OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_reg.h

120 lines
4.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
*/
#ifndef _INTEL_GUC_REG_H_
#define _INTEL_GUC_REG_H_
/* Definitions of GuC H/W registers, bits, etc */
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GUC_STATUS _MMIO(0xc000)
#define GS_RESET_SHIFT 0
#define GS_MIA_IN_RESET (0x01 << GS_RESET_SHIFT)
#define GS_BOOTROM_SHIFT 1
#define GS_BOOTROM_MASK (0x7F << GS_BOOTROM_SHIFT)
#define GS_BOOTROM_RSA_FAILED (0x50 << GS_BOOTROM_SHIFT)
#define GS_BOOTROM_JUMP_PASSED (0x76 << GS_BOOTROM_SHIFT)
#define GS_UKERNEL_SHIFT 8
#define GS_UKERNEL_MASK (0xFF << GS_UKERNEL_SHIFT)
#define GS_UKERNEL_LAPIC_DONE (0x30 << GS_UKERNEL_SHIFT)
#define GS_UKERNEL_DPC_ERROR (0x60 << GS_UKERNEL_SHIFT)
#define GS_UKERNEL_READY (0xF0 << GS_UKERNEL_SHIFT)
#define GS_MIA_SHIFT 16
#define GS_MIA_MASK (0x07 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
#define GS_MIA_CORE_STATE (0x01 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
#define GS_MIA_HALT_REQUESTED (0x02 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
#define GS_MIA_ISR_ENTRY (0x04 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
#define GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT 30
#define GS_AUTH_STATUS_MASK (0x03 << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
#define GS_AUTH_STATUS_BAD (0x01 << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
#define GS_AUTH_STATUS_GOOD (0x02 << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define SOFT_SCRATCH(n) _MMIO(0xc180 + (n) * 4)
#define SOFT_SCRATCH_COUNT 16
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define UOS_RSA_SCRATCH(i) _MMIO(0xc200 + (i) * 4)
#define UOS_RSA_SCRATCH_MAX_COUNT 64
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define DMA_ADDR_0_LOW _MMIO(0xc300)
#define DMA_ADDR_0_HIGH _MMIO(0xc304)
#define DMA_ADDR_1_LOW _MMIO(0xc308)
#define DMA_ADDR_1_HIGH _MMIO(0xc30c)
#define DMA_ADDRESS_SPACE_WOPCM (7 << 16)
#define DMA_ADDRESS_SPACE_GTT (8 << 16)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define DMA_COPY_SIZE _MMIO(0xc310)
#define DMA_CTRL _MMIO(0xc314)
drm/i915/huc: Add HuC fw loading support The HuC loading process is similar to GuC. The intel_uc_fw_fetch() is used for both cases. HuC loading needs to be before GuC loading. The WOPCM setting must be done early before loading any of them. v2: rebased on-top of drm-intel-nightly. removed if(HAS_GUC()) before the guc call. (D.Gordon) update huc_version number of format. v3: rebased to drm-intel-nightly, changed the file name format to match the one in the huc package. Changed dev->dev_private to to_i915() v4: moved function back to where it was. change wait_for_atomic to wait_for. v5: rebased. Changed the year in the copyright message to reflect the right year.Correct the comments,remove the unwanted WARN message, replace drm_gem_object_unreference() with i915_gem_object_put().Make the prototypes in intel_huc.h non-extern. v6: rebased. Update the file construction done by HuC. It is similar to GuC.Adopted the approach used in- https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/104355/ <Tvrtko Ursulin> v7: Change dev to dev_priv in macro definition. Corrected comments. v8: rebased on top of drm-tip. Updated functions intel_huc_load(), intel_huc_init() and intel_uc_fw_fetch() to accept dev_priv instead of dev. Moved contents of intel_huc.h to intel_uc.h. v9: change SKL_FW_ to SKL_HUC_FW_. Add intel_ prefix to guc_wopcm_size(). Remove unwanted checks in intel_uc.h. Rename huc_fw in struct intel_huc to simply fw to avoid redundency. v10: rebased. Correct comments. Make intel_huc_fini() accept dev_priv instead of dev like intel_huc_init() and intel_huc_load().Move definition to i915_guc_reg.h from intel_uc.h. Clean DMA_CTRL bits after HuC DMA transfer in huc_ucode_xfer() instead of guc_ucode_xfer(). Add suitable WARNs to give extra info. v11: rebased. Add proper bias for HuC and make sure there are asserts on failure by using guc_ggtt_offset_vma(). Introduce intel_huc.c and remove intel_huc_loader.c since it has functions that do more than just loading.Correct year in copyright. v12: remove invalidates that are not required anymore. Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Tested-by: Xiang Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484755558-1234-1-git-send-email-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com
