OpenCloudOS-Kernel/include/trace/events/dlm.h

683 lines
20 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
#define TRACE_SYSTEM dlm
#if !defined(_TRACE_DLM_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
#define _TRACE_DLM_H
#include <linux/dlm.h>
#include <linux/dlmconstants.h>
#include <uapi/linux/dlm_plock.h>
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
#include "../../../fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h"
#define show_lock_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
{ DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE, "NOQUEUE" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_CANCEL, "CANCEL" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_VALBLK, "VALBLK" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_QUECVT, "QUECVT" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_IVVALBLK, "IVVALBLK" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_CONVDEADLK, "CONVDEADLK" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_PERSISTENT, "PERSISTENT" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_NODLCKWT, "NODLCKWT" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_NODLCKBLK, "NODLCKBLK" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_EXPEDITE, "EXPEDITE" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_NOQUEUEBAST, "NOQUEUEBAST" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_HEADQUE, "HEADQUE" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_NOORDER, "NOORDER" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_ORPHAN, "ORPHAN" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_ALTPR, "ALTPR" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_ALTCW, "ALTCW" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK, "FORCEUNLOCK" }, \
{ DLM_LKF_TIMEOUT, "TIMEOUT" })
#define show_lock_mode(mode) __print_symbolic(mode, \
{ DLM_LOCK_IV, "IV"}, \
{ DLM_LOCK_NL, "NL"}, \
{ DLM_LOCK_CR, "CR"}, \
{ DLM_LOCK_CW, "CW"}, \
{ DLM_LOCK_PR, "PR"}, \
{ DLM_LOCK_PW, "PW"}, \
{ DLM_LOCK_EX, "EX"})
#define show_dlm_sb_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
{ DLM_SBF_DEMOTED, "DEMOTED" }, \
{ DLM_SBF_VALNOTVALID, "VALNOTVALID" }, \
{ DLM_SBF_ALTMODE, "ALTMODE" })
#define show_lkb_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
{ BIT(DLM_DFL_USER_BIT), "USER" }, \
{ BIT(DLM_DFL_ORPHAN_BIT), "ORPHAN" })
#define show_header_cmd(cmd) __print_symbolic(cmd, \
{ DLM_MSG, "MSG"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM, "RCOM"}, \
{ DLM_OPTS, "OPTS"}, \
{ DLM_ACK, "ACK"}, \
{ DLM_FIN, "FIN"})
#define show_message_version(version) __print_symbolic(version, \
{ DLM_VERSION_3_1, "3.1"}, \
{ DLM_VERSION_3_2, "3.2"})
#define show_message_type(type) __print_symbolic(type, \
{ DLM_MSG_REQUEST, "REQUEST"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_CONVERT, "CONVERT"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_UNLOCK, "UNLOCK"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_CANCEL, "CANCEL"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_REQUEST_REPLY, "REQUEST_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_CONVERT_REPLY, "CONVERT_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_UNLOCK_REPLY, "UNLOCK_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_CANCEL_REPLY, "CANCEL_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_GRANT, "GRANT"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_BAST, "BAST"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_LOOKUP, "LOOKUP"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_REMOVE, "REMOVE"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY, "LOOKUP_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_MSG_PURGE, "PURGE"})
#define show_rcom_type(type) __print_symbolic(type, \
{ DLM_RCOM_STATUS, "STATUS"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_NAMES, "NAMES"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_LOOKUP, "LOOKUP"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_LOCK, "LOCK"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_STATUS_REPLY, "STATUS_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_NAMES_REPLY, "NAMES_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_LOOKUP_REPLY, "LOOKUP_REPLY"}, \
{ DLM_RCOM_LOCK_REPLY, "LOCK_REPLY"})
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
