UbiquitousOS
/
OpenCloudOS-Kernel
mirror of https://gitee.com/OpenCloudOS/OpenCloudOS-Kernel.git
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
OpenCloudOS-Kernel/arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c

2397 lines
61 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* Handle unaligned accesses by emulation.
*
* This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
* License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
* for more details.
*
* Copyright (C) 1996, 1998, 1999, 2002 by Ralf Baechle
* Copyright (C) 1999 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add EVA instruction wrappers Use the load/store instruction wrappers from asm/asm.h to perform such operations when operating in EVA mode. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2013-12-20 00:41:05 +08:00
* Copyright (C) 2014 Imagination Technologies Ltd.
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
* This file contains exception handler for address error exception with the
* special capability to execute faulting instructions in software. The
* handler does not try to handle the case when the program counter points
* to an address not aligned to a word boundary.
*
* Putting data to unaligned addresses is a bad practice even on Intel where
* only the performance is affected. Much worse is that such code is non-
* portable. Due to several programs that die on MIPS due to alignment
* problems I decided to implement this handler anyway though I originally
* didn't intend to do this at all for user code.
*
* For now I enable fixing of address errors by default to make life easier.
* I however intend to disable this somewhen in the future when the alignment
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* problems with user programs have been fixed. For programmers this is the
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
* right way to go.
*
* Fixing address errors is a per process option. The option is inherited
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* across fork(2) and execve(2) calls. If you really want to use the
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
* option in your user programs - I discourage the use of the software
* emulation strongly - use the following code in your userland stuff:
*
* #include <sys/sysmips.h>
*
* ...
* sysmips(MIPS_FIXADE, x);
* ...
*
* The argument x is 0 for disabling software emulation, enabled otherwise.
*
* Below a little program to play around with this feature.
*
* #include <stdio.h>
* #include <sys/sysmips.h>
*
* struct foo {
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* unsigned char bar[8];
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
* };
*
* main(int argc, char *argv[])
* {
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* struct foo x = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7};
* unsigned int *p = (unsigned int *) (x.bar + 3);
* int i;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* if (argc > 1)
* sysmips(MIPS_FIXADE, atoi(argv[1]));
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* printf("*p = %08lx\n", *p);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* *p = 0xdeadface;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* for(i = 0; i <= 7; i++)
* printf("%02x ", x.bar[i]);
* printf("\n");
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
* }
*
* Coprocessor loads are not supported; I think this case is unimportant
* in the practice.
*
* TODO: Handle ndc (attempted store to doubleword in uncached memory)
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
* exception for the R6000.
* A store crossing a page boundary might be executed only partially.
* Undo the partial store in this case.
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
*/
MIPS: Implement HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING. This enables support for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-05-29 07:07:19 +08:00
#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
Detach sched.h from mm.h First thing mm.h does is including sched.h solely for can_do_mlock() inline function which has "current" dereference inside. By dealing with can_do_mlock() mm.h can be detached from sched.h which is good. See below, why. This patch a) removes unconditional inclusion of sched.h from mm.h b) makes can_do_mlock() normal function in mm/mlock.c c) exports can_do_mlock() to not break compilation d) adds sched.h inclusions back to files that were getting it indirectly. e) adds less bloated headers to some files (asm/signal.h, jiffies.h) that were getting them indirectly Net result is: a) mm.h users would get less code to open, read, preprocess, parse, ... if they don't need sched.h b) sched.h stops being dependency for significant number of files: on x86_64 allmodconfig touching sched.h results in recompile of 4083 files, after patch it's only 3744 (-8.3%). Cross-compile tested on all arm defconfigs, all mips defconfigs, all powerpc defconfigs, alpha alpha-up arm i386 i386-up i386-defconfig i386-allnoconfig ia64 ia64-up m68k mips parisc parisc-up powerpc powerpc-up s390 s390-up sparc sparc-up sparc64 sparc64-up um-x86_64 x86_64 x86_64-up x86_64-defconfig x86_64-allnoconfig as well as my two usual configs. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-21 05:22:52 +08:00
#include <linux/sched.h>
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
MIPS: add support for software performance events Software events are required as part of the measurable stuff by the Linux performance counter subsystem. Here is the list of events added by this patch: PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS Signed-off-by: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: paulus@samba.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: jamie.iles@picochip.com Acked-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1686/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2010-10-12 19:37:21 +08:00
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
#include <asm/asm.h>
#include <asm/branch.h>
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
#include <asm/cop2.h>
MIPS: Declare mips_debugfs_dir in a header We have many extern declarations of mips_debugfs_dir through arch/mips/ in various C files. Unify them by declaring mips_debugfs_dir in a header, including it in each affected C file & removing the duplicate declarations. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Cc: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@gmail.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/11181/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-09-23 01:10:55 +08:00
#include <asm/debug.h>
MIPS: microMIPS: Floating point support. Add logic needed to do floating point emulation in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven. Hill@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 01:09:02 +08:00
#include <asm/fpu.h>
#include <asm/fpu_emulator.h>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
#include <asm/inst.h>
Replace <asm/uaccess.h> with <linux/uaccess.h> globally This was entirely automated, using the script by Al: PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*<asm/uaccess.h>' sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include <linux/uaccess.h>!" \ $(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h) to do the replacement at the end of the merge window. Requested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-12-25 03:46:01 +08:00
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
MIPS: Whitespace cleanup. Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling in forever. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-01-22 19:59:30 +08:00
#define STR(x) __STR(x)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
#define __STR(x) #x
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
enum {
UNALIGNED_ACTION_QUIET,
UNALIGNED_ACTION_SIGNAL,
UNALIGNED_ACTION_SHOW,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
static u32 unaligned_instructions;
static u32 unaligned_action;
#else
#define unaligned_action UNALIGNED_ACTION_QUIET
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
#endif
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
extern void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadHW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ (".set\tnoat\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lb("%0", "0(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lbu("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\t.set\tat\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lwl("%0", "(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lwr("%0", "3(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
/* For CPUs without lwl instruction */
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:"type##_lb("%0", "0(%2)")"\n\t" \
"2:"type##_lbu("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"3:"type##_lbu("$1", "2(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"4:"type##_lbu("$1", "3(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
".set\tpop\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadHWU(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tnoat\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lbu("%0", "0(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lbu("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".set\tat\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadWU(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lwl("%0", "(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lwr("%0", "3(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"dsll\t%0, %0, 32\n\t" \
"dsrl\t%0, %0, 32\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
"\t.section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"1:\tldl\t%0, (%2)\n" \
"2:\tldr\t%0, 7(%2)\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
"\t.section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
/* For CPUs without lwl and ldl instructions */
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadWU(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:"type##_lbu("%0", "0(%2)")"\n\t" \
"2:"type##_lbu("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"3:"type##_lbu("$1", "2(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"4:"type##_lbu("$1", "3(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
".set\tpop\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
"1:lb\t%0, 0(%2)\n\t" \
"2:lbu\t $1, 1(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"3:lbu\t$1, 2(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"4:lbu\t$1, 3(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"5:lbu\t$1, 4(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"6:lbu\t$1, 5(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"7:lbu\t$1, 6(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"8:lbu\t$1, 7(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
".set\tpop\n\t" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t5b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t6b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t7b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t8b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreHW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tnoat\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_sb("%1", "1(%2)")"\n" \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"srl\t$1, %1, 0x8\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"2:\t"type##_sb("$1", "0(%2)")"\n" \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
".set\tat\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT));\
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_swl("%1", "(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_swr("%1", "3(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"1:\tsdl\t%1,(%2)\n" \
"2:\tsdr\t%1, 7(%2)\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:"type##_sb("%1", "3(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"srl\t$1, %1, 0x8\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"2:"type##_sb("$1", "2(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"srl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"3:"type##_sb("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"srl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"4:"type##_sb("$1", "0(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
".set\tpop\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (res) \
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "memory"); \
} while(0)
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Fix build error on big endian R6 kernels Commit eeb538950367 ("MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses") renamed the Load* and Store* defines in unaligned.c to _Load* and _Store* as part of its fix. One define was missed out which causes big endian R6 kernels to fail to build. arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:880:35: error: implicit declaration of function '_StoreDW' #define StoreDW(addr, value, res) _StoreDW(addr, value, res) ^ Signed-off-by: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Fixes: eeb538950367 ("MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses") Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10575/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-06-23 19:02:00 +08:00
#define _StoreDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
"1:sb\t%1, 7(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, %1, 0x8\n\t" \
"2:sb\t$1, 6(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"3:sb\t$1, 5(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"4:sb\t$1, 4(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"5:sb\t$1, 3(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"6:sb\t$1, 2(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"7:sb\t$1, 1(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"8:sb\t$1, 0(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
