OpenCloudOS-Kernel/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c

375 lines
8.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 157 Based on 3 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version [author] [graeme] [gregory] [gg]@[slimlogic] [co] [uk] [author] [kishon] [vijay] [abraham] [i] [kishon]@[ti] [com] [based] [on] [twl6030]_[usb] [c] [author] [hema] [hk] [hemahk]@[ti] [com] this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1105 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.202006027@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-27 14:55:06 +08:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Copyright (c) 2013 MundoReader S.L.
* Author: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
*/
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
#include <linux/reset.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/cp15.h>
#include <asm/smp_scu.h>
#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
#include "core.h"
static void __iomem *scu_base_addr;
static void __iomem *sram_base_addr;
static int ncores;
#define PMU_PWRDN_CON 0x08
#define PMU_PWRDN_ST 0x0c
#define PMU_PWRDN_SCU 4
static struct regmap *pmu;
static int has_pmu = true;
static int pmu_power_domain_is_on(int pd)
{
u32 val;
int ret;
ret = regmap_read(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_ST, &val);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return !(val & BIT(pd));
}
static struct reset_control *rockchip_get_core_reset(int cpu)
{
struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
struct device_node *np;
/* The cpu device is only available after the initial core bringup */
if (dev)
np = dev->of_node;
else
np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
return of_reset_control_get_exclusive(np, NULL);
}
static int pmu_set_power_domain(int pd, bool on)
{
u32 val = (on) ? 0 : BIT(pd);
ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off. In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset. In general, the correct flow is: CPU off: reset_control_assert regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd)) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off CPU on: regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on reset_control_deassert This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for i in $(seq 10000); do echo "================= $i ============" for j in $(seq 100); do while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online echo 0 > cpu2/online echo 0 > cpu3/online done while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online echo 1 > cpu2/online echo 1 > cpu3/online done done done The following is reproducable log: [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 ....... or others similar log: ....... [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor <hang> Tested by cpu up/down scripts, the results told us need delay more time before write the sram. The wait time is affected by many aspects (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, bus speed, ...). Although the cpus other than cpu0 will write the sram, the speedy is no the same as cpu0, if the cpu0 early wake up, perhaps the other cpus can't startup. As we know, the cpu0 can wake up when the cpu1/2/3 write the 'sram+4/8' and send the sev. Anyway..... At the moment, 1ms delay will be happy work for cpu up/down scripts test. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 3ee851e212d0 ("ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2015-06-09 17:49:57 +08:00
struct reset_control *rstc = rockchip_get_core_reset(pd);
int ret;
ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off. In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset. In general, the correct flow is: CPU off: reset_control_assert regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd)) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off CPU on: regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on reset_control_deassert This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for i in $(seq 10000); do echo "================= $i ============" for j in $(seq 100); do while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online echo 0 > cpu2/online echo 0 > cpu3/online done while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online echo 1 > cpu2/online echo 1 > cpu3/online done done done The following is reproducable log: [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 ....... or others similar log: ....... [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor <hang> Tested by cpu up/down scripts, the results told us need delay more time before write the sram. The wait time is affected by many aspects (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, bus speed, ...). Although the cpus other than cpu0 will write the sram, the speedy is no the same as cpu0, if the cpu0 early wake up, perhaps the other cpus can't startup. As we know, the cpu0 can wake up when the cpu1/2/3 write the 'sram+4/8' and send the sev. Anyway..... At the moment, 1ms delay will be happy work for cpu up/down scripts test. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 3ee851e212d0 ("ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2015-06-09 17:49:57 +08:00
if (IS_ERR(rstc) && read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
pr_err("%s: could not get reset control for core %d\n",
__func__, pd);
return PTR_ERR(rstc);
}
/*
* We need to soft reset the cpu when we turn off the cpu power domain,
* or else the active processors might be stalled when the individual
* processor is powered down.