/* note: we begin tracing dlm_lock_start() only if ls and lkb are found */
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_lock_start,
TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, const void *name,
unsigned int namelen, int mode, __u32 flags),
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb, name, namelen, mode, flags),
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(__u32, ls_id)
__field(__u32, lkb_id)
__field(int, mode)
__field(__u32, flags)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name,
lkb->lkb_resource ? lkb->lkb_resource->res_length : namelen)
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_fast_assign(
struct dlm_rsb *r;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id = ls->ls_global_id;
__entry->lkb_id = lkb->lkb_id;
__entry->mode = mode;
__entry->flags = flags;
r = lkb->lkb_resource;
if (r)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), r->res_name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
else if (name)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_printk("ls_id=%u lkb_id=%x mode=%s flags=%s res_name=%s",
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id, __entry->lkb_id,
show_lock_mode(__entry->mode),
show_lock_flags(__entry->flags),
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
);
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_lock_end,
TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, const void *name,
unsigned int namelen, int mode, __u32 flags, int error,
bool kernel_lock),
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb, name, namelen, mode, flags, error, kernel_lock),
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(__u32, ls_id)
__field(__u32, lkb_id)
__field(int, mode)
__field(__u32, flags)
__field(int, error)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name,
lkb->lkb_resource ? lkb->lkb_resource->res_length : namelen)
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_fast_assign(
struct dlm_rsb *r;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id = ls->ls_global_id;
__entry->lkb_id = lkb->lkb_id;
__entry->mode = mode;
__entry->flags = flags;
__entry->error = error;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
r = lkb->lkb_resource;
if (r)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), r->res_name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
else if (name)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
if (kernel_lock) {
/* return value will be zeroed in those cases by dlm_lock()
* we do it here again to not introduce more overhead if
* trace isn't running and error reflects the return value.
*/
if (error == -EAGAIN || error == -EDEADLK)
__entry->error = 0;
}
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_printk("ls_id=%u lkb_id=%x mode=%s flags=%s error=%d res_name=%s",
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id, __entry->lkb_id,
show_lock_mode(__entry->mode),
show_lock_flags(__entry->flags), __entry->error,
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
);
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_bast,
TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mode),
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb, mode),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(__u32, ls_id)
__field(__u32, lkb_id)
__field(int, mode)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name,
lkb->lkb_resource ? lkb->lkb_resource->res_length : 0)
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_fast_assign(
struct dlm_rsb *r;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id = ls->ls_global_id;
__entry->lkb_id = lkb->lkb_id;
__entry->mode = mode;
r = lkb->lkb_resource;
if (r)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), r->res_name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_printk("ls_id=%u lkb_id=%x mode=%s res_name=%s",
__entry->ls_id, __entry->lkb_id,
show_lock_mode(__entry->mode),
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
);
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_ast,
TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb),
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb),
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(__u32, ls_id)
__field(__u32, lkb_id)
__field(u8, sb_flags)
__field(int, sb_status)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name,
lkb->lkb_resource ? lkb->lkb_resource->res_length : 0)
