OpenCloudOS-Kernel/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c

1546 lines
38 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause
/*
* Copyright (c) 2014-2017 Oracle. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2003-2007 Network Appliance, Inc. All rights reserved.
*
* This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
* licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
* General Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file
* COPYING in the main directory of this source tree, or the BSD-type
* license below:
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
*
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
*
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
* copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
* disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided
* with the distribution.
*
* Neither the name of the Network Appliance, Inc. nor the names of
* its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products
* derived from this software without specific prior written
* permission.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
* "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
* LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
* A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
* OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
* SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
* LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
* DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
* THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
* OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
/*
* verbs.c
*
* Encapsulates the major functions managing:
* o adapters
* o endpoints
* o connections
* o buffer memory
*/
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 16:04:11 +08:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sunrpc/addr.h>
#include <linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h>
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
xprtrdma: Reduce the number of hardway buffer allocations While marshaling an RPC/RDMA request, the inline_{rsize,wsize} settings determine whether an inline request is used, or whether read or write chunks lists are built. The current default value of these settings is 1024. Any RPC request smaller than 1024 bytes is sent to the NFS server completely inline. rpcrdma_buffer_create() allocates and pre-registers a set of RPC buffers for each transport instance, also based on the inline rsize and wsize settings. RPC/RDMA requests and replies are built in these buffers. However, if an RPC/RDMA request is expected to be larger than 1024, a buffer has to be allocated and registered for that RPC, and deregistered and released when the RPC is complete. This is known has a "hardway allocation." Since the introduction of NFSv4, the size of RPC requests has become larger, and hardway allocations are thus more frequent. Hardway allocations are significant overhead, and they waste the existing RPC buffers pre-allocated by rpcrdma_buffer_create(). We'd like fewer hardway allocations. Increasing the size of the pre-registered buffers is the most direct way to do this. However, a blanket increase of the inline thresholds has interoperability consequences. On my 64-bit system, rpcrdma_buffer_create() requests roughly 7000 bytes for each RPC request buffer, using kmalloc(). Due to internal fragmentation, this wastes nearly 1200 bytes because kmalloc() already returns an 8192-byte piece of memory for a 7000-byte allocation request, though the extra space remains unused. So let's round up the size of the pre-allocated buffers, and make use of the unused space in the kmalloc'd memory. This change reduces the amount of hardway allocated memory for an NFSv4 general connectathon run from 1322092 to 9472 bytes (99%). Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2014-05-28 22:33:59 +08:00
#include <asm/bitops.h>
#include <rdma/ib_cm.h>
#include "xprt_rdma.h"
#include <trace/events/rpcrdma.h>
/*
* Globals/Macros
*/
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
# define RPCDBG_FACILITY RPCDBG_TRANS
#endif
/*
* internal functions
*/
static void rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked(struct rpcrdma_sendctx *sc);
static void rpcrdma_mrs_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt);
static void rpcrdma_mrs_destroy(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf);
static struct rpcrdma_regbuf *
rpcrdma_regbuf_alloc(size_t size, enum dma_data_direction direction,
gfp_t flags);
static void rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb);
static void rpcrdma_regbuf_free(struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb);
static void rpcrdma_post_recvs(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, bool temp);
/* Wait for outstanding transport work to finish. ib_drain_qp
* handles the drains in the wrong order for us, so open code
* them here.
*/
static void rpcrdma_xprt_drain(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &r_xprt->rx_ia;
/* Flush Receives, then wait for deferred Reply work
* to complete.
*/
ib_drain_rq(ia->ri_id->qp);
/* Deferred Reply processing might have scheduled
* local invalidations.
*/
ib_drain_sq(ia->ri_id->qp);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_qp_event_handler - Handle one QP event (error notification)
* @event: details of the event
* @context: ep that owns QP where event occurred
*
* Called from the RDMA provider (device driver) possibly in an interrupt
* context.
*/
static void
rpcrdma_qp_event_handler(struct ib_event *event, void *context)
{
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep = context;
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = container_of(ep, struct rpcrdma_xprt,
rx_ep);
trace_xprtrdma_qp_event(r_xprt, event);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_wc_send - Invoked by RDMA provider for each polled Send WC
* @cq: completion queue (ignored)
* @wc: completed WR
*
*/
static void
rpcrdma_wc_send(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
struct ib_cqe *cqe = wc->wr_cqe;
struct rpcrdma_sendctx *sc =
container_of(cqe, struct rpcrdma_sendctx, sc_cqe);
/* WARNING: Only wr_cqe and status are reliable at this point */
trace_xprtrdma_wc_send(sc, wc);
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked(sc);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_wc_receive - Invoked by RDMA provider for each polled Receive WC
* @cq: completion queue (ignored)
* @wc: completed WR
*
*/
static void
rpcrdma_wc_receive(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
struct ib_cqe *cqe = wc->wr_cqe;
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep = container_of(cqe, struct rpcrdma_rep,
rr_cqe);
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = rep->rr_rxprt;
/* WARNING: Only wr_cqe and status are reliable at this point */
trace_xprtrdma_wc_receive(wc);
--r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_receive_count;
if (wc->status != IB_WC_SUCCESS)
goto out_flushed;
/* status == SUCCESS means all fields in wc are trustworthy */
rpcrdma_set_xdrlen(&rep->rr_hdrbuf, wc->byte_len);
rep->rr_wc_flags = wc->wc_flags;
rep->rr_inv_rkey = wc->ex.invalidate_rkey;
ib_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(rdmab_device(rep->rr_rdmabuf),
rdmab_addr(rep->rr_rdmabuf),
wc->byte_len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, false);
rpcrdma_reply_handler(rep);
return;
out_flushed:
rpcrdma_recv_buffer_put(rep);
}
static void
rpcrdma_update_connect_private(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt,
struct rdma_conn_param *param)
{
const struct rpcrdma_connect_private *pmsg = param->private_data;
unsigned int rsize, wsize;
/* Default settings for RPC-over-RDMA Version One */
r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_implicit_roundup = xprt_rdma_pad_optimize;
rsize = RPCRDMA_V1_DEF_INLINE_SIZE;
wsize = RPCRDMA_V1_DEF_INLINE_SIZE;
if (pmsg &&
pmsg->cp_magic == rpcrdma_cmp_magic &&
pmsg->cp_version == RPCRDMA_CMP_VERSION) {
r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_implicit_roundup = true;
rsize = rpcrdma_decode_buffer_size(pmsg->cp_send_size);
wsize = rpcrdma_decode_buffer_size(pmsg->cp_recv_size);
}
if (rsize < r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_recv)
r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_recv = rsize;
if (wsize < r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_send)
r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_send = wsize;
dprintk("RPC: %s: max send %u, max recv %u\n", __func__,
r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_send,
r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_recv);
rpcrdma_set_max_header_sizes(r_xprt);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_cm_event_handler - Handle RDMA CM events
* @id: rdma_cm_id on which an event has occurred
* @event: details of the event
*
* Called with @id's mutex held. Returns 1 if caller should
* destroy @id, otherwise 0.