".set\tpop\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t5b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t6b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t7b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t8b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (res) \
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "memory"); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
#else /* __BIG_ENDIAN */
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadHW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ (".set\tnoat\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lb("%0", "1(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lbu("$1", "0(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\t.set\tat\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lwl("%0", "3(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lwr("%0", "(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
/* For CPUs without lwl instruction */
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:"type##_lb("%0", "3(%2)")"\n\t" \
"2:"type##_lbu("$1", "2(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"3:"type##_lbu("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"4:"type##_lbu("$1", "0(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
".set\tpop\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadHWU(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tnoat\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lbu("%0", "1(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lbu("$1", "0(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".set\tat\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadWU(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_lwl("%0", "3(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_lwr("%0", "(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"dsll\t%0, %0, 32\n\t" \
"dsrl\t%0, %0, 32\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
"\t.section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"1:\tldl\t%0, 7(%2)\n" \
"2:\tldr\t%0, (%2)\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
"\t.section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
/* For CPUs without lwl and ldl instructions */
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadWU(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:"type##_lbu("%0", "3(%2)")"\n\t" \
"2:"type##_lbu("$1", "2(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"3:"type##_lbu("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"4:"type##_lbu("$1", "0(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"sll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
".set\tpop\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _LoadDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
"1:lb\t%0, 7(%2)\n\t" \
"2:lbu\t$1, 6(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"3:lbu\t$1, 5(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"4:lbu\t$1, 4(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"5:lbu\t$1, 3(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"6:lbu\t$1, 2(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"7:lbu\t$1, 1(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"8:lbu\t$1, 0(%2)\n\t" \
"dsll\t%0, 0x8\n\t" \
"or\t%0, $1\n\t" \
"li\t%1, 0\n" \
".set\tpop\n\t" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%1, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t5b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t6b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t7b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t8b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (value), "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreHW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tnoat\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_sb("%1", "0(%2)")"\n" \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"srl\t$1,%1, 0x8\n" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"2:\t"type##_sb("$1", "1(%2)")"\n" \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
".set\tat\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT));\
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:\t"type##_swl("%1", "3(%2)")"\n" \
"2:\t"type##_swr("%1", "(%2)")"\n\t"\
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"1:\tsdl\t%1, 7(%2)\n" \
"2:\tsdr\t%1, (%2)\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"3:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"4:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t3b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 4b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 4b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=r" (res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT)); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#else /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
/* For CPUs without swl and sdl instructions */
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreW(addr, value, res, type) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"1:"type##_sb("%1", "0(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"srl\t$1, %1, 0x8\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"2:"type##_sb("$1", "1(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"srl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"3:"type##_sb("$1", "2(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
"srl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
"4:"type##_sb("$1", "3(%2)")"\n\t" \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
".set\tpop\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (res) \
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "memory"); \
} while(0)
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define _StoreDW(addr, value, res) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
do { \
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
".set\tpush\n\t" \
".set\tnoat\n\t" \
"1:sb\t%1, 0(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, %1, 0x8\n\t" \
"2:sb\t$1, 1(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"3:sb\t$1, 2(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"4:sb\t$1, 3(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"5:sb\t$1, 4(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"6:sb\t$1, 5(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"7:sb\t$1, 6(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
"8:sb\t$1, 7(%2)\n\t" \
"dsrl\t$1, $1, 0x8\n\t" \
".set\tpop\n\t" \
"li\t%0, 0\n" \
"10:\n\t" \
".insn\n\t" \
".section\t.fixup,\"ax\"\n\t" \
"11:\tli\t%0, %3\n\t" \
"j\t10b\n\t" \
".previous\n\t" \
".section\t__ex_table,\"a\"\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t1b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t2b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t3b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t4b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t5b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t6b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t7b, 11b\n\t" \
STR(PTR)"\t8b, 11b\n\t" \
".previous" \
: "=&r" (res) \
: "r" (value), "r" (addr), "i" (-EFAULT) \
MIPS: unaligned: Surround load/store macros in do {} while statements It's best to surround such complex macros with do {} while statements so they can appear as independent logical blocks when used within other control blocks. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9502/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:51 +08:00
: "memory"); \
} while(0)
MIPS: Add Kconfig variable for CPUs with unaligned load/store instructions MIPSR6 CPUs do not support unaligned load/store instructions (LWL, LWR, SWL, SWR and LDL, LDR, SDL, SDR for 64bit). Currently the MIPS tree has some special cases to avoid these instructions, and the code is testing for !CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6. This patch declares a new Kconfig variable: CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR. This variable indicates that the CPU supports these instructions. Then, the patch does the following: - Carefully selects this option on all CPUs except MIPSR6. - Switches all the special cases to test for the new variable, and inverts the logic: '#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6' turns into '#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR' and vice-versa. Also, when this variable is NOT selected (e.g. MIPSR6), CONFIG_GENERIC_CSUM will default to 'y', to compile generic C checksum code (instead of special assembly code that uses the unsupported instructions). This commit should not affect any existing CPU, and is required for future Lexra CPU support, that misses these instructions too. Signed-off-by: Yasha Cherikovsky <yasha.che3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/20808/ Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2018-09-26 19:16:15 +08:00
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LOAD_STORE_LR */
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
#endif
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
#define LoadHWU(addr, value, res) _LoadHWU(addr, value, res, kernel)
#define LoadHWUE(addr, value, res) _LoadHWU(addr, value, res, user)
#define LoadWU(addr, value, res) _LoadWU(addr, value, res, kernel)
#define LoadWUE(addr, value, res) _LoadWU(addr, value, res, user)
#define LoadHW(addr, value, res) _LoadHW(addr, value, res, kernel)
#define LoadHWE(addr, value, res) _LoadHW(addr, value, res, user)
#define LoadW(addr, value, res) _LoadW(addr, value, res, kernel)
#define LoadWE(addr, value, res) _LoadW(addr, value, res, user)
#define LoadDW(addr, value, res) _LoadDW(addr, value, res)
#define StoreHW(addr, value, res) _StoreHW(addr, value, res, kernel)
#define StoreHWE(addr, value, res) _StoreHW(addr, value, res, user)
#define StoreW(addr, value, res) _StoreW(addr, value, res, kernel)
#define StoreWE(addr, value, res) _StoreW(addr, value, res, user)
#define StoreDW(addr, value, res) _StoreDW(addr, value, res)
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
static void emulate_load_store_insn(struct pt_regs *regs,
void __user *addr, unsigned int __user *pc)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
{
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
unsigned long origpc, orig31, value;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
union mips_instruction insn;
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
unsigned int res;
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA Handle unaligned accesses when we access userspace memory EVA mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2013-12-13 00:15:15 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_EVA
mm_segment_t seg;
#endif
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
origpc = (unsigned long)pc;
orig31 = regs->regs[31];
perf: Remove the nmi parameter from the swevent and overflow interface The nmi parameter indicated if we could do wakeups from the current context, if not, we would set some state and self-IPI and let the resulting interrupt do the wakeup. For the various event classes: - hardware: nmi=0; PMI is in fact an NMI or we run irq_work_run from the PMI-tail (ARM etc.) - tracepoint: nmi=0; since tracepoint could be from NMI context. - software: nmi=[0,1]; some, like the schedule thing cannot perform wakeups, and hence need 0. As one can see, there is very little nmi=1 usage, and the down-side of not using it is that on some platforms some software events can have a jiffy delay in wakeup (when arch_irq_work_raise isn't implemented). The up-side however is that we can remove the nmi parameter and save a bunch of conditionals in fast paths. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-agjev8eu666tvknpb3iaj0fg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-06-27 20:41:57 +08:00
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, 0);
MIPS: add support for software performance events Software events are required as part of the measurable stuff by the Linux performance counter subsystem. Here is the list of events added by this patch: PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS Signed-off-by: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: paulus@samba.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: jamie.iles@picochip.com Acked-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1686/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2010-10-12 19:37:21 +08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* This load never faults.
*/
Sparseify MIPS. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2005-03-02 03:22:29 +08:00
__get_user(insn.word, pc);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
switch (insn.i_format.opcode) {
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
/*
* These are instructions that a compiler doesn't generate. We
* can assume therefore that the code is MIPS-aware and
* really buggy. Emulating these instructions would break the
* semantics anyway.
*/
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case ll_op:
case lld_op:
case sc_op:
case scd_op:
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
/*
* For these instructions the only way to create an address
* error is an attempted access to kernel/supervisor address
* space.
*/
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case ldl_op:
case ldr_op:
case lwl_op:
case lwr_op:
case sdl_op:
case sdr_op:
case swl_op:
case swr_op:
case lb_op:
case lbu_op:
case sb_op:
goto sigbus;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
/*
* The remaining opcodes are the ones that are really of
* interest.