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_fast_assign(
struct dlm_rsb *r;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id = ls->ls_global_id;
__entry->lkb_id = lkb->lkb_id;
__entry->sb_flags = lkb->lkb_lksb->sb_flags;
__entry->sb_status = lkb->lkb_lksb->sb_status;
r = lkb->lkb_resource;
if (r)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), r->res_name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_printk("ls_id=%u lkb_id=%x sb_flags=%s sb_status=%d res_name=%s",
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id, __entry->lkb_id,
show_dlm_sb_flags(__entry->sb_flags), __entry->sb_status,
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
);
/* note: we begin tracing dlm_unlock_start() only if ls and lkb are found */
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_unlock_start,
TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, __u32 flags),
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb, flags),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(__u32, ls_id)
__field(__u32, lkb_id)
__field(__u32, flags)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name,
lkb->lkb_resource ? lkb->lkb_resource->res_length : 0)
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_fast_assign(
struct dlm_rsb *r;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id = ls->ls_global_id;
__entry->lkb_id = lkb->lkb_id;
__entry->flags = flags;
r = lkb->lkb_resource;
if (r)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), r->res_name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_printk("ls_id=%u lkb_id=%x flags=%s res_name=%s",
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id, __entry->lkb_id,
show_lock_flags(__entry->flags),
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
);
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_unlock_end,
TP_PROTO(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, __u32 flags,
int error),
TP_ARGS(ls, lkb, flags, error),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(__u32, ls_id)
__field(__u32, lkb_id)
__field(__u32, flags)
__field(int, error)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name,
lkb->lkb_resource ? lkb->lkb_resource->res_length : 0)
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_fast_assign(
struct dlm_rsb *r;
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id = ls->ls_global_id;
__entry->lkb_id = lkb->lkb_id;
__entry->flags = flags;
__entry->error = error;
r = lkb->lkb_resource;
if (r)
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), r->res_name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
),
TP_printk("ls_id=%u lkb_id=%x flags=%s error=%d res_name=%s",
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
__entry->ls_id, __entry->lkb_id,
show_lock_flags(__entry->flags), __entry->error,
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dlm_rcom_template,
TP_PROTO(uint32_t dst, uint32_t h_seq, const struct dlm_rcom *rc),
TP_ARGS(dst, h_seq, rc),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(uint32_t, dst)
__field(uint32_t, h_seq)
__field(uint32_t, h_version)
__field(uint32_t, h_lockspace)
__field(uint32_t, h_nodeid)
__field(uint16_t, h_length)
__field(uint8_t, h_cmd)
__field(uint32_t, rc_type)
__field(int32_t, rc_result)
__field(uint64_t, rc_id)
__field(uint64_t, rc_seq)
__field(uint64_t, rc_seq_reply)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, rc_buf,
le16_to_cpu(rc->rc_header.h_length) - sizeof(*rc))
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->dst = dst;
__entry->h_seq = h_seq;
__entry->h_version = le32_to_cpu(rc->rc_header.h_version);
__entry->h_lockspace = le32_to_cpu(rc->rc_header.u.h_lockspace);
__entry->h_nodeid = le32_to_cpu(rc->rc_header.h_nodeid);
__entry->h_length = le16_to_cpu(rc->rc_header.h_length);
__entry->h_cmd = rc->rc_header.h_cmd;
__entry->rc_type = le32_to_cpu(rc->rc_type);
__entry->rc_result = le32_to_cpu(rc->rc_result);
__entry->rc_id = le64_to_cpu(rc->rc_id);
__entry->rc_seq = le64_to_cpu(rc->rc_seq);
__entry->rc_seq_reply = le64_to_cpu(rc->rc_seq_reply);
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(rc_buf), rc->rc_buf,
__get_dynamic_array_len(rc_buf));
),
TP_printk("dst=%u h_seq=%u h_version=%s h_lockspace=%u h_nodeid=%u "
"h_length=%u h_cmd=%s rc_type=%s rc_result=%d "