*/
static int
rpcrdma_cm_event_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *id, struct rdma_cm_event *event)
{
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = id->context;
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &r_xprt->rx_ia;
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep = &r_xprt->rx_ep;
struct rpc_xprt *xprt = &r_xprt->rx_xprt;
might_sleep();
trace_xprtrdma_cm_event(r_xprt, event);
switch (event->event) {
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ADDR_RESOLVED:
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ROUTE_RESOLVED:
ia->ri_async_rc = 0;
complete(&ia->ri_done);
return 0;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ADDR_ERROR:
ia->ri_async_rc = -EPROTO;
complete(&ia->ri_done);
return 0;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ROUTE_ERROR:
ia->ri_async_rc = -ENETUNREACH;
complete(&ia->ri_done);
return 0;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_DEVICE_REMOVAL:
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
pr_info("rpcrdma: removing device %s for %s:%s\n",
ia->ri_id->device->name,
rpcrdma_addrstr(r_xprt), rpcrdma_portstr(r_xprt));
#endif
set_bit(RPCRDMA_IAF_REMOVING, &ia->ri_flags);
ep->rep_connected = -ENODEV;
xprt_force_disconnect(xprt);
wait_for_completion(&ia->ri_remove_done);
ia->ri_id = NULL;
/* Return 1 to ensure the core destroys the id. */
return 1;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ESTABLISHED:
++xprt->connect_cookie;
ep->rep_connected = 1;
rpcrdma_update_connect_private(r_xprt, &event->param.conn);
wake_up_all(&ep->rep_connect_wait);
break;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_ERROR:
ep->rep_connected = -ENOTCONN;
goto disconnected;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_UNREACHABLE:
ep->rep_connected = -ENETUNREACH;
goto disconnected;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED:
dprintk("rpcrdma: connection to %s:%s rejected: %s\n",
rpcrdma_addrstr(r_xprt), rpcrdma_portstr(r_xprt),
rdma_reject_msg(id, event->status));
ep->rep_connected = -ECONNREFUSED;
if (event->status == IB_CM_REJ_STALE_CONN)
ep->rep_connected = -EAGAIN;
goto disconnected;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED:
ep->rep_connected = -ECONNABORTED;
disconnected:
xprt_force_disconnect(xprt);
wake_up_all(&ep->rep_connect_wait);
break;
default:
break;
}
dprintk("RPC: %s: %s:%s on %s/frwr: %s\n", __func__,
rpcrdma_addrstr(r_xprt), rpcrdma_portstr(r_xprt),
ia->ri_id->device->name, rdma_event_msg(event->event));
return 0;
}
static struct rdma_cm_id *
rpcrdma_create_id(struct rpcrdma_xprt *xprt, struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
unsigned long wtimeout = msecs_to_jiffies(RDMA_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT) + 1;
struct rdma_cm_id *id;
int rc;
trace_xprtrdma_conn_start(xprt);
init_completion(&ia->ri_done);
init_completion(&ia->ri_remove_done);
id = rdma_create_id(xprt->rx_xprt.xprt_net, rpcrdma_cm_event_handler,
xprt, RDMA_PS_TCP, IB_QPT_RC);
if (IS_ERR(id))
return id;
ia->ri_async_rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
rc = rdma_resolve_addr(id, NULL,
(struct sockaddr *)&xprt->rx_xprt.addr,
RDMA_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT);
if (rc)
goto out;
rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&ia->ri_done, wtimeout);
if (rc < 0) {
trace_xprtrdma_conn_tout(xprt);
goto out;
}
rc = ia->ri_async_rc;
if (rc)
goto out;
ia->ri_async_rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
rc = rdma_resolve_route(id, RDMA_RESOLVE_TIMEOUT);
if (rc)
goto out;
rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&ia->ri_done, wtimeout);
if (rc < 0) {
trace_xprtrdma_conn_tout(xprt);
goto out;
}
rc = ia->ri_async_rc;
if (rc)
goto out;
return id;
out:
rdma_destroy_id(id);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
}
/*
* Exported functions.
*/
/**
* rpcrdma_ia_open - Open and initialize an Interface Adapter.
* @xprt: transport with IA to (re)initialize
*
* Returns 0 on success, negative errno if an appropriate
* Interface Adapter could not be found and opened.
*/
int
rpcrdma_ia_open(struct rpcrdma_xprt *xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &xprt->rx_ia;
int rc;
ia->ri_id = rpcrdma_create_id(xprt, ia);
if (IS_ERR(ia->ri_id)) {
rc = PTR_ERR(ia->ri_id);
goto out_err;
}
ia->ri_pd = ib_alloc_pd(ia->ri_id->device, 0);
if (IS_ERR(ia->ri_pd)) {
rc = PTR_ERR(ia->ri_pd);
pr_err("rpcrdma: ib_alloc_pd() returned %d\n", rc);
goto out_err;
}
switch (xprt_rdma_memreg_strategy) {
case RPCRDMA_FRWR:
if (frwr_is_supported(ia->ri_id->device))
break;
/*FALLTHROUGH*/
default:
pr_err("rpcrdma: Device %s does not support memreg mode %d\n",
ia->ri_id->device->name, xprt_rdma_memreg_strategy);
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out_err;
}
return 0;
out_err:
rpcrdma_ia_close(ia);
return rc;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_ia_remove - Handle device driver unload
* @ia: interface adapter being removed
*
* Divest transport H/W resources associated with this adapter,
* but allow it to be restored later.
*/
void
rpcrdma_ia_remove(struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = container_of(ia, struct rpcrdma_xprt,
rx_ia);
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep = &r_xprt->rx_ep;
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_req *req;
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep;
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&buf->rb_refresh_worker);
/* This is similar to rpcrdma_ep_destroy, but:
* - Don't cancel the connect worker.
* - Don't call rpcrdma_ep_disconnect, which waits
* for another conn upcall, which will deadlock.
* - rdma_disconnect is unneeded, the underlying
* connection is already gone.
*/
if (ia->ri_id->qp) {
rpcrdma_xprt_drain(r_xprt);
rdma_destroy_qp(ia->ri_id);
ia->ri_id->qp = NULL;
}
ib_free_cq(ep->rep_attr.recv_cq);
ep->rep_attr.recv_cq = NULL;
ib_free_cq(ep->rep_attr.send_cq);
ep->rep_attr.send_cq = NULL;
/* The ULP is responsible for ensuring all DMA
* mappings and MRs are gone.
*/
list_for_each_entry(rep, &buf->rb_recv_bufs, rr_list)
rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(rep->rr_rdmabuf);
list_for_each_entry(req, &buf->rb_allreqs, rl_all) {
rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(req->rl_rdmabuf);
rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(req->rl_sendbuf);
rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(req->rl_recvbuf);
}
rpcrdma_mrs_destroy(buf);
ib_dealloc_pd(ia->ri_pd);
ia->ri_pd = NULL;
/* Allow waiters to continue */
complete(&ia->ri_remove_done);
trace_xprtrdma_remove(r_xprt);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_ia_close - Clean up/close an IA.
