2019-06-04 16:11:33 +08:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
|
2012-04-20 00:53:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* linux/arch/arm/mach-spear13xx/hotplug.c
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2012 ST Microelectronics Ltd.
|
|
|
|
* Deepak Sikri <deepak.sikri@st.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* based upon linux/arch/arm/mach-realview/hotplug.c
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/smp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/cp15.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: smp: remove arch-provided "pen_release"
Consolidating the "pen_release" stuff amongst the various SoC
implementations gives credence to having a CPU holding pen for
secondary CPUs. However, this is far from the truth.
Many SoC implementations cargo-cult copied various bits of the pen
release implementation from the initial Realview/Versatile Express
implementation without understanding what it was or why it existed.
The reason it existed is because these are _development_ platforms,
and some board firmware is unable to individually control the
startup of secondary CPUs. Moreover, they do not have a way to
power down or reset secondary CPUs for hot-unplug. Hence, the
pen_release implementation was designed for ARM Ltd's development
platforms to provide a working implementation, even though it is
very far from what is required.
It was decided a while back to reduce the duplication by consolidating
the "pen_release" variable, but this only made the situation worse -
we have ended up with several implementations that read this variable
but do not write it - again, showing the cargo-cult mentality at work,
lack of proper review of new code, and in some cases a lack of testing.
While it would be preferable to remove pen_release entirely from the
kernel, this is not possible without help from the SoC maintainers,
which seems to be lacking. However, I want to remove pen_release from
arch code to remove the credence that having it gives.
This patch removes pen_release from the arch code entirely, adding
private per-SoC definitions for it instead, and explicitly stating
that write_pen_release() is cargo-cult copied and should not be
copied any further. Rename write_pen_release() in a similar fashion
as well.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-12-13 22:02:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "generic.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-20 00:53:13 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int v;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asm volatile(
|
|
|
|
" mcr p15, 0, %1, c7, c5, 0\n"
|
|
|
|
" dsb\n"
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Turn off coherency
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
" mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
|
|
|
|
" bic %0, %0, #0x20\n"
|
|
|
|
" mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
|
|
|
|
" mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
|
|
|
|
" bic %0, %0, %2\n"
|
|
|
|
" mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (v)
|
|
|
|
: "r" (0), "Ir" (CR_C)
|
|
|
|
: "cc", "memory");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int v;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
|
|
|
|
" orr %0, %0, %1\n"
|
|
|
|
" mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
|
|
|
|
" mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
|
|
|
|
" orr %0, %0, #0x20\n"
|
|
|
|
" mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
|
|
|
|
: "=&r" (v)
|
|
|
|
: "Ir" (CR_C)
|
|
|
|
: "cc");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-08 20:15:22 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline void spear13xx_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
|
2012-04-20 00:53:13 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
|
|
wfi();
|
|
|
|
|
ARM: smp: remove arch-provided "pen_release"
Consolidating the "pen_release" stuff amongst the various SoC
implementations gives credence to having a CPU holding pen for
secondary CPUs. However, this is far from the truth.
Many SoC implementations cargo-cult copied various bits of the pen
release implementation from the initial Realview/Versatile Express
implementation without understanding what it was or why it existed.
The reason it existed is because these are _development_ platforms,
and some board firmware is unable to individually control the
startup of secondary CPUs. Moreover, they do not have a way to
power down or reset secondary CPUs for hot-unplug. Hence, the
pen_release implementation was designed for ARM Ltd's development
platforms to provide a working implementation, even though it is
very far from what is required.
It was decided a while back to reduce the duplication by consolidating
the "pen_release" variable, but this only made the situation worse -
we have ended up with several implementations that read this variable
but do not write it - again, showing the cargo-cult mentality at work,
lack of proper review of new code, and in some cases a lack of testing.
While it would be preferable to remove pen_release entirely from the
kernel, this is not possible without help from the SoC maintainers,
which seems to be lacking. However, I want to remove pen_release from
arch code to remove the credence that having it gives.
This patch removes pen_release from the arch code entirely, adding
private per-SoC definitions for it instead, and explicitly stating
that write_pen_release() is cargo-cult copied and should not be
copied any further. Rename write_pen_release() in a similar fashion
as well.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
2018-12-13 22:02:48 +08:00
|
|
|
if (spear_pen_release == cpu) {
|
2012-04-20 00:53:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* OK, proper wakeup, we're done
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Getting here, means that we have come out of WFI without
|
|
|
|
* having been woken up - this shouldn't happen
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Just note it happening - when we're woken, we can report
|
|
|
|
* its occurrence.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
(*spurious)++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Called with IRQs disabled
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-10-20 04:05:33 +08:00
|
|
|
void spear13xx_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
|
2012-04-20 00:53:13 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int spurious = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* we're ready for shutdown now, so do it
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
cpu_enter_lowpower();
|
2011-09-08 20:15:22 +08:00
|
|
|
spear13xx_do_lowpower(cpu, &spurious);
|
2012-04-20 00:53:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* bring this CPU back into the world of cache
|
|
|
|
* coherency, and then restore interrupts
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
cpu_leave_lowpower();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (spurious)
|
|
|
|
pr_warn("CPU%u: %u spurious wakeup calls\n", cpu, spurious);
|
|
|
|
}
|