*/
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA Handle unaligned accesses when we access userspace memory EVA mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2013-12-13 00:15:15 +08:00
case spec3_op:
MIPS: unaligned: Add DSP lwx & lhx missaligned access support Add handling of missaligned access for DSP load instructions lwx & lhx. Since DSP instructions share SPECIAL3 opcode with other non-DSP instructions, necessary logic was inserted for distinguishing between instructions with SPECIAL3 opcode. For that purpose, the instruction format for DSP instructions is added to arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/inst.h. Signed-off-by: Miodrag Dinic <miodrag.dinic@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@imgtech.com> Cc: James.Hogan@imgtec.com Cc: Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Cc: Raghu.Gandham@imgtec.com Cc: Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com Cc: Douglas.Leung@imgtec.com Cc: Petar.Jovanovic@imgtec.com Cc: Goran.Ferenc@imgtec.com Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16511/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-06-19 23:50:11 +08:00
if (insn.dsp_format.func == lx_op) {
switch (insn.dsp_format.op) {
case lwx_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.dsp_format.rd] = value;
break;
case lhx_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
LoadHW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.dsp_format.rd] = value;
break;
default:
goto sigill;
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA Handle unaligned accesses when we access userspace memory EVA mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2013-12-13 00:15:15 +08:00
}
MIPS: unaligned: Add DSP lwx & lhx missaligned access support Add handling of missaligned access for DSP load instructions lwx & lhx. Since DSP instructions share SPECIAL3 opcode with other non-DSP instructions, necessary logic was inserted for distinguishing between instructions with SPECIAL3 opcode. For that purpose, the instruction format for DSP instructions is added to arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/inst.h. Signed-off-by: Miodrag Dinic <miodrag.dinic@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@imgtech.com> Cc: James.Hogan@imgtec.com Cc: Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Cc: Raghu.Gandham@imgtec.com Cc: Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com Cc: Douglas.Leung@imgtec.com Cc: Petar.Jovanovic@imgtec.com Cc: Goran.Ferenc@imgtec.com Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16511/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-06-19 23:50:11 +08:00
}
#ifdef CONFIG_EVA
else {
/*
* we can land here only from kernel accessing user
* memory, so we need to "switch" the address limit to
* user space, so that address check can work properly.
*/
seg = get_fs();
set_fs(USER_DS);
switch (insn.spec3_format.func) {
case lhe_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2)) {
set_fs(seg);
goto sigbus;
}
LoadHWE(addr, value, res);
if (res) {
set_fs(seg);
goto fault;
}
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.spec3_format.rt] = value;
break;
case lwe_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4)) {
set_fs(seg);
goto sigbus;
}
MIPS: unaligned: Prevent EVA instructions on kernel unaligned accesses Commit c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") allowed unaligned accesses to be emulated for EVA. However, when emulating regular load/store unaligned accesses, we need to use the appropriate "address space" instructions for that. Previously, an unaligned load/store instruction in kernel space would have used the corresponding EVA instructions to emulate it which led to segmentation faults because of the address translation that happens with EVA instructions. This is now fixed by using the EVA instruction only when emulating EVA unaligned accesses. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9501/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:50 +08:00
LoadWE(addr, value, res);
MIPS: unaligned: Add DSP lwx & lhx missaligned access support Add handling of missaligned access for DSP load instructions lwx & lhx. Since DSP instructions share SPECIAL3 opcode with other non-DSP instructions, necessary logic was inserted for distinguishing between instructions with SPECIAL3 opcode. For that purpose, the instruction format for DSP instructions is added to arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/inst.h. Signed-off-by: Miodrag Dinic <miodrag.dinic@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@imgtech.com> Cc: James.Hogan@imgtec.com Cc: Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Cc: Raghu.Gandham@imgtec.com Cc: Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com Cc: Douglas.Leung@imgtec.com Cc: Petar.Jovanovic@imgtec.com Cc: Goran.Ferenc@imgtec.com Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16511/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-06-19 23:50:11 +08:00
if (res) {
set_fs(seg);
goto fault;
}
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.spec3_format.rt] = value;
break;
case lhue_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2)) {
set_fs(seg);
goto sigbus;
}
LoadHWUE(addr, value, res);
if (res) {
set_fs(seg);
goto fault;
}
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.spec3_format.rt] = value;
break;
case she_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 2)) {
set_fs(seg);
goto sigbus;
}
compute_return_epc(regs);
value = regs->regs[insn.spec3_format.rt];
StoreHWE(addr, value, res);
if (res) {
set_fs(seg);
goto fault;
}
break;
case swe_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4)) {
set_fs(seg);
goto sigbus;
}
compute_return_epc(regs);
value = regs->regs[insn.spec3_format.rt];
StoreWE(addr, value, res);
if (res) {
set_fs(seg);
goto fault;
}
break;
default:
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA Handle unaligned accesses when we access userspace memory EVA mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2013-12-13 00:15:15 +08:00
set_fs(seg);
MIPS: unaligned: Add DSP lwx & lhx missaligned access support Add handling of missaligned access for DSP load instructions lwx & lhx. Since DSP instructions share SPECIAL3 opcode with other non-DSP instructions, necessary logic was inserted for distinguishing between instructions with SPECIAL3 opcode. For that purpose, the instruction format for DSP instructions is added to arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/inst.h. Signed-off-by: Miodrag Dinic <miodrag.dinic@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@imgtech.com> Cc: James.Hogan@imgtec.com Cc: Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Cc: Raghu.Gandham@imgtec.com Cc: Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com Cc: Douglas.Leung@imgtec.com Cc: Petar.Jovanovic@imgtec.com Cc: Goran.Ferenc@imgtec.com Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16511/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-06-19 23:50:11 +08:00
goto sigill;
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA Handle unaligned accesses when we access userspace memory EVA mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2013-12-13 00:15:15 +08:00
}
set_fs(seg);
}
#endif
MIPS: unaligned: Add DSP lwx & lhx missaligned access support Add handling of missaligned access for DSP load instructions lwx & lhx. Since DSP instructions share SPECIAL3 opcode with other non-DSP instructions, necessary logic was inserted for distinguishing between instructions with SPECIAL3 opcode. For that purpose, the instruction format for DSP instructions is added to arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/inst.h. Signed-off-by: Miodrag Dinic <miodrag.dinic@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.markovic@imgtech.com> Cc: James.Hogan@imgtec.com Cc: Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Cc: Raghu.Gandham@imgtec.com Cc: Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com Cc: Douglas.Leung@imgtec.com Cc: Petar.Jovanovic@imgtec.com Cc: Goran.Ferenc@imgtec.com Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16511/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-06-19 23:50:11 +08:00
break;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case lh_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
tree-wide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() The use of config_enabled() against config options is ambiguous. In practical terms, config_enabled() is equivalent to IS_BUILTIN(), but the author might have used it for the meaning of IS_ENABLED(). Using IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN(), IS_MODULE() etc. makes the intention clearer. This commit replaces config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() where possible. This commit is only touching bool config options. I noticed two cases where config_enabled() is used against a tristate option: - config_enabled(CONFIG_HWMON) [ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/thermal.c ] - config_enabled(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE) [ drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c ] I did not touch them because they should be converted to IS_BUILTIN() in order to keep the logic, but I was not sure it was the authors' intention. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465215656-20569-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: Nikolay Martynov <mar.kolya@gmail.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Rafal Milecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com> Cc: Huaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-08-04 04:45:50 +08:00
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVA)) {
new helper: uaccess_kernel() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-21 09:08:07 +08:00
if (uaccess_kernel())
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
LoadHW(addr, value, res);
else
LoadHWE(addr, value, res);
} else {
LoadHW(addr, value, res);
}
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt] = value;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
break;
case lw_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
tree-wide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() The use of config_enabled() against config options is ambiguous. In practical terms, config_enabled() is equivalent to IS_BUILTIN(), but the author might have used it for the meaning of IS_ENABLED(). Using IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN(), IS_MODULE() etc. makes the intention clearer. This commit replaces config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() where possible. This commit is only touching bool config options. I noticed two cases where config_enabled() is used against a tristate option: - config_enabled(CONFIG_HWMON) [ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/thermal.c ] - config_enabled(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE) [ drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c ] I did not touch them because they should be converted to IS_BUILTIN() in order to keep the logic, but I was not sure it was the authors' intention. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465215656-20569-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: Nikolay Martynov <mar.kolya@gmail.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Rafal Milecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com> Cc: Huaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-08-04 04:45:50 +08:00
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVA)) {
new helper: uaccess_kernel() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-21 09:08:07 +08:00
if (uaccess_kernel())
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
LoadW(addr, value, res);
else
LoadWE(addr, value, res);
} else {
LoadW(addr, value, res);
}
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt] = value;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
break;
case lhu_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