*/
ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off. In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset. In general, the correct flow is: CPU off: reset_control_assert regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd)) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off CPU on: regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on reset_control_deassert This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for i in $(seq 10000); do echo "================= $i ============" for j in $(seq 100); do while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online echo 0 > cpu2/online echo 0 > cpu3/online done while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online echo 1 > cpu2/online echo 1 > cpu3/online done done done The following is reproducable log: [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 ....... or others similar log: ....... [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor <hang> Tested by cpu up/down scripts, the results told us need delay more time before write the sram. The wait time is affected by many aspects (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, bus speed, ...). Although the cpus other than cpu0 will write the sram, the speedy is no the same as cpu0, if the cpu0 early wake up, perhaps the other cpus can't startup. As we know, the cpu0 can wake up when the cpu1/2/3 write the 'sram+4/8' and send the sev. Anyway..... At the moment, 1ms delay will be happy work for cpu up/down scripts test. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 3ee851e212d0 ("ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2015-06-09 17:49:57 +08:00
if (!IS_ERR(rstc) && !on)
reset_control_assert(rstc);
if (has_pmu) {
ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n",
__func__);
return ret;
}
ret = -1;
while (ret != on) {
ret = pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: could not read power domain state\n",
__func__);
return ret;
}
}
}
ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off. In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset. In general, the correct flow is: CPU off: reset_control_assert regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd)) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off CPU on: regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on reset_control_deassert This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for i in $(seq 10000); do echo "================= $i ============" for j in $(seq 100); do while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online echo 0 > cpu2/online echo 0 > cpu3/online done while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online echo 1 > cpu2/online echo 1 > cpu3/online done done done The following is reproducable log: [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 ....... or others similar log: ....... [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor <hang> Tested by cpu up/down scripts, the results told us need delay more time before write the sram. The wait time is affected by many aspects (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, bus speed, ...). Although the cpus other than cpu0 will write the sram, the speedy is no the same as cpu0, if the cpu0 early wake up, perhaps the other cpus can't startup. As we know, the cpu0 can wake up when the cpu1/2/3 write the 'sram+4/8' and send the sev. Anyway..... At the moment, 1ms delay will be happy work for cpu up/down scripts test. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 3ee851e212d0 ("ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2015-06-09 17:49:57 +08:00
if (!IS_ERR(rstc)) {
if (on)
reset_control_deassert(rstc);
reset_control_put(rstc);
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Handling of CPU cores
*/
static int rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
{
int ret;
if (!sram_base_addr || (has_pmu && !pmu)) {
pr_err("%s: sram or pmu missing for cpu boot\n", __func__);
return -ENXIO;
}
if (cpu >= ncores) {
pr_err("%s: cpu %d outside maximum number of cpus %d\n",
__func__, cpu, ncores);
return -ENXIO;
}
/* start the core */
ret = pmu_set_power_domain(0 + cpu, true);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (read_cpuid_part() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
/*
* We communicate with the bootrom to active the cpus other
* than cpu0, after a blob of initialize code, they will
* stay at wfe state, once they are actived, they will check
* the mailbox:
* sram_base_addr + 4: 0xdeadbeaf
* sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off. In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset. In general, the correct flow is: CPU off: reset_control_assert regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd)) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off CPU on: regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on reset_control_deassert This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for i in $(seq 10000); do echo "================= $i ============" for j in $(seq 100); do while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online echo 0 > cpu2/online echo 0 > cpu3/online done while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online echo 1 > cpu2/online echo 1 > cpu3/online done done done The following is reproducable log: [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 ....... or others similar log: ....... [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor <hang> Tested by cpu up/down scripts, the results told us need delay more time before write the sram. The wait time is affected by many aspects (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, bus speed, ...). Although the cpus other than cpu0 will write the sram, the speedy is no the same as cpu0, if the cpu0 early wake up, perhaps the other cpus can't startup. As we know, the cpu0 can wake up when the cpu1/2/3 write the 'sram+4/8' and send the sev. Anyway..... At the moment, 1ms delay will be happy work for cpu up/down scripts test. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 3ee851e212d0 ("ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2015-06-09 17:49:57 +08:00
* The cpu0 need to wait the other cpus other than cpu0 entering
* the wfe state.The wait time is affected by many aspects.
