OpenCloudOS-Kernel/arch/blackfin/include/asm/entry.h

159 lines
4.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
#ifndef __BFIN_ENTRY_H
#define __BFIN_ENTRY_H
#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
#define LFLUSH_I_AND_D 0x00000808
#define LSIGTRAP 5
/* process bits for task_struct.flags */
#define PF_TRACESYS_OFF 3
#define PF_TRACESYS_BIT 5
#define PF_PTRACED_OFF 3
#define PF_PTRACED_BIT 4
#define PF_DTRACE_OFF 1
#define PF_DTRACE_BIT 5
/*
* NOTE! The single-stepping code assumes that all interrupt handlers
* start by saving SYSCFG on the stack with their first instruction.
*/
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
/* This one is used for exceptions, emulation, and NMI. It doesn't push
RETI and doesn't do cli. */
#define SAVE_ALL_SYS save_context_no_interrupts
/* This is used for all normal interrupts. It saves a minimum of registers
to the stack, loads the IRQ number, and jumps to common code. */
#ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE
# define LOAD_IPIPE_IPEND \
P0.l = lo(IPEND); \
P0.h = hi(IPEND); \
R1 = [P0];
#else
# define LOAD_IPIPE_IPEND
#endif
Blackfin: make deferred hardware errors more exact Hardware errors on the Blackfin architecture are queued by nature of the hardware design. Things that could generate a hardware level queue up at the system interface and might not process until much later, at which point the system would send a notification back to the core. As such, it is possible for user space code to do something that would trigger a hardware error, but have it delay long enough for the process context to switch. So when the hardware error does signal, we mistakenly evaluate it as a different process or as kernel context and panic (erp!). This makes it pretty difficult to find the offending context. But wait, there is good news somewhere. By forcing a SSYNC in the interrupt entry, we force all pending queues at the system level to be processed and all hardware errors to be signaled. Then we check the current interrupt state to see if the hardware error is now signaled. If so, we re-queue the current interrupt and return thus allowing the higher priority hardware error interrupt to process properly. Since we haven't done any other context processing yet, the right context will be selected and killed. There is still the possibility that the exact offending instruction will be unknown, but at least we'll have a much better idea of where to look. The downside of course is that this causes system-wide syncs at every interrupt point which results in significant performance degradation. Since this situation should not occur in any properly configured system (as hardware errors are triggered by things like bad pointers), make it a debug configuration option and disable it by default. Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
2009-05-19 02:33:26 +08:00
#ifndef CONFIG_EXACT_HWERR
/* As a debugging aid - we save IPEND when DEBUG_KERNEL is on,
* otherwise it is a waste of cycles.
*/
# ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
#define INTERRUPT_ENTRY(N) \
[--sp] = SYSCFG; \
[--sp] = P0; /*orig_p0*/ \
[--sp] = R0; /*orig_r0*/ \
[--sp] = (R7:0,P5:0); \
R0 = (N); \
LOAD_IPIPE_IPEND \
jump __common_int_entry;
# else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL */
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
#define INTERRUPT_ENTRY(N) \
[--sp] = SYSCFG; \
[--sp] = P0; /*orig_p0*/ \
[--sp] = R0; /*orig_r0*/ \
[--sp] = (R7:0,P5:0); \
Blackfin: make deferred hardware errors more exact Hardware errors on the Blackfin architecture are queued by nature of the hardware design. Things that could generate a hardware level queue up at the system interface and might not process until much later, at which point the system would send a notification back to the core. As such, it is possible for user space code to do something that would trigger a hardware error, but have it delay long enough for the process context to switch. So when the hardware error does signal, we mistakenly evaluate it as a different process or as kernel context and panic (erp!). This makes it pretty difficult to find the offending context. But wait, there is good news somewhere. By forcing a SSYNC in the interrupt entry, we force all pending queues at the system level to be processed and all hardware errors to be signaled. Then we check the current interrupt state to see if the hardware error is now signaled. If so, we re-queue the current interrupt and return thus allowing the higher priority hardware error interrupt to process properly. Since we haven't done any other context processing yet, the right context will be selected and killed. There is still the possibility that the exact offending instruction will be unknown, but at least we'll have a much better idea of where to look. The downside of course is that this causes system-wide syncs at every interrupt point which results in significant performance degradation. Since this situation should not occur in any properly configured system (as hardware errors are triggered by things like bad pointers), make it a debug configuration option and disable it by default. Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
2009-05-19 02:33:26 +08:00
p0.l = lo(IPEND); \
p0.h = hi(IPEND); \
r1 = [p0]; \
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
R0 = (N); \
LOAD_IPIPE_IPEND \
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
jump __common_int_entry;
Blackfin: make deferred hardware errors more exact Hardware errors on the Blackfin architecture are queued by nature of the hardware design. Things that could generate a hardware level queue up at the system interface and might not process until much later, at which point the system would send a notification back to the core. As such, it is possible for user space code to do something that would trigger a hardware error, but have it delay long enough for the process context to switch. So when the hardware error does signal, we mistakenly evaluate it as a different process or as kernel context and panic (erp!). This makes it pretty difficult to find the offending context. But wait, there is good news somewhere. By forcing a SSYNC in the interrupt entry, we force all pending queues at the system level to be processed and all hardware errors to be signaled. Then we check the current interrupt state to see if the hardware error is now signaled. If so, we re-queue the current interrupt and return thus allowing the higher priority hardware error interrupt to process properly. Since we haven't done any other context processing yet, the right context will be selected and killed. There is still the possibility that the exact offending instruction will be unknown, but at least we'll have a much better idea of where to look. The downside of course is that this causes system-wide syncs at every interrupt point which results in significant performance degradation. Since this situation should not occur in any properly configured system (as hardware errors are triggered by things like bad pointers), make it a debug configuration option and disable it by default. Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
2009-05-19 02:33:26 +08:00
# endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL */
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
/* For timer interrupts, we need to save IPEND, since the user_mode
Blackfin: make deferred hardware errors more exact Hardware errors on the Blackfin architecture are queued by nature of the hardware design. Things that could generate a hardware level queue up at the system interface and might not process until much later, at which point the system would send a notification back to the core. As such, it is possible for user space code to do something that would trigger a hardware error, but have it delay long enough for the process context to switch. So when the hardware error does signal, we mistakenly evaluate it as a different process or as kernel context and panic (erp!). This makes it pretty difficult to find the offending context. But wait, there is good news somewhere. By forcing a SSYNC in the interrupt entry, we force all pending queues at the system level to be processed and all hardware errors to be signaled. Then we check the current interrupt state to see if the hardware error is now signaled. If so, we re-queue the current interrupt and return thus allowing the higher priority hardware error interrupt to process properly. Since we haven't done any other context processing yet, the right context will be selected and killed. There is still the possibility that the exact offending instruction will be unknown, but at least we'll have a much better idea of where to look. The downside of course is that this causes system-wide syncs at every interrupt point which results in significant performance degradation. Since this situation should not occur in any properly configured system (as hardware errors are triggered by things like bad pointers), make it a debug configuration option and disable it by default. Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
2009-05-19 02:33:26 +08:00
*macro accesses it to determine where to account time.