tree-wide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() The use of config_enabled() against config options is ambiguous. In practical terms, config_enabled() is equivalent to IS_BUILTIN(), but the author might have used it for the meaning of IS_ENABLED(). Using IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN(), IS_MODULE() etc. makes the intention clearer. This commit replaces config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() where possible. This commit is only touching bool config options. I noticed two cases where config_enabled() is used against a tristate option: - config_enabled(CONFIG_HWMON) [ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/thermal.c ] - config_enabled(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE) [ drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c ] I did not touch them because they should be converted to IS_BUILTIN() in order to keep the logic, but I was not sure it was the authors' intention. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465215656-20569-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: Nikolay Martynov <mar.kolya@gmail.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Rafal Milecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com> Cc: Huaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-08-04 04:45:50 +08:00
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVA)) {
new helper: uaccess_kernel() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-21 09:08:07 +08:00
if (uaccess_kernel())
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
LoadHWU(addr, value, res);
else
LoadHWUE(addr, value, res);
} else {
LoadHWU(addr, value, res);
}
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt] = value;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
break;
case lwu_op:
[PATCH] mips: clean up 32/64-bit configuration Start cleaning 32-bit vs. 64-bit configuration. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-04 06:56:16 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
LoadWU(addr, value, res);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt] = value;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
break;
[PATCH] mips: clean up 32/64-bit configuration Start cleaning 32-bit vs. 64-bit configuration. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-04 06:56:16 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
case ld_op:
[PATCH] mips: clean up 32/64-bit configuration Start cleaning 32-bit vs. 64-bit configuration. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-04 06:56:16 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt] = value;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
break;
[PATCH] mips: clean up 32/64-bit configuration Start cleaning 32-bit vs. 64-bit configuration. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-04 06:56:16 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
case sh_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
value = regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt];
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
tree-wide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() The use of config_enabled() against config options is ambiguous. In practical terms, config_enabled() is equivalent to IS_BUILTIN(), but the author might have used it for the meaning of IS_ENABLED(). Using IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN(), IS_MODULE() etc. makes the intention clearer. This commit replaces config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() where possible. This commit is only touching bool config options. I noticed two cases where config_enabled() is used against a tristate option: - config_enabled(CONFIG_HWMON) [ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/thermal.c ] - config_enabled(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE) [ drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c ] I did not touch them because they should be converted to IS_BUILTIN() in order to keep the logic, but I was not sure it was the authors' intention. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465215656-20569-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: Nikolay Martynov <mar.kolya@gmail.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Rafal Milecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com> Cc: Huaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-08-04 04:45:50 +08:00
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVA)) {
new helper: uaccess_kernel() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-21 09:08:07 +08:00
if (uaccess_kernel())
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
StoreHW(addr, value, res);
else
StoreHWE(addr, value, res);
} else {
StoreHW(addr, value, res);
}
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
case sw_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
value = regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt];
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
tree-wide: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() The use of config_enabled() against config options is ambiguous. In practical terms, config_enabled() is equivalent to IS_BUILTIN(), but the author might have used it for the meaning of IS_ENABLED(). Using IS_ENABLED(), IS_BUILTIN(), IS_MODULE() etc. makes the intention clearer. This commit replaces config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() where possible. This commit is only touching bool config options. I noticed two cases where config_enabled() is used against a tristate option: - config_enabled(CONFIG_HWMON) [ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/thermal.c ] - config_enabled(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE) [ drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c ] I did not touch them because they should be converted to IS_BUILTIN() in order to keep the logic, but I was not sure it was the authors' intention. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465215656-20569-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> Cc: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> Cc: yu-cheng yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> Cc: Nikolay Martynov <mar.kolya@gmail.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Rafal Milecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alex Smith <alex.smith@imgtec.com> Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@iki.fi> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com> Cc: Huaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-08-04 04:45:50 +08:00
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVA)) {
new helper: uaccess_kernel() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2017-03-21 09:08:07 +08:00
if (uaccess_kernel())
MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction emulation for EVA When emulating a regular lh/lw/lhu/sh/sw we need to use the appropriate instruction if we are in EVA mode. This is necessary for userspace applications which trigger alignment exceptions. In such case, the userspace load/store instruction needs to be emulated with the correct eva/non-eva instruction by the kernel emulator. Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Fixes: c1771216ab48 ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Handle unaligned accesses for EVA") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9503/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-03-09 22:54:52 +08:00
StoreW(addr, value, res);
else
StoreWE(addr, value, res);
} else {
StoreW(addr, value, res);
}
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
case sd_op:
[PATCH] mips: clean up 32/64-bit configuration Start cleaning 32-bit vs. 64-bit configuration. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-04 06:56:16 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
compute_return_epc(regs);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
value = regs->regs[insn.i_format.rt];
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
[PATCH] mips: clean up 32/64-bit configuration Start cleaning 32-bit vs. 64-bit configuration. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-04 06:56:16 +08:00
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case lwc1_op:
case ldc1_op:
case swc1_op:
case sdc1_op:
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
case cop1x_op: {
void __user *fault_addr = NULL;
MIPS: microMIPS: Floating point support. Add logic needed to do floating point emulation in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven. Hill@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 01:09:02 +08:00
die_if_kernel("Unaligned FP access in kernel code", regs);
BUG_ON(!used_math());
res = fpu_emulator_cop1Handler(regs, &current->thread.fpu, 1,
&fault_addr);
own_fpu(1); /* Restore FPU state. */
/* Signal if something went wrong. */
MIPS: Set `si_code' for SIGFPE signals sent from emulation too Rework `process_fpemu_return' and move IEEE 754 exception interpretation there, from `do_fpe'. Record the cause bits set in FCSR before they are cleared and pass them through to `process_fpemu_return' so as to set `si_code' correctly too for SIGFPE signals sent from emulation rather than those issued by hardware with the FPE processor exception only. For simplicity `mipsr2_decoder' assumes `*fcr31' has been preinitialised and only sets it to anything if an FPU instruction has been emulated, which in turn is the only case SIGFPE can be issued for here. Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9705/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-04-04 06:27:15 +08:00
process_fpemu_return(res, fault_addr, 0);
MIPS: microMIPS: Floating point support. Add logic needed to do floating point emulation in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven. Hill@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 01:09:02 +08:00
if (res == 0)
break;
return;
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT */
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA
case msa_op: {
unsigned int wd, preempted;
enum msa_2b_fmt df;
union fpureg *fpr;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
MIPS: MSA unaligned memory access support The MSA architecture specification allows for hardware to not implement unaligned vector memory accesses in some or all cases. A typical example of this is the I6400 core which does not implement unaligned vector memory access when the memory crosses a page boundary. The architecture also requires that such memory accesses complete successfully as far as userland is concerned, so the kernel is required to emulate them. This patch implements support for emulating unaligned MSA ld & st instructions by copying between the user memory & the tasks FP context in struct thread_struct, updating hardware registers from there as appropriate in order to avoid saving & restoring the entire vector context for each unaligned memory access. Tested both using an I6400 CPU and with a QEMU build hacked to produce AdEL exceptions for unaligned vector memory accesses. [paul.burton@imgtec.com: - Remove #ifdef's - Move msa_op into enum major_op rather than #define - Replace msa_{to,from}_wd with {read,write}_msa_wr_{b,h,w,l} and the format-agnostic wrappers, removing the custom endian mangling for big endian systems. - Restructure the msa_op case in emulate_load_store_insn to share more code between the load & store cases. - Avoid the need for a temporary union fpureg on the stack by simply reusing the already suitably aligned context in struct thread_struct. - Use sizeof(*fpr) rather than hardcoding 16 as the size for user memory checks & copies. - Stop recalculating the address of the unaligned vector memory access and rely upon the value read from BadVAddr as we do for other unaligned memory access instructions. - Drop the now unused val8 & val16 fields in union fpureg. - Rewrite commit message. - General formatting cleanups.] Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jie Chen <chenj@lemote.com> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10573/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-06-22 19:21:00 +08:00
if (!cpu_has_msa)
goto sigill;
/*
* If we've reached this point then userland should have taken
* the MSA disabled exception & initialised vector context at
* some point in the past.