* @ia: interface adapter to close
*
*/
void
rpcrdma_ia_close(struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
if (ia->ri_id != NULL && !IS_ERR(ia->ri_id)) {
if (ia->ri_id->qp)
rdma_destroy_qp(ia->ri_id);
rdma_destroy_id(ia->ri_id);
}
ia->ri_id = NULL;
/* If the pd is still busy, xprtrdma missed freeing a resource */
if (ia->ri_pd && !IS_ERR(ia->ri_pd))
ib_dealloc_pd(ia->ri_pd);
ia->ri_pd = NULL;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_ep_create - Create unconnected endpoint
* @r_xprt: transport to instantiate
*
* Returns zero on success, or a negative errno.
*/
int rpcrdma_ep_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep = &r_xprt->rx_ep;
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &r_xprt->rx_ia;
struct rpcrdma_connect_private *pmsg = &ep->rep_cm_private;
struct ib_cq *sendcq, *recvcq;
unsigned int max_sge;
int rc;
ep->rep_max_requests = xprt_rdma_slot_table_entries;
ep->rep_inline_send = xprt_rdma_max_inline_write;
ep->rep_inline_recv = xprt_rdma_max_inline_read;
max_sge = min_t(unsigned int, ia->ri_id->device->attrs.max_send_sge,
RPCRDMA_MAX_SEND_SGES);
if (max_sge < RPCRDMA_MIN_SEND_SGES) {
pr_warn("rpcrdma: HCA provides only %d send SGEs\n", max_sge);
return -ENOMEM;
}
xprtrdma: Fix calculation of ri_max_send_sges Commit 16f906d66cd7 ("xprtrdma: Reduce required number of send SGEs") introduced the rpcrdma_ia::ri_max_send_sges field. This fixes a problem where xprtrdma would not work if the device's max_sge capability was small (low single digits). At least RPCRDMA_MIN_SEND_SGES are needed for the inline parts of each RPC. ri_max_send_sges is set to this value: ia->ri_max_send_sges = max_sge - RPCRDMA_MIN_SEND_SGES; Then when marshaling each RPC, rpcrdma_args_inline uses that value to determine whether the device has enough Send SGEs to convey an NFS WRITE payload inline, or whether instead a Read chunk is required. More recently, commit ae72950abf99 ("xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments") used the ri_max_send_sges value to calculate the size of an array, but that commit erroneously assumed ri_max_send_sges contains a value similar to the device's max_sge, and not one that was reduced by the minimum SGE count. This assumption results in the calculated size of the sendctx's Send SGE array to be too small. When the array is used to marshal an RPC, the code can write Send SGEs into the following sendctx element in that array, corrupting it. When the device's max_sge is large, this issue is entirely harmless; but it results in an oops in the provider's post_send method, if dev.attrs.max_sge is small. So let's straighten this out: ri_max_send_sges will now contain a value with the same meaning as dev.attrs.max_sge, which makes the code easier to understand, and enables rpcrdma_sendctx_create to calculate the size of the SGE array correctly. Reported-by: Michal Kalderon <Michal.Kalderon@cavium.com> Fixes: 16f906d66cd7 ("xprtrdma: Reduce required number of send SGEs") Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: Michal Kalderon <Michal.Kalderon@cavium.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.10+ Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2018-02-01 01:34:05 +08:00
ia->ri_max_send_sges = max_sge;
rc = frwr_open(ia, ep);
if (rc)
return rc;
ep->rep_attr.event_handler = rpcrdma_qp_event_handler;
ep->rep_attr.qp_context = ep;
ep->rep_attr.srq = NULL;
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_sge = max_sge;
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_recv_sge = 1;
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_inline_data = 0;
ep->rep_attr.sq_sig_type = IB_SIGNAL_REQ_WR;
ep->rep_attr.qp_type = IB_QPT_RC;
ep->rep_attr.port_num = ~0;
dprintk("RPC: %s: requested max: dtos: send %d recv %d; "
"iovs: send %d recv %d\n",
__func__,
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr,
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_recv_wr,
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_sge,
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_recv_sge);
ep->rep_send_batch = ep->rep_max_requests >> 3;
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
ep->rep_send_count = ep->rep_send_batch;
init_waitqueue_head(&ep->rep_connect_wait);
ep->rep_receive_count = 0;
sendcq = ib_alloc_cq(ia->ri_id->device, NULL,
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr + 1,
ia->ri_id->device->num_comp_vectors > 1 ? 1 : 0,
IB_POLL_WORKQUEUE);
if (IS_ERR(sendcq)) {
rc = PTR_ERR(sendcq);
goto out1;
}
recvcq = ib_alloc_cq(ia->ri_id->device, NULL,
ep->rep_attr.cap.max_recv_wr + 1,
0, IB_POLL_WORKQUEUE);
if (IS_ERR(recvcq)) {
rc = PTR_ERR(recvcq);
goto out2;
}
ep->rep_attr.send_cq = sendcq;
ep->rep_attr.recv_cq = recvcq;
/* Initialize cma parameters */
memset(&ep->rep_remote_cma, 0, sizeof(ep->rep_remote_cma));
/* Prepare RDMA-CM private message */
pmsg->cp_magic = rpcrdma_cmp_magic;
pmsg->cp_version = RPCRDMA_CMP_VERSION;
pmsg->cp_flags |= RPCRDMA_CMP_F_SND_W_INV_OK;
pmsg->cp_send_size = rpcrdma_encode_buffer_size(ep->rep_inline_send);
pmsg->cp_recv_size = rpcrdma_encode_buffer_size(ep->rep_inline_recv);
ep->rep_remote_cma.private_data = pmsg;
ep->rep_remote_cma.private_data_len = sizeof(*pmsg);
/* Client offers RDMA Read but does not initiate */
ep->rep_remote_cma.initiator_depth = 0;
ep->rep_remote_cma.responder_resources =
min_t(int, U8_MAX, ia->ri_id->device->attrs.max_qp_rd_atom);
/* Limit transport retries so client can detect server
* GID changes quickly. RPC layer handles re-establishing
* transport connection and retransmission.
*/
ep->rep_remote_cma.retry_count = 6;
/* RPC-over-RDMA handles its own flow control. In addition,
* make all RNR NAKs visible so we know that RPC-over-RDMA
* flow control is working correctly (no NAKs should be seen).
*/
ep->rep_remote_cma.flow_control = 0;
ep->rep_remote_cma.rnr_retry_count = 0;
return 0;
out2:
ib_free_cq(sendcq);
out1:
return rc;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_ep_destroy - Disconnect and destroy endpoint.
* @r_xprt: transport instance to shut down
*
*/
void rpcrdma_ep_destroy(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep = &r_xprt->rx_ep;
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &r_xprt->rx_ia;
if (ia->ri_id && ia->ri_id->qp) {
rpcrdma_ep_disconnect(ep, ia);
rdma_destroy_qp(ia->ri_id);
ia->ri_id->qp = NULL;
}
if (ep->rep_attr.recv_cq)
ib_free_cq(ep->rep_attr.recv_cq);
if (ep->rep_attr.send_cq)
ib_free_cq(ep->rep_attr.send_cq);
}
/* Re-establish a connection after a device removal event.
* Unlike a normal reconnection, a fresh PD and a new set
* of MRs and buffers is needed.
