2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* OMAP4 specific common source file.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc.
|
|
|
|
* Author:
|
|
|
|
* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software,you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
|
|
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/io.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
|
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/memblock.h>
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/hardware/gic.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
|
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
|
2012-01-13 23:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/memblock.h>
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-17 18:51:26 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <plat/irqs.h>
|
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <plat/sram.h>
|
2011-05-17 18:51:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <mach/hardware.h>
|
2010-06-17 00:49:47 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <mach/omap-wakeupgen.h>
|
2011-11-11 05:45:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "common.h"
|
2011-01-01 22:26:04 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "omap4-sar-layout.h"
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
|
2011-03-03 20:33:25 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __iomem *l2cache_base;
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-01 22:26:04 +08:00
|
|
|
static void __iomem *sar_ram_base;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP4_ERRATA_I688
|
|
|
|
/* Used to implement memory barrier on DRAM path */
|
|
|
|
#define OMAP4_DRAM_BARRIER_VA 0xfe600000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void __iomem *dram_sync, *sram_sync;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void omap_bus_sync(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (dram_sync && sram_sync) {
|
|
|
|
writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(dram_sync), dram_sync);
|
|
|
|
writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(sram_sync), sram_sync);
|
|
|
|
isb();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int __init omap_barriers_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct map_desc dram_io_desc[1];
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t paddr;
|
|
|
|
u32 size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cpu_is_omap44xx())
|
|
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE, SZ_1M);
|
2012-01-13 23:00:51 +08:00
|
|
|
paddr = arm_memblock_steal(size, SZ_1M);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-06-26 09:04:31 +08:00
|
|
|
dram_io_desc[0].virtual = OMAP4_DRAM_BARRIER_VA;
|
|
|
|
dram_io_desc[0].pfn = __phys_to_pfn(paddr);
|
|
|
|
dram_io_desc[0].length = size;
|
|
|
|
dram_io_desc[0].type = MT_MEMORY_SO;
|
|
|
|
iotable_init(dram_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(dram_io_desc));
|
|
|
|
dram_sync = (void __iomem *) dram_io_desc[0].virtual;
|
|
|
|
sram_sync = (void __iomem *) OMAP4_SRAM_VA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_info("OMAP4: Map 0x%08llx to 0x%08lx for dram barrier\n",
|
|
|
|
(long long) paddr, dram_io_desc[0].virtual);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
core_initcall(omap_barriers_init);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
void __init gic_init_irq(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-11-16 01:22:45 +08:00
|
|
|
void __iomem *omap_irq_base;
|
|
|
|
void __iomem *gic_dist_base_addr;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Static mapping, never released */
|
|
|
|
gic_dist_base_addr = ioremap(OMAP44XX_GIC_DIST_BASE, SZ_4K);
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!gic_dist_base_addr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Static mapping, never released */
|
2011-05-17 18:51:26 +08:00
|
|
|
omap_irq_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_GIC_CPU_BASE, SZ_512);
|
|
|
|
BUG_ON(!omap_irq_base);
|
2010-12-04 23:55:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-06-17 00:49:47 +08:00
|
|
|
omap_wakeupgen_init();
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-17 18:51:26 +08:00
|
|
|
gic_init(0, 29, gic_dist_base_addr, omap_irq_base);
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
|
2010-08-01 00:10:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-03 20:33:25 +08:00
|
|
|
void __iomem *omap4_get_l2cache_base(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return l2cache_base;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-01 00:10:10 +08:00
|
|
|
static void omap4_l2x0_disable(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Disable PL310 L2 Cache controller */
|
|
|
|
omap_smc1(0x102, 0x0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 17:00:44 +08:00
|
|
|
static void omap4_l2x0_set_debug(unsigned long val)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Program PL310 L2 Cache controller debug register */
|
|
|
|
omap_smc1(0x100, val);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
static int __init omap_l2_cache_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2010-11-20 01:31:03 +08:00
|
|
|
u32 aux_ctrl = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* To avoid code running on other OMAPs in
|
|
|
|
* multi-omap builds
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!cpu_is_omap44xx())
|
|
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Static mapping, never released */
|
|
|
|
l2cache_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_L2CACHE_BASE, SZ_4K);
|
2011-03-03 20:06:52 +08:00
|
|
|
if (WARN_ON(!l2cache_base))
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2010-09-16 21:14:47 +08:00
|
|
|
* 16-way associativity, parity disabled
|
|
|
|
* Way size - 32KB (es1.0)
|
|
|
|
* Way size - 64KB (es2.0 +)
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2010-11-20 01:31:03 +08:00
|
|
|
aux_ctrl = ((1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_ASSOCIATIVITY_SHIFT) |
|
|
|
|
(0x1 << 25) |
|
|
|
|
(0x1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN_SHIFT) |
|
|
|
|
(0x1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_NS_INT_CTRL_SHIFT));
|
|
|
|
|
omap4: l2x0: enable instruction and data prefetching
Enabling L2 prefetching improves performance as shown on Panda
ES2.1 board with mem test, and it has measurable impact on
performances. I think we should consider it, even though it damages
"writes" a bit. (rebased to k.org)
Usually the prefetch is used at both levels together L1 + L2, however,
to enable the CP15 prefetch engines, these are under security, and on
GP devices, we cannot enable it(e.g. on PandaBoard). However, just
enabling PL310 prefetch seems to provide performance improvement,
as shown in the data below (from Ubuntu) and would be a great thing
to pull in.