*/
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
#define TIMER_INTERRUPT_ENTRY(N) \
[--sp] = SYSCFG; \
[--sp] = P0; /*orig_p0*/ \
[--sp] = R0; /*orig_r0*/ \
[--sp] = (R7:0,P5:0); \
p0.l = lo(IPEND); \
p0.h = hi(IPEND); \
r1 = [p0]; \
R0 = (N); \
jump __common_int_entry;
Blackfin: make deferred hardware errors more exact Hardware errors on the Blackfin architecture are queued by nature of the hardware design. Things that could generate a hardware level queue up at the system interface and might not process until much later, at which point the system would send a notification back to the core. As such, it is possible for user space code to do something that would trigger a hardware error, but have it delay long enough for the process context to switch. So when the hardware error does signal, we mistakenly evaluate it as a different process or as kernel context and panic (erp!). This makes it pretty difficult to find the offending context. But wait, there is good news somewhere. By forcing a SSYNC in the interrupt entry, we force all pending queues at the system level to be processed and all hardware errors to be signaled. Then we check the current interrupt state to see if the hardware error is now signaled. If so, we re-queue the current interrupt and return thus allowing the higher priority hardware error interrupt to process properly. Since we haven't done any other context processing yet, the right context will be selected and killed. There is still the possibility that the exact offending instruction will be unknown, but at least we'll have a much better idea of where to look. The downside of course is that this causes system-wide syncs at every interrupt point which results in significant performance degradation. Since this situation should not occur in any properly configured system (as hardware errors are triggered by things like bad pointers), make it a debug configuration option and disable it by default. Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
2009-05-19 02:33:26 +08:00
#else /* CONFIG_EXACT_HWERR is defined */
/* if we want hardware error to be exact, we need to do a SSYNC (which forces
* read/writes to complete to the memory controllers), and check to see that
* caused a pending HW error condition. If so, we assume it was caused by user
* space, by setting the same interrupt that we are in (so it goes off again)
* and context restore, and a RTI (without servicing anything). This should
* cause the pending HWERR to fire, and when that is done, this interrupt will
* be re-serviced properly.
* As you can see by the code - we actually need to do two SSYNCS - one to
* make sure the read/writes complete, and another to make sure the hardware
* error is recognized by the core.
*/
#define INTERRUPT_ENTRY(N) \
SSYNC; \
SSYNC; \
[--sp] = SYSCFG; \
[--sp] = P0; /*orig_p0*/ \
[--sp] = R0; /*orig_r0*/ \
[--sp] = (R7:0,P5:0); \
R1 = ASTAT; \
P0.L = LO(ILAT); \
P0.H = HI(ILAT); \
R0 = [P0]; \
CC = BITTST(R0, EVT_IVHW_P); \
IF CC JUMP 1f; \
ASTAT = R1; \
p0.l = lo(IPEND); \
p0.h = hi(IPEND); \
r1 = [p0]; \
R0 = (N); \
LOAD_IPIPE_IPEND \
jump __common_int_entry; \
1: ASTAT = R1; \
RAISE N; \
(R7:0, P5:0) = [SP++]; \
SP += 0x8; \
SYSCFG = [SP++]; \
CSYNC; \
RTI;
#define TIMER_INTERRUPT_ENTRY(N) \
SSYNC; \
SSYNC; \
[--sp] = SYSCFG; \
[--sp] = P0; /*orig_p0*/ \
[--sp] = R0; /*orig_r0*/ \
[--sp] = (R7:0,P5:0); \
R1 = ASTAT; \
P0.L = LO(ILAT); \
P0.H = HI(ILAT); \
R0 = [P0]; \
CC = BITTST(R0, EVT_IVHW_P); \
IF CC JUMP 1f; \
ASTAT = R1; \
p0.l = lo(IPEND); \
p0.h = hi(IPEND); \
r1 = [p0]; \
R0 = (N); \
jump __common_int_entry; \
1: ASTAT = R1; \
RAISE N; \
(R7:0, P5:0) = [SP++]; \
SP += 0x8; \
SYSCFG = [SP++]; \
CSYNC; \
RTI;
#endif /* CONFIG_EXACT_HWERR */
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
/* This one pushes RETI without using CLI. Interrupts are enabled. */
#define SAVE_CONTEXT_SYSCALL save_context_syscall
#define SAVE_CONTEXT save_context_with_interrupts
Blackfin arch: Faster C implementation of no-MPU CPLB handler This is a mixture ofcMichael McTernan's patch and the existing cplb-mpu code. We ditch the old cplb-nompu implementation, which is a good example of why a good algorithm in a HLL is preferrable to a bad algorithm written in assembly. Rather than try to construct a table of all posible CPLBs and search it, we just create a (smaller) table of memory regions and their attributes. Some of the data structures are now unified for both the mpu and nompu cases. A lot of needless complexity in cplbinit.c is removed. Further optimizations: * compile cplbmgr.c with a lot of -ffixed-reg options, and omit saving these registers on the stack when entering a CPLB exception. * lose cli/nop/nop/sti sequences for some workarounds - these don't * make sense in an exception context Additional code unification should be possible after this. [Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>: - convert CPP if statements to C if statements - remove redundant statements - use a do...while loop rather than a for loop to get slightly better optimization and to avoid gcc "may be used uninitialized" warnings ... we know that the [id]cplb_nr_bounds variables will never be 0, so this is OK - the no-mpu code was the last user of MAX_MEM_SIZE and with that rewritten, we can punt it - add some BUG_ON() checks to make sure we dont overflow the small cplb_bounds array - add i/d cplb entries for the bootrom because there is functions/data in there we want to access - we do not need a NULL trailing entry as any time we access the bounds arrays, we use the nr_bounds variable ] Signed-off-by: Michael McTernan <mmcternan@airvana.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