2017-01-19 00:05:53 +08:00
#define HUC_UKERNEL (1<<9)
#define UOS_MOVE (1<<4)
#define START_DMA (1<<0)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET _MMIO(0xc340)
drm/i915/huc: Add HuC fw loading support The HuC loading process is similar to GuC. The intel_uc_fw_fetch() is used for both cases. HuC loading needs to be before GuC loading. The WOPCM setting must be done early before loading any of them. v2: rebased on-top of drm-intel-nightly. removed if(HAS_GUC()) before the guc call. (D.Gordon) update huc_version number of format. v3: rebased to drm-intel-nightly, changed the file name format to match the one in the huc package. Changed dev->dev_private to to_i915() v4: moved function back to where it was. change wait_for_atomic to wait_for. v5: rebased. Changed the year in the copyright message to reflect the right year.Correct the comments,remove the unwanted WARN message, replace drm_gem_object_unreference() with i915_gem_object_put().Make the prototypes in intel_huc.h non-extern. v6: rebased. Update the file construction done by HuC. It is similar to GuC.Adopted the approach used in- https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/104355/ <Tvrtko Ursulin> v7: Change dev to dev_priv in macro definition. Corrected comments. v8: rebased on top of drm-tip. Updated functions intel_huc_load(), intel_huc_init() and intel_uc_fw_fetch() to accept dev_priv instead of dev. Moved contents of intel_huc.h to intel_uc.h. v9: change SKL_FW_ to SKL_HUC_FW_. Add intel_ prefix to guc_wopcm_size(). Remove unwanted checks in intel_uc.h. Rename huc_fw in struct intel_huc to simply fw to avoid redundency. v10: rebased. Correct comments. Make intel_huc_fini() accept dev_priv instead of dev like intel_huc_init() and intel_huc_load().Move definition to i915_guc_reg.h from intel_uc.h. Clean DMA_CTRL bits after HuC DMA transfer in huc_ucode_xfer() instead of guc_ucode_xfer(). Add suitable WARNs to give extra info. v11: rebased. Add proper bias for HuC and make sure there are asserts on failure by using guc_ggtt_offset_vma(). Introduce intel_huc.c and remove intel_huc_loader.c since it has functions that do more than just loading.Correct year in copyright. v12: remove invalidates that are not required anymore. Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Tested-by: Xiang Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484755558-1234-1-git-send-email-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com
2017-01-19 00:05:53 +08:00
#define HUC_LOADING_AGENT_VCR (0<<1)
#define HUC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC (1<<1)
#define GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALUE 0x80000 /* 512KB */
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GUC_MAX_IDLE_COUNT _MMIO(0xC3E4)
drm/i915/huc: Add HuC fw loading support The HuC loading process is similar to GuC. The intel_uc_fw_fetch() is used for both cases. HuC loading needs to be before GuC loading. The WOPCM setting must be done early before loading any of them. v2: rebased on-top of drm-intel-nightly. removed if(HAS_GUC()) before the guc call. (D.Gordon) update huc_version number of format. v3: rebased to drm-intel-nightly, changed the file name format to match the one in the huc package. Changed dev->dev_private to to_i915() v4: moved function back to where it was. change wait_for_atomic to wait_for. v5: rebased. Changed the year in the copyright message to reflect the right year.Correct the comments,remove the unwanted WARN message, replace drm_gem_object_unreference() with i915_gem_object_put().Make the prototypes in intel_huc.h non-extern. v6: rebased. Update the file construction done by HuC. It is similar to GuC.Adopted the approach used in- https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/104355/ <Tvrtko Ursulin> v7: Change dev to dev_priv in macro definition. Corrected comments. v8: rebased on top of drm-tip. Updated functions intel_huc_load(), intel_huc_init() and