*/
BUG_ON(!thread_msa_context_live());
df = insn.msa_mi10_format.df;
wd = insn.msa_mi10_format.wd;
fpr = &current->thread.fpu.fpr[wd];
switch (insn.msa_mi10_format.func) {
case msa_ld_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, sizeof(*fpr)))
goto sigbus;
MIPS: Fix MSA ld unaligned failure cases Copying the content of an MSA vector from user memory may involve TLB faults & mapping in pages. This will fail when preemption is disabled due to an inability to acquire mmap_sem from do_page_fault, which meant such vector loads to unmapped pages would always fail to be emulated. Fix this by disabling preemption later only around the updating of vector register state. This change does however introduce a race between performing the load into thread context & the thread being preempted, saving its current live context & clobbering the loaded value. This should be a rare occureence, so optimise for the fast path by simply repeating the load if we are preempted. Additionally if the copy failed then the failure path was taken with preemption left disabled, leading to the kernel typically encountering further issues around sleeping whilst atomic. The change to where preemption is disabled avoids this issue. Fixes: e4aa1f153add "MIPS: MSA unaligned memory access support" Reported-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: James Cowgill <James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.3 Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/12345/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2016-02-03 11:35:49 +08:00
do {
/*
* If we have live MSA context keep track of
* whether we get preempted in order to avoid
* the register context we load being clobbered
* by the live context as it's saved during
* preemption. If we don't have live context
* then it can't be saved to clobber the value
* we load.
*/
preempted = test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDMSA);
res = __copy_from_user_inatomic(fpr, addr,
sizeof(*fpr));
if (res)
goto fault;
/*
* Update the hardware register if it is in use
* by the task in this quantum, in order to
* avoid having to save & restore the whole
* vector context.
*/
preempt_disable();
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDMSA)) {
write_msa_wr(wd, fpr, df);
preempted = 0;
}
preempt_enable();
} while (preempted);
MIPS: MSA unaligned memory access support The MSA architecture specification allows for hardware to not implement unaligned vector memory accesses in some or all cases. A typical example of this is the I6400 core which does not implement unaligned vector memory access when the memory crosses a page boundary. The architecture also requires that such memory accesses complete successfully as far as userland is concerned, so the kernel is required to emulate them. This patch implements support for emulating unaligned MSA ld & st instructions by copying between the user memory & the tasks FP context in struct thread_struct, updating hardware registers from there as appropriate in order to avoid saving & restoring the entire vector context for each unaligned memory access. Tested both using an I6400 CPU and with a QEMU build hacked to produce AdEL exceptions for unaligned vector memory accesses. [paul.burton@imgtec.com: - Remove #ifdef's - Move msa_op into enum major_op rather than #define - Replace msa_{to,from}_wd with {read,write}_msa_wr_{b,h,w,l} and the format-agnostic wrappers, removing the custom endian mangling for big endian systems. - Restructure the msa_op case in emulate_load_store_insn to share more code between the load & store cases. - Avoid the need for a temporary union fpureg on the stack by simply reusing the already suitably aligned context in struct thread_struct. - Use sizeof(*fpr) rather than hardcoding 16 as the size for user memory checks & copies. - Stop recalculating the address of the unaligned vector memory access and rely upon the value read from BadVAddr as we do for other unaligned memory access instructions. - Drop the now unused val8 & val16 fields in union fpureg. - Rewrite commit message. - General formatting cleanups.] Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jie Chen <chenj@lemote.com> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10573/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-06-22 19:21:00 +08:00
break;
case msa_st_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, sizeof(*fpr)))
goto sigbus;
/*
* Update from the hardware register if it is in use by
* the task in this quantum, in order to avoid having to
* save & restore the whole vector context.
*/
preempt_disable();
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDMSA))
read_msa_wr(wd, fpr, df);
preempt_enable();
res = __copy_to_user_inatomic(addr, fpr, sizeof(*fpr));
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
default:
goto sigbus;
}
compute_return_epc(regs);
break;
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
}
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA */
MIPS: MSA unaligned memory access support The MSA architecture specification allows for hardware to not implement unaligned vector memory accesses in some or all cases. A typical example of this is the I6400 core which does not implement unaligned vector memory access when the memory crosses a page boundary. The architecture also requires that such memory accesses complete successfully as far as userland is concerned, so the kernel is required to emulate them. This patch implements support for emulating unaligned MSA ld & st instructions by copying between the user memory & the tasks FP context in struct thread_struct, updating hardware registers from there as appropriate in order to avoid saving & restoring the entire vector context for each unaligned memory access. Tested both using an I6400 CPU and with a QEMU build hacked to produce AdEL exceptions for unaligned vector memory accesses. [paul.burton@imgtec.com: - Remove #ifdef's - Move msa_op into enum major_op rather than #define - Replace msa_{to,from}_wd with {read,write}_msa_wr_{b,h,w,l} and the format-agnostic wrappers, removing the custom endian mangling for big endian systems. - Restructure the msa_op case in emulate_load_store_insn to share more code between the load & store cases. - Avoid the need for a temporary union fpureg on the stack by simply reusing the already suitably aligned context in struct thread_struct. - Use sizeof(*fpr) rather than hardcoding 16 as the size for user memory checks & copies. - Stop recalculating the address of the unaligned vector memory access and rely upon the value read from BadVAddr as we do for other unaligned memory access instructions. - Drop the now unused val8 & val16 fields in union fpureg. - Rewrite commit message. - General formatting cleanups.] Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com> Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jie Chen <chenj@lemote.com> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10573/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-06-22 19:21:00 +08:00
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
/*
* COP2 is available to implementor for application specific use.
* It's up to applications to register a notifier chain and do
* whatever they have to do, including possible sending of signals.
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
*
* This instruction has been reallocated in Release 6
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
*/
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case lwc2_op:
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
cu2_notifier_call_chain(CU2_LWC2_OP, regs);
break;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case ldc2_op:
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
cu2_notifier_call_chain(CU2_LDC2_OP, regs);
break;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case swc2_op:
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
cu2_notifier_call_chain(CU2_SWC2_OP, regs);
break;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
case sdc2_op:
MIPS: Modularize COP2 handling Away with the daemons of ifdef; get ready for future COP2 users. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/708/
2009-11-24 09:24:58 +08:00
cu2_notifier_call_chain(CU2_SDC2_OP, regs);
break;
MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6 The load/store unaligned instructions have been removed in MIPS R6 so we need to re-implement the related macros using the regular load/store instructions. Moreover, the load/store from coprocessor 2 instructions have been reallocated in Release 6 so we will handle them in the emulator instead. Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
2014-10-28 18:42:23 +08:00
#endif
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
default:
/*
* Pheeee... We encountered an yet unknown instruction or
* cache coherence problem. Die sucker, die ...
*/
goto sigill;
}
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
unaligned_instructions++;
#endif
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
return;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
fault:
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
/* roll back jump/branch */
regs->cp0_epc = origpc;
regs->regs[31] = orig31;
/* Did we have an exception handler installed? */
if (fixup_exception(regs))
return;
die_if_kernel("Unhandled kernel unaligned access", regs);
force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
return;
sigbus:
die_if_kernel("Unhandled kernel unaligned access", regs);
force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
return;
sigill:
die_if_kernel
("Unhandled kernel unaligned access or invalid instruction", regs);
force_sig(SIGILL, current);
}
/* Recode table from 16-bit register notation to 32-bit GPR. */
const int reg16to32[] = { 16, 17, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
/* Recode table from 16-bit STORE register notation to 32-bit GPR. */
MIPS: Declare various variables & functions static We currently have various variables & functions which are only used within a single translation unit, but which we don't declare static. This causes various sparse warnings of the form: arch/mips/kernel/mips-r2-to-r6-emul.c:49:1: warning: symbol 'mipsr2emustats' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:1381:11: warning: symbol 'reg16to32st' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/mips/mm/mmap.c:146:15: warning: symbol 'arch_mmap_rnd' was not declared. Should it be static? Fix these & others by declaring various affected variables & functions static, avoiding the sparse warnings & redundant symbols. [ralf@linux-mips.org: Add Marcin's build fix.] Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: trivial@kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17176/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-08-24 02:17:54 +08:00
static const int reg16to32st[] = { 0, 17, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
MIPS: Declare emulate_load_store_microMIPS as a static function. It is only used from within a single file, it should not be globally visible. Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Acked-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5325/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-05-25 04:54:08 +08:00
static void emulate_load_store_microMIPS(struct pt_regs *regs,
void __user *addr)
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
{
unsigned long value;
unsigned int res;
int i;
unsigned int reg = 0, rvar;
unsigned long orig31;
u16 __user *pc16;
u16 halfword;
unsigned int word;
unsigned long origpc, contpc;
union mips_instruction insn;
struct mm_decoded_insn mminsn;
origpc = regs->cp0_epc;
orig31 = regs->regs[31];
mminsn.micro_mips_mode = 1;
/*
* This load never faults.