*/
static int
rpcrdma_ep_recreate_xprt(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt,
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep, struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
int rc, err;
trace_xprtrdma_reinsert(r_xprt);
rc = -EHOSTUNREACH;
if (rpcrdma_ia_open(r_xprt))
goto out1;
rc = -ENOMEM;
err = rpcrdma_ep_create(r_xprt);
if (err) {
pr_err("rpcrdma: rpcrdma_ep_create returned %d\n", err);
goto out2;
}
rc = -ENETUNREACH;
err = rdma_create_qp(ia->ri_id, ia->ri_pd, &ep->rep_attr);
if (err) {
pr_err("rpcrdma: rdma_create_qp returned %d\n", err);
goto out3;
}
rpcrdma_mrs_create(r_xprt);
return 0;
out3:
rpcrdma_ep_destroy(r_xprt);
out2:
rpcrdma_ia_close(ia);
out1:
return rc;
}
static int
rpcrdma_ep_reconnect(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, struct rpcrdma_ep *ep,
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
struct rdma_cm_id *id, *old;
int err, rc;
trace_xprtrdma_reconnect(r_xprt);
rpcrdma_ep_disconnect(ep, ia);
rc = -EHOSTUNREACH;
id = rpcrdma_create_id(r_xprt, ia);
if (IS_ERR(id))
goto out;
/* As long as the new ID points to the same device as the
* old ID, we can reuse the transport's existing PD and all
* previously allocated MRs. Also, the same device means
* the transport's previous DMA mappings are still valid.
*
* This is a sanity check only. There should be no way these
* point to two different devices here.
*/
old = id;
rc = -ENETUNREACH;
if (ia->ri_id->device != id->device) {
pr_err("rpcrdma: can't reconnect on different device!\n");
goto out_destroy;
}
err = rdma_create_qp(id, ia->ri_pd, &ep->rep_attr);
if (err)
goto out_destroy;
/* Atomically replace the transport's ID and QP. */
rc = 0;
old = ia->ri_id;
ia->ri_id = id;
rdma_destroy_qp(old);
out_destroy:
rdma_destroy_id(old);
out:
return rc;
}
/*
* Connect unconnected endpoint.
*/
int
rpcrdma_ep_connect(struct rpcrdma_ep *ep, struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = container_of(ia, struct rpcrdma_xprt,
rx_ia);
struct rpc_xprt *xprt = &r_xprt->rx_xprt;
int rc;
retry:
switch (ep->rep_connected) {
case 0:
dprintk("RPC: %s: connecting...\n", __func__);
rc = rdma_create_qp(ia->ri_id, ia->ri_pd, &ep->rep_attr);
if (rc) {
rc = -ENETUNREACH;
goto out_noupdate;
}
break;
case -ENODEV:
rc = rpcrdma_ep_recreate_xprt(r_xprt, ep, ia);
if (rc)
goto out_noupdate;
break;
default:
rc = rpcrdma_ep_reconnect(r_xprt, ep, ia);
if (rc)
goto out;
}
ep->rep_connected = 0;
xprt_clear_connected(xprt);
xprtrdma: Fix disconnect regression I found that injecting disconnects with v4.18-rc resulted in random failures of the multi-threaded git regression test. The root cause appears to be that, after a reconnect, the RPC/RDMA transport is waking pending RPCs before the transport has posted enough Receive buffers to receive the Replies. If a Reply arrives before enough Receive buffers are posted, the connection is dropped. A few connection drops happen in quick succession as the client and server struggle to regain credit synchronization. This regression was introduced with commit 7c8d9e7c8863 ("xprtrdma: Move Receive posting to Receive handler"). The client is supposed to post a single Receive when a connection is established because it's not supposed to send more than one RPC Call before it gets a fresh credit grant in the first RPC Reply [RFC 8166, Section 3.3.3]. Unfortunately there appears to be a longstanding bug in the Linux client's credit accounting mechanism. On connect, it simply dumps all pending RPC Calls onto the new connection. It's possible it has done this ever since the RPC/RDMA transport was added to the kernel ten years ago. Servers have so far been tolerant of this bad behavior. Currently no server implementation ever changes its credit grant over reconnects, and servers always repost enough Receives before connections are fully established. The Linux client implementation used to post a Receive before each of these Calls. This has covered up the flooding send behavior. I could try to correct this old bug so that the client sends exactly one RPC Call and waits for a Reply. Since we are so close to the next merge window, I'm going to instead provide a simple patch to post enough Receives before a reconnect completes (based on the number of credits granted to the previous connection). The spurious disconnects will be gone, but the client will still send multiple RPC Calls immediately after a reconnect. Addressing the latter problem will wait for a merge window because a) I expect it to be a large change requiring lots of testing, and b) obviously the Linux client has interoperated successfully since day zero while still being broken. Fixes: 7c8d9e7c8863 ("xprtrdma: Move Receive posting to ... ") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18+ Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2018-07-28 22:46:47 +08:00
rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, true);
rc = rdma_connect(ia->ri_id, &ep->rep_remote_cma);
if (rc)
goto out;
wait_event_interruptible(ep->rep_connect_wait, ep->rep_connected != 0);
if (ep->rep_connected <= 0) {
if (ep->rep_connected == -EAGAIN)
goto retry;
rc = ep->rep_connected;
goto out;
}
dprintk("RPC: %s: connected\n", __func__);
out:
if (rc)
ep->rep_connected = rc;
out_noupdate:
return rc;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_ep_disconnect - Disconnect underlying transport
* @ep: endpoint to disconnect
* @ia: associated interface adapter
*
* This is separate from destroy to facilitate the ability
* to reconnect without recreating the endpoint.
*
* This call is not reentrant, and must not be made in parallel
* on the same endpoint.
*/
void
rpcrdma_ep_disconnect(struct rpcrdma_ep *ep, struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = container_of(ep, struct rpcrdma_xprt,
rx_ep);
int rc;
/* returns without wait if ID is not connected */
rc = rdma_disconnect(ia->ri_id);
if (!rc)
wait_event_interruptible(ep->rep_connect_wait,
ep->rep_connected != 1);
else
ep->rep_connected = rc;
trace_xprtrdma_disconnect(r_xprt, rc);
rpcrdma_xprt_drain(r_xprt);
}
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
/* Fixed-size circular FIFO queue. This implementation is wait-free and
* lock-free.
*
* Consumer is the code path that posts Sends. This path dequeues a
* sendctx for use by a Send operation. Multiple consumer threads
* are serialized by the RPC transport lock, which allows only one
* ->send_request call at a time.
*
* Producer is the code path that handles Send completions. This path
* enqueues a sendctx that has been completed. Multiple producer
* threads are serialized by the ib_poll_cq() function.
*/
/* rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy() assumes caller has already quiesced
* queue activity, and rpcrdma_xprt_drain has flushed all remaining
* Send requests.
