of
call/jump relocations against SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero addends,
although not optimally. Since the relocations are presented in the same
order that we checked them for duplicates, any duplicates that we failed
to spot the first time around will be accounted for in the PLT allocation
so there is guaranteed to be sufficient space for them when actually
emitting the PLT.
For instance, the following sequence of relocations:
000004d8 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000004fc 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000050e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000520 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000532 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000544 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000556 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
00000568 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000057a 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000058c 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
0000059e 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005b0 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005c2 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
000005d4 00058b0a R_ARM_THM_CALL 00000000 warn_slowpath_null
may result in several PLT entries to be allocated, and also emitted, if
any of the entries in the middle refer to a Place that contains a non-zero
addend (i.e., one for all the preceding zero-addend relocations, one for
all the following zero-addend relocations, and one for the non-zero addend
relocation itself)
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-18 16:58:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!idx)
|
|
|
|
/* Populate a new set of entries */
|
|
|
|
*plt = (struct plt_entries){
|
|
|
|
{ [0 ... PLT_ENT_COUNT - 1] = PLT_ENT_LDR, },
|
|
|
|
{ val, }
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
plt->lit[idx] = val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (u32)&plt->ldr[idx];
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
#define cmp_3way(a,b) ((a) < (b) ? -1 : (a) > (b))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int cmp_rel(const void *a, const void *b)
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
const Elf32_Rel *x = a, *y = b;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/* sort by type and symbol index */
|
|
|
|
i = cmp_3way(ELF32_R_TYPE(x->r_info), ELF32_R_TYPE(y->r_info));
|
|
|
|
if (i == 0)
|
|
|
|
i = cmp_3way(ELF32_R_SYM(x->r_info), ELF32_R_SYM(y->r_info));
|
|
|
|
return i;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool is_zero_addend_relocation(Elf32_Addr base, const Elf32_Rel *rel)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u32 *tval = (u32 *)(base + rel->r_offset);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Do a bitwise compare on the raw addend rather than fully decoding
|
|
|
|
* the offset and doing an arithmetic comparison.
|
|
|
|
* Note that a zero-addend jump/call relocation is encoded taking the
|
|
|
|
* PC bias into account, i.e., -8 for ARM and -4 for Thumb2.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
switch (ELF32_R_TYPE(rel->r_info)) {
|
|
|
|
u16 upper, lower;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_THM_CALL:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_THM_JUMP24:
|
|
|
|
upper = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(((u16 *)tval)[0]);
|
|
|
|
lower = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(((u16 *)tval)[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (upper & 0x7ff) == 0x7ff && (lower & 0x2fff) == 0x2ffe;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_CALL:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_PC24:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_JUMP24:
|
|
|
|
return (__mem_to_opcode_arm(*tval) & 0xffffff) == 0xfffffe;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
BUG();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool duplicate_rel(Elf32_Addr base, const Elf32_Rel *rel, int num)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const Elf32_Rel *prev;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Entries are sorted by type and symbol index. That means that,
|
|
|
|
* if a duplicate entry exists, it must be in the preceding
|
|
|
|
* slot.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!num)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prev = rel + num - 1;
|
|
|
|
return cmp_rel(rel + num, prev) == 0 &&
|
|
|
|
is_zero_addend_relocation(base, prev);
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Count how many PLT entries we may need */
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
static unsigned int count_plts(const Elf32_Sym *syms, Elf32_Addr base,
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
const Elf32_Rel *rel, int num, Elf32_Word dstidx)
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int ret = 0;
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
const Elf32_Sym *s;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
switch (ELF32_R_TYPE(rel[i].r_info)) {
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_CALL:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_PC24:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_JUMP24:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_THM_CALL:
|
|
|
|
case R_ARM_THM_JUMP24:
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We only have to consider branch targets that resolve
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* to symbols that are defined in a different section.
|
|
|
|
* This is not simply a heuristic, it is a fundamental
|
|
|
|
* limitation, since there is no guaranteed way to emit
|
|
|
|
* PLT entries sufficiently close to the branch if the
|
|
|
|
* section size exceeds the range of a branch
|
|
|
|
* instruction. So ignore relocations against defined
|
|
|
|
* symbols if they live in the same section as the
|
|
|
|
* relocation target.
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
s = syms + ELF32_R_SYM(rel[i].r_info);
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (s->st_shndx == dstidx)
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Jump relocations with non-zero addends against
|
|
|
|
* undefined symbols are supported by the ELF spec, but
|
|
|
|
* do not occur in practice (e.g., 'jump n bytes past
|
|
|
|
* the entry point of undefined function symbol f').
|
|
|
|
* So we need to support them, but there is no need to
|
|
|
|
* take them into consideration when trying to optimize
|
|
|
|
* this code. So let's only check for duplicates when
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
* the addend is zero. (Note that calls into the core
|
|
|
|
* module via init PLT entries could involve section
|
|
|
|
* relative symbol references with non-zero addends, for
|
|
|
|
* which we may end up emitting duplicates, but the init
|
|
|
|
* PLT is released along with the rest of the .init
|
|
|
|
* region as soon as module loading completes.)
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!is_zero_addend_relocation(base, rel + i) ||
|
|
|
|
!duplicate_rel(base, rel, i))
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
ret++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
|
|
|
|
char *secstrings, struct module *mod)
|
|
|
|
{
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned long core_plts = 0;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long init_plts = 0;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
Elf32_Shdr *s, *sechdrs_end = sechdrs + ehdr->e_shnum;
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
Elf32_Sym *syms = NULL;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* To store the PLTs, we expand the .text section for core module code
|
2016-08-16 23:21:02 +08:00
|
|
|
* and for initialization code.
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
for (s = sechdrs; s < sechdrs_end; ++s) {
|
2016-08-16 23:21:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (strcmp(".plt", secstrings + s->sh_name) == 0)
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt = s;
|
|
|
|
else if (strcmp(".init.plt", secstrings + s->sh_name) == 0)
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.init.plt = s;
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
else if (s->sh_type == SHT_SYMTAB)
|
|
|
|
syms = (Elf32_Sym *)s->sh_addr;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!mod->arch.core.plt || !mod->arch.init.plt) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("%s: module PLT section(s) missing\n", mod->name);
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
return -ENOEXEC;
|
|
|
|
}
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!syms) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("%s: module symtab section missing\n", mod->name);
|
|
|
|
return -ENOEXEC;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (s = sechdrs + 1; s < sechdrs_end; ++s) {
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
Elf32_Rel *rels = (void *)ehdr + s->sh_offset;
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
int numrels = s->sh_size / sizeof(Elf32_Rel);
|
|
|
|
Elf32_Shdr *dstsec = sechdrs + s->sh_info;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (s->sh_type != SHT_REL)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: kernel: allocate PLT entries only for external symbols
When CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS is enabled, jump and call instructions in
modules no longer need to be within 16 MB (8 MB for Thumb2) of their
targets. If they are further away, a PLT entry will be generated on the
fly for each of them, which extends the range to the entire 32-bit
address space.
However, since these PLT entries will become the branch targets of the
original jump and call instructions, the PLT itself needs to be in
range, or we end up in the same situation we started in. Since the PLT
is in a separate section, this essentially means that all jumps and calls
inside the same module must be resolvable without PLT entries.
The PLT allocation code executes before the module itself is loaded in
its final location, and so it has to use a worst-case estimate for
which jumps and calls will require an entry in the PLT at relocation
time. As an optimization, this code deduplicates entries pointing to
the same symbol, using a O(n^2) algorithm. However, it does not take
the above into account, i.e., that PLT entries will only be needed for
jump and call relocations against symbols that are not defined in the
module.
So disregard relocations against symbols that are defined in the module
itself.
As an additional minor optimization, ignore input sections that lack
the SHF_EXECINSTR flag. Since jump and call relocations operate on
executable instructions only, there is no need to look in sections that
do not contain executable code.
Tested-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
2016-08-16 22:49:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* ignore relocations that operate on non-exec sections */
|
|
|
|
if (!(dstsec->sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-17 19:45:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/* sort by type and symbol index */
|
|
|
|
sort(rels, numrels, sizeof(Elf32_Rel), cmp_rel, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (strncmp(secstrings + dstsec->sh_name, ".init", 5) != 0)
|
|
|
|
core_plts += count_plts(syms, dstsec->sh_addr, rels,
|
|
|
|
numrels, s->sh_info);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
init_plts += count_plts(syms, dstsec->sh_addr, rels,
|
|
|
|
numrels, s->sh_info);
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: 8662/1: module: split core and init PLT sections
Since commit 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs"),
the ARM module PLT code allocates all PLT entries in a single core
section, since the overhead of having a separate init PLT section is
not justified by the small number of PLT entries usually required for
init code.
However, the core and init module regions are allocated independently,
and there is a corner case where the core region may be allocated from
the VMALLOC region if the dedicated module region is exhausted, but the
init region, being much smaller, can still be allocated from the module
region. This puts the PLT entries out of reach of the relocated branch
instructions, defeating the whole purpose of PLTs.
So split the core and init PLT regions, and name the latter ".init.plt"
so it gets allocated along with (and sufficiently close to) the .init
sections that it serves. Also, given that init PLT entries may need to
be emitted for branches that target the core module, modify the logic
that disregards defined symbols to only disregard symbols that are
defined in the same section.
Fixes: 35fa91eed817 ("ARM: kernel: merge core and init PLTs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Reported-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Tested-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2017-02-23 02:40:12 +08:00
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt->sh_type = SHT_NOBITS;
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt->sh_flags = SHF_EXECINSTR | SHF_ALLOC;
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt->sh_addralign = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt->sh_size = round_up(core_plts * PLT_ENT_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
sizeof(struct plt_entries));
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.init.plt->sh_type = SHT_NOBITS;
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.init.plt->sh_flags = SHF_EXECINSTR | SHF_ALLOC;
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.init.plt->sh_addralign = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.init.plt->sh_size = round_up(init_plts * PLT_ENT_SIZE,
|
|
|
|
sizeof(struct plt_entries));
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.init.plt_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s: plt=%x, init.plt=%x\n", __func__,
|
|
|
|
mod->arch.core.plt->sh_size, mod->arch.init.plt->sh_size);
|
2014-11-24 23:54:35 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|