* (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, ...)
*/
ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset We need different orderings when turning a core on and turning a core off. In one case we need to assert reset before turning power off. In ther other case we need to turn power on and the deassert reset. In general, the correct flow is: CPU off: reset_control_assert regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), BIT(pd)) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_off CPU on: regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), 0) wait_for_power_domain_to_turn_on reset_control_deassert This is needed for stressing CPU up/down, as per: cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/ for i in $(seq 10000); do echo "================= $i ============" for j in $(seq 100); do while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "000"" ]] echo 0 > cpu1/online echo 0 > cpu2/online echo 0 > cpu3/online done while [[ "$(cat cpu1/online)$(cat cpu2/online)$(cat cpu3/online)" != "111" ]]; do echo 1 > cpu1/online echo 1 > cpu2/online echo 1 > cpu3/online done done done The following is reproducable log: [34466.186812] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 0.669 msecs [34466.186824] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [34466.187509] CPU1: shutdown [34466.188672] CPU2: shutdown [34473.736627] Kernel panic - not syncing:Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 ....... or others similar log: ....... [ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown [ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown [ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown [ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor [ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor <hang> Tested by cpu up/down scripts, the results told us need delay more time before write the sram. The wait time is affected by many aspects (e.g: cpu frequency, bootrom frequency, sram frequency, bus speed, ...). Although the cpus other than cpu0 will write the sram, the speedy is no the same as cpu0, if the cpu0 early wake up, perhaps the other cpus can't startup. As we know, the cpu0 can wake up when the cpu1/2/3 write the 'sram+4/8' and send the sev. Anyway..... At the moment, 1ms delay will be happy work for cpu up/down scripts test. Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Fixes: 3ee851e212d0 ("ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2015-06-09 17:49:57 +08:00
mdelay(1); /* ensure the cpus other than cpu0 to startup */
writel(__pa_symbol(secondary_startup), sram_base_addr + 8);
writel(0xDEADBEAF, sram_base_addr + 4);
dsb_sev();
}
return 0;
}
/**
* rockchip_smp_prepare_sram - populate necessary sram block
* Starting cores execute the code residing at the start of the on-chip sram
* after power-on. Therefore make sure, this sram region is reserved and
* big enough. After this check, copy the trampoline code that directs the
* core to the real startup code in ram into the sram-region.
* @node: mmio-sram device node
*/
static int __init rockchip_smp_prepare_sram(struct device_node *node)
{
unsigned int trampoline_sz = &rockchip_secondary_trampoline_end -
&rockchip_secondary_trampoline;
struct resource res;
unsigned int rsize;
int ret;
ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
if (ret < 0) {
pr_err("%s: could not get address for node %pOF\n",
__func__, node);
return ret;
}
rsize = resource_size(&res);
if (rsize < trampoline_sz) {
pr_err("%s: reserved block with size 0x%x is too small for trampoline size 0x%x\n",
__func__, rsize, trampoline_sz);
return -EINVAL;
}
/* set the boot function for the sram code */
rockchip_boot_fn = __pa_symbol(secondary_startup);
/* copy the trampoline to sram, that runs during startup of the core */
memcpy_toio(sram_base_addr, &rockchip_secondary_trampoline, trampoline_sz);
flush_cache_all();
outer_clean_range(0, trampoline_sz);
dsb_sev();
return 0;
}
static const struct regmap_config rockchip_pmu_regmap_config = {
.name = "rockchip-pmu",
.reg_bits = 32,
.val_bits = 32,
.reg_stride = 4,
};
static int __init rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu(void)
{
struct device_node *node;
void __iomem *pmu_base;
/*
* This function is only called via smp_ops->smp_prepare_cpu().
* That only happens if a "/cpus" device tree node exists
* and has an "enable-method" property that selects the SMP
* operations defined herein.