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
*/
static void rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf)
{
unsigned long i;
for (i = 0; i <= buf->rb_sc_last; i++)
kfree(buf->rb_sc_ctxs[i]);
kfree(buf->rb_sc_ctxs);
}
static struct rpcrdma_sendctx *rpcrdma_sendctx_create(struct rpcrdma_ia *ia)
{
struct rpcrdma_sendctx *sc;
sc = kzalloc(struct_size(sc, sc_sges, ia->ri_max_send_sges),
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sc)
return NULL;
sc->sc_wr.wr_cqe = &sc->sc_cqe;
sc->sc_wr.sg_list = sc->sc_sges;
sc->sc_wr.opcode = IB_WR_SEND;
sc->sc_cqe.done = rpcrdma_wc_send;
return sc;
}
static int rpcrdma_sendctxs_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_sendctx *sc;
unsigned long i;
/* Maximum number of concurrent outstanding Send WRs. Capping
* the circular queue size stops Send Queue overflow by causing
* the ->send_request call to fail temporarily before too many
* Sends are posted.
*/
i = buf->rb_max_requests + RPCRDMA_MAX_BC_REQUESTS;
dprintk("RPC: %s: allocating %lu send_ctxs\n", __func__, i);
buf->rb_sc_ctxs = kcalloc(i, sizeof(sc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf->rb_sc_ctxs)
return -ENOMEM;
buf->rb_sc_last = i - 1;
for (i = 0; i <= buf->rb_sc_last; i++) {
sc = rpcrdma_sendctx_create(&r_xprt->rx_ia);
if (!sc)
return -ENOMEM;
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
sc->sc_xprt = r_xprt;
buf->rb_sc_ctxs[i] = sc;
}
return 0;
}
/* The sendctx queue is not guaranteed to have a size that is a
* power of two, thus the helpers in circ_buf.h cannot be used.
* The other option is to use modulus (%), which can be expensive.
*/
static unsigned long rpcrdma_sendctx_next(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf,
unsigned long item)
{
return likely(item < buf->rb_sc_last) ? item + 1 : 0;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked - Acquire a send context
* @r_xprt: controlling transport instance
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
*
* Returns pointer to a free send completion context; or NULL if
* the queue is empty.
*
* Usage: Called to acquire an SGE array before preparing a Send WR.
*
* The caller serializes calls to this function (per transport), and
* provides an effective memory barrier that flushes the new value
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
* of rb_sc_head.
*/
struct rpcrdma_sendctx *rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
struct rpcrdma_sendctx *sc;
unsigned long next_head;
next_head = rpcrdma_sendctx_next(buf, buf->rb_sc_head);
if (next_head == READ_ONCE(buf->rb_sc_tail))
goto out_emptyq;
/* ORDER: item must be accessed _before_ head is updated */
sc = buf->rb_sc_ctxs[next_head];
/* Releasing the lock in the caller acts as a memory
* barrier that flushes rb_sc_head.
*/
buf->rb_sc_head = next_head;
return sc;
out_emptyq:
/* The queue is "empty" if there have not been enough Send
* completions recently. This is a sign the Send Queue is
* backing up. Cause the caller to pause and try again.
*/
xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(&r_xprt->rx_xprt);
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
r_xprt->rx_stats.empty_sendctx_q++;
return NULL;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked - Release a send context
* @sc: send context to release
*
* Usage: Called from Send completion to return a sendctxt
* to the queue.
*
* The caller serializes calls to this function (per transport).
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
*/
static void
rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked(struct rpcrdma_sendctx *sc)
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &sc->sc_xprt->rx_buf;
unsigned long next_tail;
/* Unmap SGEs of previously completed but unsignaled
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
* Sends by walking up the queue until @sc is found.
*/
next_tail = buf->rb_sc_tail;
do {
next_tail = rpcrdma_sendctx_next(buf, next_tail);
/* ORDER: item must be accessed _before_ tail is updated */
rpcrdma_sendctx_unmap(buf->rb_sc_ctxs[next_tail]);
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
} while (buf->rb_sc_ctxs[next_tail] != sc);
/* Paired with READ_ONCE */
smp_store_release(&buf->rb_sc_tail, next_tail);
xprt_write_space(&sc->sc_xprt->rx_xprt);
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
}
static void
rpcrdma_mrs_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_ia *ia = &r_xprt->rx_ia;
unsigned int count;
LIST_HEAD(free);
LIST_HEAD(all);
for (count = 0; count < ia->ri_max_segs; count++) {
struct rpcrdma_mr *mr;
int rc;
mr = kzalloc(sizeof(*mr), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mr)
break;
rc = frwr_init_mr(ia, mr);
if (rc) {
kfree(mr);
break;
}
mr->mr_xprt = r_xprt;
list_add(&mr->mr_list, &free);
list_add(&mr->mr_all, &all);
}
spin_lock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
list_splice(&free, &buf->rb_mrs);
list_splice(&all, &buf->rb_all);
r_xprt->rx_stats.mrs_allocated += count;
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
trace_xprtrdma_createmrs(r_xprt, count);
}
static void
rpcrdma_mr_refresh_worker(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = container_of(work, struct rpcrdma_buffer,
rb_refresh_worker.work);
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = container_of(buf, struct rpcrdma_xprt,
rx_buf);
rpcrdma_mrs_create(r_xprt);
xprt_write_space(&r_xprt->rx_xprt);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_req_create - Allocate an rpcrdma_req object
* @r_xprt: controlling r_xprt
* @size: initial size, in bytes, of send and receive buffers
* @flags: GFP flags passed to memory allocators
*
* Returns an allocated and fully initialized rpcrdma_req or NULL.
*/
struct rpcrdma_req *rpcrdma_req_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, size_t size,
gfp_t flags)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buffer = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb;
struct rpcrdma_req *req;
req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), flags);
if (req == NULL)
goto out1;
rb = rpcrdma_regbuf_alloc(RPCRDMA_HDRBUF_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE, flags);
if (!rb)
goto out2;
req->rl_rdmabuf = rb;
xdr_buf_init(&req->rl_hdrbuf, rdmab_data(rb), rdmab_length(rb));
req->rl_sendbuf = rpcrdma_regbuf_alloc(size, DMA_TO_DEVICE, flags);
if (!req->rl_sendbuf)
goto out3;
req->rl_recvbuf = rpcrdma_regbuf_alloc(size, DMA_NONE, flags);
if (!req->rl_recvbuf)
goto out4;
req->rl_buffer = buffer;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->rl_registered);
spin_lock(&buffer->rb_lock);
list_add(&req->rl_all, &buffer->rb_allreqs);
spin_unlock(&buffer->rb_lock);
return req;
out4:
kfree(req->rl_sendbuf);
out3:
kfree(req->rl_rdmabuf);
out2:
kfree(req);
out1:
return NULL;
}
static bool rpcrdma_rep_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, bool temp)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep;
rep = kzalloc(sizeof(*rep), GFP_KERNEL);
if (rep == NULL)
goto out;
rep->rr_rdmabuf = rpcrdma_regbuf_alloc(r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_inline_recv,
DMA_FROM_DEVICE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rep->rr_rdmabuf)
goto out_free;
xdr_buf_init(&rep->rr_hdrbuf, rdmab_data(rep->rr_rdmabuf),
rdmab_length(rep->rr_rdmabuf));
rep->rr_cqe.done = rpcrdma_wc_receive;
rep->rr_rxprt = r_xprt;
rep->rr_recv_wr.next = NULL;
rep->rr_recv_wr.wr_cqe = &rep->rr_cqe;
rep->rr_recv_wr.sg_list = &rep->rr_rdmabuf->rg_iov;
rep->rr_recv_wr.num_sge = 1;
rep->rr_temp = temp;
spin_lock(&buf->rb_lock);
list_add(&rep->rr_list, &buf->rb_recv_bufs);
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_lock);
return true;
out_free:
kfree(rep);
out:
return false;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_buffer_create - Create initial set of req/rep objects
* @r_xprt: transport instance to (re)initialize
*
* Returns zero on success, otherwise a negative errno.
*/
int rpcrdma_buffer_create(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
int i, rc;
buf->rb_max_requests = r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_max_requests;
buf->rb_bc_srv_max_requests = 0;
spin_lock_init(&buf->rb_mrlock);
spin_lock_init(&buf->rb_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->rb_mrs);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->rb_all);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&buf->rb_refresh_worker,
rpcrdma_mr_refresh_worker);
rpcrdma_mrs_create(r_xprt);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->rb_send_bufs);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->rb_allreqs);
rc = -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < buf->rb_max_requests; i++) {
struct rpcrdma_req *req;
req = rpcrdma_req_create(r_xprt, RPCRDMA_V1_DEF_INLINE_SIZE,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req)
goto out;
list_add(&req->rl_list, &buf->rb_send_bufs);
}
xprtrdma: Fix disconnect regression I found that injecting disconnects with v4.18-rc resulted in random failures of the multi-threaded git regression test. The root cause appears to be that, after a reconnect, the RPC/RDMA transport is waking pending RPCs before the transport has posted enough Receive buffers to receive the Replies. If a Reply arrives before enough Receive buffers are posted, the connection is dropped. A few connection drops happen in quick succession as the client and server struggle to regain credit synchronization. This regression was introduced with commit 7c8d9e7c8863 ("xprtrdma: Move Receive posting to Receive handler"). The client is supposed to post a single Receive when a connection is established because it's not supposed to send more than one RPC Call before it gets a fresh credit grant in the first RPC Reply [RFC 8166, Section 3.3.3]. Unfortunately there appears to be a longstanding bug in the Linux client's credit accounting mechanism. On connect, it simply dumps all pending RPC Calls onto the new connection. It's possible it has done this ever since the RPC/RDMA transport was added to the kernel ten years ago. Servers have so far been tolerant of this bad behavior. Currently no server implementation ever changes its credit grant over reconnects, and servers always repost enough Receives before connections are fully established. The Linux client implementation used to post a Receive before each of these Calls. This has covered up the flooding send behavior. I could try to correct this old bug so that the client sends exactly one RPC Call and waits for a Reply. Since we are so close to the next merge window, I'm going to instead provide a simple patch to post enough Receives before a reconnect completes (based on the number of credits granted to the previous connection). The spurious disconnects will be gone, but the client will still send multiple RPC Calls immediately after a reconnect. Addressing the latter problem will wait for a merge window because a) I expect it to be a large change requiring lots of testing, and b) obviously the Linux client has interoperated successfully since day zero while still being broken. Fixes: 7c8d9e7c8863 ("xprtrdma: Move Receive posting to ... ") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18+ Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2018-07-28 22:46:47 +08:00
buf->rb_credits = 1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->rb_recv_bufs);
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
rc = rpcrdma_sendctxs_create(r_xprt);
if (rc)
goto out;
return 0;
out:
rpcrdma_buffer_destroy(buf);
return rc;
}
static void rpcrdma_rep_destroy(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
{
rpcrdma_regbuf_free(rep->rr_rdmabuf);
kfree(rep);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_req_destroy - Destroy an rpcrdma_req object
* @req: unused object to be destroyed
*
* This function assumes that the caller prevents concurrent device
* unload and transport tear-down.
*/
void
rpcrdma_req_destroy(struct rpcrdma_req *req)
{
list_del(&req->rl_all);
rpcrdma_regbuf_free(req->rl_recvbuf);
rpcrdma_regbuf_free(req->rl_sendbuf);
rpcrdma_regbuf_free(req->rl_rdmabuf);
kfree(req);
}
static void
rpcrdma_mrs_destroy(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf)
{
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = container_of(buf, struct rpcrdma_xprt,
rx_buf);
struct rpcrdma_mr *mr;
unsigned int count;
count = 0;
spin_lock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
while (!list_empty(&buf->rb_all)) {
mr = list_entry(buf->rb_all.next, struct rpcrdma_mr, mr_all);
list_del(&mr->mr_all);
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
/* Ensure MW is not on any rl_registered list */
if (!list_empty(&mr->mr_list))
list_del(&mr->mr_list);
frwr_release_mr(mr);
count++;
spin_lock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
}
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
r_xprt->rx_stats.mrs_allocated = 0;
dprintk("RPC: %s: released %u MRs\n", __func__, count);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_buffer_destroy - Release all hw resources
* @buf: root control block for resources
*
* ORDERING: relies on a prior rpcrdma_xprt_drain :
* - No more Send or Receive completions can occur
* - All MRs, reps, and reqs are returned to their free lists
*/
void
rpcrdma_buffer_destroy(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf)
{
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&buf->rb_refresh_worker);
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
rpcrdma_sendctxs_destroy(buf);
while (!list_empty(&buf->rb_recv_bufs)) {
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep;
rep = list_first_entry(&buf->rb_recv_bufs,
struct rpcrdma_rep, rr_list);
list_del(&rep->rr_list);
rpcrdma_rep_destroy(rep);
}
while (!list_empty(&buf->rb_send_bufs)) {
struct rpcrdma_req *req;
nfs-rdma: Fix for FMR leaks Two memory region leaks were found during testing: 1. rpcrdma_buffer_create: While allocating RPCRDMA_FRMR's ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr is called and then ib_alloc_fast_reg_page_list is called. If ib_alloc_fast_reg_page_list returns an error it bails out of the routine dropping the last ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr frmr region creating a memory leak. Added code to dereg the last frmr if ib_alloc_fast_reg_page_list fails. 2. rpcrdma_buffer_destroy: While cleaning up, the routine will only free the MR's on the rb_mws list if there are rb_send_bufs present. However, in rpcrdma_buffer_create while the rb_mws list is being built if one of the MR allocation requests fail after some MR's have been allocated on the rb_mws list the routine never gets to create any rb_send_bufs but instead jumps to the rpcrdma_buffer_destroy routine which will never free the MR's on rb_mws list because the rb_send_bufs were never created. This leaks all the MR's on the rb_mws list that were created prior to one of the MR allocations failing. Issue(2) was seen during testing. Our adapter had a finite number of MR's available and we created enough connections to where we saw an MR allocation failure on our Nth NFS connection request. After the kernel cleaned up the resources it had allocated for the Nth connection we noticed that FMR's had been leaked due to the coding error described above. Issue(1) was seen during a code review while debugging issue(2). Signed-off-by: Allen Andrews <allen.andrews@emulex.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2014-05-28 22:32:09 +08:00
req = list_first_entry(&buf->rb_send_bufs,
struct rpcrdma_req, rl_list);
list_del(&req->rl_list);
rpcrdma_req_destroy(req);
}
nfs-rdma: Fix for FMR leaks Two memory region leaks were found during testing: 1. rpcrdma_buffer_create: While allocating RPCRDMA_FRMR's ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr is called and then ib_alloc_fast_reg_page_list is called. If ib_alloc_fast_reg_page_list returns an error it bails out of the routine dropping the last ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr frmr region creating a memory leak. Added code to dereg the last frmr if ib_alloc_fast_reg_page_list fails. 2. rpcrdma_buffer_destroy: While cleaning up, the routine will only free the MR's on the rb_mws list if there are rb_send_bufs present. However, in rpcrdma_buffer_create while the rb_mws list is being built if one of the MR allocation requests fail after some MR's have been allocated on the rb_mws list the routine never gets to create any rb_send_bufs but instead jumps to the rpcrdma_buffer_destroy routine which will never free the MR's on rb_mws list because the rb_send_bufs were never created. This leaks all the MR's on the rb_mws list that were created prior to one of the MR allocations failing. Issue(2) was seen during testing. Our adapter had a finite number of MR's available and we created enough connections to where we saw an MR allocation failure on our Nth NFS connection request. After the kernel cleaned up the resources it had allocated for the Nth connection we noticed that FMR's had been leaked due to the coding error described above. Issue(1) was seen during a code review while debugging issue(2). Signed-off-by: Allen Andrews <allen.andrews@emulex.com> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2014-05-28 22:32:09 +08:00
rpcrdma_mrs_destroy(buf);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_mr_get - Allocate an rpcrdma_mr object
* @r_xprt: controlling transport
*
* Returns an initialized rpcrdma_mr or NULL if no free
* rpcrdma_mr objects are available.