intel_uc_fw_fetch() to accept dev_priv instead of dev. Moved contents of intel_huc.h to intel_uc.h. v9: change SKL_FW_ to SKL_HUC_FW_. Add intel_ prefix to guc_wopcm_size(). Remove unwanted checks in intel_uc.h. Rename huc_fw in struct intel_huc to simply fw to avoid redundency. v10: rebased. Correct comments. Make intel_huc_fini() accept dev_priv instead of dev like intel_huc_init() and intel_huc_load().Move definition to i915_guc_reg.h from intel_uc.h. Clean DMA_CTRL bits after HuC DMA transfer in huc_ucode_xfer() instead of guc_ucode_xfer(). Add suitable WARNs to give extra info. v11: rebased. Add proper bias for HuC and make sure there are asserts on failure by using guc_ggtt_offset_vma(). Introduce intel_huc.c and remove intel_huc_loader.c since it has functions that do more than just loading.Correct year in copyright. v12: remove invalidates that are not required anymore. Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Tested-by: Xiang Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484755558-1234-1-git-send-email-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com
2017-01-19 00:05:53 +08:00
#define HUC_STATUS2 _MMIO(0xD3B0)
#define HUC_FW_VERIFIED (1<<7)
/* Defines WOPCM space available to GuC firmware */
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GUC_WOPCM_SIZE _MMIO(0xc050)
/* GuC addresses below GUC_WOPCM_TOP don't map through the GTT */
#define GUC_WOPCM_TOP (0x80 << 12) /* 512KB */
#define BXT_GUC_WOPCM_RC6_RESERVED (0x10 << 12) /* 64KB */
/* GuC addresses above GUC_GGTT_TOP also don't map through the GTT */
#define GUC_GGTT_TOP 0xFEE00000
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GEN8_GT_PM_CONFIG _MMIO(0x138140)
#define GEN9LP_GT_PM_CONFIG _MMIO(0x138140)
#define GEN9_GT_PM_CONFIG _MMIO(0x13816c)
#define GT_DOORBELL_ENABLE (1<<0)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GEN8_GTCR _MMIO(0x4274)
#define GEN8_GTCR_INVALIDATE (1<<0)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GUC_ARAT_C6DIS _MMIO(0xA178)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GUC_SHIM_CONTROL _MMIO(0xc064)
#define GUC_DISABLE_SRAM_INIT_TO_ZEROES (1<<0)
#define GUC_ENABLE_READ_CACHE_LOGIC (1<<1)
#define GUC_ENABLE_MIA_CACHING (1<<2)
#define GUC_GEN10_MSGCH_ENABLE (1<<4)
#define GUC_ENABLE_READ_CACHE_FOR_SRAM_DATA (1<<9)
#define GUC_ENABLE_READ_CACHE_FOR_WOPCM_DATA (1<<10)
#define GUC_ENABLE_MIA_CLOCK_GATING (1<<15)
#define GUC_GEN10_SHIM_WC_ENABLE (1<<21)
#define GUC_SEND_INTERRUPT _MMIO(0xc4c8)
#define GUC_SEND_TRIGGER (1<<0)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GEN8_DRBREGL(x) _MMIO(0x1000 + (x) * 8)
#define GEN8_DRB_VALID (1<<0)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GEN8_DRBREGU(x) _MMIO(0x1000 + (x) * 8 + 4)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define DE_GUCRMR _MMIO(0x44054)
drm/i915: Type safe register read/write Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had with misplaced parens. This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific register access function. The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike before making it nice. As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg. looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change: lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d mov $0x1,%edx - movslq %r9d,%r9 - mov %r9,%rsi - mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp) - callq *0xd8(%rbx) + mov %r9d,%esi + mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp) callq *0xd8(%rbx) So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be mostly just minor shuffling of instructions. v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines mo more switch statements left to worry about ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch all other unrelated changes split out v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc. v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/ Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2015-11-18 21:33:26 +08:00
#define GUC_BCS_RCS_IER _MMIO(0xC550)
#define GUC_VCS2_VCS1_IER _MMIO(0xC554)
#define GUC_WD_VECS_IER _MMIO(0xC558)
#define GUC_PM_P24C_IER _MMIO(0xC55C)
#endif