OpenCloudOS-Kernel/lib/kunit/executor.c

264 lines
6.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/glob.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
/*
* These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in
* include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, and consequently must be extern.
*/
extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_start[];
extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[];
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
static char *filter_glob_param;
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-01 06:20:45 +08:00
static char *action_param;
module_param_named(filter_glob, filter_glob_param, charp, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob,
"Filter which KUnit test suites/tests run at boot-time, e.g. list* or list*.*del_test");
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-01 06:20:45 +08:00
module_param_named(action, action_param, charp, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(action,
"Changes KUnit executor behavior, valid values are:\n"
"<none>: run the tests like normal\n"
"'list' to list test names instead of running them.\n");
/* glob_match() needs NULL terminated strings, so we need a copy of filter_glob_param. */
struct kunit_test_filter {
char *suite_glob;
char *test_glob;
};
/* Split "suite_glob.test_glob" into two. Assumes filter_glob is not empty. */
static void kunit_parse_filter_glob(struct kunit_test_filter *parsed,
const char *filter_glob)
{
const int len = strlen(filter_glob);
const char *period = strchr(filter_glob, '.');
if (!period) {
parsed->suite_glob = kzalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
parsed->test_glob = NULL;
strcpy(parsed->suite_glob, filter_glob);
return;
}
parsed->suite_glob = kzalloc(period - filter_glob + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
parsed->test_glob = kzalloc(len - (period - filter_glob) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
strncpy(parsed->suite_glob, filter_glob, period - filter_glob);
strncpy(parsed->test_glob, period + 1, len - (period - filter_glob));
}
/* Create a copy of suite with only tests that match test_glob. */
static struct kunit_suite *
kunit_filter_tests(struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob)
{
int n = 0;
struct kunit_case *filtered, *test_case;
struct kunit_suite *copy;
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
if (!test_glob || glob_match(test_glob, test_case->name))
++n;
}
if (n == 0)
return NULL;
/* Use memcpy to workaround copy->name being const. */
copy = kmalloc(sizeof(*copy), GFP_KERNEL);
memcpy(copy, suite, sizeof(*copy));
filtered = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
n = 0;
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
if (!test_glob || glob_match(test_glob, test_case->name))
filtered[n++] = *test_case;
}
copy->test_cases = filtered;
return copy;
}
static char *kunit_shutdown;
core_param(kunit_shutdown, kunit_shutdown, charp, 0644);
static struct kunit_suite * const *
kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite,
struct kunit_test_filter *filter)
{
int i, n = 0;
struct kunit_suite **filtered, *filtered_suite;
n = 0;
for (i = 0; subsuite[i]; ++i) {
if (glob_match(filter->suite_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
++n;
}
if (n == 0)
return NULL;
filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!filtered)
return NULL;
n = 0;
for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
if (!glob_match(filter->suite_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
continue;
filtered_suite = kunit_filter_tests(subsuite[i], filter->test_glob);
if (filtered_suite)
filtered[n++] = filtered_suite;
}
filtered[n] = NULL;
return filtered;
}
struct suite_set {
struct kunit_suite * const * const *start;
struct kunit_suite * const * const *end;
};
static void kunit_free_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const *subsuite)
{
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; subsuite[i]; i++)
kfree(subsuite[i]);
kfree(subsuite);
}
static void kunit_free_suite_set(struct suite_set suite_set)
{
struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
kunit_free_subsuite(*suites);
kfree(suite_set.start);
}
static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
const char *filter_glob)
{
int i;
struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite;
struct suite_set filtered;
struct kunit_test_filter filter;
const size_t max = suite_set->end - suite_set->start;
copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL);
filtered.start = copy;
if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */
filtered.end = copy;
return filtered;
}
kunit_parse_filter_glob(&filter, filter_glob);
for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(suite_set->start[i], &filter);
if (filtered_subsuite)
*copy++ = filtered_subsuite;
}
filtered.end = copy;
kfree(filter.suite_glob);
kfree(filter.test_glob);
return filtered;
}
static void kunit_handle_shutdown(void)
{
if (!kunit_shutdown)
return;
if (!strcmp(kunit_shutdown, "poweroff"))
kernel_power_off();
else if (!strcmp(kunit_shutdown, "halt"))
kernel_halt();
else if (!strcmp(kunit_shutdown, "reboot"))
kernel_restart(NULL);
}
static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set)
{
struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
int num_of_suites = 0;
for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
num_of_suites++;
pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
pr_info("1..%d\n", num_of_suites);
}
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-01 06:20:45 +08:00
static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
{
struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-01 06:20:45 +08:00
kunit_print_tap_header(suite_set);
for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
}
static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
{
unsigned int i;
struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
struct kunit_case *test_case;
/* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
for (i = 0; (*suites)[i] != NULL; i++) {
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites)[i], test_case) {
pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)[i]->name, test_case->name);
}
}
}
int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
{
struct suite_set suite_set = {
.start = __kunit_suites_start,
.end = __kunit_suites_end,
};
if (filter_glob_param)
suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param);
kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-10-01 06:20:45 +08:00
if (!action_param)
kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set);
else if (strcmp(action_param, "list") == 0)
kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set);
else
pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param);
if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each array */
kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
}
kunit_handle_shutdown();
return 0;
}
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST)
#include "executor_test.c"
#endif
#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */