OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c

398 lines
9.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* File: pci-acpi.c
* Purpose: Provide PCI support in ACPI
*
* Copyright (C) 2005 David Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
* Copyright (C) 2004 Tom Long Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@intel.com>
* Copyright (C) 2004 Intel Corp.
*/
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
#include <acpi/acpi.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include "pci.h"
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
/**
* pci_acpi_wake_bus - Wake-up notification handler for root buses.
* @handle: ACPI handle of a device the notification is for.
* @event: Type of the signaled event.
* @context: PCI root bus to wake up devices on.
*/
static void pci_acpi_wake_bus(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
{
struct pci_bus *pci_bus = context;
if (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE && pci_bus)
pci_pme_wakeup_bus(pci_bus);
}
/**
* pci_acpi_wake_dev - Wake-up notification handler for PCI devices.
* @handle: ACPI handle of a device the notification is for.
* @event: Type of the signaled event.
* @context: PCI device object to wake up.
*/
static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context)
{
struct pci_dev *pci_dev = context;
if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE || !pci_dev)
return;
if (pci_dev->pme_poll)
pci_dev->pme_poll = false;
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) {
pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
return;
}
/* Clear PME Status if set. */
if (pci_dev->pme_support)
pci_check_pme_status(pci_dev);
PCI / PM: Extend PME polling to all PCI devices The land of PCI power management is a land of sorrow and ugliness, especially in the area of signaling events by devices. There are devices that set their PME Status bits, but don't really bother to send a PME message or assert PME#. There are hardware vendors who don't connect PME# lines to the system core logic (they know who they are). There are PCI Express Root Ports that don't bother to trigger interrupts when they receive PME messages from the devices below. There are ACPI BIOSes that forget to provide _PRW methods for devices capable of signaling wakeup. Finally, there are BIOSes that do provide _PRW methods for such devices, but then don't bother to call Notify() for those devices from the corresponding _Lxx/_Exx GPE-handling methods. In all of these cases the kernel doesn't have a chance to receive a proper notification that it should wake up a device, so devices stay in low-power states forever. Worse yet, in some cases they continuously send PME Messages that are silently ignored, because the kernel simply doesn't know that it should clear the device's PME Status bit. This problem was first observed for "parallel" (non-Express) PCI devices on add-on cards and Matthew Garrett addressed it by adding code that polls PME Status bits of such devices, if they are enabled to signal PME, to the kernel. Recently, however, it has turned out that PCI Express devices are also affected by this issue and that it is not limited to add-on devices, so it seems necessary to extend the PME polling to all PCI devices, including PCI Express and planar ones. Still, it would be wasteful to poll the PME Status bits of devices that are known to receive proper PME notifications, so make the kernel (1) poll the PME Status bits of all PCI and PCIe devices enabled to signal PME and (2) disable the PME Status polling for devices for which correct PME notifications are received. Tested-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2011-10-04 05:16:33 +08:00
pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
if (pci_dev->subordinate)
pci_pme_wakeup_bus(pci_dev->subordinate);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
/**
* pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier - Register PM notifier for given PCI bus.
* @dev: ACPI device to add the notifier for.
* @pci_bus: PCI bus to walk checking for PME status if an event is signaled.
*/
acpi_status pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev,
struct pci_bus *pci_bus)
{
return acpi_add_pm_notifier(dev, pci_acpi_wake_bus, pci_bus);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
/**
* pci_acpi_remove_bus_pm_notifier - Unregister PCI bus PM notifier.
* @dev: ACPI device to remove the notifier from.
*/
acpi_status pci_acpi_remove_bus_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev)
{
return acpi_remove_pm_notifier(dev, pci_acpi_wake_bus);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
/**
* pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier - Register PM notifier for given PCI device.
* @dev: ACPI device to add the notifier for.
* @pci_dev: PCI device to check for the PME status if an event is signaled.
*/
acpi_status pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev,
struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
{
return acpi_add_pm_notifier(dev, pci_acpi_wake_dev, pci_dev);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
/**
* pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier - Unregister PCI device PM notifier.
* @dev: ACPI device to remove the notifier from.
*/
acpi_status pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev)
{
return acpi_remove_pm_notifier(dev, pci_acpi_wake_dev);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
phys_addr_t acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(acpi_handle handle)
{
acpi_status status = AE_NOT_EXIST;
unsigned long long mcfg_addr;
if (handle)
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__CBA,
NULL, &mcfg_addr);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return 0;
return (phys_addr_t)mcfg_addr;
}
/*
* _SxD returns the D-state with the highest power
* (lowest D-state number) supported in the S-state "x".
*
* If the devices does not have a _PRW
* (Power Resources for Wake) supporting system wakeup from "x"
* then the OS is free to choose a lower power (higher number
* D-state) than the return value from _SxD.
*
* But if _PRW is enabled at S-state "x", the OS
* must not choose a power lower than _SxD --
* unless the device has an _SxW method specifying
* the lowest power (highest D-state number) the device
* may enter while still able to wake the system.