What prefetch does is enable automatic next line prefetching. With this
enabled, whenever the PL310 receives a cachable read request, it
automatically prefetches the following cache line as well.
Measurement Data:
==
STOCK 10.10 WITHOUT PATCH
========================
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2aaad000 0x2b2ad000
copy libc 133 MB/s
copy Android v5 273 MB/s
copy Android NEON 235 MB/s
copy INT32 116 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 187 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 204 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 173 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 216 MB/s
read ASM ARM 286 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 242 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 286 MB/s
write libc 1947 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1943 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1942 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1935 MB/s
10.10 + PATCH
=============
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2ab17000 0x2b317000
copy libc 129 MB/s
copy Android v5 256 MB/s
copy Android NEON 356 MB/s
copy INT32 127 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 337 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 350 MB/s
read ASM ARM 496 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 470 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 488 MB/s
write libc 1701 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1682 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1693 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1681 MB/s
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2010-11-20 01:31:04 +08:00
|
|
|
if (omap_rev() == OMAP4430_REV_ES1_0) {
|
2010-11-20 01:31:03 +08:00
|
|
|
aux_ctrl |= 0x2 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_WAY_SIZE_SHIFT;
|
omap4: l2x0: enable instruction and data prefetching
Enabling L2 prefetching improves performance as shown on Panda
ES2.1 board with mem test, and it has measurable impact on
performances. I think we should consider it, even though it damages
"writes" a bit. (rebased to k.org)
Usually the prefetch is used at both levels together L1 + L2, however,
to enable the CP15 prefetch engines, these are under security, and on
GP devices, we cannot enable it(e.g. on PandaBoard). However, just
enabling PL310 prefetch seems to provide performance improvement,
as shown in the data below (from Ubuntu) and would be a great thing
to pull in.
What prefetch does is enable automatic next line prefetching. With this
enabled, whenever the PL310 receives a cachable read request, it
automatically prefetches the following cache line as well.
Measurement Data:
==
STOCK 10.10 WITHOUT PATCH
========================
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2aaad000 0x2b2ad000
copy libc 133 MB/s
copy Android v5 273 MB/s
copy Android NEON 235 MB/s
copy INT32 116 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 187 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 204 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 173 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 216 MB/s
read ASM ARM 286 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 242 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 286 MB/s
write libc 1947 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1943 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1942 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1935 MB/s
10.10 + PATCH
=============
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2ab17000 0x2b317000
copy libc 129 MB/s
copy Android v5 256 MB/s
copy Android NEON 356 MB/s
copy INT32 127 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 337 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 350 MB/s
read ASM ARM 496 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 470 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 488 MB/s
write libc 1701 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1682 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1693 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1681 MB/s
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2010-11-20 01:31:04 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
aux_ctrl |= ((0x3 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_WAY_SIZE_SHIFT) |
|
2010-11-20 01:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
(1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_SHARE_OVERRIDE_SHIFT) |
|
omap4: l2x0: enable instruction and data prefetching
Enabling L2 prefetching improves performance as shown on Panda
ES2.1 board with mem test, and it has measurable impact on
performances. I think we should consider it, even though it damages
"writes" a bit. (rebased to k.org)
Usually the prefetch is used at both levels together L1 + L2, however,
to enable the CP15 prefetch engines, these are under security, and on
GP devices, we cannot enable it(e.g. on PandaBoard). However, just
enabling PL310 prefetch seems to provide performance improvement,
as shown in the data below (from Ubuntu) and would be a great thing
to pull in.