"rc_id=%llu rc_seq=%llu rc_seq_reply=%llu "
"rc_buf=0x%s", __entry->dst, __entry->h_seq,
show_message_version(__entry->h_version),
__entry->h_lockspace, __entry->h_nodeid, __entry->h_length,
show_header_cmd(__entry->h_cmd),
show_rcom_type(__entry->rc_type),
__entry->rc_result, __entry->rc_id, __entry->rc_seq,
__entry->rc_seq_reply,
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(rc_buf),
__get_dynamic_array_len(rc_buf)))
);
DEFINE_EVENT(dlm_rcom_template, dlm_send_rcom,
TP_PROTO(uint32_t dst, uint32_t h_seq, const struct dlm_rcom *rc),
TP_ARGS(dst, h_seq, rc));
DEFINE_EVENT(dlm_rcom_template, dlm_recv_rcom,
TP_PROTO(uint32_t dst, uint32_t h_seq, const struct dlm_rcom *rc),
TP_ARGS(dst, h_seq, rc));
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_send_message,
TP_PROTO(uint32_t dst, uint32_t h_seq, const struct dlm_message *ms,
const void *name, int namelen),
TP_ARGS(dst, h_seq, ms, name, namelen),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(uint32_t, dst)
__field(uint32_t, h_seq)
__field(uint32_t, h_version)
__field(uint32_t, h_lockspace)
__field(uint32_t, h_nodeid)
__field(uint16_t, h_length)
__field(uint8_t, h_cmd)
__field(uint32_t, m_type)
__field(uint32_t, m_nodeid)
__field(uint32_t, m_pid)
__field(uint32_t, m_lkid)
__field(uint32_t, m_remid)
__field(uint32_t, m_parent_lkid)
__field(uint32_t, m_parent_remid)
__field(uint32_t, m_exflags)
__field(uint32_t, m_sbflags)
__field(uint32_t, m_flags)
__field(uint32_t, m_lvbseq)
__field(uint32_t, m_hash)
__field(int32_t, m_status)
__field(int32_t, m_grmode)
__field(int32_t, m_rqmode)
__field(int32_t, m_bastmode)
__field(int32_t, m_asts)
__field(int32_t, m_result)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, m_extra,
le16_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_length) - sizeof(*ms))
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, res_name, namelen)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->dst = dst;
__entry->h_seq = h_seq;
__entry->h_version = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_version);
__entry->h_lockspace = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_header.u.h_lockspace);
__entry->h_nodeid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_nodeid);
__entry->h_length = le16_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_length);
__entry->h_cmd = ms->m_header.h_cmd;
__entry->m_type = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_type);
__entry->m_nodeid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_nodeid);
__entry->m_pid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_pid);
__entry->m_lkid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_lkid);
__entry->m_remid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_remid);
__entry->m_parent_lkid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_parent_lkid);
__entry->m_parent_remid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_parent_remid);
__entry->m_exflags = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_exflags);
__entry->m_sbflags = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_sbflags);
__entry->m_flags = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_flags);
__entry->m_lvbseq = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_lvbseq);
__entry->m_hash = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_hash);
__entry->m_status = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_status);
__entry->m_grmode = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_grmode);
__entry->m_rqmode = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_rqmode);
__entry->m_bastmode = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_bastmode);
__entry->m_asts = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_asts);
__entry->m_result = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_result);
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(m_extra), ms->m_extra,
__get_dynamic_array_len(m_extra));
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(res_name), name,
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name));
),
TP_printk("dst=%u h_seq=%u h_version=%s h_lockspace=%u h_nodeid=%u "
"h_length=%u h_cmd=%s m_type=%s m_nodeid=%u "
"m_pid=%u m_lkid=%u m_remid=%u m_parent_lkid=%u "
"m_parent_remid=%u m_exflags=%s m_sbflags=%s m_flags=%s "
"m_lvbseq=%u m_hash=%u m_status=%d m_grmode=%s "
