OpenCloudOS-Kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c

144 lines
4.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
/*
* Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
*/
#include "i915_drv.h"
#include "i915_gem_batch_pool.h"
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
/**
* DOC: batch pool
*
* In order to submit batch buffers as 'secure', the software command parser
* must ensure that a batch buffer cannot be modified after parsing. It does
* this by copying the user provided batch buffer contents to a kernel owned
* buffer from which the hardware will actually execute, and by carefully
* managing the address space bindings for such buffers.
*
* The batch pool framework provides a mechanism for the driver to manage a
* set of scratch buffers to use for this purpose. The framework can be
* extended to support other uses cases should they arise.
*/
/**
* i915_gem_batch_pool_init() - initialize a batch buffer pool
* @engine: the associated request submission engine
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
* @pool: the batch buffer pool
*/
void i915_gem_batch_pool_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool)
{
int n;
pool->engine = engine;
for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list); n++)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->cache_list[n]);
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
}
/**
* i915_gem_batch_pool_fini() - clean up a batch buffer pool
* @pool: the pool to clean up
*
* Note: Callers must hold the struct_mutex.
*/
void i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool)
{
int n;
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list); n++) {
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next;
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next,
&pool->cache_list[n],
batch_pool_link)
__i915_gem_object_release_unless_active(obj);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->cache_list[n]);
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
}
}
/**
* i915_gem_batch_pool_get() - allocate a buffer from the pool
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
* @pool: the batch buffer pool
* @size: the minimum desired size of the returned buffer
*
* Returns an inactive buffer from @pool with at least @size bytes,
* with the pages pinned. The caller must i915_gem_object_unpin_pages()
* on the returned object.
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
*
* Note: Callers must hold the struct_mutex
*
* Return: the buffer object or an error pointer
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
*/
struct drm_i915_gem_object *
i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
size_t size)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
struct list_head *list;
drm/i915: Introduce an internal allocator for disposable private objects Quite a few of our objects used for internal hardware programming do not benefit from being swappable or from being zero initialised. As such they do not benefit from using a shmemfs backing storage and since they are internal and never directly exposed to the user, we do not need to worry about providing a filp. For these we can use an drm_i915_gem_object wrapper around a sg_table of plain struct page. They are not swap backed and not automatically pinned. If they are reaped by the shrinker, the pages are released and the contents discarded. For the internal use case, this is fine as for example, ringbuffers are pinned from being written by a request to be read by the hardware. Once they are idle, they can be discarded entirely. As such they are a good match for execlist ringbuffers and a small variety of other internal objects. In the first iteration, this is limited to the scratch batch buffers we use (for command parsing and state initialisation). v2: Allocate physically contiguous pages, where possible. v3: Reduce maximum order on subsequent requests following an allocation failure. v4: Fix up mismatch between swiotlb segment size and page count (it counts in 2k units, not 4k pages) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-28 20:58:30 +08:00
int n, ret;
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
/* Compute a power-of-two bucket, but throw everything greater than
* 16KiB into the same bucket: i.e. the the buckets hold objects of
* (1 page, 2 pages, 4 pages, 8+ pages).
*/
n = fls(size >> PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
if (n >= ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list))
n = ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list) - 1;
list = &pool->cache_list[n];
list_for_each_entry(obj, list, batch_pool_link) {
/* The batches are strictly LRU ordered */
if (i915_gem_object_is_active(obj)) {
if (!reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(obj->resv,
true))
break;
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
i915_gem_retire_requests(pool->engine->i915);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_object_is_active(obj));
}
drm/i915: Move GEM activity tracking into a common struct reservation_object In preparation to support many distinct timelines, we need to expand the activity tracking on the GEM object to handle more than just a request per engine. We already use the struct reservation_object on the dma-buf to handle many fence contexts, so integrating that into the GEM object itself is the preferred solution. (For example, we can now share the same reservation_object between every consumer/producer using this buffer and skip the manual import/export via dma-buf.) v2: Reimplement busy-ioctl (by walking the reservation object), postpone the ABI change for another day. Similarly use the reservation object to find the last_write request (if active and from i915) for choosing display CS flips. Caveats: * busy-ioctl: busy-ioctl only reports on the native fences, it will not warn of stalls (in set-domain-ioctl, pread/pwrite etc) if the object is being rendered to by external fences. It also will not report the same busy state as wait-ioctl (or polling on the dma-buf) in the same circumstances. On the plus side, it does retain reporting of which *i915* engines are engaged with this object. * non-blocking atomic modesets take a step backwards as the wait for render completion blocks the ioctl. This is fixed in a subsequent patch to use a fence instead for awaiting on the rendering, see "drm/i915: Restore nonblocking awaits for modesetting" * dynamic array manipulation for shared-fences in reservation is slower than the previous lockless static assignment (e.g. gem_exec_lut_handle runtime on ivb goes from 42s to 66s), mainly due to atomic operations (maintaining the fence refcounts). * loss of object-level retirement callbacks, emulated by VMA retirement tracking. * minor loss of object-level last activity information from debugfs, could be replaced with per-vma information if desired Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-21-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-28 20:58:44 +08:00