What prefetch does is enable automatic next line prefetching. With this
enabled, whenever the PL310 receives a cachable read request, it
automatically prefetches the following cache line as well.
Measurement Data:
==
STOCK 10.10 WITHOUT PATCH
========================
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2aaad000 0x2b2ad000
copy libc 133 MB/s
copy Android v5 273 MB/s
copy Android NEON 235 MB/s
copy INT32 116 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 187 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 204 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 173 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 216 MB/s
read ASM ARM 286 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 242 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 286 MB/s
write libc 1947 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1943 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1942 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1935 MB/s
10.10 + PATCH
=============
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2ab17000 0x2b317000
copy libc 129 MB/s
copy Android v5 256 MB/s
copy Android NEON 356 MB/s
copy INT32 127 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 337 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 350 MB/s
read ASM ARM 496 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 470 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 488 MB/s
write libc 1701 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1682 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1693 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1681 MB/s
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2010-11-20 01:31:04 +08:00
|
|
|
(1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH_SHIFT) |
|
2010-11-20 01:31:06 +08:00
|
|
|
(1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH_SHIFT) |
|
|
|
|
(1 << L2X0_AUX_CTRL_EARLY_BRESP_SHIFT));
|
omap4: l2x0: enable instruction and data prefetching
Enabling L2 prefetching improves performance as shown on Panda
ES2.1 board with mem test, and it has measurable impact on
performances. I think we should consider it, even though it damages
"writes" a bit. (rebased to k.org)
Usually the prefetch is used at both levels together L1 + L2, however,
to enable the CP15 prefetch engines, these are under security, and on
GP devices, we cannot enable it(e.g. on PandaBoard). However, just
enabling PL310 prefetch seems to provide performance improvement,
as shown in the data below (from Ubuntu) and would be a great thing
to pull in.
What prefetch does is enable automatic next line prefetching. With this
enabled, whenever the PL310 receives a cachable read request, it
automatically prefetches the following cache line as well.
Measurement Data:
==
STOCK 10.10 WITHOUT PATCH
========================
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2aaad000 0x2b2ad000
copy libc 133 MB/s
copy Android v5 273 MB/s
copy Android NEON 235 MB/s
copy INT32 116 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 187 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 204 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 173 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 216 MB/s
read ASM ARM 286 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 242 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 286 MB/s
write libc 1947 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1943 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1942 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1935 MB/s
10.10 + PATCH
=============
~# ./memspeed
size 8388608 8192k 8M
offset 8388608, 0
buffers 0x2ab17000 0x2b317000
copy libc 129 MB/s
copy Android v5 256 MB/s
copy Android NEON 356 MB/s
copy INT32 127 MB/s
copy ASM ARM 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 64 337 MB/s
copy ASM VLDM 128 321 MB/s
copy ASM VLD1 350 MB/s
read ASM ARM 496 MB/s
read ASM VLDM 470 MB/s
read ASM VLD1 488 MB/s
write libc 1701 MB/s
write ASM ARM 1682 MB/s
write ASM VSTM 1693 MB/s
write ASM VST1 1681 MB/s
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2010-11-20 01:31:04 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (omap_rev() != OMAP4430_REV_ES1_0)
|
|
|
|
omap_smc1(0x109, aux_ctrl);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Enable PL310 L2 Cache controller */
|
|
|
|
omap_smc1(0x102, 0x1);
|
2010-11-20 01:31:03 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l2x0_init(l2cache_base, aux_ctrl, L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK);
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-01 00:10:10 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Override default outer_cache.disable with a OMAP4
|
|
|
|
* specific one
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
outer_cache.disable = omap4_l2x0_disable;
|
2011-02-22 17:00:44 +08:00
|
|
|
outer_cache.set_debug = omap4_l2x0_set_debug;
|
2010-08-01 00:10:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-15 03:05:26 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
early_initcall(omap_l2_cache_init);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2011-01-01 22:26:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void __iomem *omap4_get_sar_ram_base(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return sar_ram_base;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* SAR RAM used to save and restore the HW
|
|
|
|
* context in low power modes
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int __init omap4_sar_ram_init(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* To avoid code running on other OMAPs in
|
|
|
|
* multi-omap builds
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!cpu_is_omap44xx())
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Static mapping, never released */
|
|
|
|
sar_ram_base = ioremap(OMAP44XX_SAR_RAM_BASE, SZ_16K);
|
|
|
|
if (WARN_ON(!sar_ram_base))
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
early_initcall(omap4_sar_ram_init);
|