"m_rqmode=%s m_bastmode=%s m_asts=%d m_result=%d "
"m_extra=0x%s res_name=0x%s", __entry->dst,
__entry->h_seq, show_message_version(__entry->h_version),
__entry->h_lockspace, __entry->h_nodeid, __entry->h_length,
show_header_cmd(__entry->h_cmd),
show_message_type(__entry->m_type),
__entry->m_nodeid, __entry->m_pid, __entry->m_lkid,
__entry->m_remid, __entry->m_parent_lkid,
__entry->m_parent_remid, show_lock_flags(__entry->m_exflags),
show_dlm_sb_flags(__entry->m_sbflags),
show_lkb_flags(__entry->m_flags), __entry->m_lvbseq,
__entry->m_hash, __entry->m_status,
show_lock_mode(__entry->m_grmode),
show_lock_mode(__entry->m_rqmode),
show_lock_mode(__entry->m_bastmode),
__entry->m_asts, __entry->m_result,
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(m_extra),
__get_dynamic_array_len(m_extra)),
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(res_name),
__get_dynamic_array_len(res_name)))
);
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_recv_message,
TP_PROTO(uint32_t dst, uint32_t h_seq, const struct dlm_message *ms),
TP_ARGS(dst, h_seq, ms),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(uint32_t, dst)
__field(uint32_t, h_seq)
__field(uint32_t, h_version)
__field(uint32_t, h_lockspace)
__field(uint32_t, h_nodeid)
__field(uint16_t, h_length)
__field(uint8_t, h_cmd)
__field(uint32_t, m_type)
__field(uint32_t, m_nodeid)
__field(uint32_t, m_pid)
__field(uint32_t, m_lkid)
__field(uint32_t, m_remid)
__field(uint32_t, m_parent_lkid)
__field(uint32_t, m_parent_remid)
__field(uint32_t, m_exflags)
__field(uint32_t, m_sbflags)
__field(uint32_t, m_flags)
__field(uint32_t, m_lvbseq)
__field(uint32_t, m_hash)
__field(int32_t, m_status)
__field(int32_t, m_grmode)
__field(int32_t, m_rqmode)
__field(int32_t, m_bastmode)
__field(int32_t, m_asts)
__field(int32_t, m_result)
__dynamic_array(unsigned char, m_extra,
le16_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_length) - sizeof(*ms))
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->dst = dst;
__entry->h_seq = h_seq;
__entry->h_version = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_version);
__entry->h_lockspace = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_header.u.h_lockspace);
__entry->h_nodeid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_nodeid);
__entry->h_length = le16_to_cpu(ms->m_header.h_length);
__entry->h_cmd = ms->m_header.h_cmd;
__entry->m_type = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_type);
__entry->m_nodeid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_nodeid);
__entry->m_pid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_pid);
__entry->m_lkid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_lkid);
__entry->m_remid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_remid);
__entry->m_parent_lkid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_parent_lkid);
__entry->m_parent_remid = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_parent_remid);
__entry->m_exflags = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_exflags);
__entry->m_sbflags = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_sbflags);
__entry->m_flags = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_flags);
__entry->m_lvbseq = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_lvbseq);
__entry->m_hash = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_hash);
__entry->m_status = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_status);
__entry->m_grmode = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_grmode);
__entry->m_rqmode = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_rqmode);
__entry->m_bastmode = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_bastmode);
__entry->m_asts = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_asts);
__entry->m_result = le32_to_cpu(ms->m_result);
memcpy(__get_dynamic_array(m_extra), ms->m_extra,
__get_dynamic_array_len(m_extra));
),
TP_printk("dst=%u h_seq=%u h_version=%s h_lockspace=%u h_nodeid=%u "
"h_length=%u h_cmd=%s m_type=%s m_nodeid=%u "
"m_pid=%u m_lkid=%u m_remid=%u m_parent_lkid=%u "
"m_parent_remid=%u m_exflags=%s m_sbflags=%s m_flags=%s "
"m_lvbseq=%u m_hash=%u m_status=%d m_grmode=%s "
"m_rqmode=%s m_bastmode=%s m_asts=%d m_result=%d "
"m_extra=0x%s", __entry->dst,
__entry->h_seq, show_message_version(__entry->h_version),
__entry->h_lockspace, __entry->h_nodeid, __entry->h_length,
show_header_cmd(__entry->h_cmd),
show_message_type(__entry->m_type),
__entry->m_nodeid, __entry->m_pid, __entry->m_lkid,
__entry->m_remid, __entry->m_parent_lkid,
__entry->m_parent_remid, show_lock_flags(__entry->m_exflags),
show_dlm_sb_flags(__entry->m_sbflags),
show_lkb_flags(__entry->m_flags), __entry->m_lvbseq,
__entry->m_hash, __entry->m_status,
show_lock_mode(__entry->m_grmode),
show_lock_mode(__entry->m_rqmode),
show_lock_mode(__entry->m_bastmode),
__entry->m_asts, __entry->m_result,
__print_hex_str(__get_dynamic_array(m_extra),
__get_dynamic_array_len(m_extra)))
);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dlm_plock_template,
TP_PROTO(const struct dlm_plock_info *info),
TP_ARGS(info),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(uint8_t, optype)
__field(uint8_t, ex)
__field(uint8_t, wait)
__field(uint8_t, flags)
__field(uint32_t, pid)
__field(int32_t, nodeid)
__field(int32_t, rv)
__field(uint32_t, fsid)
__field(uint64_t, number)
__field(uint64_t, start)
__field(uint64_t, end)
__field(uint64_t, owner)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->optype = info->optype;
__entry->ex = info->ex;
__entry->wait = info->wait;
__entry->flags = info->flags;
__entry->pid = info->pid;
__entry->nodeid = info->nodeid;
__entry->rv = info->rv;
__entry->fsid = info->fsid;
__entry->number = info->number;
__entry->start = info->start;
__entry->end = info->end;
__entry->owner = info->owner;
),
TP_printk("fsid=%u number=%llx owner=%llx optype=%d ex=%d wait=%d flags=%x pid=%u nodeid=%d rv=%d start=%llx end=%llx",
__entry->fsid, __entry->number, __entry->owner,
__entry->optype, __entry->ex, __entry->wait,
__entry->flags, __entry->pid, __entry->nodeid,
__entry->rv, __entry->start, __entry->end)
);
DEFINE_EVENT(dlm_plock_template, dlm_plock_read,
TP_PROTO(const struct dlm_plock_info *info), TP_ARGS(info));
DEFINE_EVENT(dlm_plock_template, dlm_plock_write,
TP_PROTO(const struct dlm_plock_info *info), TP_ARGS(info));
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_send,
TP_PROTO(int nodeid, int ret),
TP_ARGS(nodeid, ret),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(int, nodeid)
__field(int, ret)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->nodeid = nodeid;
__entry->ret = ret;
),
TP_printk("nodeid=%d ret=%d", __entry->nodeid, __entry->ret)
);
TRACE_EVENT(dlm_recv,
TP_PROTO(int nodeid, int ret),
TP_ARGS(nodeid, ret),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(int, nodeid)
__field(int, ret)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->nodeid = nodeid;
__entry->ret = ret;
),
TP_printk("nodeid=%d ret=%d", __entry->nodeid, __entry->ret)
);
fs: dlm: initial support for tracepoints This patch adds initial support for dlm tracepoints. It will introduce tracepoints to dlm main functionality dlm_lock()/dlm_unlock() and their complete ast() callback or blocking bast() callback. The lock/unlock functionality has a start and end tracepoint, this is because there exists a race in case if would have a tracepoint at the end position only the complete/blocking callbacks could occur before. To work with eBPF tracing and using their lookup hash functionality there could be problems that an entry was not inserted yet. However use the start functionality for hash insert and check again in end functionality if there was an dlm internal error so there is no ast callback. In further it might also that locks with local masters will occur those callbacks immediately so we must have such functionality. I did not make everything accessible yet, although it seems eBPF can be used to access a lot of internal datastructures if it's aware of the struct definitions of the running kernel instance. We still can change it, if you do eBPF experiments e.g. time measurements between lock and callback functionality you can simple use the local lkb_id field as hash value in combination with the lockspace id if you have multiple lockspaces. Otherwise you can simple use trace-cmd for some functionality, e.g. `trace-cmd record -e dlm` and `trace-cmd report` afterwards. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
2021-11-03 03:17:15 +08:00
#endif /* if !defined(_TRACE_DLM_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) */
/* This part must be outside protection */
#include <trace/define_trace.h>