2009-01-07 23:14:38 +08:00
#define SAVE_CONTEXT_CPLB save_context_cplb
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
#define RESTORE_ALL_SYS restore_context_no_interrupts
#define RESTORE_CONTEXT restore_context_with_interrupts
Blackfin arch: Faster C implementation of no-MPU CPLB handler This is a mixture ofcMichael McTernan's patch and the existing cplb-mpu code. We ditch the old cplb-nompu implementation, which is a good example of why a good algorithm in a HLL is preferrable to a bad algorithm written in assembly. Rather than try to construct a table of all posible CPLBs and search it, we just create a (smaller) table of memory regions and their attributes. Some of the data structures are now unified for both the mpu and nompu cases. A lot of needless complexity in cplbinit.c is removed. Further optimizations: * compile cplbmgr.c with a lot of -ffixed-reg options, and omit saving these registers on the stack when entering a CPLB exception. * lose cli/nop/nop/sti sequences for some workarounds - these don't * make sense in an exception context Additional code unification should be possible after this. [Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>: - convert CPP if statements to C if statements - remove redundant statements - use a do...while loop rather than a for loop to get slightly better optimization and to avoid gcc "may be used uninitialized" warnings ... we know that the [id]cplb_nr_bounds variables will never be 0, so this is OK - the no-mpu code was the last user of MAX_MEM_SIZE and with that rewritten, we can punt it - add some BUG_ON() checks to make sure we dont overflow the small cplb_bounds array - add i/d cplb entries for the bootrom because there is functions/data in there we want to access - we do not need a NULL trailing entry as any time we access the bounds arrays, we use the nr_bounds variable ] Signed-off-by: Michael McTernan <mmcternan@airvana.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
2009-01-07 23:14:38 +08:00
#define RESTORE_CONTEXT_CPLB restore_context_cplb
blackfin architecture This adds support for the Analog Devices Blackfin processor architecture, and currently supports the BF533, BF532, BF531, BF537, BF536, BF534, and BF561 (Dual Core) devices, with a variety of development platforms including those avaliable from Analog Devices (BF533-EZKit, BF533-STAMP, BF537-STAMP, BF561-EZKIT), and Bluetechnix! Tinyboards. The Blackfin architecture was jointly developed by Intel and Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) as the Micro Signal Architecture (MSA) core and introduced it in December of 2000. Since then ADI has put this core into its Blackfin processor family of devices. The Blackfin core has the advantages of a clean, orthogonal,RISC-like microprocessor instruction set. It combines a dual-MAC (Multiply/Accumulate), state-of-the-art signal processing engine and single-instruction, multiple-data (SIMD) multimedia capabilities into a single instruction-set architecture. The Blackfin architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the ADSP-BF53x/BF56x Blackfin Processor Programming Reference http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/download/frsrelease/29/2549/Blackfin_PRM.pdf The Blackfin processor is already supported by major releases of gcc, and there are binary and source rpms/tarballs for many architectures at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs There is complete documentation, including "getting started" guides available at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/ which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for bfin-linux-uclibc This patch, as well as the other patches (toolchain, distribution, uClibc) are actively supported by Analog Devices Inc, at: http://blackfin.uclinux.org/ We have tested this on LTP, and our test plan (including pass/fails) can be found at: http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=testing_the_linux_kernel [m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl: balance parenthesis in blackfin header files] Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-07 05:50:22 +08:00
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif /* __BFIN_ENTRY_H */