*/
pc16 = (unsigned short __user *)msk_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc);
__get_user(halfword, pc16);
pc16++;
contpc = regs->cp0_epc + 2;
word = ((unsigned int)halfword << 16);
mminsn.pc_inc = 2;
if (!mm_insn_16bit(halfword)) {
__get_user(halfword, pc16);
pc16++;
contpc = regs->cp0_epc + 4;
mminsn.pc_inc = 4;
word |= halfword;
}
mminsn.insn = word;
if (get_user(halfword, pc16))
goto fault;
mminsn.next_pc_inc = 2;
word = ((unsigned int)halfword << 16);
if (!mm_insn_16bit(halfword)) {
pc16++;
if (get_user(halfword, pc16))
goto fault;
mminsn.next_pc_inc = 4;
word |= halfword;
}
mminsn.next_insn = word;
insn = (union mips_instruction)(mminsn.insn);
if (mm_isBranchInstr(regs, mminsn, &contpc))
insn = (union mips_instruction)(mminsn.next_insn);
/* Parse instruction to find what to do */
switch (insn.mm_i_format.opcode) {
case mm_pool32a_op:
switch (insn.mm_x_format.func) {
case mm_lwxs_op:
reg = insn.mm_x_format.rd;
goto loadW;
}
goto sigbus;
case mm_pool32b_op:
switch (insn.mm_m_format.func) {
case mm_lwp_func:
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
if (reg == 31)
goto sigbus;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
addr += 4;
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg + 1] = value;
goto success;
case mm_swp_func:
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
if (reg == 31)
goto sigbus;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
value = regs->regs[reg + 1];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
goto success;
case mm_ldp_func:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
if (reg == 31)
goto sigbus;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 16))
goto sigbus;
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
addr += 8;
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg + 1] = value;
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
goto sigill;
case mm_sdp_func:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
if (reg == 31)
goto sigbus;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 16))
goto sigbus;
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 8;
value = regs->regs[reg + 1];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
goto sigill;
case mm_lwm32_func:
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
rvar = reg & 0xf;
if ((rvar > 9) || !reg)
goto sigill;
if (reg & 0x10) {
if (!access_ok
(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4 * (rvar + 1)))
goto sigbus;
} else {
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4 * rvar))
goto sigbus;
}
if (rvar == 9)
rvar = 8;
for (i = 16; rvar; rvar--, i++) {
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
regs->regs[i] = value;
}
if ((reg & 0xf) == 9) {
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
regs->regs[30] = value;
}
if (reg & 0x10) {
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[31] = value;
}
goto success;
case mm_swm32_func:
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
rvar = reg & 0xf;
if ((rvar > 9) || !reg)
goto sigill;
if (reg & 0x10) {
if (!access_ok
(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4 * (rvar + 1)))
goto sigbus;
} else {
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4 * rvar))
goto sigbus;
}
if (rvar == 9)
rvar = 8;
for (i = 16; rvar; rvar--, i++) {
value = regs->regs[i];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
}
if ((reg & 0xf) == 9) {
value = regs->regs[30];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
}
if (reg & 0x10) {
value = regs->regs[31];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
}
goto success;
case mm_ldm_func:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
rvar = reg & 0xf;
if ((rvar > 9) || !reg)
goto sigill;
if (reg & 0x10) {
if (!access_ok
(VERIFY_READ, addr, 8 * (rvar + 1)))
goto sigbus;
} else {
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 8 * rvar))
goto sigbus;
}
if (rvar == 9)
rvar = 8;
for (i = 16; rvar; rvar--, i++) {
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
regs->regs[i] = value;
}
if ((reg & 0xf) == 9) {
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 8;
regs->regs[30] = value;
}
if (reg & 0x10) {
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[31] = value;
}
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
goto sigill;
case mm_sdm_func:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
rvar = reg & 0xf;
if ((rvar > 9) || !reg)
goto sigill;
if (reg & 0x10) {
if (!access_ok
(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 8 * (rvar + 1)))
goto sigbus;
} else {
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 8 * rvar))
goto sigbus;
}
if (rvar == 9)
rvar = 8;
for (i = 16; rvar; rvar--, i++) {
value = regs->regs[i];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 8;
}
if ((reg & 0xf) == 9) {
value = regs->regs[30];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 8;
}
if (reg & 0x10) {
value = regs->regs[31];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
}
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
goto sigill;
/* LWC2, SWC2, LDC2, SDC2 are not serviced */
}
goto sigbus;
case mm_pool32c_op:
switch (insn.mm_m_format.func) {
case mm_lwu_func:
reg = insn.mm_m_format.rd;
goto loadWU;
}
/* LL,SC,LLD,SCD are not serviced */
goto sigbus;
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
case mm_pool32f_op:
switch (insn.mm_x_format.func) {
case mm_lwxc1_func:
case mm_swxc1_func:
case mm_ldxc1_func:
case mm_sdxc1_func:
goto fpu_emul;
}
goto sigbus;
case mm_ldc132_op:
case mm_sdc132_op:
case mm_lwc132_op:
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
case mm_swc132_op: {
void __user *fault_addr = NULL;
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
fpu_emul:
/* roll back jump/branch */
regs->cp0_epc = origpc;
regs->regs[31] = orig31;
die_if_kernel("Unaligned FP access in kernel code", regs);
BUG_ON(!used_math());
BUG_ON(!is_fpu_owner());
res = fpu_emulator_cop1Handler(regs, &current->thread.fpu, 1,
&fault_addr);
own_fpu(1); /* restore FPU state */
/* If something went wrong, signal */
MIPS: Set `si_code' for SIGFPE signals sent from emulation too Rework `process_fpemu_return' and move IEEE 754 exception interpretation there, from `do_fpe'. Record the cause bits set in FCSR before they are cleared and pass them through to `process_fpemu_return' so as to set `si_code' correctly too for SIGFPE signals sent from emulation rather than those issued by hardware with the FPE processor exception only. For simplicity `mipsr2_decoder' assumes `*fcr31' has been preinitialised and only sets it to anything if an FPU instruction has been emulated, which in turn is the only case SIGFPE can be issued for here. Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/9705/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-04-04 06:27:15 +08:00
process_fpemu_return(res, fault_addr, 0);
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
if (res == 0)
goto success;
return;
MIPS: unaligned: Remove FP & MSA code when unsupported When CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n we don't support floating point, so remove support for floating point instructions from emulate_load_store_insn() & emulate_load_store_microMIPS(). This code should not be needed & relies upon access to FPU state in struct task_struct which will later be removed. Similarly & for the same reasons, when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_MSA=n remove support for MSA instructions. Since MSA support depends upon FP support this is implied when CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT=n. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/21020/ Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
2018-11-08 07:14:07 +08:00
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_FP_SUPPORT */
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
case mm_lh32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto loadHW;
case mm_lhu32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto loadHWU;
case mm_lw32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto loadW;
case mm_sh32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto storeHW;
case mm_sw32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto storeW;
case mm_ld32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto loadDW;
case mm_sd32_op:
reg = insn.mm_i_format.rt;
goto storeDW;
case mm_pool16c_op:
switch (insn.mm16_m_format.func) {
case mm_lwm16_op:
reg = insn.mm16_m_format.rlist;
rvar = reg + 1;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4 * rvar))
goto sigbus;
for (i = 16; rvar; rvar--, i++) {
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
regs->regs[i] = value;
}
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[31] = value;
goto success;
case mm_swm16_op:
reg = insn.mm16_m_format.rlist;
rvar = reg + 1;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4 * rvar))
goto sigbus;
for (i = 16; rvar; rvar--, i++) {
value = regs->regs[i];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
addr += 4;
}
value = regs->regs[31];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
goto success;
}
goto sigbus;
case mm_lhu16_op:
reg = reg16to32[insn.mm16_rb_format.rt];
goto loadHWU;
case mm_lw16_op:
reg = reg16to32[insn.mm16_rb_format.rt];
goto loadW;
case mm_sh16_op:
reg = reg16to32st[insn.mm16_rb_format.rt];
goto storeHW;
case mm_sw16_op:
reg = reg16to32st[insn.mm16_rb_format.rt];
goto storeW;
case mm_lwsp16_op:
reg = insn.mm16_r5_format.rt;
goto loadW;
case mm_swsp16_op:
reg = insn.mm16_r5_format.rt;
goto storeW;
case mm_lwgp16_op:
reg = reg16to32[insn.mm16_r3_format.rt];
goto loadW;
default:
goto sigill;
}
loadHW:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
LoadHW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
goto success;
loadHWU:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
LoadHWU(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
goto success;
loadW:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
goto success;
loadWU:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
LoadWU(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
loadDW:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
regs->regs[reg] = value;
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
storeHW:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreHW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
goto success;
storeW:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
goto success;
storeDW:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
goto success;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
success:
regs->cp0_epc = contpc; /* advance or branch */
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
unaligned_instructions++;
#endif
return;
fault:
/* roll back jump/branch */
regs->cp0_epc = origpc;
regs->regs[31] = orig31;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/* Did we have an exception handler installed? */
if (fixup_exception(regs))
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
return;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
[MIPS] Fix "no space between function name and open parenthesis" warnings. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-10-12 06:46:15 +08:00
die_if_kernel("Unhandled kernel unaligned access", regs);
MIPS: Use force_sig when handling address errors. When init is started it is SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE. If it were to get an address error, we would try to send it SIGBUS, but it would be ignored and the faulting instruction restarted. This results in an endless loop. We need to use force_sig() instead so it will actually die and give us some useful information. Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2009-05-06 03:49:47 +08:00
force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
return;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
sigbus:
die_if_kernel("Unhandled kernel unaligned access", regs);
MIPS: Use force_sig when handling address errors. When init is started it is SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE. If it were to get an address error, we would try to send it SIGBUS, but it would be ignored and the faulting instruction restarted. This results in an endless loop. We need to use force_sig() instead so it will actually die and give us some useful information. Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2009-05-06 03:49:47 +08:00
force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
return;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
sigill:
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
die_if_kernel
("Unhandled kernel unaligned access or invalid instruction", regs);
MIPS: Use force_sig when handling address errors. When init is started it is SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE. If it were to get an address error, we would try to send it SIGBUS, but it would be ignored and the faulting instruction restarted. This results in an endless loop. We need to use force_sig() instead so it will actually die and give us some useful information. Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2009-05-06 03:49:47 +08:00
force_sig(SIGILL, current);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
}
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
static void emulate_load_store_MIPS16e(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user * addr)
{
unsigned long value;
unsigned int res;
int reg;
unsigned long orig31;
u16 __user *pc16;
unsigned long origpc;
union mips16e_instruction mips16inst, oldinst;
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
unsigned int opcode;
int extended = 0;
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
origpc = regs->cp0_epc;
orig31 = regs->regs[31];
pc16 = (unsigned short __user *)msk_isa16_mode(origpc);
/*
* This load never faults.