*/
struct rpcrdma_mr *
rpcrdma_mr_get(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_mr *mr = NULL;
spin_lock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
if (!list_empty(&buf->rb_mrs))
mr = rpcrdma_mr_pop(&buf->rb_mrs);
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
if (!mr)
goto out_nomrs;
return mr;
out_nomrs:
trace_xprtrdma_nomrs(r_xprt);
if (r_xprt->rx_ep.rep_connected != -ENODEV)
schedule_delayed_work(&buf->rb_refresh_worker, 0);
/* Allow the reply handler and refresh worker to run */
cond_resched();
return NULL;
}
static void
__rpcrdma_mr_put(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf, struct rpcrdma_mr *mr)
{
spin_lock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
rpcrdma_mr_push(mr, &buf->rb_mrs);
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_mrlock);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_mr_put - Release an rpcrdma_mr object
* @mr: object to release
*
*/
void
rpcrdma_mr_put(struct rpcrdma_mr *mr)
{
__rpcrdma_mr_put(&mr->mr_xprt->rx_buf, mr);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_mr_unmap_and_put - DMA unmap an MR and release it
* @mr: object to release
*
*/
void
rpcrdma_mr_unmap_and_put(struct rpcrdma_mr *mr)
{
struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = mr->mr_xprt;
if (mr->mr_dir != DMA_NONE) {
trace_xprtrdma_mr_unmap(mr);
ib_dma_unmap_sg(r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_id->device,
mr->mr_sg, mr->mr_nents, mr->mr_dir);
mr->mr_dir = DMA_NONE;
}
__rpcrdma_mr_put(&r_xprt->rx_buf, mr);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_buffer_get - Get a request buffer
* @buffers: Buffer pool from which to obtain a buffer
*
* Returns a fresh rpcrdma_req, or NULL if none are available.
*/
struct rpcrdma_req *
rpcrdma_buffer_get(struct rpcrdma_buffer *buffers)
{
struct rpcrdma_req *req;
spin_lock(&buffers->rb_lock);
req = list_first_entry_or_null(&buffers->rb_send_bufs,
struct rpcrdma_req, rl_list);
if (req)
list_del_init(&req->rl_list);
spin_unlock(&buffers->rb_lock);
return req;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_buffer_put - Put request/reply buffers back into pool
* @req: object to return
*
*/
void
rpcrdma_buffer_put(struct rpcrdma_req *req)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buffers = req->rl_buffer;
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep = req->rl_reply;
req->rl_reply = NULL;
spin_lock(&buffers->rb_lock);
list_add(&req->rl_list, &buffers->rb_send_bufs);
if (rep) {
if (!rep->rr_temp) {
list_add(&rep->rr_list, &buffers->rb_recv_bufs);
rep = NULL;
}
}
spin_unlock(&buffers->rb_lock);
if (rep)
rpcrdma_rep_destroy(rep);
}
/*
* Put reply buffers back into pool when not attached to
* request. This happens in error conditions.
*/
void
rpcrdma_recv_buffer_put(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buffers = &rep->rr_rxprt->rx_buf;
if (!rep->rr_temp) {
spin_lock(&buffers->rb_lock);
list_add(&rep->rr_list, &buffers->rb_recv_bufs);
spin_unlock(&buffers->rb_lock);
} else {
rpcrdma_rep_destroy(rep);
}
}
/* Returns a pointer to a rpcrdma_regbuf object, or NULL.
*
* xprtrdma uses a regbuf for posting an outgoing RDMA SEND, or for
* receiving the payload of RDMA RECV operations. During Long Calls
* or Replies they may be registered externally via frwr_map.
*/
static struct rpcrdma_regbuf *
rpcrdma_regbuf_alloc(size_t size, enum dma_data_direction direction,
gfp_t flags)
{
struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb;
rb = kmalloc(sizeof(*rb), flags);
if (!rb)
return NULL;
rb->rg_data = kmalloc(size, flags);
if (!rb->rg_data) {
kfree(rb);
return NULL;
}
rb->rg_device = NULL;
rb->rg_direction = direction;
rb->rg_iov.length = size;
return rb;
}
/**
* rpcrdma_regbuf_realloc - re-allocate a SEND/RECV buffer
* @rb: regbuf to reallocate
* @size: size of buffer to be allocated, in bytes
* @flags: GFP flags
*
* Returns true if reallocation was successful. If false is
* returned, @rb is left untouched.
*/
bool rpcrdma_regbuf_realloc(struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
void *buf;
buf = kmalloc(size, flags);
if (!buf)
return false;
rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(rb);
kfree(rb->rg_data);
rb->rg_data = buf;
rb->rg_iov.length = size;
return true;
}
/**
* __rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_map - DMA-map a regbuf
* @r_xprt: controlling transport instance
* @rb: regbuf to be mapped
*
* Returns true if the buffer is now DMA mapped to @r_xprt's device
*/
bool __rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_map(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt,
struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb)
{
struct ib_device *device = r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_id->device;
if (rb->rg_direction == DMA_NONE)
return false;
rb->rg_iov.addr = ib_dma_map_single(device, rdmab_data(rb),
rdmab_length(rb), rb->rg_direction);
if (ib_dma_mapping_error(device, rdmab_addr(rb))) {
trace_xprtrdma_dma_maperr(rdmab_addr(rb));
return false;
}
rb->rg_device = device;
rb->rg_iov.lkey = r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_pd->local_dma_lkey;
return true;
}
static void rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb)
{
if (!rb)
return;
if (!rpcrdma_regbuf_is_mapped(rb))
return;
ib_dma_unmap_single(rb->rg_device, rdmab_addr(rb), rdmab_length(rb),
rb->rg_direction);
rb->rg_device = NULL;
}
static void rpcrdma_regbuf_free(struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb)
{
rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_unmap(rb);
if (rb)
kfree(rb->rg_data);
kfree(rb);
}
/**
* rpcrdma_ep_post - Post WRs to a transport's Send Queue
* @ia: transport's device information
* @ep: transport's RDMA endpoint information
* @req: rpcrdma_req containing the Send WR to post
*
* Returns 0 if the post was successful, otherwise -ENOTCONN
* is returned.