GEM_BUG_ON(!reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(obj->resv,
true));
drm/i915: Move GEM activity tracking into a common struct reservation_object In preparation to support many distinct timelines, we need to expand the activity tracking on the GEM object to handle more than just a request per engine. We already use the struct reservation_object on the dma-buf to handle many fence contexts, so integrating that into the GEM object itself is the preferred solution. (For example, we can now share the same reservation_object between every consumer/producer using this buffer and skip the manual import/export via dma-buf.) v2: Reimplement busy-ioctl (by walking the reservation object), postpone the ABI change for another day. Similarly use the reservation object to find the last_write request (if active and from i915) for choosing display CS flips. Caveats: * busy-ioctl: busy-ioctl only reports on the native fences, it will not warn of stalls (in set-domain-ioctl, pread/pwrite etc) if the object is being rendered to by external fences. It also will not report the same busy state as wait-ioctl (or polling on the dma-buf) in the same circumstances. On the plus side, it does retain reporting of which *i915* engines are engaged with this object. * non-blocking atomic modesets take a step backwards as the wait for render completion blocks the ioctl. This is fixed in a subsequent patch to use a fence instead for awaiting on the rendering, see "drm/i915: Restore nonblocking awaits for modesetting" * dynamic array manipulation for shared-fences in reservation is slower than the previous lockless static assignment (e.g. gem_exec_lut_handle runtime on ivb goes from 42s to 66s), mainly due to atomic operations (maintaining the fence refcounts). * loss of object-level retirement callbacks, emulated by VMA retirement tracking. * minor loss of object-level last activity information from debugfs, could be replaced with per-vma information if desired Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-21-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-28 20:58:44 +08:00
if (obj->base.size >= size)
goto found;
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
}
obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(pool->engine->i915, size);
if (IS_ERR(obj))
return obj;
found:
ret = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
drm/i915: Introduce an internal allocator for disposable private objects Quite a few of our objects used for internal hardware programming do not benefit from being swappable or from being zero initialised. As such they do not benefit from using a shmemfs backing storage and since they are internal and never directly exposed to the user, we do not need to worry about providing a filp. For these we can use an drm_i915_gem_object wrapper around a sg_table of plain struct page. They are not swap backed and not automatically pinned. If they are reaped by the shrinker, the pages are released and the contents discarded. For the internal use case, this is fine as for example, ringbuffers are pinned from being written by a request to be read by the hardware. Once they are idle, they can be discarded entirely. As such they are a good match for execlist ringbuffers and a small variety of other internal objects. In the first iteration, this is limited to the scratch batch buffers we use (for command parsing and state initialisation). v2: Allocate physically contiguous pages, where possible. v3: Reduce maximum order on subsequent requests following an allocation failure. v4: Fix up mismatch between swiotlb segment size and page count (it counts in 2k units, not 4k pages) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2016-10-28 20:58:30 +08:00
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
list_move_tail(&obj->batch_pool_link, list);
drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools This adds a small module for managing a pool of batch buffers. The only current use case is for the command parser, as described in the kerneldoc in the patch. The code is simple, but separating it out makes it easier to change the underlying algorithms and to extend to future use cases should they arise. The interface is simple: init to create an empty pool, fini to clean it up, get to obtain a new buffer. Note that all buffers are expected to be inactive before cleaning up the pool. Locking is currently based on the caller holding the struct_mutex. We already do that in the places where we will use the batch pool for the command parser. v2: - s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/ for locking assertions - Remove the cap on pool size - Switch from alloc/free to init/fini v3: - Idiomatic looping structure in _fini - Correct handling of purged objects - Don't return a buffer that's too much larger than needed v4: - Rebased to latest -nightly v5: - Remove _put() function and clean up comments to match v6: - Move purged check inside the loop (danvet, from v4 1/7 feedback) v7: - Use single list instead of two. (Chris W) - s/active_list/cache_list - Squashed in debug patches (Chris W) drm/i915: Add a batch pool debugfs file It provides some useful information about the buffers in the global command parser batch pool. v2: rebase on global pool instead of per-ring pools v3: rebase drm/i915: Add batch pool details to i915_gem_objects debugfs To better account for the potentially large memory consumption of the batch pool. v8: - Keep cache in LRU order (danvet, from v6 1/5 feedback) Issue: VIZ-4719 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com> Reviewed-By: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-12 04:13:08 +08:00
return obj;
}