*/
__get_user(mips16inst.full, pc16);
oldinst = mips16inst;
/* skip EXTEND instruction */
if (mips16inst.ri.opcode == MIPS16e_extend_op) {
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
extended = 1;
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
pc16++;
__get_user(mips16inst.full, pc16);
} else if (delay_slot(regs)) {
/* skip jump instructions */
/* JAL/JALX are 32 bits but have OPCODE in first short int */
if (mips16inst.ri.opcode == MIPS16e_jal_op)
pc16++;
pc16++;
if (get_user(mips16inst.full, pc16))
goto sigbus;
}
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
opcode = mips16inst.ri.opcode;
switch (opcode) {
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
case MIPS16e_i64_op: /* I64 or RI64 instruction */
switch (mips16inst.i64.func) { /* I64/RI64 func field check */
case MIPS16e_ldpc_func:
case MIPS16e_ldsp_func:
reg = reg16to32[mips16inst.ri64.ry];
goto loadDW;
case MIPS16e_sdsp_func:
reg = reg16to32[mips16inst.ri64.ry];
goto writeDW;
case MIPS16e_sdrasp_func:
reg = 29; /* GPRSP */
goto writeDW;
}
goto sigbus;
case MIPS16e_swsp_op:
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
reg = reg16to32[mips16inst.ri.rx];
if (extended && cpu_has_mips16e2)
switch (mips16inst.ri.imm >> 5) {
case 0: /* SWSP */
case 1: /* SWGP */
break;
case 2: /* SHGP */
opcode = MIPS16e_sh_op;
break;
default:
goto sigbus;
}
break;
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
case MIPS16e_lwpc_op:
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
reg = reg16to32[mips16inst.ri.rx];
break;
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
case MIPS16e_lwsp_op:
reg = reg16to32[mips16inst.ri.rx];
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
if (extended && cpu_has_mips16e2)
switch (mips16inst.ri.imm >> 5) {
case 0: /* LWSP */
case 1: /* LWGP */
break;
case 2: /* LHGP */
opcode = MIPS16e_lh_op;
break;
case 4: /* LHUGP */
opcode = MIPS16e_lhu_op;
break;
default:
goto sigbus;
}
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
break;
case MIPS16e_i8_op:
if (mips16inst.i8.func != MIPS16e_swrasp_func)
goto sigbus;
reg = 29; /* GPRSP */
break;
default:
reg = reg16to32[mips16inst.rri.ry];
break;
}
MIPS: MIPS16e2: Subdecode extended LWSP/SWSP instructions Implement extended LWSP/SWSP instruction subdecoding for the purpose of unaligned GP-relative memory access emulation. With the introduction of the MIPS16e2 ASE[1] the previously must-be-zero 3-bit field at bits 7..5 of the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes has become a `sel' field, acting as an opcode extension for additional operations. In both cases the `sel' value of 0 has retained the original operation, that is: LW rx, offset(sp) and: SW rx, offset(sp) for LWSP and SWSP respectively. In hardware predating the MIPS16e2 ASE other values may or may not have been decoded, architecturally yielding unpredictable results, and in our unaligned memory access emulation we have treated the 3-bit field as a don't-care, that is effectively making all the possible encodings of the field alias to the architecturally defined encoding of 0. For the non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has in particular defined these GP-relative operations: LW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 LH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 LHU rx, offset(gp) # sel = 4 and SW rx, offset(gp) # sel = 1 SH rx, offset(gp) # sel = 2 for LWSP and SWSP respectively, which will trap with an Address Error exception if the effective address calculated is not naturally-aligned for the operation requested. These operations have been selected for unaligned access emulation, for consistency with the corresponding regular MIPS and microMIPS operations. For other non-zero values of the `sel' field the MIPS16e2 ASE has defined further operations, which however either never trap with an Address Error exception, such as LWL or GP-relative SB, or are not supposed to be emulated, such as LL or SC. These operations have been selected to exclude from unaligned access emulation, should an Address Error exception ever happen with them. Subdecode the `sel' field in unaligned access emulation then for the extended encodings of the instructions selected with the LWSP and SWSP major opcodes, whenever support for the MIPS16e2 ASE has been detected in hardware, and either emulate the operation requested or send SIGBUS to the originating process, according to the selection described above. For hardware implementing the MIPS16 ASE, however lacking MIPS16e2 ASE support retain the original interpretation of the `sel' field. The effects of this change are illustrated with the following user program: $ cat mips16e2-test.c #include <inttypes.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int64_t scratch[16] = { 0 }; int32_t *tmp0, *tmp1, *tmp2; int i; scratch[0] = 0xc8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1; scratch[1] = 0xd0cfcecdcccbcac9; asm volatile( "move %0, $sp\n\t" "move %1, $gp\n\t" "move $sp, %4\n\t" "addiu %2, %4, 8\n\t" "move $gp, %2\n\t" "lw %2, 2($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 16(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 2($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 24(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 1($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 32(%4)\n\t" "lh %2, 1($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 40(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 3($sp)\n\t" "sw %2, 48(%4)\n\t" "lhu %2, 3($gp)\n\t" "sw %2, 56(%4)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 66($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 82($gp)\n\t" "lw %2, 0(%4)\n\t" "sw %2, 97($sp)\n\t" "lw %2, 8(%4)\n\t" "sh %2, 113($gp)\n\t" "move $gp, %1\n\t" "move $sp, %0" : "=&d" (tmp0), "=&d" (tmp1), "=&d" (tmp2), "=m" (scratch) : "d" (scratch)); for (i = 0; i < sizeof(scratch) / sizeof(*scratch); i += 2) printf("%016" PRIx64 "\t%016" PRIx64 "\n", scratch[i], scratch[i + 1]); return 0; } $ to be compiled with: $ gcc -mips16 -mips32r2 -Wa,-mmips16e2 -o mips16e2-test mips16e2-test.c $ With 74Kf hardware, which does not implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, this program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000c7c6c5c4 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 0000000000000000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 0000000000000000 $ regardless of whether the change has been applied or not. With the change not applied and interAptive MR2 hardware[2], which does implement the MIPS16e2 ASE, it produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000cdcccbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 00000000cfcecdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000cccbcac900 $ which shows that for GP-relative operations the correct trapping address calculated from $gp has been obtained from the CP0 BadVAddr register and so has data from the source operand, however masking and extension has not been applied for halfword operations. With the change applied and interAptive MR2 hardware the program produces the following output: $ ./mips16e2-test c8c7c6c5c4c3c2c1 d0cfcecdcccbcac9 00000000c6c5c4c3 00000000cecdcccb 00000000c5c4c3c2 00000000ffffcbca 00000000c7c6c5c4 000000000000cdcc 0000c4c3c2c10000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000cccbcac90000 000000c4c3c2c100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000cac900 $ as expected. References: [1] "MIPS32 Architecture for Programmers: MIPS16e2 Application-Specific Extension Technical Reference Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD01172, Revision 01.00, April 26, 2016 [2] "MIPS32 interAptiv Multiprocessing System Software User's Manual", Imagination Technologies Ltd., Document Number: MD00904, Revision 02.01, June 15, 2016, Chapter 24 "MIPS16e Application-Specific Extension to the MIPS32 Instruction Set", pp. 871-883 Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16095/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2017-05-23 20:38:19 +08:00
switch (opcode) {
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
case MIPS16e_lb_op:
case MIPS16e_lbu_op:
case MIPS16e_sb_op:
goto sigbus;
case MIPS16e_lh_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
LoadHW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
regs->regs[reg] = value;
break;
case MIPS16e_lhu_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
LoadHWU(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
regs->regs[reg] = value;
break;
case MIPS16e_lw_op:
case MIPS16e_lwpc_op:
case MIPS16e_lwsp_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
LoadW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
regs->regs[reg] = value;
break;
case MIPS16e_lwu_op:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
LoadWU(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
regs->regs[reg] = value;
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
case MIPS16e_ld_op:
loadDW:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
LoadDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
regs->regs[reg] = value;
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
case MIPS16e_sh_op:
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 2))
goto sigbus;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreHW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
case MIPS16e_sw_op:
case MIPS16e_swsp_op:
case MIPS16e_i8_op: /* actually - MIPS16e_swrasp_func */
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 4))
goto sigbus;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
case MIPS16e_sd_op:
writeDW:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
/*
* A 32-bit kernel might be running on a 64-bit processor. But
* if we're on a 32-bit processor and an i-cache incoherency
* or race makes us see a 64-bit instruction here the sdl/sdr
* would blow up, so for now we don't handle unaligned 64-bit
* instructions on 32-bit kernels.