*/
int
rpcrdma_ep_post(struct rpcrdma_ia *ia,
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep,
struct rpcrdma_req *req)
{
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
struct ib_send_wr *send_wr = &req->rl_sendctx->sc_wr;
xprtrdma: Use gathered Send for large inline messages An RPC Call message that is sent inline but that has a data payload (ie, one or more items in rq_snd_buf's page list) must be "pulled up:" - call_allocate has to reserve enough RPC Call buffer space to accommodate the data payload - call_transmit has to memcopy the rq_snd_buf's page list and tail into its head iovec before it is sent As the inline threshold is increased beyond its current 1KB default, however, this means data payloads of more than a few KB are copied by the host CPU. For example, if the inline threshold is increased just to 4KB, then NFS WRITE requests up to 4KB would involve a memcpy of the NFS WRITE's payload data into the RPC Call buffer. This is an undesirable amount of participation by the host CPU. The inline threshold may be much larger than 4KB in the future, after negotiation with a peer server. Instead of copying the components of rq_snd_buf into its head iovec, construct a gather list of these components, and send them all in place. The same approach is already used in the Linux server's RPC-over-RDMA reply path. This mechanism also eliminates the need for rpcrdma_tail_pullup, which is used to manage the XDR pad and trailing inline content when a Read list is present. This requires that the pages in rq_snd_buf's page list be DMA-mapped during marshaling, and unmapped when a data-bearing RPC is completed. This is slightly less efficient for very small I/O payloads, but significantly more efficient as data payload size and inline threshold increase past a kilobyte. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2016-09-15 22:57:24 +08:00
int rc;
if (!ep->rep_send_count || kref_read(&req->rl_kref) > 1) {
xprtrdma: Add data structure to manage RDMA Send arguments Problem statement: Recently Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> observed that kernel RDMA- enabled storage initiators don't handle delayed Send completion correctly. If Send completion is delayed beyond the end of a ULP transaction, the ULP may release resources that are still being used by the HCA to complete a long-running Send operation. This is a common design trait amongst our initiators. Most Send operations are faster than the ULP transaction they are part of. Waiting for a completion for these is typically unnecessary. Infrequently, a network partition or some other problem crops up where an ordering problem can occur. In NFS parlance, the RPC Reply arrives and completes the RPC, but the HCA is still retrying the Send WR that conveyed the RPC Call. In this case, the HCA can try to use memory that has been invalidated or DMA unmapped, and the connection is lost. If that memory has been re-used for something else (possibly not related to NFS), and the Send retransmission exposes that data on the wire. Thus we cannot assume that it is safe to release Send-related resources just because a ULP reply has arrived. After some analysis, we have determined that the completion housekeeping will not be difficult for xprtrdma: - Inline Send buffers are registered via the local DMA key, and are already left DMA mapped for the lifetime of a transport connection, thus no additional handling is necessary for those - Gathered Sends involving page cache pages _will_ need to DMA unmap those pages after the Send completes. But like inline send buffers, they are registered via the local DMA key, and thus will not need to be invalidated In addition, RPC completion will need to wait for Send completion in the latter case. However, nearly always, the Send that conveys the RPC Call will have completed long before the RPC Reply arrives, and thus no additional latency will be accrued. Design notes: In this patch, the rpcrdma_sendctx object is introduced, and a lock-free circular queue is added to manage a set of them per transport. The RPC client's send path already prevents sending more than one RPC Call at the same time. This allows us to treat the consumer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_get_locked) as if there is a single consumer thread. The producer side of the queue (rpcrdma_sendctx_put_locked) is invoked only from the Send completion handler, which is a single thread of execution (soft IRQ). The only care that needs to be taken is with the tail index, which is shared between the producer and consumer. Only the producer updates the tail index. The consumer compares the head with the tail to ensure that the a sendctx that is in use is never handed out again (or, expressed more conventionally, the queue is empty). When the sendctx queue empties completely, there are enough Sends outstanding that posting more Send operations can result in a Send Queue overflow. In this case, the ULP is told to wait and try again. This introduces strong Send Queue accounting to xprtrdma. As a final touch, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> suggested a mechanism that does not require signaling every Send. We signal once every N Sends, and perform SGE unmapping of N Send operations during that one completion. Reported-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
2017-10-20 22:48:12 +08:00
send_wr->send_flags |= IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
ep->rep_send_count = ep->rep_send_batch;
} else {
send_wr->send_flags &= ~IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
--ep->rep_send_count;
}
rc = frwr_send(ia, req);
trace_xprtrdma_post_send(req, rc);
if (rc)
return -ENOTCONN;
return 0;
}
static void
rpcrdma_post_recvs(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, bool temp)
{
struct rpcrdma_buffer *buf = &r_xprt->rx_buf;
struct rpcrdma_ep *ep = &r_xprt->rx_ep;
struct ib_recv_wr *wr, *bad_wr;
int needed, count, rc;
rc = 0;
count = 0;
needed = buf->rb_credits + (buf->rb_bc_srv_max_requests << 1);
if (ep->rep_receive_count > needed)
goto out;
needed -= ep->rep_receive_count;
if (!temp)
needed += RPCRDMA_MAX_RECV_BATCH;
count = 0;
wr = NULL;
while (needed) {
struct rpcrdma_regbuf *rb;
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep;
spin_lock(&buf->rb_lock);
rep = list_first_entry_or_null(&buf->rb_recv_bufs,
struct rpcrdma_rep, rr_list);
if (likely(rep))
list_del(&rep->rr_list);
spin_unlock(&buf->rb_lock);
if (!rep) {
if (!rpcrdma_rep_create(r_xprt, temp))
break;
continue;
}
rb = rep->rr_rdmabuf;
if (!rpcrdma_regbuf_dma_map(r_xprt, rb)) {
rpcrdma_recv_buffer_put(rep);
break;
}
trace_xprtrdma_post_recv(rep->rr_recv_wr.wr_cqe);
rep->rr_recv_wr.next = wr;
wr = &rep->rr_recv_wr;
++count;
--needed;
}
if (!count)
goto out;
rc = ib_post_recv(r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_id->qp, wr,
(const struct ib_recv_wr **)&bad_wr);
if (rc) {
for (wr = bad_wr; wr;) {
struct rpcrdma_rep *rep;
rep = container_of(wr, struct rpcrdma_rep, rr_recv_wr);
wr = wr->next;
rpcrdma_recv_buffer_put(rep);
--count;
}
}
ep->rep_receive_count += count;
out:
trace_xprtrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, count, rc);
}