*
* ie. depending on global OS policy:
*
* if (_PRW at S-state x)
* choose from highest power _SxD to lowest power _SxW
* else // no _PRW at S-state x
* choose highest power _SxD or any lower power
*/
static pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
int acpi_state, d_max;
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
if (pdev->no_d3cold)
d_max = ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT;
else
d_max = ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
acpi_state = acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&pdev->dev, NULL, d_max);
if (acpi_state < 0)
return PCI_POWER_ERROR;
switch (acpi_state) {
case ACPI_STATE_D0:
return PCI_D0;
case ACPI_STATE_D1:
return PCI_D1;
case ACPI_STATE_D2:
return PCI_D2;
case ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT:
return PCI_D3hot;
case ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD:
return PCI_D3cold;
}
return PCI_POWER_ERROR;
}
static bool acpi_pci_power_manageable(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
acpi_handle handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev);
return handle ? acpi_bus_power_manageable(handle) : false;
}
static int acpi_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
{
acpi_handle handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev);
acpi_handle tmp;
static const u8 state_conv[] = {
[PCI_D0] = ACPI_STATE_D0,
[PCI_D1] = ACPI_STATE_D1,
[PCI_D2] = ACPI_STATE_D2,
[PCI_D3hot] = ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD,
[PCI_D3cold] = ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD,
};
int error = -EINVAL;
/* If the ACPI device has _EJ0, ignore the device */
if (!handle || ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp)))
return -ENODEV;
switch (state) {
case PCI_D3cold:
if (dev_pm_qos_flags(&dev->dev, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF) ==
PM_QOS_FLAGS_ALL) {
error = -EBUSY;
break;
}
case PCI_D0:
case PCI_D1:
case PCI_D2:
case PCI_D3hot:
error = acpi_bus_set_power(handle, state_conv[state]);
}
if (!error)
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "power state changed by ACPI to %s\n",
acpi_power_state_string(state_conv[state]));
return error;
}
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
static bool acpi_pci_can_wakeup(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
acpi_handle handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->dev);
return handle ? acpi_bus_can_wakeup(handle) : false;
}
static void acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
{
while (bus->parent) {
if (!acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&bus->self->dev, enable))
return;
bus = bus->parent;
}
/* We have reached the root bus. */
if (bus->bridge)
acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(bus->bridge, enable);
}
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
static int acpi_pci_sleep_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
{
if (acpi_pci_can_wakeup(dev))
return acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(&dev->dev, enable);
acpi_pci_propagate_wakeup_enable(dev->bus, enable);
return 0;
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
}
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
static void acpi_pci_propagate_run_wake(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
{
while (bus->parent) {
struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
if (bridge->pme_interrupt)
return;
if (!acpi_pm_device_run_wake(&bridge->dev, enable))
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
return;
bus = bus->parent;
}
/* We have reached the root bus. */
if (bus->bridge)
acpi_pm_device_run_wake(bus->bridge, enable);
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
}
static int acpi_pci_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
{
PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2012-06-23 10:23:51 +08:00
/*
* Per PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 section
* 5.3.3.2 Link Wakeup, platform support is needed for D3cold
* waking up to power on the main link even if there is PME
* support for D3cold
*/
if (dev->pme_interrupt && !dev->runtime_d3cold)
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
return 0;
if (!acpi_pm_device_run_wake(&dev->dev, enable))
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
return 0;
acpi_pci_propagate_run_wake(dev->bus, enable);
return 0;
}
static struct pci_platform_pm_ops acpi_pci_platform_pm = {
.is_manageable = acpi_pci_power_manageable,
.set_state = acpi_pci_set_power_state,
.choose_state = acpi_pci_choose_state,
PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up * Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-07-07 09:34:48 +08:00
.sleep_wake = acpi_pci_sleep_wake,
PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-02-18 06:44:09 +08:00
.run_wake = acpi_pci_run_wake,
};
void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
if (acpi_pci_disabled || !bus->bridge)
return;
acpi_pci_slot_enumerate(bus);
acpiphp_enumerate_slots(bus);
}
void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
if (acpi_pci_disabled || !bus->bridge)
return;
acpiphp_remove_slots(bus);
acpi_pci_slot_remove(bus);
}
/* ACPI bus type */
static int acpi_pci_find_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle)
{
ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561 Reported-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
2013-08-08 04:55:00 +08:00
struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
bool is_bridge;
u64 addr;
ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561 Reported-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
2013-08-08 04:55:00 +08:00
/*
* pci_is_bridge() is not suitable here, because pci_dev->subordinate
* is set only after acpi_pci_find_device() has been called for the
* given device.
*/
is_bridge = pci_dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE
|| pci_dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS;
/* Please ref to ACPI spec for the syntax of _ADR */
addr = (PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn) << 16) | PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn);
ACPI: Try harder to resolve _ADR collisions for bridges In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561 Reported-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
2013-08-08 04:55:00 +08:00
*handle = acpi_find_child(ACPI_HANDLE(dev->parent), addr, is_bridge);
if (!*handle)
return -ENODEV;
return 0;
}
static void pci_acpi_setup(struct device *dev)
{
struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
struct acpi_device *adev;
if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev) || !adev->wakeup.flags.valid)
return;
device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
acpi_pci_sleep_wake(pci_dev, false);
pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(adev, pci_dev);
if (adev->wakeup.flags.run_wake)
device_set_run_wake(dev, true);
}
static void pci_acpi_cleanup(struct device *dev)
{
acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
struct acpi_device *adev;
if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev) && adev->wakeup.flags.valid) {
device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
device_set_run_wake(dev, false);
pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(adev);
}
}
static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev)
{
return dev->bus == &pci_bus_type;
}
static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
.name = "PCI",
.match = pci_acpi_bus_match,
.find_device = acpi_pci_find_device,
.setup = pci_acpi_setup,
.cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
};
static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
{
int ret;
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_MSI) {
pr_info("ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support MSI, so disable it\n");
pci_no_msi();
}
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
pr_info("ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it\n");
pcie_no_aspm();
}
ret = register_acpi_bus_type(&acpi_pci_bus);
if (ret)
return 0;
pci_set_platform_pm(&acpi_pci_platform_pm);
acpi_pci_slot_init();
acpiphp_init();
return 0;
}
arch_initcall(acpi_pci_init);