*/
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, addr, 8))
goto sigbus;
MIPS16e_compute_return_epc(regs, &oldinst);
value = regs->regs[reg];
StoreDW(addr, value, res);
if (res)
goto fault;
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
/* Cannot handle 64-bit instructions in 32-bit kernel */
goto sigill;
default:
/*
* Pheeee... We encountered an yet unknown instruction or
* cache coherence problem. Die sucker, die ...
*/
goto sigill;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
unaligned_instructions++;
#endif
return;
fault:
/* roll back jump/branch */
regs->cp0_epc = origpc;
regs->regs[31] = orig31;
/* Did we have an exception handler installed? */
if (fixup_exception(regs))
return;
die_if_kernel("Unhandled kernel unaligned access", regs);
force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
return;
sigbus:
die_if_kernel("Unhandled kernel unaligned access", regs);
force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
return;
sigill:
die_if_kernel
("Unhandled kernel unaligned access or invalid instruction", regs);
force_sig(SIGILL, current);
}
MIPS: Cleanup indentation and whitespace Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5536/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-06-21 18:10:46 +08:00
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
asmlinkage void do_ade(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
MIPS: Implement HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING. This enables support for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-05-29 07:07:19 +08:00
enum ctx_state prev_state;
Sparseify MIPS. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2005-03-02 03:22:29 +08:00
unsigned int __user *pc;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
mm_segment_t seg;
MIPS: Implement HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING. This enables support for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-05-29 07:07:19 +08:00
prev_state = exception_enter();
MIPS: add support for software performance events Software events are required as part of the measurable stuff by the Linux performance counter subsystem. Here is the list of events added by this patch: PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS Signed-off-by: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: paulus@samba.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: jamie.iles@picochip.com Acked-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org> Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1686/ Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2010-10-12 19:37:21 +08:00
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS,
perf: Remove the nmi parameter from the swevent and overflow interface The nmi parameter indicated if we could do wakeups from the current context, if not, we would set some state and self-IPI and let the resulting interrupt do the wakeup. For the various event classes: - hardware: nmi=0; PMI is in fact an NMI or we run irq_work_run from the PMI-tail (ARM etc.) - tracepoint: nmi=0; since tracepoint could be from NMI context. - software: nmi=[0,1]; some, like the schedule thing cannot perform wakeups, and hence need 0. As one can see, there is very little nmi=1 usage, and the down-side of not using it is that on some platforms some software events can have a jiffy delay in wakeup (when arch_irq_work_raise isn't implemented). The up-side however is that we can remove the nmi parameter and save a bunch of conditionals in fast paths. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-agjev8eu666tvknpb3iaj0fg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-06-27 20:41:57 +08:00
1, regs, regs->cp0_badvaddr);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* Did we catch a fault trying to load an instruction?
*/
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
if (regs->cp0_badvaddr == regs->cp0_epc)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
goto sigbus;
[MIPS] Fixup secure computing stuff. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-25 23:19:33 +08:00
if (user_mode(regs) && !test_thread_flag(TIF_FIXADE))
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
goto sigbus;
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
if (unaligned_action == UNALIGNED_ACTION_SIGNAL)
goto sigbus;
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
/*
* Do branch emulation only if we didn't forward the exception.
* This is all so but ugly ...
*/
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
/*
* Are we running in microMIPS mode?
*/
if (get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc)) {
/*
* Did we catch a fault trying to load an instruction in
* 16-bit mode?
*/
if (regs->cp0_badvaddr == msk_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc))
goto sigbus;
if (unaligned_action == UNALIGNED_ACTION_SHOW)
show_registers(regs);
if (cpu_has_mmips) {
seg = get_fs();
if (!user_mode(regs))
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
emulate_load_store_microMIPS(regs,
(void __user *)regs->cp0_badvaddr);
set_fs(seg);
return;
}
MIPS: MIPS16e: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in MIPS16e mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:46:15 +08:00
if (cpu_has_mips16) {
seg = get_fs();
if (!user_mode(regs))
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
emulate_load_store_MIPS16e(regs,
(void __user *)regs->cp0_badvaddr);
set_fs(seg);
return;
}
MIPS: microMIPS: Add unaligned access support. Add logic needed to handle unaligned accesses in microMIPS mode. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
2013-03-26 02:18:07 +08:00
goto sigbus;
}
if (unaligned_action == UNALIGNED_ACTION_SHOW)
show_registers(regs);
pc = (unsigned int __user *)exception_epc(regs);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
seg = get_fs();
if (!user_mode(regs))
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
[MIPS] Fix build warning in unaligned load/store emulator. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-07-29 16:16:19 +08:00
emulate_load_store_insn(regs, (void __user *)regs->cp0_badvaddr, pc);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
set_fs(seg);
return;
sigbus:
die_if_kernel("Kernel unaligned instruction access", regs);
force_sig(SIGBUS, current);
/*
* XXX On return from the signal handler we should advance the epc
*/
MIPS: Implement HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING. This enables support for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2013-05-29 07:07:19 +08:00
exception_exit(prev_state);
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-17 06:20:36 +08:00
}
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
static int __init debugfs_unaligned(void)
{
struct dentry *d;
if (!mips_debugfs_dir)
return -ENODEV;
d = debugfs_create_u32("unaligned_instructions", S_IRUGO,
mips_debugfs_dir, &unaligned_instructions);
MIPS: Fix debugfs_create_*'s error checking method for mips/kernel/ debugfs_create_*() returns NULL on error. Make its callers return -ENODEV on error. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2008-10-17 19:12:35 +08:00
if (!d)
return -ENOMEM;
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
d = debugfs_create_u32("unaligned_action", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
mips_debugfs_dir, &unaligned_action);
MIPS: Fix debugfs_create_*'s error checking method for mips/kernel/ debugfs_create_*() returns NULL on error. Make its callers return -ENODEV on error. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2008-10-17 19:12:35 +08:00
if (!d)
return -ENOMEM;
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
return 0;
}
MIPS: unaligned: Move from deprecated __initcall to arch_initcall. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2015-07-20 15:04:41 +08:00
arch_initcall(debugfs_unaligned);
[MIPS] Add some debugfs files to debug unaligned accesses Currently a number of unaligned instructions is counted but not used. Add /debug/mips/unaligned_instructions file to show the value. And add /debug/mips/unaligned_action to control behavior upon an unaligned access. Possible actions are: 0: silently fixup the unaligned access. 1: send SIGBUS. 2: dump registers, process name, etc. and fixup. Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
2007-06-29 23:55:48 +08:00
#endif