*/
node = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node, "rockchip,pmu");
of_node_put(node);
if (!IS_ERR(pmu))
return 0;
pmu = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("rockchip,rk3066-pmu");
if (!IS_ERR(pmu))
return 0;
/* fallback, create our own regmap for the pmu area */
pmu = NULL;
node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "rockchip,rk3066-pmu");
if (!node) {
pr_err("%s: could not find pmu dt node\n", __func__);
return -ENODEV;
}
pmu_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
of_node_put(node);
if (!pmu_base) {
pr_err("%s: could not map pmu registers\n", __func__);
return -ENOMEM;
}
pmu = regmap_init_mmio(NULL, pmu_base, &rockchip_pmu_regmap_config);
if (IS_ERR(pmu)) {
int ret = PTR_ERR(pmu);
iounmap(pmu_base);
pmu = NULL;
pr_err("%s: regmap init failed\n", __func__);
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
static void __init rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
{
struct device_node *node;
unsigned int i;
node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "rockchip,rk3066-smp-sram");
if (!node) {
pr_err("%s: could not find sram dt node\n", __func__);
return;
}
sram_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
if (!sram_base_addr) {
pr_err("%s: could not map sram registers\n", __func__);
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
of_node_put(node);
return;
}
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
if (has_pmu && rockchip_smp_prepare_pmu()) {
of_node_put(node);
return;
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
}
if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
if (rockchip_smp_prepare_sram(node)) {
of_node_put(node);
return;
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
}
/* enable the SCU power domain */
pmu_set_power_domain(PMU_PWRDN_SCU, true);
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
of_node_put(node);
node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-scu");
if (!node) {
pr_err("%s: missing scu\n", __func__);
return;
}
scu_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
if (!scu_base_addr) {
pr_err("%s: could not map scu registers\n", __func__);
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
of_node_put(node);
return;
}
/*
* While the number of cpus is gathered from dt, also get the
* number of cores from the scu to verify this value when
* booting the cores.
*/
ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base_addr);
pr_err("%s: ncores %d\n", __func__, ncores);
scu_enable(scu_base_addr);
} else {
unsigned int l2ctlr;
asm ("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : "=r" (l2ctlr));
ncores = ((l2ctlr >> 24) & 0x3) + 1;
}
ARM: rockchip: fix missing of_node_put calls in smp code The call to of_get_next_child returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:269:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/pm.c:275:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 259, but without a corresponding object release within this function ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:281:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:285:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:289:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 272, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./arch/arm/mach-rockchip/platsmp.c:303:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 294, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
2019-04-26 15:08:08 +08:00
of_node_put(node);
/* Make sure that all cores except the first are really off */
for (i = 1; i < ncores; i++)
pmu_set_power_domain(0 + i, false);
}
static void __init rk3036_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
{
has_pmu = false;
rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus(max_cpus);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
static int rockchip_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
{
/*
* We need a delay here to ensure that the dying CPU can finish
* executing v7_coherency_exit() and reach the WFI/WFE state
* prior to having the power domain disabled.
*/
mdelay(1);
pmu_set_power_domain(0 + cpu, false);
return 1;
}
static void rockchip_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
v7_exit_coherency_flush(louis);
while (1)
cpu_do_idle();
}
#endif
static const struct smp_operations rk3036_smp_ops __initconst = {
.smp_prepare_cpus = rk3036_smp_prepare_cpus,
.smp_boot_secondary = rockchip_boot_secondary,
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
.cpu_kill = rockchip_cpu_kill,
.cpu_die = rockchip_cpu_die,
#endif
};
static const struct smp_operations rockchip_smp_ops __initconst = {
.smp_prepare_cpus = rockchip_smp_prepare_cpus,
.smp_boot_secondary = rockchip_boot_secondary,
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
.cpu_kill = rockchip_cpu_kill,
.cpu_die = rockchip_cpu_die,
#endif
};
CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3036_smp, "rockchip,rk3036-smp", &rk3036_smp_ops);
CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(rk3066_smp, "rockchip,rk3066-smp", &rockchip_smp_ops);